Hi There,
One of our clients has a head office in Singapore who have sent over a
Nokia/ Check Point NGX R65 firewall to replace there existing 3Com one,
The firewall needs configured with the same rules as the 3Com one, and we
have got it set-up to work on the network, but cannot work out how
I did not have that many open for the installation I had to manage. I think
I had a total of 4 ports open and 2 of those 80 and 443 had to be open
anyway.
Jon
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/927847 - yuck...
On Tue, Dec
That is SO not current.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 12:55 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: A new challenge for me...
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/927847 - yuck...
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 19:51, Brian
Good call. Do you know which GP would lock out the Temp directory?
:)
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 11:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Odd GP issue
I believe it's creating a
Possibly one of the ones that restricts access to the c: drive? I can't
remember the GPO exactly offhand...
2009/12/9 Owens, Michael michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov
Good call. Do you know which GP would lock out the Temp directory?
:)
--
*From:* Christopher Bodnar
Thank you. Sorry I don't know GPs at all.
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 9:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Odd GP issue
Possibly one of the ones that restricts access to the c: drive? I can't
Off the top of my head, try something like
*User Configuration*, *Administrative Templates*, *Windows
Components,* *Windows
Explorer** | Hide these specified drives in My Computer*
Or other GPOs around that level
2009/12/9 Owens, Michael michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov
Thank you. Sorry I don't
One of my vendors is proposing using Symantec Backup Exec System Restore to
mirror two SANs. That seems like it would have a LOT of overhead and would
want to take a backup of the primary SAN and restore it to the D/R SAN
every time. Considering I'm trying to do this over a WAN link, and not a
Thanks everyone--sounds like a call to me. We are now heavily using
preferences to replace our old printer scripting.
-B
-Original Message-
From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:p...@optimumdata.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 2:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Missing find
And that's two ports too many.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 04:25, Jon Harris jk.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I did not have that many open for the installation I had to manage. I think
I had a total of 4 ports open and 2 of those 80 and 443 had to be open
anyway.
Jon
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:55
Indeed...the buttons are missing on my 2008 R2 DCs as well. Lucky I kept
another R1 here when I bottled out of the 2008 R2 forest functional level
switch :-)
2009/12/8 Miller Bonnie L. mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu
Not finding much on this on google…
On WS08 R2, run GPMC, edit a policy,
Hey, it was nearly the first hit.
I actually have only had to open one port beyond 80 and 443, though I
can't remember which it was off the top of my head, but that's one
port too many, since I can't proxy it.
Kurt
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 04:25, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
How about a Jabber server? That would not require A/D integration, so you
could, theoretically put it in the DMZ.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 6:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: A new challenge for me...
With that attitude, no wonder every single product now uses the universal
firewall bypass port to conduct it's business.
Cheers
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 9 December 2009 11:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: A new
That's what OpenFire is, I believe. On the list.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 07:05, John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com wrote:
How about a Jabber server? That would not require A/D integration, so you
could, theoretically put it in the DMZ.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff
I could see doing that one time to get the initial copy on the back up SAN
but unless Symantec will do live sync'ing of the information from that point
on I agree you would be really eating up your bandwidth. Maybe look at
Sunbelt's sync tools if the free ones from Microsoft will not work.
Jon
At least I can proxy 80/443, and my firewall understands http(s) - I
love my Sidewinder.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 07:06, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:
With that attitude, no wonder every single product now uses the universal
firewall bypass port to conduct it's business.
Cheers
What do you mean you can't proxy Live Messenger? A word of warning as I am
sure you know there are even older tech articles on the MS web site that
would have you open even more ports.
Jon
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey, it was nearly the first hit.
The only way I know of to proxy Live Messenger is with ISA, and I
don't have that in my environment.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 07:15, Jon Harris jk.har...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean you can't proxy Live Messenger? A word of warning as I am
sure you know there are even older tech articles
How do you even know that the protocol sitting on top of port 80/443 is
understandable by your proxy? It's just arbitrary data encapsulated in a HTTP
(or maybe even not) payload
If I send a POST request, how does your proxy even know how to decode the POST
payload?
Cheers
Ken
-Original
I think you need to load up a copy of the current Live Messenger and look at
the proxy settings to verify that. Last time I looked they were fairly
generic, but that was some time ago.
