On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:32, Dennis Kane wrote:
> I'm assuming that no one here is interested in NatLang issues or how
> to implement them in Javascript?!
On the contrary, everyone's pretty interested. That's why they asked
you to show it off.
As you said yourself, previous explorations in th
Jesus, dude, thanks for the psychoanalysis. Anyone reading this
thread can see what turned into a slow moving train wreck. I posted
my thing and some people said: Cool! In the first post, I said
something about eventually doing an open source thing. Someone said:
"I want the source!" I said, "
+1
On 28 Apr 2012, at 17:31, Isaac Schlueter wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:53, Dennis Kane wrote:
>> Let's all remember what open source is really all about. A program is
>> called closed source if it is distributed in binary format only. The open
>> source movement makes the demand tha
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:53, Dennis Kane wrote:
> Let's all remember what open source is really all about. A program is
> called closed source if it is distributed in binary format only. The open
> source movement makes the demand that one cannot distribute a binary program
> using, for exampl
, but you can still respect that others
do.
Sent from my Windows Phone
--
From: Dennis Kane
Sent: 4/26/2012 10:53 AM
To: nodejs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [nodejs] Re: Your thoughts wanted on a node AI project
On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 7:07:52 PM UTC-7, Isaac
> Which means: if I don't want to give away the entirety of my labors that
I've been agonizing over for all these years, then I have no legitimate
reason to post to this forum.
No, that is not what I meant. I literally meant "why are you here?".
I had only thought of the recruiting angle but no
On Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:57:26 AM UTC-7, Mark Hahn wrote:
>
> I guess the question everyone is thinking (or asking) is why are you here?
> I can understand the recruiting, but I can't think of any other reason.
>
> Which means: if I don't want to give away the entirety of my labors that
I'
I guess the question everyone is thinking (or asking) is why are you here?
I can understand the recruiting, but I can't think of any other reason.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Dennis Kane wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 7:07:52 PM UTC-7, Isaac Schlueter wrote:
>>
>>
>> The MIT licens
On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 7:07:52 PM UTC-7, Isaac Schlueter wrote:
>
>
> The MIT license in node (as well as the MIT and BSD licenses in the
> vast majority of open source node programs) explicitly allows use for
> closed-source commercial applications. If Dennis wants to keep his
> source c
On Thursday, April 26, 2012 3:35:48 AM UTC-7, shawn wilson wrote:
>
> Per parsing language, you might want to look at what python's nltk and
> Java's gate (less familiar with the later) have done for inspiration
>
Yeah, I saw the python nltk yesterday just to see what was currently out
there. De
Per parsing language, you might want to look at what python's nltk and
Java's gate (less familiar with the later) have done for inspiration.
On Apr 25, 2012 10:07 PM, "Isaac Schlueter" wrote:
> Please do not bicker over politics here. This is not the place, and
> it never ever ends well.
>
> Ple
Please do not bicker over politics here. This is not the place, and
it never ever ends well.
Please do not call each other idiots or make other personal remarks.
If you want to say that a piece of *code* is terrible, or that a
software approach is misguided, or that a statement is factually
untru
>
> You don't come off as an asshole -- and besides, we have no problem with
> assholes: we're developers. Saying the things you're saying, to the
> audience you're saying them to -- well, it's that you come off as an idiot.
> The good news is this is a lot easier to fix.
>
>
I'm an idiot bec
Hey wait who hired the troll?
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Dennis Kane wrote:
>
> Seems like you still have a long way to go to reach that. :D
>>
>> I don't think it should be too much longer before I can start making some
> sales calls based on the progress I've already made.
>
>>
>>
>> Wel
> Seems like you still have a long way to go to reach that. :D
>
> I don't think it should be too much longer before I can start making some
sales calls based on the progress I've already made.
>
>
> Well, your long-time goal is to make a good program that can answer
> questions using some lo
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Dennis Kane wrote:
> OK guys, firefighter Kane to the rescue.
>
Some firefighter -- you're the one w/ the lighter, now you pour on fuel and
claim you're here to help?
> I said "tad". For full disclosure, I've been using Debian for many years,
> and I feel it i
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:14:12AM -0700, Dennis Kane wrote:
> I don't know what else to say other than I'm excited as hell to try to make
> some major noise in the free markets. If I come in here being all gung ho
> about open sourcing all of this, then that will be much less likely.
Seems lik
OK guys, firefighter Kane to the rescue. I said "tad". For full
disclosure, I've been using Debian for many years, and I feel it is by far
the best OS in existence. I am writing this in nano, the source code of
which I have done some hacking on.
I'm here because I can't do this thing by myse
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Dennis Kane wrote:
> Was just saying it is, a tad. Maybe "pointless" was a bad word choice.
> Overblown is probably better. Don't think you can deny that without those
> other things, the source code of any non trivial program is quite a
> worthless commodity
Was just saying it is, a tad. Maybe "pointless" was a bad word choice.
Overblown is probably better. Don't think you can deny that without those
other things, the source code of any non trivial program is quite a
worthless commodity in and of itself. The entire node ecosystem, at the
moment
Was just saying it is, a tad. Maybe "pointless" was a bad word choice.
Overblown is probably better. Don't think you can deny that without those
other things, the source code of any non trivial program is quite a
worthless commodity in and of itself. The entire node ecosystem, at the
moment
Was just saying it is, a tad. Maybe "pointless" was a bad word choice.
Overblown is probably better. Don't think you can deny that without those
other things, the source code of any non trivial program is quite a
worthless commodity in and of itself. The entire node ecosystem, at the
moment
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Dennis Kane wrote:
> I do find the whole open source movement a tad pointless. For me, the
> source code always takes a back seat to good API documentation, well
> commented header files, decent man pages, a good bug reporting/fixing
> system, etc.
>
I think you
Now that I think about it more, Javascript makes the entire issue of open
source much less urgent given that one can pass in their own custom
functions, either for replacement purposes or for extension. I'll just
have to provide the API for what kinds of arguments will be passed in and
what sh
Hi Jann,
I'm not sure you really want the source at this point... at least not
without some pretty detailed explanation to go along with it!
I first started working on the algorithm six years ago in perl, which
also happened to be when I was first learning how to program. Given
my inexperience,
The first AI that impressed me and has value for me is the one that
delivers me what I want in the day before I consciously realize I want it.
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message
That's great!
I am reminded of this blog [[ http://www.briangrinstead.com ]] which also
has some neat AI algorithms written in JS. He wrote them for the browser,
but I can tell you his A* implementation
[[ http://www.briangrinstead.com/blog/astar-search-algorithm-in-javascript
]] works great
27 matches
Mail list logo
