Re: OldCmp.exe

When didn't you send it? :-) Nice one! On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:14 AM, David Lum wrote: > Thanks for not reading the e-mail I didn’t send because I figured it out > myself while typing the e-mail I cancelled, but did you know if you use > “DN=” instead of “DC=” in when specifying a BaseDN it

Re: Good SBS list

12 at 9:06 AM, Richard Stovall wrote: > >> Sending this at 9:06 AM EDT on 3/23/12. >> >> It seems like the list's performance has improved dramatically. Maybe >> they upgraded or fixed whatever problem was causing it. If so, thanks very >> much for doing so. >

Re: Good SBS list

Stu! GFI! Are you guys listening? On Thursday, March 22, 2012, James Hill wrote: > Thanks Michael. In the past I would have agreed but the list is so slow that I often think it isn’t working at all. > > > > From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 21 March 2012 11

Re: OT: Utterly convincing spam

if you're not the idiot who's bank account >> is being emptied. >> >> >> On 22 March 2012 14:42, Jonathan Link wrote: >> >>> Patsy Mark? >>> YGtBFKM. >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Ralph Smith >>> wrote

Re: OT: Utterly convincing spam

nds like some spammers/scammers have a sense of humour. > Admittedly, it's quite funny - if you're not the idiot who's bank account > is being emptied. > > On 22 March 2012 14:42, Jonathan Link wrote: > >> Patsy Mark? >> YGtBFKM. >> >> On Thu

Re: quick answer?

I guess I'm confused, does TeamViewer not support Switch User, leaving the logged in user still active and TeamViewer still running? I know I can do this with our VPN software, and Go2mypc allows one to logoff and login as another user or switch user... I don't use Teamviewer, so it is conceivable

Re: Network Analyzer

I hate to think of what the list delay implications of this are In any event, he's going to the bit bucket. On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Tom Miller wrote: > I am currently out of the office attending a conference. I will return on > Monday March 26th. If you require immediate technical

Re: Network Analyzer

Ok someone's sub needs to be put on hold or something. On Sunday, March 18, 2012, Tom Miller wrote: > I am currently out of the office attending a conference. I will return on Monday March 26th. If you require immediate technical assistance, please contact the I.T. Help Desk at 788-0911 or help

Re: Worth some consideration...

I can feel the love. There's a lot of love here. On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > Love you too, -sc. > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:40, Steven M. Caesare > wrote: > >> > That's a bit harsh, I think. > > > > You mis-spelled "accurate". > > > > -sc > > > >> -Original Messag

Re: OT - Iron Mountain Question

Thought it was something like that... On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Jacob Kisner wrote: > Yes.. Jacob .. ex-excalibur.;-) > > Well, after some fact finding, we pay $275 for the tapes being picked > up and stored.. the other 2800 was for box/paper storage. All I got > in the beginning was "Wh

Re: In case anyone didn't see this on the Patch Management list...

For me, business hours are 7am to 8pm this time of year, and Saturdays and Sundays are often quite busy with a Director or two in the office working. And that can be almost anytime, so I have to schedule my downtime events carefully. On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > What's the

Re: Worth some consideration...

Uh, yeah they are, if they're not stored in a secure place. Sticky notes, by design, are meant to be placed somewhere convenient to the user, which, to me, suggests somewhere out in the open. That's completely different from a sheet of paper containing some common passwords necessary to certain f

Re: In case anyone didn't see this on the Patch Management list...

+1 I do this, too. On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Kennedy, Jim wrote: > WSUS. Set to download but not install. Then I RDP and hit install. Saves > quite a bit of time since they are already downloaded. An improvement over > what you are doing, but still not perfect of course. But I am in full

Re: OT: Apple hype fails to catch on in England

We need him to double his post count tomorrow, too. On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr < michealespin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, Mack, > > What's happening? We need to talk about your email signature... Yeah. > Did you get that memo? Yeah. It's just we're putting new redicul

Re: Did you know 14,000Kb isn't 14MB?