Jon
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
The only way I know of to proxy
I had to set up the newest just two weeks ago on the CEO's laptop - it
required one more port than 80/443, so I put in a firewall exception
just for her machine.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 07:20, Jon Harris jk.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you need to load up a copy of the current Live Messenger
I at least have the minimal protection afforded by enforcing
well-formed URIs - and a few other goodies it does.
Poking an arbitrary TCP hole in the firewall doesn't even give me that.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 07:18, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:
How do you even know that the protocol
I want to run a GPO to change the small date format to mm/dd/ and negative
currency and negative format as well.
I have found the shortdate.adm and imported it into the GP management tool on
my DC but I don't see the setting in the GP editor???
CLASS USER
CATEGORY Control panel
POLICY date
Right-click in the left pane any folder under Administrative templates.
Choose View, then Filtering.
Uncheck only show policy settings that can be fully managed.
Carl
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 10:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Try this:
§ In the menu at the top of the window click View, Filtering
§ Uncheck the box Only show policy settings that can be fully managed
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct:
https://www.microsoft.com/licensing/servicecenter/home.aspx
-Original Message-
From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 12:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: volume licensing still down?
Not me.
What URL are you guys using?
Thanks! That's what I was trying yesterday. Worked fine just now.
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
don.gu...@prufoxroach.com
-Original Message-
From:
I had to finally call the service center. I couldn't see my keys or
dls. But I could log in.
There was an option under my preferences that they changed to opt out.
I had to change this to opt in and wait an hour and things are good
again.
pita
-Original Message-
From: Terry Dickson
URI has nothing to do with payload.
POST /somefile.ext HTTP/1.1
HOST: myserver.com
Key=binary blob here
Is an entirely valid HTTP request, and the URI is well formed. Unfortunately
you have no visibility into the binary blob here part unless your proxy
happens to be able to decode that
Thanks
From: Carl Houseman
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 10:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: shortdate adm template GPO
Right-click in the left pane any folder under Administrative templates.
Choose View, then Filtering.
Uncheck only show policy settings that can be fully
Thanks.
From: Don Guyer
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 11:01 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: shortdate adm template GPO
Try this:
§ In the menu at the top of the window click View, Filtering
§ Uncheck the box Only show policy settings that can be fully managed
Cool. I didn't realize Sunbelt offered synchronization tools. I'll have to
look into that. It looks like unless we go with IBM or NetApp we're SOL on
avoiding host-based replication.
John-AldrichTile-Tools
From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009
Two tactics that you should implement:
1) Start - Run - RSOP.msc. That will give you effective settings in
effect on the client. That might give you an obvious hint as to what is causing
the issue, and what GPO it comes from
2) Get ProcessMonitor, and work out what Access Denied
Is anyone else getting *really *hacked off by Gmail putting out this
[Message clipped] View entire
message?ui=2ik=66c87ee11cview=lgmsg=125744925c6b981f
on just about everything coming from the list? I can't find a workaround or
setting for it anywhere, apart from occasional sanctimonious online
Would have been the one from the Windows 2003 Support Tools.
Z
Edward Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
ezi...@lifespan.org
Phone:401-639-3505
From: KenM [mailto:kenmli...@gmail.com]
Sent:
Symantec Backup Exec 12.5 has been rock-solid in my experience.
Roger Wright
___
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:31 AM, John Aldrich
jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.comwrote:
Ok. Let me ask this in a slightly different way then… assuming it does
what it **says** it does, do you trust *Symantec* to do
Can you use another reader (POP or IMAP) to access your Gmail account? That
should clear it up.
(Other folks might say that those of us using Outlook 2010 should stop - but
that ain't gonna happen.)
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 11:38 AM
I share the pain this is causing!
Roger Wright
___
Sent from Tampa, FL, United States
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:37 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is anyone else getting *really *hacked off by Gmail putting out this
[Message clipped] View entire
Yeah... I saw that after I'd already posted the suggestion. That being said,
there are, I believe, there are probably some free/open-source Jabber servers,
possibly even virtual server images you can download.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent:
As soon as I get the time, I will probably be switching.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:37 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is anyone else getting really hacked off by Gmail putting out this
[Message clipped] View entire message
on just about everything coming from the list? I can't
I've noticed that when I press reply on a [Message clipped] View entire
message http://?ui=2ik=66c87ee11cview=lgmsg=125744925c6b981f email
message, it automatically expands it. Not great but better than
sanctimonious drivel, I hope...
