Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Andrew S. Baker
I'd argue that it's only a model once you monetize it. :) Ultimately, I think the vendors are going to go that way, because it is cheaper to produce and easier to support. Much easier to finesse the necessary price points for an ever-growing value conscious society. And it even benefits

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread John Aldrich
Here's something I thought of... Sure you'll be able to buy an unlock code, but will the end-user realize that they are getting the same physical hardware as someone who pays more and know that they can unlock better performance? Thinking about the folks who go into Best Buy or WalMart to buy a

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread John Aldrich
I'm thinking it's more like you go to the local GM dealership and they sell you a Cadillac, and you drive out off the lot with one of those Kiddy Cadillacs and then the sales rep tells you, Oh, for an additional $1500 you can upgrade to a 'real' car. Based on who this seems to be marketed to (i.e.

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread James Rankin
If it means they'll get more money, they'll tell you about it. Every time I buy a car they try and sell me every add-on possible. I feel emasculated when I come out without all the extras. They won't hide it, that you can count on! On 22 September 2010 13:59, John Aldrich

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Andrew S. Baker
It's already been pointed out that the car analogies aren't helping... *** I think that most folks **who go to the electronics store or Wal-Mart are going to say heck, if this **isn't the top of the line, I don't want it. * You really think that people are going to Walmart for *Top Of The

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Andrew S. Baker
* Sure you'll be able to buy an unlock code, but will the end-user realize that they are getting the same physical hardware as someone who pays more and know that they can unlock better performance?* Does it matter if they realize that? If what they pay matches the performance they thought they

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Ken Schaefer
-Original Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: Wednesday, 22 September 2010 8:52 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU Here's something I thought of... Sure you'll be able to buy an

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread John Aldrich
I think we're going to have to agree to disagree. -Original Message- From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:45 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU -Original

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
It seems that's an advertising issue as opposed to a technical or am I being robbed issue. Given Intel's prowess in the market, I suspect if there's money to be made with this model, they'll ensure it's effectively marketed. Do you know the Intel Inside campaign? Can you see the logo in your

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Phillip Partipilo
Call me out on this one if I am totally off my rocker, but why does it seem that all the folks in this particular debate who are pro this concept of artificial limitations seem to be independent contractors/consultants? Phillip Partipilo Parametric Solutions Inc. Jupiter, Florida (561)

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
1) It's be great if you actually answered the question. I deliberately made is simple and singular in order to make a point. 2) Your analogies serve to contradict: an auto sales person will do everything in their power to upsell you options, particularly at the time of purchase. When you

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Phillip Partipilo
As a former Best Buy drone who was trained to sell parallel printer cables for $40, I resemble that remark. Wait, what? Phillip Partipilo Parametric Solutions Inc. Jupiter, Florida (561) 747-6107 -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent:

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
His question is a good one though... by and large you haven't really stated WHY you feel the way you do, when it's been pointed out that you likely get significant BENEFIT from this model, even if you never take advantage of it. The quality of this list goes up when the discourse (even the

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
I'm neither. And my POV on this represents both my SysAdmin and personal sides. -sc -Original Message- From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:p...@psnet.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 10:13 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Ken Schaefer
I'm not an independent consultant - I'm a Wintel architect with HP. -Original Message- From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:p...@psnet.com] Sent: Wednesday, 22 September 2010 10:13 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU Call

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
Accessory/cable/warrantee sales at the big-box electronics stores kills me. Buddy of mine recently asked me to help him buy a new flatscreen. (His 6-yr-old 50 720P plasma which was top of the line in 2004, and for which he paid _$7,000_ for finally died). We ended up finding a nice 60 Sharp

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread William Robbins
Nice cop out. - WJR On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 08:56, John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.comwrote: I think we're going to have to agree to disagree. -Original Message- From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:45 AM To: NT System

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread John Aldrich
*shrug* This discussion has gone on for awhile and neither side is going to be able to sway the other. I see no need to drag it out and keep it going when we're just going to disagree. I've stated my position, I've tried various examples to explain why I think it's a bad idea, and vice versa, but

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steve Ens
Hi John You still thinking about posting pics on that bean bag chair? I love those for watching movies! Thanks Steve On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:19 AM, John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com wrote: *shrug* This discussion has gone on for awhile and neither side is going to be able to sway

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread William Robbins
Whatever. You do this passive-aggressive arguing shit too often. You start off saying you weren't clear on your original point then you proceed to defend a point you patently have no understanding of, then as what should become clearly your error, you either cease to reply to the email thread,

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Andrew S. Baker
I don't think it breaks down evenly like that. What would it signify if it did, btw? *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Phillip Partipilo p...@psnet.com wrote: Call me out on this one if