, at 7:32 PM, Jonathan Link wrote: > > Gmail thinks you are spamming you or I'm spamming you? > > > On Thursday, March 15, 2012, Mack Bolan wrote: >> Same for me oddly enough, fortunately I set up a filter. ;) >> >> Mack S. Bolan >> >> >> >>

Re: Did you know 14,000Kb isn't 14MB?

Gmail thinks you are spamming you or I'm spamming you? On Thursday, March 15, 2012, Mack Bolan wrote: > Same for me oddly enough, fortunately I set up a filter. ;) > > Mack S. Bolan > > > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Jonathan Link wrote: > > Gmail think

Re: list delays

That is only because of the lists lag factor. On Thursday, March 15, 2012, Mack Bolan wrote: > Seems like only yesterday Larry said "I'm not going anywhere unless you ban me..." > > Mack S. Bolan > > > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Cynicalgeek wrote: >> >> Thank you Max for calling me and p

Re: Did you know 14,000Kb isn't 14MB?

You can probably fill 500 LoC with what people don't understand... On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr < michealespin...@gmail.com> wrote: > 14000 KB definitely does not equal 14 MB, but many ppl dont understand the > relationship between [K] ilobytes and [M] egabytes... > > -- >

Re: Worth some consideration...

Only for Chuck Norris. On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Mack Bolan wrote: > So that makes sticky notes ok? > > Mack S. Bolan > > > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > >> Perhaps you might want to rethink your threat model: >> >> http://www.darkreading.com/database-security/167

Re: list delays

Please. It is not you or your sig, IMO. On Thursday, March 15, 2012, Rankin, James R wrote: > I must apologise for my sig causing so much bother. > > ---Blackberried > ____ > From: Jonathan Link > Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:04:36 -0400 > To: N

Re: BWAhahahahahah

That'll do, wench. That'll do. On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Steve Ens wrote: > I thought we were tools...not jerks! > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Jonathan Link wrote: > >> I'd say more often than not, I start writing an email to this list, and >&g

Re: BWAhahahahahah

Asking where someone gleaned a piece of info is entierely different from make it work. You have to assimilate and apply the information. A lot of what I do here in the office is point people in the direction to go. Just today, someone described a problem and I said, sounds like X, did you check

Re: list delays

my real name on here several times. > However, after seeing how a lot of the "masters" of this list treat the > readers of the list, I'll never do it. The "masters" find enjoyment in > berating and personally attacking readers of the list. I wouldn't put it >

Re: BWAhahahahahah

I'd say more often than not, I start writing an email to this list, and as I'm preparing it and gathering my notes and explaining what I've done, I'll uncover a piece that I've missed and then go fix it, and discard the email. Dealing with the jerks on this list makes me a better IT professional.

Re: list delays

Well, in all fairness he did send it well before lunch. The arrival time is outside of his control. On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Webster wrote: > HEY I JUST ATE! > > > > Carl Webster > > Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional > > http://www.CarlWebster.com

Re: list delays

Y'all are silly. It's already plural. Move along. On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Richard Stovall wrote: > Good point. "Y'alls" is the possessive improperly punctuated. > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Erik Goldoff wrote: > >> no no NO ! >> >> The plural of "Y'all" is "All Y'all" >

Re: list delays

ing my phone ring with bogus requests. > > Real pros. > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Doug Hampshire wrote: > >> Don't make me stop this car. Because I will and you can just sit there >> until you learn to behave. >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at

Re: Worth some consideration...