Andrew
2009/12/9 James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com
Is
Ok. That gives me a bit more confidence in that product. J
John-AldrichTile-Tools
From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 11:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Symantec Backup Exec System Restore 2010
Symantec Backup Exec 12.5 has
Greetings!
As a part of a merger, etc, I was migrated to a new domain. As a part
of this migration I had 3 network drives (big!) mapped to me via GPO.
Those drives are in NYC, and I am in Illinois...
Consequently, My Computer became pretty much unusable until I unmapped
the drives. (I had
So I'm clicking on a link for a Microsoft KB article sent to me by Sunbelt
support pertaining to Windows 2000 2003 Server OS from my pc. The top of
the screen has this rather interesting message on it: This article applies
to a different version of Windows than the one you are using. Content in
Today is one of those days where my brain is just not working well. I could
use some help.
I have a virtual 2003 AD test environment running under VMWare Workstation 7
including DNS,DHCP. Each virtual is configured to use vmware's bridged
networking and I am using 169.x network for all of the
I'm not seeing that on just about everything coming from the list, just on
messages from MBSand maybe one other person.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.comwrote:
Can you use another reader (POP or IMAP) to access your Gmail account?
That should
BESR is a ghost like product that works while windows is running.
Once the initial ghost image is created, it can do incremental images
after that, and you can control how often it starts over and does a new
full image. You can easily do a bare metal restore, and they support
restores to
Although it's probably there for a reason that others smarter than me will
point out, you could maybe try changing the default limitation:
http://www.nordicedge.se/support/kb/questions/74/NSD1020+How+to+change+the+LDAP+search+limit+limitation+of+1000+objects+in+Active+Directory
-B
From:
Hi Bryan,
If you mean 169.254.x.x then you're out of luck as that is an APIPA address
and APIPA cannot be routed to other subnets, (which includes the Internet).
See http://www.petri.co.il/whats_apipa.htm for more info.
Regards,
Andrew
2009/12/9 Bryan Garmon bryan.gar...@gmail.com
Today is
I wouldn't recommend it.
From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 12:06 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Issue with Seeing ALL OU's in Tree from LDP.exe
Although it's probably there for a reason that others smarter than me will
Good morning everyone (or good afternoon as the case may be).
I was wondering, from those of you that have had hands on experience with
Policy Patrol and their Exchange disclaimer program what you thought.
What we're looking for is a program that will add an outbound signature to all
e-mails
Does it slow down queries in AD in general? That's what I was thinking.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 9:08 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Issue with Seeing ALL OU's in Tree from LDP.exe
I wouldn't recommend it.
From: Miller
Although Michaels recent messages have been fine...
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm not seeing that on just about everything coming from the list, just
on messages from MBSand maybe one other person.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:45 AM,
http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2006/06/23/428114.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa998536.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997076.aspx
This is the right answer for the OP. Under Options - Search, change the search
call type to paged.
From: Miller Bonnie L.
Good stuff-makes sense!
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 9:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Issue with Seeing ALL OU's in Tree from LDP.exe
http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2006/06/23/428114.aspx
Yeah. I saw that. still not convinced it's not using a sledge hammer to kill
a mosquito. J What I want to do is replicate the changes from one SAN to
another over a VPN (2 Mbit on my end and 5 Mbit on the remote side) for D/R
purposes.
John-AldrichTile-Tools
From: Alverson, Tom (Xetron)
Hmm. I guess one advantage of using BESR would be that I could also use it
to drive a tape library at the D/R site for an additional off-line backup.
Hmm. something to think about.
John-AldrichTile-Tools
From: Alverson, Tom (Xetron) [mailto:tom.alver...@ngc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December
It looked like MS Word HTML formatting is what is causing the messages to be
extra-huge. Might it be the option to use Word as the email editor in
Outlook that is causing it?
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Kevin Lundy klu...@gmail.com wrote:
Although Michaels recent messages have been
Yet one more reason I dislike gmail.
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 11:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT-ish: GMail annoying mail clipping
As soon as I get the time, I will probably be
Hmm, give the virtual adapter a second IP address on the 10.x.x.x network
and establish default gateway to the 10.x.x.x router?
Carl
From: Bryan Garmon [mailto:bryan.gar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 12:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Simple Networking
Marty,
Take a look at Exchange Rules from http://www.codetwo.com. It's affordable
and can pull the data directly out of AD.
Roger Wright
___
Sent from Tampa, FL, United States
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Marty Nelson mnel...@transdyn.com wrote:
Good morning everyone (or good
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO
Richard:
Have you tried deleting the
HKey_Current_User\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Mou
ntPoints2 key?