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
The difference being, is that you don't tend to support your opinions (which you tend to assert strongly) with reason or facts. When given a solid reason that challenges your assertion, instead of addressing it, you alter the discussion, often using analogies that merely serve to re-state

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Miller, Michael
Let's talk about your feelings. :) From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 11:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU Whatever. You do this passive-aggressive arguing shit too

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
Well, it certainly seems that in this thread some folks don't want to talk about things like FACTS. -sc From: Miller, Michael [mailto:michael.mil...@dys.ohio.gov] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 12:00 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Webster
You still use FAX? Webster From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU Well, it certainly seems that in this thread some folks don't want to talk about things like FACTS. -sc ~ Finally,

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
Shooky requires signature on payment for services rendered. -sc From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 12:13 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU You still use FAX?

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Andrew S. Baker
And ISDN. *ASB* * * On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com wrote: You still use FAX? Webster *From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] *Subject:* RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU Well, it certainly seems

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread William Robbins
Ha! May as well given the reckless abandon of logic! - WJR On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:00, Miller, Michael michael.mil...@dys.ohio.govwrote: Let’s talk about your feelings. J *From:* William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, September 22, 2010 11:24 AM *To:* NT

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Raper, Jonathan - Eagle
Jus the fax, ma'am, jus the fax... Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/ From: Webster

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread William Robbins
You realize, of course, Mr. Carpet has already said Good Day! right? - WJR On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:53, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.comwrote: The difference being, is that you don't tend to support your opinions (which you tend to assert strongly) with reason or facts. When given

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread William Robbins
My feelings are that I'll either get another off-list email explaining how I'm wrong, or he's got his head in the sand already and won't respond. - WJR On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:00, Miller, Michael michael.mil...@dys.ohio.govwrote: Let’s talk about your feelings. J *From:* William

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Roger Wright
Whoa! Sounds like someone needs to take the challenge! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwX8MzOKOzI Roger Wright ___ When it's GOOD there ain't nothin' like it, and when it's BAD there ain't nothin' like it! On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:24 AM, William Robbins dangerw...@gmail.comwrote:

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread John Aldrich
So much for pleasant differences of opinion. You: If you don't agree with me, I'm going to call you names and say bad things about you until you agree. Me: Go ahead, as the saying goes, sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me. From: William Robbins

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
I still have my full-length ISA slot ISDN card at home in my box-O'-cards... -sc From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 12:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU And ISDN.

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
This conclusion is eerily like the Application vs. OS ending. I'm beginning to see a trend here... -sc From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 12:52 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
Off list??!? That's no fun! -sc From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 12:53 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU My feelings are that I'll either get another

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
I haven't seen you called any names? The reality is you ARE ignoring what's being pointed out to you (have your head in the sand), are being passive-aggressive (you make assertions challenging the facts being presented to you and then side-step backing those assertions up), and it sounds like

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Webster
ISA? How about a Micro Channel one! J But I threw it away when we moved to TN. Webster From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU I still have my full-length ISA slot ISDN card at home in my

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Paul Hutchings
You know I haven't been on this list too long but is this honestly what we want to see? If the guy's wrong he's wrong, big deal, life's a little too short to get too hung up on who's right out there on the internet. From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: 22 September

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Don Ely - sc thinks I am a good man...
Its not about being right or wrong necessarily. Its about having a debate backed up with facts and not wavering because you're in over your head. Sometimes, its better to close your mouth (or keyboard) and be thought a fool than to open it and undoubtedly prove you are one... Sent from my

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Raper, Jonathan - Eagle
Paul, thank you. Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/ From: Paul Hutchings

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread William J. Robbins
Not this topic. The people of Latin decent in Wal-Mart one. I tried being reasonable on that one and kept it off-list. But that was the same tune off-list. Presentation and defense of subjective observations as viable facts. I should probably forward my initial off-list reply to the list

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread William J. Robbins
TN!? Where are you? Nashville area here. WJR - from my Crackberry. If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck. -Original Message- From: Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:29:05 To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Don Ely - sc thinks I am a good man...
Great. That's all we need is you two hooking up... :P Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: William J. Robbins dangerw...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:36:03 To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Reply-To: NT System Admin

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread John Aldrich
Dear Mr. Caesare, I have *not* emailed anyone off-list in this discussion and I resent any implications to the contrary. *Thread Plonked* -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 1:29 PM To: NT System Admin Issues

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Sean Martin
Stu? Stu? We need you! We can't cope without moderation! - Sean On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:35 AM, William J. Robbins dangerw...@gmail.comwrote: Not this topic. The people of Latin decent in Wal-Mart one. I tried being reasonable on that one and kept it off-list. But that was the same tune