Shabbat Shalom? On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:25 AM, HELP_PC wrote: > I guess they are talking for English language > Try a complete phrase in Hebrew using western alphabet ! > > Guido Elia > > HELPPC - HELPPC SERVICE > > > -Messaggio originale- > Da: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]

Re: New to virtualization

OSE + 4 VOSE limit per enterprise > license. For more than 4 VOSEs on a physical host, you need 2 (or more) > enterprise licenses. > > ** ** > > Check out page 8 on the document above – has this exact example in a > diagram. > > ** ** > > Cheers

Re: list delays

g my real name on here several times. >>>> However, after seeing how a lot of the "masters" of this list treat the >>>> readers of the list, I'll never do it. The "masters" find enjoyment in >>>> berating and personally attacking readers of th

Re: FW: list delays

h&locale=en_US&pvs=pp&pohelp=&trk=ndir_viewmore > > > ** ** > > -sc > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 14, 2012 6:43 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues >

Re: list delays

seeing how a lot of the "masters" of this list treat the >> readers of the list, I'll never do it. The "masters" find enjoyment in >> berating and personally attacking readers of the list. I wouldn't put it >> past some or the "masters" to

Re: OT - Iron Mountain Question

Do you mean formerly of Excaliburfilms? I think it all boils down to the actual terms of the contract... We certainly don't have enough information... Do they store the 18 tapes for a defined period of time and then destroy them at the end of that time? Does this library grow by 18 tapes per week

Re: FW: list delays

uthType=name&authToken=BQXh&locale=en_US&pvs=pp&pohelp=&trk=ndir_viewmore > > > ** ** > > -sc**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, Marc

Re: list delays

Didn't see anyone call you a tool... On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:09 PM, wrote: > And I'm the one that's called a tool? > > I probably made money for you James. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 14, 2012, at 5:37 PM, James Rankin wrote: > > > > On 14 March 2012 19:48, Steven M. Caesare wrote: >

Re: FW: list delays

Except Shookie, anyway... On Wednesday, March 14, 2012, Webster wrote: > I also make it extremely difficult for anyone to track me down. I obfuscate all my online info. That is why no one will ever know my true identity! > > > > > > Carl Webster > Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional >

Re: FW: list delays

Wasn't much to see. On Wednesday, March 14, 2012, Webster wrote: > Profile is now gone. > > Carl Webster > > Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional > > http://www.CarlWebster.com > > From: William Robbins > Subject: Re: list delays > > Not according to his LinkedIn profile: http://www.lin

Re: list delays

Time to update my sunbelt ntsysadmin filter. On Wednesday, March 14, 2012, Cynicalgeek wrote: > You guys and gals are awesome. > BEGIN SIG > "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Maecenas porttitor congue massa. Fusce posuere, magna sed pulvinar ultricies, purus lectus malesu

Re: list delays

B) personally attack (verbally) in >>> real life over the phone, via snail mail, etc. >>> >>> This list is still useful but there is a lot of unprofessionalism that >>> goes on that has nothing to do with my 'cynicalgeek' email address not >>>

Re: My SBS swing brag

leaves you with a >> 2003 std server. I just happen to have the 2003 server, but sbcore still >> there. >> >> Jonathan Link wrote: >> >>> Kinda what I thought, might be a technical licensing violation... >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:2

Re: list delays

t; real life over the phone, via snail mail, etc. >> >> This list is still useful but there is a lot of unprofessionalism that >> goes on that has nothing to do with my 'cynicalgeek' email address not >> using my real name. >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 14,

Re: List Speed?

------ > *From:* Jonathan Link [jonathan.l...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* 14 March 2012 2:17 PM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: List Speed? > > I'd rather have fast list response and associated griping than the > current situation. > > My cynical mind? GFI d

Re: list delays

goes on that has nothing to do with my 'cynicalgeek' email address not > using my real name. > > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Jonathan Link > wrote: > >> It's pretty easy to ignore a signature. It's also funny, so I tend to >> give it a p

Re: list delays

It's pretty easy to ignore a signature. It's also funny, so I tend to give it a pass. I've seen worse signatures with huge pictures, those are pretty objectionable. The list members have come down hard on people with huge graphics and whatnot in their signature. Is Mr Rankin's long? Yeah, but

