Thanks Benjamin
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 May 2008 21:59
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DR/Backup Solution
Depending on what you are looking to do ...
Application Failover
Wansync
Doubletake
Vmware ESX3 (fibre with
Matthew,
Phil pretty much has hit the nail on the head; we're using VoIP phones and
want to get rid of the need to use external power supplies. We only use 16
ports on our existing 24-port HP ProCurve 10/100 switch and only have four
phones at the moment but want the flexibility to move them
Thanks. Knew about the RAM just was fuzzy on the way Microsoft viewed
CPU's.
Mark
From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 May 2008 20:26
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Little fuzzy
Standard works-we are running this with dual quad-core Dell
Hi,
It is based on sockets, not cores:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/compare-specs.aspx
It was the same in Windows Server 2003
Cheers
Ken
From: Kelsay, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 15 May 2008 5:06 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Little fuzzy
The shares are in the registry, the LUN's have to be on the same drive
letter, for the server service to bring them online.
Its just easier to migrate data with robocopy and export the shares with
regedit and import them on new system.
Z
Edward E. Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Thanks James, dsacls will do the trick nicely. I wasn't aware of adfind
either so will also have a look at this too.
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Rankin, James R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Have you tried dsacls?
Also I don't know whether adfind would do this.
Would anyone know where I could buy a couple Linksys WRT54G wiress
routers that DOES have the removable antennas. All I can currently
find are the ones w/ the molded antennas, which will not help me in my
current situation.
Any ideas? Anyone have 2 that they want to sell? :D
Thanks,
Scott
~
I had one in the house but my missus threw it out, claiming that my hoarding
of spare parts served no purpose. I will show her a copy of this email
before chastising her in the extreme.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 May 2008 14:09
To: NT
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Scott Mailing List
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would anyone know where I could buy a couple Linksys WRT54G wiress
routers that DOES have the removable antennas.
They're always removable... it's putting them back on that's harder. ;-)
Seriously: Try looking
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Matthew W. Ross
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, why is the HP and Cisco gear so expensive for POE switches? Sigh.
I'm guessing some combination of (1) lower manufacturing volume
means less economy-of-scale and thus higher per-unit costs, and (2)
because PoE is
Are all the GL's RP-TNC antennas? Or is there a version where they
switch over to the molded ones like the 54G's are?
Thank you!
Scott
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Scott Mailing List
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would
I'm with you on all that Ken. One question I have, is why is it wanting
SSL, when I don't have the default website listening on 443?
Joe Heaton
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 6:59 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
I've got a sharepoint server sitting on a virtual machine. I've been tasked
to give some of our contractors access to the box to enter information,
etc. I've thought about giving them domain user names and locking down
terminal sessions, giving them access to that box only. I've thought about
Licensing is resolved.
I uninstalled Licensing and IIS, re-installed, and I can now access the
LMC. Now, I'm hitting my next wall, which is errors trying to install
the actual Presentation Server.
I'll be back! (In best Governator voice)
Joe Heaton
From:
I have one, what are you offering ?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 9:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Where to find Linksys WRT54G with Removable Antenna
Would anyone know where I could buy a couple Linksys
TO the list,
I am trying to correctly, wrap my head about the relationship between
the processor min/max specifications on Windows 2003 Standard,
Enterprise, and Datacenter.
MY specific question is this, and my google fu and MSDN have failed me.
If I had a Single Dual-Core processor its
I have had one Microsoft Licensing person tell me, not put in writing or
email that it is based on the Physical Processor. Not the number of
cores on that processor, so 4 quad core processors are still only a
4-processor system for licensing purposes. Now I am still not sure
that is the case,
No.
Windows licensing cares about SOCKETS, not cores.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 11:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Processor
It's better to put a SEPARATE a/d in the DMZ than it is to put your
production a/d in the DMZ.