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread William J. Robbins
And I'm all for that...right up until I get an off list, uninvited mind you, reply in my inbox. At that point you've crossed over whether or not someone is wrong on the Internet Queue -sc with the XKCD link. WJR - from my Crackberry. If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread William J. Robbins
That's mature. And submitted as defense exhibit X. WJR - from my Crackberry. If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck. -Original Message- From: John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:39:16 To: NT System Admin

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread William J. Robbins
Uh huh. WJR - from my Crackberry. If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck. -Original Message- From: Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:40:24 To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Paul Hutchings
If you think that warrants some of your comments so be it, personally I don't. From: William J. Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 September 2010 18:42 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU And I'm all for

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Webster
Work for LPS Integration in Nashville and live in Tullahoma. Commute as little as possible. Webster From: William J. Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU TN!? Where are you? Nashville area here. WJR

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Webster
Shookie Baby will get very jealous. J Webster From: Don Ely - sc thinks I am a good man... [mailto:don@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU Great. That's all we need is you two hooking up... :P _ From: William J.

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread William Robbins
Be afraid... - WJR On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:39, Don Ely - sc thinks I am a good man... don@gmail.com wrote: Great. That's all we need is you two hooking up... :P Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -- *From: * William J. Robbins

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread William Robbins
Which comments do you object to personally then? I'm not in need of justification either. - WJR On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:45, Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.ukwrote: If you think that warrants some of your comments so be it, personally I don’t. *From:* William J. Robbins

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread William Robbins
Ha! No way! That means you know Jeff Castile? I live in the Smyrna area, but I have spent plenty of time in the Tims Ford area. - WJR On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:46, Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com wrote: Work for LPS Integration in Nashville and live in Tullahoma. Commute as little as

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Don Ely - sc thinks I am a good man...
That's no joke... :) Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:47:43 To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Don Ely - sc thinks I am a good man...
I already am... Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: William Robbins dangerw...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:49:12 To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Don Ely - sc thinks I am a good man...
Oh my! Its a reunion!! Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: William Robbins dangerw...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:56:12 To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread William Robbins
Correction, a Southern Reunion. - WJR On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:57, Don Ely - sc thinks I am a good man... don@gmail.com wrote: Oh my! Its a reunion!! Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -- *From: * William Robbins dangerw...@gmail.com *Date:

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Erik Goldoff
Can’t we all just get along ? … “WHACK!” grin Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Paul Hutchings
If I could be coerced to give a damn I'd feel sorry for your pathetic, closed-minded, delusional ass. But I can't. You're just pitiful. If you think a difference of opinion or some frustration because someone puts forward a view without evidence to back it up warrants that then fair enough,

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Jeff Steward
I am not an independent contractor/consultant and this makes sense to me. Of course, I also have 20+ years of manufacturing experience so that may color my attitude. You are given a choice of buying X performance now with the OPTION to buy Y performance increase for an incremental cost IF you so

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
On any topic? Will's point is that you have acted in this manner previously... if you'll notice his reference is past tense. What's being pointed out to you is that you continue to do this. -sc -Original Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent:

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Webster
Yes, I work with Jeff. He is one freakishly smart guy for all things related to both Cisco and Exchange. Webster p.s. I was born at the old Smyrna Air Force Base From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
All things in moderation. Well, except list discussions... -sc From: William J. Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 1:44 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU Uh huh. WJR -

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
http://xkcd.com/386/ -sc From: William J. Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 1:42 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU And I'm all for that...right up until I get an off

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
Isn't it Suth'ren? sc From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 1:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU Correction, a Southern Reunion. - WJR On Wed, Sep 22, 2010

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Don Ely - sc thinks I am a good man...
Why do we gotta be called freaks? Meanie! I'm taking my keyboard and I'm going home! Good day to you sir! I say, good day! Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:01:28 To: NT System Admin

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Don Ely - sc thinks I am a good man...
He just wants us to think he are ejumahkayted... Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:04:35 To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
Believe you me, I am not hung up in the least. -sc From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 1:32 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU You know I haven't been on this

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Don Ely - sc thinks I am a good man...
Too many Lemon drops? Oddly enough my spelling of education in a previous message caused bb spell chuck to believe I meant ejaculated... I couldn't help but lol at that... Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com Date:

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Malcolm Reitz
Where is Stu when you need him to kill a thread? This one veered off in to the weeds at least 95 messages ago and I suspect I'm not the only one tired of hitting the delete key. Let it go. -Malcolm From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Maglinger, Paul
Do I hear banjo music? From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 12:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU Correction, a Southern Reunion. - WJR On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Webster
Only when you squeal like a pig! J Webster From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU Do I hear banjo music? From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Don Ely - sc thinks I am a good man...
Errr... What in the heck do you suthren folks DO at these reunions? Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:45:19 To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Reply-To: NT System Admin