Larry
From: richardmccl...@aspca.org [mailto:richardmccl...@aspca.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 11:54 AM
I turned off use css for formatting in outlook 2010. Does this message still
get truncated in gmail?
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Can't turn that off.
From: Jeff Bunting [mailto:bunting.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 12:28 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT-ish: GMail annoying mail clipping
It looked like MS Word HTML formatting is what is causing the messages to be
extra-huge. Might it be
Looks better on gmail. Nice font too.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.comwrote:
I turned off “use css for formatting” in outlook 2010. Does this message
still get truncated in gmail?
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
Looks fine on my BB FWIW
From: Michael B. Smith
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Wed Dec 09 12:39:49 2009
Subject: so...let's try this one
I turned off “use css for formatting� in outlook 2010. Does this message still
get truncated in gmail?
Predecessor installe DisclaimIt and it works well for us. Pulls from AD,
does plain text and html.
I'd say it's cheap because his methodology was to try and be as cheap as
possible in the short term.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Marty Nelson mnel...@transdyn.com wrote:
Good morning
No clipping message on this one.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Steve Ens stevey...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks better on gmail. Nice font too.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Michael B. Smith
mich...@smithcons.comwrote:
I turned off “use css for formatting” in outlook 2010. Does this
All of your messages have been OK in gmail today that I've seen (prior to
this one too). The CSS formatting sounds like the problem. Yeesterdays had
168K of style formatting in them. The rest of the message was 5K
Jeff
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Michael B. Smith
Yeah, I've seen that on the KBs for a while now. Rarely do I find it
useful, but I think that is mostly because in my case I'm using Windows 7
and everyone else in my org is using Windows XP.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.comwrote:
So I'm clicking on a link
Carl,
This is a great idea and worked wonderfully for the DC where I added the 2nd
NIC. Now the DC has internet access. Any ideas for the rest of the machines
or do you think I just need to add a second nic to each of the virtuals?
Would prefer not to have to go the route of the 2nd nic on all
I always setup a non-domain VM (though it could be a member I suppose) and
configure RRAS as a basic NAT firewall for the private VM network. They are
not bridged this way, but it works quite well. You can forward ports through
the firewall for the physical machines that need to get access.
Internet Connection sharing? Not a good idea on a DC I'd imagine, but maybe
OK for your test environment.
Jeff
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Bryan Garmon bryan.gar...@gmail.comwrote:
Carl,
This is a great idea and worked wonderfully for the DC where I added the
2nd NIC. Now the DC has
John, unless there has been a change since BESR 8.0, you will be unable to
drive your tape library. I had to go with a combination of BESR 8 and Backup
Exec 12. Using Backup Exec 12 for my tape library.
I absolutely love BESR 8 and use it as my primary D/R software.
Jeff Johnson
Systems
Bummer. Oh, well.. J
John-AldrichTile-Tools
From: Jeff Johnson [mailto:jjohn...@hydraflowusa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 1:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Backup Exec System Restore 2010
John, unless there has been a change since BESR 8.0, you will
I've had problems with Vista x64 before with the Installer service having an
error but this is the first time I've seen it in 7. I've tried all the registry
hacks to fix it, reregistering msiexec and nothing I do makes it work. Any of
the Windows 7 googles for this are all related to beta and
Kinda scary I think..
Not too scary - theyre probably just reading the browsers user agent
string and displaying the message as necessary. Wouldnt that be helpful in
some cases?
- Andy O.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
Ok. I was about to say yes you can turn off Word as your editor but before
I actually sent that, I checked, and you're right. Microsoft has added the
Word editor as the built-in editor for Outlook as of OL2007. That being
said, you could set Outlook to send out plain-text emails. J
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 08:11, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:
URI has nothing to do with payload.
Yes, I knew that.
POST /somefile.ext HTTP/1.1
HOST: myserver.com
Key=binary blob here
Is an entirely valid HTTP request, and the URI is well formed. Unfortunately
you
have no
Thank you - i have this working wonderfully now. To recap:
VM gets 2 nics - 1 for 10.x and a 2nd for 169.x
Default gateway is set only on the 10.x nic
RRAS is configured as NAT/firewall on the private network (169.x)
On each client machine, default gateway is set to IP of the server that has
the
You first. :-P
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 1:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT-ish: GMail annoying mail clipping
Ok. I was about to say yes you can turn off Word as your editor but before I
actually sent that, I
Soytonlee. Glad it works for you and glad to help.