Re: List Speed?

nual fee. The (useful and applicable) knowledge I’ve > gained participating in this list far outweighs any other source I’ve been > exposed to, ever. > > ** ** > > Regards,**** > > ** ** > > Don Guyer > > Directory and Messaging Services > Catholic H

Re: My SBS swing brag

machine up and not > move all the printers, scan to SMB folders, and antivirus software. > The machine was still good for those light duty activities and it > simplified everything and saved the client some money. > > Bill > > Jonathan Link wrote: > > Not by much. I used th

Re: New to virtualization

r, web interface server, terminal > services profile storage)**** > > Document imaging (also my 2nd DC, and print server) > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:49 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues &

Re: List Speed?

* ** > > Regards, > > ** ** > > Don Guyer > > Directory and Messaging Services > Catholic Health East, ITSS > > ** ** > > *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:57 PM > > *To:* NT System Ad

Re: List Speed?

I'd pay. Even annually. The utility of this list is approaching nil. Yeah, I go off-topic, I admit it. Find a frequent contributor who doesn't... Waiting 4 or more hours for a reply, seeing multiple postings about the same item (Dell acquiring Sonicwall) is something I can do without. On Tue,

Re: Carolina "BBQ Sauce" (was Re: Proxy server and ISA)

rs since all three thread topics were banned. When we tuba > > players gather at conferences, the list members still talk about > > the vile language and name calling that went on in those > > "discussions". They would have made Gary Slinger look like a > &

Re: Dell to acquire SonicWall...

An example of what happens when messages to the list take hours to reach it. For a big story, I can envision a dozen of these type of messages appearing... On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Matthew W. Ross wrote: > > http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-03-13/dell-to-acquire-sonicwall-from-inves

Re: Now this is interesting...

That is interesting. I'd be interested in discussing the implications of such an acquisition, but I don't have a couple of weeks. Yes, I went there. On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Richard Stovall wrote: > Dell to acquire Sonicwall. > > http://content.dell.com/us/en/corp/d/secure/acq-sonicwal

Re: New to virtualization

Forgot I even sent this... On Tuesday, March 13, 2012, Jonathan Link wrote: > If I were doing licensing from scratch, I'd go Datacenter, even accounting for the CPU licensing, it's not all that much more. The ability to add and move servers, "thinly" provision servers,

Re: Carolina "BBQ Sauce" (was Re: Proxy server and ISA)

They do no how to make chili there. And it ain't got no beans, neither! :-{P On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Webster wrote: > Texas Jambalaya!!! Texans don't know how to make no stinkin' > jambalaya!!! f you want REAL Jambalaya, you head yourself over to south > Louisiana (bring a boat I h

Re: New to virtualization

If I were doing licensing from scratch, I'd go Datacenter, even accounting for the CPU licensing, it's not all that much more. The ability to add and move servers, "thinly" provision servers, etc makes a a much more robust environment. When I say thinly provision servers, I mean, making a server

Re: My SBS swing brag

Not by much. I used the SBSMigration swing kit to swing to new hardware a while back. I could've done everything in it manually, certainly. The ~$200 for me was well worth it to put all the pieces of information together in one spot. Saying I used this tool for this reason and then how you used

Re: Carolina "BBQ Sauce" (was Re: Proxy server and ISA)

> Ale is actually quite popular in the States > > > On 13 March 2012 14:08, Jonathan Link wrote: > >> We brew ales here, too. >> >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:53 AM, James Rankin wrote: >> >>> American beer is lager >>> >>> This topic

Re: Carolina "BBQ Sauce" (was Re: Proxy server and ISA)

those >> "discussions". They would have made Gary Slinger look like a saint! :) >> >> >> Carl Webster >> >> Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional >> >> http://www.CarlWebster.com <http://www.carlwebster.com/> >> --

Re: PC lifecycle?