It may be the proper solution, it may not be. You've not given me enough
information to make a decision. J
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
As per the licensing that is correct, I am on select licensing, so its
not a real big issue, what the core- of the discussion is what windows
see, and uses, so I am not asking for enhanced version of OS, if I don't
need them ( Basically Standard VS Enterprise, VS Datacenter)
Right now I got Quad
If its isolated and not integrated inward (e.g. trusted, etc), then it
should be a manageable threat..
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking not, but one of our developers is wanting to setup a separate
domain in the DMZ, so that we can create AD
Correct. We just recently got a quote for SQL, telling the person that
we have dual quad core processors on the server in question, and the
quote came back for 2 processors, not 8...
Joe Heaton
-Original Message-
From: Terry Dickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15,
Again I got the licensing stuff down, I need to know physically what
Windows will see, and utilize.
I am getting more and more Quad-Core (2 and 4 Processor) machines and I
want to make sure that I am ordering and specing the right OS ( Standard
VS Enterprise 32bit Windows 2003/2008)
Z
Edward
I don't think it's a bad way to do it. But there might be another/easier way to
skin this cat. Bring the web app inside the DMZ, use your existing AD and
publish it via an ISA server or something similar that is in the DMZ.
I am not against the separate AD in the DMZ, provided you do it the
Is hardware compression device-dependent? IOW, can a tape made on one
brand of device be read on another brand's drive?
Roger Wright
Network Administrator
727.572.7076 x388
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~
Isn't there going to be a cost for CAL's to those who authenticate?
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 8:13 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AD in the DMZ, good idea?
It would be a single server, running all functions necessary. There would
Can you reinstall IIS then Citrix license Manager? I have seen issues where
I had to reinstall IIS and LMC to fix problem.
Mike
Original Message:
-
From: Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 07:27:22 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE:
Should have said:
Is hardware compression device-dependent? IOW, can a tape made on one
brand of device be read on another brand's drive if hardware compression
is used?
From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 11:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
That's fine - but as you pointed out, that comes at a cost. A Windows Server
CAL plus a SQL Server CAL for each external user. That's around $200 in
today's cost.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL
Windows will use all available cores, regardless of the version.
If you have dual quad cores, it's still only two processors, and that's what
defines the Windows version you buy, even though windows sees 8 processor
cores and will use them all.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
Couldn't those costs be reduced by licensing SQL per processor, and buy your
Windows CALs per server? Rather than a CAL per user, use concurrent
connections?
I'm a little rusty on my Microsoft Licensing.
Regards,
Joe
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Michael B. Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.voipsupply.com/index.php?cPath=271_195
and
http://www.voipsupply.com/index.php?cPath=271_299
Take note that a good 10/100 switch + rackmount power injector is close
in price to just getting a PoE switch in the first place.
Matthew W. Ross wrote:
Oooh... I gotta look into this. Do
I have a dual quad core running windows 2003 standard. MSINFO32 and task
manager show 8 cpus. All 8 CPUs are being used.
-Original Message-
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 8:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Processor Cores, and
If you can be sure to make up the cost per customer, it's not a bad idea.
From: Joe Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 9:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AD in the DMZ, good idea?
Couldn't those costs be reduced by licensing SQL per processor, and
Same thing I been told also.. based on physical processors.
-Original Message-
From: Terry Dickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 8:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Processor Cores, and Windows Version questions
I have had one Microsoft Licensing
You can deal with the SQL licensing per processor, yep.
No such thing as concurrent licensing. You license per device or per user.
You either license the contractor themselves or the device they use to
connect with.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
I just put together a dual quad core SQL server with 8 GB RAM running SQL
2005.. dang!
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 8:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Processor Cores, and Windows Version questions
Correct. We
Do you have Exchange? If so, how are you publishing OWA to the internet?
Most places that I have been involved with use similar methods for
publishing OWA and SharePoint to the internet.
Personally I am a big fan of placing this behind a ISA server.
Vince
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:31 AM,
Thanks,
You and Jacob confirmed what I needed to see.