From: Bryan Garmon [mailto:bryan.gar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 1:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Simple Networking Question?
Thank you - i have this working wonderfully now. To recap:
VM gets 2
Thanks! All the same crud there that was in HKLM\etc...
Thanks!
--
richard
Safe to delete any of these
Kent, Larry CTR USA larry.k...@us.army.mil wrote on 12/09/2009
11:35:47 AM:
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO
Richard:
Have you tried deleting the
No, yet one more reason to hate MSFT's HTML formatting of emails.
The garbage it appends is horrific.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 09:30, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote:
Yet one more reason I dislike gmail.
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com]
On 9 Dec 2009 at 11:00, Sherry Abercrombie wrote:
So I'm clicking on a link for a Microsoft KB article sent to me by
Sunbelt support pertaining to Windows 2000 2003 Server OS from my pc.
The top of the screen has this rather interesting message on it: This
article applies to a different
Yet another reason to hate MSFT's Outlook. Can't turn off Word as your
editor? How stupid is that?
Kurt
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 09:40, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
Can’t turn that off.
From: Jeff Bunting [mailto:bunting.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 12:28
Don't tell me I cannot hate gmail.
Because I do.
That doesn't preclude me from hating others tho.
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 1:37 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT-ish: GMail annoying mail
On 9 Dec 2009 at 10:54, richardmccl...@aspca.org wrote:
Clues?
What shows when you type NET USE[enter] in a CMD window?
FWIW, in the registry, HKLM\System\MountedDevices shows a couple dozen
entries which begin \??\Volume{long hex string in brackets}. Then, I
see \DosDevices\A: (as well
Heh. At least hate it for the right reasons. I think they're dealing
with huge, crappily (is that a word? Now it is...) formatted emails in
a reasonable way.
Kurt
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:40, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote:
Don't tell me I cannot hate gmail.
Because I do.
http://www.microsoft.com/responsepoint/default.aspx
Anyone have any experience with the MS phone system? I have a client who
saw this somewhere and is asking my recommendations. I have never seen it
before.
Steve
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
It's a compromise, as are so many things.
You want something that can render HTML, yet do so safely.
You don't want to have the same issues with modern email programs using the
full IE rendering engine that Outlook 2003 did.
You don't want to invest in multiple editors, that not being a good
Not exactly true. An IP address is just an IP address. It's like
saying that RFC 1918 addresses can't be routed to the Internet - it's
absolutely not true, and if you look at the addresses hitting the
outside of your firewall, you'll see plenty of them. They *shouldn't*
be routed to the Internet,
Thanks Andy and Angus, I 'know' how it's happening, but you're both missing
my point. Why the heck does Microsoft need to know what OS I'm on when I'm
browsing their site telling me I may be on the wrong page? I'm a network
admin, I try to keep browsing from an actual server to a minimum, if
Why not, like IE does, allow you to specify your editor?
I'll take Notepad, Notepad++, PFE32, Crimson, VIM or any of a host of
others before I'd take Word.
Bad, bad, bad decision.
And, I doubt that Word is any safer in rendering HTML than IE, ultimately.
Kurt
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:53,
If Word MUST be enabled as the editor in Outlook 2010, does this mean that
Outlook can no longer be purchased as a stand-alone application? Must one
now purchase the full office suite, even if Outlook is the only required
app?
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Michael B. Smith
I doubt that admins are the target audience for those messages. In fact,
this thread pretty much proves that. :-)
I'm just guessing, but I bet the target for that is for those true users
looking for answers via a search engine and coming across a KB article
for Windows (enter ancient version
Good point. If I want to use it as an Exchange client, standalone, and
not part of the Office suite, am I screwed?
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:26, Andrew Laya andrew.l...@gmail.com wrote:
If Word MUST be enabled as the editor in Outlook 2010, does this mean that
Outlook can no longer be purchased
Sounds to me like they are shooting for the lowest common denominator, not a
brilliant admin like yourself, Sherry. ;-)
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Joe Tinney jtin...@lastar.com wrote:
I doubt that admins are the target audience for those messages. In fact,
this thread pretty much
Hi All,
I recently installed my first SBS2008 Server running Exchange 2007. It
seems to be running fairly well but I've gotten intermittent reports about
PDF attachments becoming corrupt.
Has anyone else experienced this? Some Googling shows KB937625 which
seems to describe the problem
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