You have to work the numbers. How much downtime/lost productivity. It's dependent on the situation. As I said, our computers are in the hands of revenue producers. When they're down, they aren't billing their time. They either have to make it up (morale issue) or it is lost productivity (money

Re: Carolina "BBQ Sauce" (was Re: Proxy server and ISA)

Is it the well done/not well done burger debate? I can't imagine what situation arose that needed to ban beer from the discussion. It must have been truly heinous. On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Webster wrote: > I run a mailing list for tuba and euphonium players since mid 90s. > There are

Re: Carolina "BBQ Sauce" (was Re: Proxy server and ISA)

Saucing is an individual choice. Some cuts need a sauce. I prefer a peppery brisket without additional sauces. I like my pulled pork to have a bit of sauce because that smoke can really penetrate the fat, so a nice vinegar sauce helps to cut that down just a bit, so i don't feel like I'm eating

Re: OT: Carolina "BBQ Sauce" (was Re: Proxy server and ISA)

Yes. On Monday, March 12, 2012, Webster wrote: > “A good dry rub, and hours low and slow on the smoke is all it takes” > > > > Are you talking cigars, women or pork shoulders? > > > > > > Carl Webster > Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional > http://www.CarlWebster.com > > > > From: Erik

Re: Carolina "BBQ Sauce" (was Re: Proxy server and ISA)

Never let facts get in the way of a rant. On Monday, March 12, 2012, Steve Ens wrote: > ketchup is vinegar based (or at least has loads of it in it). > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Mayo, Bill wrote: > > Texas uses that tomato-based stuff, right? Ketchup is for fries! > > > > From: John Le

Re: OT: Carolina "BBQ Sauce" (was Re: Proxy server and ISA)

Why would you want to? On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Webster wrote: > I am in the Charlotte area for 2 more weeks. Is there anywhere in NC > that doesn't base their "sauce" on vinegar and or mustard? > > >Carl Webster > > Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional > > http://www.C

Re: (homedrive)

If folders are named for users, for /d is your friend in situations requiring setting rights en masse. I batch created users and folders annually when I worked for a school, and I didn't use the profile tab in ADUC. I think it was because of the logon optimization issue... It's been a while but thi

Re: Windows File Archive

. > > This list, while very friendly, has been more tolerating than recently > than in the past of such things. Not necessarily a bad thing, but also > something notably annoying to many more experienced professionals. And > there is the rub; this is a bitch-slap, not an act of un

Re: Fw: Required Active Directory Administrator/6+months Contract/Lake Success,NY

There is no iPad 3. On Saturday, March 10, 2012, James Rankin wrote: > Naturally, I bet you are testing like hell on that iPad 3 :-) > > On 10 March 2012 11:39, Webster wrote: >> >> Not "wants", the word is "requires". And they are not "toys", they are "business tools" that help us keep up with

Re: Windows File Archive

It has been a while since he posted. On Friday, March 9, 2012, Richard McClary wrote: > The embarrassing thing is, it took me most of the day to figure out who Carpet Boy is. “Sixty” has hit me pretty hard… > > > > From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] > Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 6:36 P

Re: PC lifecycle?

CompleteCare for the life of the unit I also keep a stable of spares from computers taken out of service. On Friday, March 9, 2012, Jonathan Link wrote: > We have been three years for notebooks and 4 years for desktops. Our environment is mostly notebooks. > > I'm planning to increase th

Re: PC lifecycle?