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Phillip Partipilo
I am reminded of a failed business model that was somewhat akin to this unlocking some hardware that you purchased. Divx. Phillip Partipilo Parametric Solutions Inc. Jupiter, Florida (561) 747-6107 From: Jeff Steward [mailto:jstew...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 2:01 PM

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread pdw1914
I take it, then, Paul that you weren't a subscriber to the Exchange list of about a decade ago? There were some real flame wars on that list. (Even got my fingers singed by EC once) Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:31:47

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Jonathan Link
Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria! On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Stu? Stu? We need you! We can't cope without moderation! - Sean On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:35 AM, William J. Robbins dangerw...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Don Ely - sc thinks I am a good man...
I have no recollection of the events in question... Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: pdw1...@hotmail.com Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:15:31 To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Anders Blomgren
I prefer pay as you go and I'm doing inhouse IT. Endlessly hunting for the best bang for the buck just tells me that you have no idea what your actual needs are and that you're forever going to be disappointed. -Anders On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Phillip Partipilo p...@psnet.com wrote:

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread William Robbins
The fact that you don't have evidence is not my problem. The fact that you assume I don't because I opted to keep that of-list is telling. - WJR On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:59, Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.ukwrote: “If I could be coerced to give a damn I'd feel sorry for your

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Andrew S. Baker
I had to get rid of a bunch of stuff late last year. Sad times indeed... *ASB* * * On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.comwrote: I still have my full-length ISA slot ISDN card at home in my box-O’-cards… -sc *From:* Andrew S. Baker

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Miller, Michael
Just stop already, I am personally sick of hearing about it. As Malcolm said, I'm also tired of hitting the delete key. Please move on. From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 3:48 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote: I still have my full-length ISA slot ISDN card at home in my box-O’-cards… Wow. And I thought I was bad for hanging on to my 8-bit ISA Paradise VGA card. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote: I haven't seen you called any names? delusional ass I think qualifies. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ---

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
Just the right amount, actually. I think your BB wanted you to write a secret invisible message -sc From: Don Ely - sc thinks I am a good man... [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 2:10 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Kim Longenbaugh
He should take that delusional part back, eh? LOL I'm old fashioned, forget that L3 crap -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 3:41 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
Very different model, actually. -sc From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:p...@psnet.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 2:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU I am reminded of a failed business model that was

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
A good Ed Crowley flaming was a thing of beauty. -sc From: pdw1...@hotmail.com [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 3:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU I take it, then, Paul that you

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Don Ely - sc thinks I am a good man...
What am I? Chopped liver? RFRC Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:50:40 To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
SACRILEGE! -sc From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 3:57 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU I had to get rid of a bunch of stuff late last year. Sad times indeed...

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
I think you get what you pay for around here. Which probably means you don't get to dictate what's sent unless your domain name ends in @sunbelst-software.com. -sc From: Miller, Michael [mailto:michael.mil...@dys.ohio.gov] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 4:20 PM To: NT System

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
I was just playing off the already-submitted EC reference -sc From: Don Ely - sc thinks I am a good man... [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 4:52 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
The full quote was: If I could be coerced to give a damn I'd feel sorry for your pathetic, closed-minded, delusional ass. To not only be pedantic, not only was it a modifier for Mr. Aldrich's body part, I read that context as I believe you to be delusional, and almost feel sorry for you. Not

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Webster
I'm thinking you are more Limburger Cheese or a properly fermented kim-chi. Webster From: Don Ely - sc thinks I am a good man... [mailto:don@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU What am I? Chopped liver? RFRC ~ Finally, powerful

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Don Ely - sc thinks I am a good man...
M... Kimchee and bulgogi... A couple of my favs... Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:04:48 To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Jonathan Link
I happen to like all three. On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com wrote: I’m thinking you are more Limburger Cheese or a properly fermented kim-chi. Webster *From:* Don Ely - sc thinks I am a good man... [mailto:don@gmail.com] *Subject:* Re: Intel wants

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Steven M. Caesare
Almost delusional, you are. That card is practically a collector's item... -sc -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 4:38 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on

RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Sam Cayze
Then ignore the thread? What are doing hitting the delete key? Just don't read the messages... Just stop already, I am personally sick of hearing about it. As Malcolm said, I'm also tired of hitting the delete key. Please move on. From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com]

Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

2010-09-22 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
Gmail has a wonderful mute feature. -- ME2 On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Sam Cayze sam.ca...@rollouts.com wrote: Then ignore the thread? What are doing hitting the delete key? Just don’t read the messages… Just stop already, I am personally sick of hearing about it. As Malcolm

  1   2   3   >