Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical

nnille, Sonny > and Cher... > > -- > *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:42 PM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical > > It's a heartache > N

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

/me having flashbacks of Donnie and Marie, Captain and Tennille, Sonny and Cher... From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:42 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical It

Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical

It's a heartache Nothing but a heartache Hits you when it's too late Hits you when your down. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Andy Shook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks like I'm headin' for a heartbreak ... > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~

Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical

TVK not returning your calls? On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Andy Shook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks like I'm headin' for a heartbreak ... > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ ~ > -- ME2

Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical

Looks like I'm headin' for a heartbreak ... ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ ~

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

TED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 09:29 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical I'll be there for you; These five words I pledge to you. When you breath, I want to be the air for you. I'll be there for you. Shook From: Sherry Abercr

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical No, that would be Shookie didn’t release the shift key before typing 1. Thanks for pointing that out…jerk! (THAT’s added emphasis J ) Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13

Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical

ombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:06 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical > > > > Oh, I "got it" Dave, I'm just taking a shot at Shook. > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:50 AM,

Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical

; *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:29 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical > > > > I'll be there for you; > > These five words I pledge to you. > > When you breath, I want to be the air for you. >

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

These five words I SWEAR to you. Sorry. Had to fix it. _ From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical I'll be there for you; These five words I pledge t

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

I'll be there for you; These five words I pledge to you. When you breath, I want to be the air for you. I'll be there for you. Shook From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming -

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

I think you're livin' on a prayer, Shookster... From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 7:12 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Sherry, I'm shot to the heart and you're to blame. You give lov

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

Sherry, I'm shot to the heart and you're to blame. You give love a bad name. Shook From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:06 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical Oh, I "got it" Dave, I&

Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical

> > > "OK" to Shook is not the same as it is to the rest of him. > > > > Dave > > > > *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 6:24 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Server naming

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

M To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical Just one question.please define "OK"? ;) On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Andy Shook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: Yeah I used to be schizophrenic but we're OK now.

Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical

gt; *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:06 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical > > > > Refers to self in third person…"adds emphasis" to others… h… > > > > -sc > > > > *From:* Andy Shook

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

Yeah I used to be schizophrenic but we’re OK now. Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:06 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Refers to self in third person…”adds emphasis” to others… h… -sc

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

Refers to self in third person…”adds emphasis” to others… h… -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical No, that would be Shookie didn’t release the shift key

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

No, that would be Shookie didn’t release the shift key before typing 1. Thanks for pointing that out…jerk! (THAT’s added emphasis ☺ ) Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 7:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

same here From: Steven M. Caesare [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 14 October 2008 10:15 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical No. Server name is based on unit/function. We didn’t differentiate HP’s from Dell’s, so we

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

Is that “added emphasis”? -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical +! A server…is a server… is a server Shook From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

No. Server name is based on unit/function. We didn't differentiate HP's from Dell's, so we don't differentiate physical from virtual. -sc From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:20 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physica

Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical

It's something I noticed with the VMware guests registered in WSUS ;) Troy Meyer wrote: > Nice find Phil, I have never considered that VMware would be listed there. -- Phil Brutsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

Nice find Phil, I have never considered that VMware would be listed there. -Troy -Original Message- From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical WMI will do it. This

Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical

WMI will do it. This article will help (beware of line wrap): http://windowsitpro.com/article/articleid/97188/how-can-i-create-a-wmi-filter-for-only-certain-computer-makes.html Servers running on VMware will list the computer manufacturer as "VMware, Inc.". David Lum wrote: > Mostly, unless you

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

ues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical I know this isn't specific help - but there is a flag in either AD or in WMI that defines the server as being virtual. I'm in the throes of authoring or I'd go track it down for you - perhaps that'll give you the lead you nee

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

Internal Asset Tracking DB, very easy to pull a report filtered on type. Regards, Jim From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 08:53 To: ML: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical >> From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

anty and asset tracking), how do you guys handle that? AD dump with a compare of a VM list? Dave From: Stephan Barr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of lists Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:38 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Asset tags or serial

Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical

I tend not to make virtuals or physicals any different (after all they are invisible to end users and a lot of support teams) - but seeing as though all the physical servers we have run ESX anyway, the 'ESX' bit makes them pretty identifiable from all the others :-) 2008/10/13 David Lum <[EMAIL P

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

We insert "vm" into the computer name. Don Guyer Systems Engineer Information Services Department Prudential Fox Roach/ Trident 431 W. Lancaster Avenue Devon, PA 19333 Ph: (610) 993-3299 Fax: (610) 650-5306 www.prufoxroach.com http://www.prufoxroach.com/> [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: D