We have been three years for notebooks and 4 years for desktops. Our environment is mostly notebooks. I'm planning to increase the lifecycle of notebooks to 4 years, since there don't seem to be a lot of changes these past few years. Also moving to SSDs. On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 3:12 PM, David Ma

Re: MagicJack

Years ago, when I was transitioning between jobs (I was finishing up college) my wife called our cable company and said I was unemployed (not really accurate) and that we wanted to cancel service, or at least drop it down to basic cable. We ended up getting more tiers, premium channels, etc for 3

Re: H: (homedrive)

One share. you can designate subfolders under that share as the homefolder. On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:18 PM, David Lum wrote: > Do you guys create individual shares for each user, or do something > different? > > *David Lum* > Systems Engineer // NWEATM > Office 503.548.5229 //* *Cell (vo

Re: Windows File Archive

tion may be - before they ask an incomplete question, or >> try to move forward with an incomplete thought again. >> >> >> This list, while very friendly, has been more tolerating than recently >> than in the past of such things. Not necessarily a bad thing, but

Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?

And just making it that much easier once SkyNET gets going... On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Cameron wrote: > HOLY CRAP on the prices!! > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Miller Bonnie L. < > mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu> wrote: > >> > The lawn mower does what I need it to do, although if I

Re: ping

Don't encourage him. On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Jeff Brown wrote: > I thought it was pretty damn funny! And I got the original yesterday, > as I presume he did. > > ** ** > > *From:* Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, March 08, 2012 4:07 PM > *To:* NT System Ad

Windows File Archive

While I may not employ Gary's colorful vocabulary, I agree with his basic sentiment. I would think a solution would include such a capability. If you are rolling your own then I suggest testing as I have had false positives with robocopy. On Thursday, March 8, 2012, Cesare' A. Ramos wrote: > Som

Re: Windows File Archive

Someone ordered red wine and wanted to watch Idol. On Thursday, March 8, 2012, Don Ely wrote: > Hotel bar out of alcohol again? ;o) > > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Gary Slinger wrote: > > The problem with you damn do-gooders trying to answer his question is: > > * he hasn't stated what syst

Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?

Best phone skit ever... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAG39jKi0lI On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:25 PM, John Hornbuckle < john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us> wrote: > Best phone ever. End of story. > > ** ** > > www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5C6X9vOEkU > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > John > >

Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?

the “unification” > version where MS no longer developed the Win9x line. > > ** ** > > XP was fine, but IMO it did more to fill any gaps the 9x crowd was needing > than it did introduce tangible beneficial change to the NT-lineage > predecessor. > > ** ** > > -sc

Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?

I may be off by a digit. Might be 256 MB of RAM, for some reason 128 MB is sticking in my mind. On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Jonathan Link wrote: > I remember way back then. I was the sole person supporting a school with > ~600 computers. I went with NT for all teacher workstatio

Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?

’t really like 2000. Had too much NT for me, but that’s just me. I > think I remember a lot of ANGST back then about MS cranking out OS’s simply > to build revenue.**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, March 08, 2012 1

Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?

Alright then. I just think you'll find you're in the minority of people who think 2000 wasn't good or great. As an aside, I remember when XP came out, people called it Windows Legos edition. People moved to XP because MS stopped updating 2000 and it wasn't a bad upgrade, mainly a change in look

Re: A Little Help Needed

I think this is more of a network routing question. AFAIK, AD doesn't care if machines are on separate networks, as long as the DC's can communicate, and the network is correctly routed. I'd probably standup a DC for domain 1 at site 2, to minimize traffic across the VPN. On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at

Re: KVM over IP

Don't beat yourself up. That's what we are here for... On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:48 PM, David Lum wrote: > Complain? About what..I’m an idiot? lol > > ** ** > > *From:* Heaton, Joseph@DFG [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 06, 2012 11:45 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues >

Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?

e: > What everyone else gets to invest in bitching and hyperbole but I get > attacked because I disagree? Nice. > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Jonathan Link wrote: > >> When did the list start allowing binaries? It appears my attachment was >> lost, I don't

Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?

When did the list start allowing binaries? It appears my attachment was lost, I don't hear any panic. Yes, I hear whining. Kvetching, bitching, call it what you will. It's a human condition, people do it. Many of us see this as change for change sake, much like the Ribbon in Office 2007 and la

Re: VMWare tools

Here's an idea... No idea if it would work, but I don't see why it wouldn't. Copy the contents of that CD to a fileshare, install from that share. Don't have to deal with the CD being mounted properly or autorun. On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Michael Leone wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9

Re: ???