Z
Edward E. Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA
Phone: 401-639-3505
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 11:53 AM
To: NT
Hi Vince
Yes I do use OWA. But publishing sharepoint would mean creating userids and
passwords for all of the outside contract people...do you have any docs for
this?
Steve
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Reedy Vince [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have Exchange? If so, how are you
LOL try a Quad Quad Core with 32GB of RAM, that is sic :)
Z
Edward E. Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA
Phone: 401-639-3505
-Original Message-
From: Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 12:18 PM
To: NT System Admin
It will see 8 and use 8. Same goes for the 16.
-Original Message-
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 8:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Processor Cores, and Windows Version questions
Again I got the licensing stuff down, I need to
We've got a domain service account that is repeatedly getting locked
out, but I'm not getting any 644 or 529 events in the DC security logs
for that account. I've also run the built in Account Lockouts search in
EventCombNT and come up empty. I'm pretty sure it is some kind of a
scheduled job
BTW, Its Windows 2003 server Forest and Domain functional level
...Tim
From: Tim Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 9:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: account lockout
We've got a domain service account that is repeatedly getting locked
out, but
Ziots, Edward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/15/2008 12:41:56 PM:
LOL try a Quad Quad Core with 32GB of RAM, that is sic :)
I do. :-) In an active-active SQL cluster, at that (HP DL580 G5s). And we
have another one coming in, do run some sort of SAS Business Intelligence
software (not really
Run a SQL profiler trace and audit log on's for that account.
You can even audit log on failures. This should give you the process that is
screwing you up.
- Original Message -
From: Tim Evans
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 12:49 PM
Subject: RE:
Is ADAM not an option?
Thanks,
Jeremy Phillips
Senior Messaging Engineer | Azaleos Corporation | T: 206.926.1945 | M:
540.322.7980
You rely on Exchange. We keep it running.
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 9:18 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
On 15 May 2008 at 8:09, Ziots, Edward wrote:
I believe there is a duplicate file finder utility with the Windows
2003/XP resource kit, look for dupfinder.exe on google.
Thanks, I'll try that one.
On 15 May 2008 at 9:24, Travis Robinson wrote:
If you want just a regular program, TreeSize
I have a couple users on a BES and a bunch of sales guys on POP3 all on
different vendors (att/sprint/Verizon) as of this morning no one is getting
email on the pop3 even though if you logon to the account and check it
verifies correctly.
Anyone else?
~ Upgrade to Next Generation
Well, my initial thought was that there has to be another way to
authenticate the contractors coming in. I personally don't really want
to setup another domain, but that's what one of the developers wants to
do. My personal idea is to have some process like when you sign up for
a web forum,
Yep, did that this morning and it fixed it.
Joe Heaton
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 8:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Citrix problem with install
Can you reinstall IIS then Citrix license Manager? I
Thanks, I'll have our DBA give that a try and let you know how it goes.
Is it correct that these failed logons wouldn't show up in the DC's
security logs if I'm auditing logon failures?
...Tim
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 9:55 AM
To:
Wouldn't RAM come into play also? Are you going to be able to put in
enough RAM with Std?
Joe Heaton
-Original Message-
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 9:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Processor Cores, and Windows Version
Hard to say. I had the SA account failing log in's every time a user got into
an app. didn't show in the DC event or the workstation event just the Error
log of SQL. So I ran the SQL Profiler and found the computer that was failing
the log in. Mostly because I thought I might have a mouse in
I'm not sure where your aversion to external domains comes from. It is a
pretty reasonable way to authenticate external users while keeping them
off your internal domain. Also, if you have any kind of auditing
requirements, you'll quickly find the auditing an app with its own
internal
It makes sense if you got multiple boxes in the DMZ for the DMZ tasks. I've
got a single Web edition server in a DMZ for one client. I never bothered
with AD there, because well, it's Web edition and the only server in that
DMZ.
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May
It's not unreasonable, but it is also a good idea that the business knows
the license impact involved.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 2:09 PM
To: NT System Admin
No disagreement. You always have to balance the technical issues with
the costs.
Malcolm
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 15 May, 2008 13:23
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AD in the DMZ, good idea?
It's not unreasonable, but it is also a good
Just came across this:
http://download.microsoft.com/download/7/d/5/7d5fa2f1-dd6a-4d88-a824-dc2
999a36617/Five%20Misunderstood%20Features%20in%20Windows%20Vista.pdf
or
http://tinyurl.com/5qkj8q
It's a Microsoft publication called Five Misunderstood Features in
Windows Vista. Seems timely in
List,
I'm neck deep in a developing documenting a business continuity plan
and right now I'm working on the ESX portion of my infrastructure and to
put this in proper context, I don't have the budget for a secondary
facility/co-lo or needed HW/SW/licenses right now but I'm planning for
it
www.tinyurl.com/5cuzfohttp://www.tinyurl.com/5cuzfo
Maybe/Maybe not :)
jlc
From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 9:39 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tape Hardware Compression
Should have said:
Is hardware compression device-dependent? IOW, can a
Adfind will totally blow dsacls out of the water for querying SD's, same
as it does any of the ds* tools :-)
From: Rankin, James R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 4:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How do I export the NTFS ACL on specific AD objects?
budget = manhood
From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 1:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: DR\BC for ESX design considerations
List,
I'm neck deep in a developing documenting a business continuity plan and
right now I'm working on the ESX portion of my
I figured it be you, Strader or ME2 with the quick turn around.
Shook
From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 2:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DR\BC for ESX design considerations
budget = manhood
Does anyone here uses Pharos Systems for their print solution? I have some
information in front of me now but I do not fully understand how the system
works, hardware requirement, and costs involved in setting one of these units
up.
Z.V.
This e-mail message
Well, you like it quick, don't ya?
Christopher J. Bosak
Vector Company
c. 847.603.4673
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue.
- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me
From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 14:00
Hell every time I make a comment it offends someone so I've stopped
with the wise cracks, with the exception for TVK that is.
From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 3:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DR\BC for ESX
Really getting tired of your whining, dude. Get over all that and move
on...
Don't worry, I still think you're swell.
Shook
From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 3:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DR\BC
Go home, crack open some Jack Daniels and make it go away.
From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 3:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DR\BC for ESX design considerations
Enough with the OT humor alreadyand no I
Ralph said he thought it was the thing to do when you win a World of
Warcraft tournament. They told the suspicious working girls they were
people of restricted growth working with a traveling circus, and as
State law does not allow those with disabilities to be discriminated
against they had no
Why don't you just mount SMB on your ESX box, and then have the backup copy
to a server that has vmware server running. In 2.53 you have to convert it,
and in 3.0 *I* think you need to convert it or run Workstation 6.0. This
would require a shutdown of the vm's to get a clean copy or esx ranger
I love the last line: Ralph's ambition is to one day become a
politician
Sounds like he's getting a head start.
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 3:12 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Early Friday OMG that kid
Attach it. Open the Disk Management control panel. Assign it a drive letter.
I have multiple external drives, thumb drives, etc that all have
unique drive letters on my system - letter that they keep every time
they come visit.
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Scott Mailing List
[EMAIL
Newark, TX is very close to Fort Worth. It's a little spot on the road that
until there was a 4 way stop-sign installed you would miss it if you weren't
paying attention.
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralph said he thought it was the thing to do
No pun intended, I am sure...
Dave Lum - Systems Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands
-Original Message-
From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 1:19 PM
To: NT System Admin
Best part of the article...
Ralph's ambition is to one day become a politician.
ROTFLMAO!
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 1:12 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Early Friday OMG that kid has cajones...
Ralph
So we had a power outage yesterday, finally came back online this
morning. Now for some very odd reason, our ASA which connects to ATTs
CISCO 2800 then to the circuit; is not performing the look ups to allow
our staff surf the net.
Any ideas if i should start looking on the DNS side of 2003?
So we had a power outage yesterday, finally came back online this
morning. Now for some very odd reason, our ASA which connects to ATTs
CISCO 2800 then to the circuit; is not performing the look ups to allow
our staff surf the net.
Any ideas if i should start looking on the DNS side of 2003?
Not enough info to assist...
Please elaborate on your DNS architecture. Clients query internal DNS
server...all internal queries go to internal master DNS
server...Master DNS box performs lookups on behalf of the domain to an
ISP DNS server or to the ASA?
If above is correct, then is
You did not say if you purchased HA and DRS. If you have a VMware cluster of
2-3 hosts this will provide you with a level
Of high availability and fault tolerance. If one host dies they are
restarted on another host or if one node becomes overloaded
It will move to another host. I would 86 using
I do have HA, DRS, V Motion and VCB so I'm aware of and use all these.
My thoughts are how best to protect/reproduce an environment if our
single site has a disaster. SRM came out today, I think, but as
mentioned in OP, I don't have the budget for a co-lo at this time.
Andy Shook
Decision
Guys, quick question... We're doing a mock disaster recovery here. Can we spin
up a child dc without also spinning up a DFR dc and get it to work well enough
to start AD, authenticate users, etc? We've tried it already and it hasn't
worked so far. I suspect it's due to the lack of an
Hi,
Adding an SSL certificate is unrelated to requiring SSL. Either in IIS (via the
Require SSL setting) or in the application itself, you can require connections
to be over HTTPS. But the act of acquiring and installing a certificate and
configuring IIS to use it is a separate process.
Windows Server works on the sockets in the machine. Not the cores.
If you have one/two/four physical sockets, it doesn't matter how many cores
each CPU has - you need to use the version of Windows Server that will work
with that number of physical sockets.
Cheers
Ken
-Original
You could use offsite storage and do backup and restore. Still going to need
hardware, power, rackspace, etc., somewhere if you are going
to have a DR site.
_
From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 7:06 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
sa is not a Windows account. It wouldn't show up in Windows Security event
logs
Cheers
Ken
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 16 May 2008 3:20 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: account lockout
Hard to say. I had the SA account failing log in's every time
The two Forest level FSMO role holders are the Schema Master (which holds the
writable copy of the Schema) and the Domain Naming Master (which prevents
naming collisions when altering domains). You don't need either to authenticate
users.
Cheers
Ken
From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not enough information.
Where is your DNS? Do you have an entry for a GC that points to your remaining
DC?
You need a GC to populate Universal Group membership (or you need Universal
Group membership caching enabled). No GC = no logon (except using cached
credentials)
Cheers
Ken
From: RM
The single dc that we restored in the dr lab was indeed a gc. However, nothing
came up. Dns wouldn't even start. Dns is on all of our dc's.
RM
-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 5:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Well, you need to start by troubleshooting:
a) What services didn't start (e.g. you need NetLogon, Kerberos Key
Distribution Centre, DNS etc)
b) Why they didn't start
Cheers
Ken
From: RM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 16 May 2008 11:20 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
There's supposed to be scheduled RIM outage for system upgrades on May 18th,
2AM to 6AM EST, but nothing before that. I'm not seeing any problems with
our BES users on any of the carriers today.
Regards,
Amer Karim
From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Thanks it turns out the pop3 users couldn't connect because the company
didn't renew its domain :-)
_
From: Amer Karim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 12:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Sync
There's supposed to be scheduled RIM
If I had a single site I would be looking to 'save' the SAN because I can
always put boxes on the end with VI3 and mount the images. Again DRBD would
work with a bunch of cheap hardware and no cost if you don't have a san
already. At the end of the day your sole need is to get your vmdk's onto
93 matches
Mail list logo