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

Asset tags or serial numbers. From: Axcess Internet (Listserv) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 10:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical David: Our naming convention allows for us to differentiate between types of

Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical

No naming difference (have more virtual servers than physical), no reason, just didn't see a need to make a distinction. We starting to do the same think John is doing, P2Ving some older servers that are on old hardware, and it's getting to expensive to cover under extended warranties. Last week

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

David: Our naming convention allows for us to differentiate between types of server, so yes, we do. XXX = Business Unit XX = Type of Device (WS, SV, RT, etc...) XX = Department (Two digit letter for department, TS = Technical Support, etc...) XX = Number within department (digit number 01, 02,

RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical

+! A server…is a server… is a server Shook From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical No difference, as a matter of fact most of our VMs are P2Vd old physical servers where the

Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical

No difference, as a matter of fact most of our VMs are P2Vd old physical servers where the hardware was on it's way. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families From: David Lum To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Mon Oct 13 11:20:07 2008 Subjec

RE: Server naming

6 February 2008 5:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming I too, would like to know why. I remember taking an MS AD course in which the instructor said that OU's should not mirror the organizational structure of a company. He was, however, unable to give me a "good

RE: Server naming

System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming Its not, just took the opportunity to stimulate discussion... Andy From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 7:20 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming And how is t

RE: Server naming

Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 1:45 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming I am by far no AD expert, and have limited multi-site experience, but I've been taught that OU's should be aligned to allow easy administration of each s

RE: Server naming

ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 10:45 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming I am by far no AD expert, and have limited multi-site experience, but I've been taught that OU's should be aligned to allow easy administration of each site. I could be

RE: Server naming

Never heard that one before. Have you ever found anything that substantiates that? From: Les B. Minaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 1:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming I too, would like to know why. I remember taking an MS

RE: Server naming

se note: I gave credit where credit was due this time. ;-P From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 1:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming Folks, OU's are organizational units, why in the

RE: Server naming

ngineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA Phone: 401-639-3505 -Original Message- From: Les B. Minaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 1:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming I too, would like to know why.

RE: Server naming

OU's should be organized in a manner that provided sufficient flexibility with GPO's et cetera. Nothing more, nothing less. What defines that flexibility is variable by organization. Les. From: Tim Vander Kooi Sent: Mon 2/4/2008 5:22 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Serve

Re: Server naming

. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 7:27 AM > > > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Server naming > > > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Server naming > > > > > > > > > Troll. > > > &

RE: Server naming & AD orginization

right brain battle J. Dave Lum - Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025 "When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands" From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 4:24 PM To: NT System Admin Issues S

RE: Server naming

Knuckle draggin'-biscuit neck. :-) Shook From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 7:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming Troll. :-) Regards, Michael B. Smith

RE: Server naming

Troll. J Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 7:22 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming Its not, just took the opportunity to stimulate

RE: Server naming

Your right, my mistakes. :-) Andy From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 6:01 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming So it's lines of businesses? I think you had it right the first time

RE: Server naming

Its not, just took the opportunity to stimulate discussion... Andy From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 7:20 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming And how is that any different to what I said

Re: Server naming

t; Tim > > > > > > *From:* Webb, Brian (Corp) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Monday, February 04, 2008 3:26 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Server naming > > > > > > I think what Tim is saying is the reason for creating

RE: Server naming

ers Ken From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 5 February 2008 9:23 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming And there is nothing wrong with your way of doing it. I have my OUs set by area so that I can use GPOs to install software from different servers

RE: Server naming

be organised that way. Cheers Ken From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 5 February 2008 7:58 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming I would also disagree, I have one physical site and I have my AD organized by our lines of business. Shook http

RE: Server naming

stration and/or application of security templates etc by server role. Cheers Ken From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 5 February 2008 7:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming I'm curious why you say that Ken. From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

RE: Server naming

So it's lines of businesses? I think you had it right the first time Shook :) Joe Heaton From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 1:00 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming Business = busin

RE: Server naming

reason for his blanket statement regarding how it shouldn't be done. If a reason exists I would be interested to know what it is. Tim From: Webb, Brian (Corp) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 3:26 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming I

RE: Server naming

From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 2:53 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming I'm curious why you say that Ken. From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 4:07 AM T

Re: Server naming

e, I have one physical site and I have my AD organized by > our lines of business. > > > Shook > http://www.linkedin.com/in/andyshook > > > From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 3:53 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > S

RE: Server naming

Business = businesses :-) Andy From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 3:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming I would also disagree, I have one physical site and I have my AD organized by our

RE: Server naming

Issues Subject: RE: Server naming I'm curious why you say that Ken. From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 4:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming Unless you have server administration by region, you shouldn

RE: Server naming

I'm curious why you say that Ken. From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 4:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming Unless you have server administration by region, you shouldn't be organising your servers int

RE: Server naming

Unless you have server administration by region, you shouldn't be organising your servers into regional specific OUs. Cheers Ken From: MarvinC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 1 February 2008 4:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming Makes a whole lot of sens

RE: Server naming

It really depends on how many servers you have. If you've got a few thousand servers (or more), you sometimes need something like that. Cheers Ken From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 1 February 2008 3:58 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server namin

RE: Server naming

ROFLMFAO. I'm sorry but it's been a busy assed day and that just made it a good one... Thanks Shook. -Original Message- From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 9:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming There's no

RE: Server naming

Urrectum? I almost Killdum. Andy -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 12:54 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming On Jan 31, 2008 11:53 AM, Andy Shook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I once worked

Re: Server naming

On Jan 31, 2008 11:53 AM, Andy Shook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I once worked at an SMB that hade nine servers and they named them after > the planets. I had to change them real quick when a veep had to tell me > that he was having trouble connecting to Uranus. Fortunately, astronomers have a

RE: Server naming

System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming Using Uranus is only a problem in the US were no one know how to pronounce it properly. It's pronounced: http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/audio.pl?uranus02.wav=Uranus Not: http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/audio.pl?uranus01.wav=Uranus On Jan 31, 2008 11:

Re: Server naming

uary 31, 2008 10:44 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Server naming > > At my last job, we used golf related terms. Eagle, Putter, Driver, Wedge, > Bunker, etc... at the job before that, we used superheroes. > Superman, Spiderman, etc. > > Currently, we're u

RE: Server naming

. -Original Message- From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 10:44 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming At my last job, we used golf related terms. Eagle, Putter, Driver, Wedge, Bunker, etc... at the job before that, we used superheroes

RE: Server naming

31, 2008 12:04 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming Using Uranus is only a problem in the US were no one know how to pronounce it properly. It's pronounced: http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/audio.pl?uranus02.wav=Uranus Not: http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/audio.pl?uranus01.w

Re: Server naming

Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming We used Winny the Poo names at my last job (at a University), I though that sucked until I came to work here, where the server names where based on what order they bought the servers: Rollouts1 Rollouts2 Rollouts3 Rollouts4 ... I changed that pretty qui

Re: Server naming

ituation, since he's a big > froo-froo. > > Andy > > > -Original Message- > From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 11:49 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Server naming > > We used Winny the Poo names

RE: Server naming

Unfortunately all us FEDs have the same issue...thousands of systems involved and a need to exchange information tends to create a naming convention that is easy to validate where something is that you need... True for users or for internal hackers unfortunately... ~ Upgrade to Next Generation

RE: Server naming

From: MarvinC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 8:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming US GAATL1 DC 01 Region CityState or location Server Role or function Server # File & Print: USGAATL1FPS01 DC: USG

RE: Server naming

David; I use a proces that defines the OS,Operating Environment, Server Function, Sequence number , and Physcial location all within the Name. If interested I can send Offline. It sounds complicated but very easy to remember or figure out. This process allows you to know if it's a VM Instance

Re: Server naming

> From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 10:44 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Server naming > > At my last job, we used golf related terms. Eagle, Putter, Driver, > Wedge, Bunker, etc... at the job before that, we used su

RE: Server naming

a big froo-froo. Andy -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 11:49 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming We used Winny the Poo names at my last job (at a University), I though that sucked until I came to work

RE: Server naming

: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 10:44 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming At my last job, we used golf related terms. Eagle, Putter, Driver, Wedge, Bunker, etc... at the job before that, we used superheroes. Superman, Spiderman, etc

RE: Server naming

here to go for the info he's looking for... Joe Heaton -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 8:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming On Jan 31, 2008 10:22 AM, David Lum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: Server naming

On Jan 31, 2008 10:22 AM, David Lum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attacking server naming conventions again, how do you guys name your > servers? Depends on the nature of the organization. For larger organizations, or if you have lots of servers, a name based on the site, function and a number t

RE: Server naming

You can also use "MUL" for MULti-purpose... ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ ~

RE: Server naming

I put a small "v" in the front of the name for my virtual servers. vExchange01, for example... Andy -Original Message- From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 10:23 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Server naming Attacking server naming conventions

RE: Server naming

I always went with UTIL for a multi-function server. Andrew Greene Webmaster City of Anderson 120 E Main St., Anderson, IN 46018 765-648-5947 -Original Message- From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 10:23 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Server