Until it is *just* him. On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Michael Leone wrote: > On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Rankin, James R > wrote: > > Am I blacklisted, or has no-one else seen any list messages all day? Its > eerily quiet... > > It's not just you. Remember - it's never *just* you ... LOL

Re: Roles in AD

It's because it has an extra day... On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Heaton, Joseph@DFG wrote: > Thanks everyone. Right after I posted, I did more searching and figured > out the same thing. > > ** ** > > It’s been a long month… > > ** ** > > Joe Heaton > > ITB – Windows Server Supp

Re: VMWare tools

I've noticed that there are times that the autorun doesn't pop up the installer. I'm able to go to the virtual cd and install it, though. AFAIK, the command to install VMWare tools just loads the virtual CD into the virtual drive, and some interaction is necessary, or even advisable... On Fri, Fe

Re: Interesting change password failure

I don't think you can be claiming that you assumed it was done if someone assured you it was done... Unless you want to assume that "everyone lies." On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Rankin, James R wrote: > I was assured this had been done. And now I guess the next reply will be a > clever play

Re: Interesting change password failure

And probably not even them... On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:06 PM, James Rankin wrote: > Only someone at Mcafee would dare > > On 23 February 2012 18:22, Ben Scott wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Andrew S. Baker >> wrote: >> > How much does anyone want to bet that McCrappy is implica

Re: Limiting DHCP

I don't think he's implying that at all, but it is certainly ambiguous. Most wireless routers have a DHCP server built in. His OP specified:"I've recently set up a wireless router in the DMZ on our firewall." And what constitutes his DMZ is unknown... On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Kurt Buff w

Re: Limiting DHCP

I think he's wanting to prevent anyone from connecting to his network by just plugging in anywhere, with any device... On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Michael B. Smith wrote: > Isn’t the DMZ a separate network segment? It should be…. > > ** ** > > *From:* Evan Brastow [mailto:ebras...@auto

Re: Limiting DHCP

Changing to static IPs requires you touch every machine. Yuck. Going with option #2, I'm assuming you mean reservations, is pretty easy to implement, as you have all that information available via the DHCP console. So, it's easy to make the change there, and workstations/users won't be any the w

Re: Picking up file server tuning again

Uhhh... time to slap some users... :-) On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > RE: PST files. > > This might well be part of the issue: > > #net file | findstr /i pst > 21310605 J:\Home\...\Archive PSTs\archive.pstUSER1 0 > 21310606 J:\Home\USER1\Archive PSTs\x.PSTUS

Re: Free .PST capture tool Exchange 2010

This seems familiar... On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:08 AM, David Lum wrote: > If you have Exchange 2010 this may be of interest to you > > > http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/01/30/pst-time-to-walk-the-plank.aspx > > > *David Lum* > Systems Engineer // NWEATM > Office 503.54

Re: I think I've asked this before...

I switched from a 2003 to 2008 server a few years ago. It was not R2 or 64 bit but from an ACL perspective I had no problems. I just added the LUNs and setup the shares and was done. On Monday, February 13, 2012, Kurt Buff wrote: > but I don't remember seeing an answer - apologies if someone answ

Re: Home Antivirus

TAANSTAFL On Monday, February 13, 2012, Richard Stovall wrote: > But it's not McAfee!! > Which, right now, is McFree! (After rebate.) > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Ben Scott wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Richard Stovall wrote: >> > Hurry up! Time's almost out on the deal

Re: An observation on moving users to new machines

For the IT staff or for the user who lost iTunes data? On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Michael B. Smith wrote: > That would be a resume generating event for many of my clients. > > ** ** > > Regards, > > ** ** > > Michael B. Smith > > Consultant and Exchange MVP > > http://TheE

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >