RE: Terminal Server HA Configuration

Depends on what you’re using them for, but I’ve had success in the past using Microsoft’s NLB to load balance terminal servers, only needed the login script to run the exchange (profgen) profile utility to enable seamless Outlook for users Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, & Secu

RE: Terminal Server HA Configuration

Hi Ken, Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately no SAN available at the moment. Longer term, we'd be looking to Virtualize. From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:ken.corne...@kimball.com] Sent: Monday 13 February 2012 18:17 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Terminal Server HA Configuration

RE: Terminal Server HA Configuration

If you have a SAN available, run VMWare ESX on your servers. You'll have to pay a bit extra for automatic failover. Or, you can use the free version and manually switch your virtuals over in case of failure. Ken Cornetet 812.482.8499 To err is human - to moo, bovine. From: Robert Jackson [mailt

RE: Terminal Server printing

That's what I've done. I've got about 100 users (mostly providers and their office staff) using TS. I have to check the TS Event Log about once a week to see if it kicks out an error due a printer driver not installed but other than that, works fine. From: david@nwea.org To: ntsysadmin@l

Re: Terminal Server Q

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:30 AM, James Rankin wrote: > I'd be willing to bet some trashy app has the path to the user's profile > hard-coded somewhere. I know Windows Media Player does/did this. The trashy apps come with the computer. ;) -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN

Re: Terminal Server Q

I'd be willing to bet some trashy app has the path to the user's profile hard-coded somewhere. Might be worth running some ProcMon instances against your key apps if it's really vital. On 9 June 2011 15:24, Webster wrote: > The change to “ProfilesDirectory” _*should*_ only affect _*new*_ > profi

RE: Terminal Server Q

The change to "ProfilesDirectory" _should_ only affect _new_ profiles. Off the top of my head, I cannot think of any caveats to your 2nd question beyond the usual YMMV, don't call me I'll call you and if anything breaks it is all Gary Slinger's fault. Carl Webster Consultant and Citri

RE: Terminal Server 2003 Pauses

.wait...then the app launches. Dave From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 12:37 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Terminal Server 2003 Pauses Interesting... knock on wood, but we haven't seen THAT problem as of yet with our

RE: Terminal Server 2003 Pauses

e are very few staff here using it and all other thin client issues are resolved) I'll be getting back to looking at the new options. -Bonnie From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 11:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Terminal Server 2003

RE: Terminal Server 2003 Pauses

I agree with Bonnie, sounds like TCP Chimney related issue. Thanks Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http://dabcc.com/Webster From: Garcia-Moran, Carlos [mailto:cgarciamo...@spragueenergy.com] Sent: Monday, January 31, 201

RE: Terminal Server 2003 Pauses

Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 9:17 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Terminal Server 2003 Pauses Sorry for the late reply. How are your TCP Chimney settings configured on these boxes? This sounds like it could be a related issue. -Bonnie From: Garcia-Moran, Carlos [mailto:cgar

RE: Terminal Server 2003 Pauses

PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Terminal Server 2003 Pauses If I had to guess you've got a memory issue of some sort. PSS is very adept at tracking these things down so given the option I'd suggest booking a case and getting some help. PTEs, Non-Paged/Paged Pool depletion, et

RE: Terminal Server 2003 Pauses

Issues Subject: RE: Terminal Server 2003 Pauses If I had to guess you've got a memory issue of some sort. PSS is very adept at tracking these things down so given the option I'd suggest booking a case and getting some help. PTEs, Non-Paged/Paged Pool depletion, etc would be where

RE: Terminal Server 2003 Pauses

riandesmond.com<mailto:br...@briandesmond.com> c - 312.731.3132 From: Garcia-Moran, Carlos [mailto:cgarciamo...@spragueenergy.com] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 12:26 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Terminal Server 2003 Pauses Not to our knowledge, I'll talk with one of my c

RE: Terminal Server 2003 Pauses

ent: Monday, January 31, 2011 1:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Terminal Server 2003 Pauses I would look at the network. Any changes to the switches, VLANS, etc?? Greg Sweers CEO ACTS360.com<http://www.acts360.com/> P.O. Box 1193 Brandon, FL 33509 813-657-0849 Office 813-758-

RE: Terminal Server 2003 Pauses

I would look at the network. Any changes to the switches, VLANS, etc?? Greg Sweers CEO ACTS360.com P.O. Box 1193 Brandon, FL 33509 813-657-0849 Office 813-758-6850 Cell 813-341-1270 Fax From: Garcia-Moran, Carlos [mailto:cgarciamo...@spragueenergy.com] Sent: Monday, Jan

Re: Terminal Server or VPN?

On 10 Nov 2010 at 15:22, Joseph Heaton wrote: > Bad weather event? wow, the rivers would have to be really over the banks > for that to happen here in Sacramento. No snow, no tornados, man we don't > get any of that fun stuff. Earthquake upgrades force temporary move for Sacramento's St. Fran

RE: Terminal Server or VPN?

stem Admin Issues Subject: RE: Terminal Server or VPN? Just one day.. I would just give them the day off. Too much of a headache for one day. We had to move back in April. We gave the employees Friday off, with pay, while us techs moved and setup all the workstations/servers/etc... We talked abo

Re: Terminal Server or VPN?

I think they're on a break. Probably having fluffernutters. On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Jonathan Link wrote: > Their work is already in the can, as it were. > > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Andrew Laya wrote: > >> Did the 'talent' get the day off with pay too? :-) >> >> >> >> On 11/

Re: Terminal Server or VPN?

Their work is already in the can, as it were. On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Andrew Laya wrote: > Did the 'talent' get the day off with pay too? :-) > > > > On 11/11/10, Jacob wrote: > > Just one day.. I would just give them the day off. Too much of a headache > > for one day. > > > > > > >

Re: Terminal Server or VPN?

Did the 'talent' get the day off with pay too? :-) On 11/11/10, Jacob wrote: > Just one day.. I would just give them the day off. Too much of a headache > for one day. > > > > We had to move back in April. We gave the employees Friday off, with pay, > while us techs moved and setup all the wor

Re: Terminal Server or VPN?

Did the 'talent' get the day off with pay too? :-) On 11/11/10, Jacob wrote: > Just one day.. I would just give them the day off. Too much of a headache > for one day. > > > > We had to move back in April. We gave the employees Friday off, with pay, > while us techs moved and setup all the wor

RE: Terminal Server or VPN? Now TS on VM Q's too

Excellent reference point, thanks Carl! From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 11:15 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Terminal Server or VPN? Now TS on VM Q's too I am not a TS person and have only ever setup 1 pure TS in my career. I

RE: Terminal Server or VPN? Now TS on VM Q's too

. Of course, the two guys heading up VRX are fellow CTPs! J Thanks Carl Webster Citrix Technology Professional http://dabcc.com/Webster From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Subject: RE: Terminal Server or VPN? Now TS on VM Q's too Andrew this is actually my thi

RE: Terminal Server or VPN?

Likewise 400 miles south on the I5 ;-) -Original Message- From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 3:22 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Terminal Server or VPN? Bad weather event? wow, the rivers would have to be really over the banks

RE: Terminal Server or VPN?

Just one day.. I would just give them the day off. Too much of a headache for one day. We had to move back in April. We gave the employees Friday off, with pay, while us techs moved and setup all the workstations/servers/etc. We talked about having employees, like data entry, work from home. Ju

RE: Terminal Server or VPN? Now TS on VM Q's too

Yep that’s one item I am checking out now, thanks! Dave From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 3:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Terminal Server or VPN? Now TS on VM Q's too Have you looked at the TS / RD Gateway feature?

Re: Terminal Server or VPN? Now TS on VM Q's too

> ------ > *From:* Andrew S. Baker [asbz...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 10, 2010 2:58 PM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Terminal Server or VPN? > > Sometimes you don't really have a choice, as it makes good business sen

Re: Terminal Server or VPN? Now TS on VM Q's too

ccess working internaly, and a basic TS 2K8 server up, the > practice I don't have is TS Gateway. I think I can get there in 3-4 weeks > and have some testing time, but we'll see... > > Dave > > > > -- > *From:* Andrew S. Baker [asbz...@

Re: Terminal Server or VPN? Now TS on VM Q's too

TS 2K8 server up, the > practice I don't have is TS Gateway. I think I can get there in 3-4 weeks > and have some testing time, but we'll see... > > Dave > > > > -- > *From:* Andrew S. Baker [asbz...@gmail.com] > *Sent:*

RE: Terminal Server or VPN? Now TS on VM Q's too

ve some testing time, but we'll see... Dave From: Andrew S. Baker [asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 2:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Terminal Server or VPN? Sometimes you don't really have a choice, as it makes good

RE: Terminal Server or VPN?

I'd go with the TS/RD Gateway option. It is very very easy to configure and "just works" imo. TS/RD Gateway can be configured to allow members of security groups to only be able to rdp to certain machines etc. We don't allow any VPN access as it just isn't necessary. From: David Lum [mailto:da

Re: Terminal Server or VPN?

at it as a "bad weather" event to simulate the weather > being too bad for 95% of the folks to get into the office. > > From: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:malcolm.re...@live.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 1:50 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Terminal

Re: Terminal Server or VPN?

rom: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:malcolm.re...@live.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 1:50 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Terminal Server or VPN? > > I would never, ever, allow non-company-managed PCs to connect to our VPN. As > you think, that's just asking for all

RE: Terminal Server or VPN?

s pretty sad when a decrease in the amount lost seems like a raise... >>> Webster 11/10/2010 3:33 PM >>> Yours are mostly economic events! Webster > -Original Message- > From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] > Subject: RE: Terminal Server or VPN? >

RE: Terminal Server or VPN?

Yours are mostly economic events! Webster > -Original Message- > From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] > Subject: RE: Terminal Server or VPN? > > Bad weather event? wow, the rivers would have to be really over the banks > for that to happen here in Sacram

RE: Terminal Server or VPN?

17th, the org is taking this opportunity to treat it as a "bad weather" event to simulate the weather being too bad for 95% of the folks to get into the office. From: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:malcolm.re...@live.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 1:50 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE:

Re: Terminal Server or VPN?

Sometimes you don't really have a choice, as it makes good business sense to allow it. A VPN can be configured to allow appropriate-only access. It does not have to be synonymous with a free-for-all connection. The TS solution has licensing implications, as well. Hopefully, 5 weeks is enough ti

Re: Terminal Server or VPN?

Have you considered something like LogMeIn for remote access? Perhaps a trial during the month of December so you can cover that one day. Roger Wright ___ Life isn't like a box of chocolates. It's more like a jar of jalapenos: what you do today might burn your butt tomorrow. On Wed, Nov 10,

Re: Terminal Server or VPN?

My preference would be for a good web-based SSL VPN solution. For your size of environment, SonicWall has some nice appliances that allow ActiveX and Java apps (so that even folks with Mac and *Nix boxes can get in) that provide a great RDP session interface in a web browser, as well as file direct

RE: Terminal Server or VPN?

r 10, 2010 1:50 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Terminal Server or VPN? I would never, ever, allow non-company-managed PCs to connect to our VPN. As you think, that's just asking for all kinds of trouble. Since most of your home users won't have MS Office on their home PCs,

Re: Terminal Server or VPN?

If their PCs are available for remoting into, just use TS Gateway on the 2008 terminal server. (I think it's called RD Gateway on R2). It's really easy to configure and there's nothing else to do. On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Malcolm Reitz wrote: > I would never, ever, allow non-company-man

RE: Terminal Server or VPN?

I would never, ever, allow non-company-managed PCs to connect to our VPN. As you think, that's just asking for all kinds of trouble. Since most of your home users won't have MS Office on their home PCs, they'll get more done if you give them TS access to your standard corporate suite of applica

Re: Terminal Server or VPN?

Might be a good chance to get up to speed on TS. We have a TS 2008 farm here, but I'm moving those servers to XenApp. It worked fine, although I had some issues with wildcard certificates. I think that was an issue with the version and is not presented in 2008 R2 from what I understand. Use the

Re: Terminal Server Problem

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Steven Peck wrote: > Our last one went away this last spring.  That said, we still have a few NT4 > servers with 'critical' data that cannot be upgraded (HR/Financial) from old > 'divisions'. We've got something like that for our old financial software, too. I'v

Re: Terminal Server Problem

I tested that when I duplicated the problem for the OP and it did not fix the issue. The issue lies with the change in default security zone settings and adding the banking site to the Trusted Sites zone fixes the problem. -Jeff Steward On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 2:43 AM, James Rankin wrote: > Tr

Re: Terminal Server Problem

Tried using compatibility view? On 23 September 2010 20:00, Shawn Everett wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I have a client with the following setup: > - Windows 2000 Domain Controller > - Windows 2003 Terminal Server > > They were running IE6 on the terminal server quite successfully. Their on > site IT g

Re: Terminal Server Problem

ow many NT4 networks might still be out there... > > > > Truth be told, there are a lot more that folks might think…. > > > > *From:* Jeff Steward [mailto:jstew...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, September 23, 2010 4:32 PM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > > *Subject:*

RE: Terminal Server Problem

rust. From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 4:39 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Terminal Server Problem Our last one went away this last spring. That said, we still have a few NT4 servers with 'critical' data that cannot be upgraded

Re: Terminal Server Problem

ould allow YouTube on >> a >> Terminal Server? >> >> >> >> >> >> Webster >> >> >> >> *From:* Jeff Steward [mailto:jstew...@gmail.com] >> *Subject:* Re: Terminal Server Problem >> >> >> >> Adding the

Re: Terminal Server Problem

stew...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, September 23, 2010 4:32 PM >> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >> >> *Subject:* Re: Terminal Server Problem >> >> >> >> I wondered that myself. I figured anyone still running a W2K DC must be >> hurtin

Re: Terminal Server Problem

Thanks Jeff! :) Glad to know it's not unique to my environment. Shawn > I can confirm that rbc and scotia bank return blank pages on a W2K3 TS > session with IE8. If I have time I will see if I can't figure out why > this > is so. > > -Jeff Steward > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Shawn Eve

Re: Terminal Server Problem

are a lot more that folks might think…. > > > > *From:* Jeff Steward [mailto:jstew...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, September 23, 2010 4:32 PM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > > *Subject:* Re: Terminal Server Problem > > > > I wondered that myself. I figured anyone still

RE: Terminal Server Problem

> It makes me wonder how many NT4 networks might still be out there... Truth be told, there are a lot more that folks might think From: Jeff Steward [mailto:jstew...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 4:32 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Terminal Server Prob

Re: Terminal Server Problem

me for asking but who in their right mind would allow YouTube on a > Terminal Server? > > > > > > Webster > > > > *From:* Jeff Steward [mailto:jstew...@gmail.com] > *Subject:* Re: Terminal Server Problem > > > > Adding the site to the trusted sites

RE: Terminal Server Problem

Pardon me for asking but who in their right mind would allow YouTube on a Terminal Server? Webster From: Jeff Steward [mailto:jstew...@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Terminal Server Problem Adding the site to the trusted sites zone fixes the display issue on the banking sites. You'

Re: Terminal Server Problem

Adding the site to the trusted sites zone fixes the display issue on the banking sites. You're on your own for YouTube! -Jeff Steward On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Shawn Everett wrote: > rbc and scotia bank for example. > > This is internal on the LAN using the terminal server for browsing,

Re: Terminal Server Problem

I can confirm that rbc and scotia bank return blank pages on a W2K3 TS session with IE8. If I have time I will see if I can't figure out why this is so. -Jeff Steward On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Shawn Everett wrote: > rbc and scotia bank for example. > > This is internal on the LAN using

Re: Terminal Server Problem

rbc and scotia bank for example. This is internal on the LAN using the terminal server for browsing, email and apps. The workstations have no problems browsing. It's strictly and IE8/Terminal server issue. Shawn > Sample banking sites? Are these users on an internal LAN and using the TS > or

Re: Terminal Server Problem

Sample banking sites? Are these users on an internal LAN and using the TS or are these external users coming in over VPN or WAN? -Jeff Steward On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Shawn Everett wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I have a client with the following setup: > - Windows 2000 Domain Controller > - W

RE: Terminal Server Problem

Uninstall IE8 and institute this new IT feature called Testing and Change Management. Webster > -Original Message- > From: Shawn Everett [mailto:sh...@tandac.com] > Subject: Terminal Server Problem > > Hi Guys, > > I have a client with the following setup: > - Windows 2000 Domain Contro

Re: Terminal Server / RDP "access denied" (asked and solved, posted FYI)...

On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 6:52 PM, David Lum wrote: > Below is what you guys helped me fix because I was trying to make sure I had > all the info you needed. I've found that, when I take the time to do all my homework before posting, I'll often uncover the answer in the process. :) > I solved it

Re: Terminal Server License Server - Windows 2008 R2

, Miller Bonnie L. wrote: > Yep, any server as long as it’s WS08 R2. > > > > *From:* David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] > *Sent:* Friday, May 21, 2010 6:49 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Terminal Server License Server - Windows 2008 R2 > > > &

RE: Terminal Server License Server - Windows 2008 R2

Yep, any server as long as it's WS08 R2. From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 6:49 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Terminal Server License Server - Windows 2008 R2 Member server is OK. Having it on a DC gives other TS servers auto-disc

Re: Terminal Server License Server - Windows 2008 R2

I recently migrated from a Win2k3 TS License server to a Win2k8 R2 RDS License server. It's on a Member server and I configured the discovery scope to "Forest". Everything seems to be working well. On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:48 AM, David Lum wrote: > Member server is OK. Having it on a DC gives

RE: Terminal Server License Server - Windows 2008 R2

Member server is OK. Having it on a DC gives other TS servers auto-discovery capability is the main thing I am aware of for having it on a DC, but I think a DNS entry does the same thing. Someone correct me if I am wrong. David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.

Re: Terminal Server Install mode

Run the command prompt as admin. On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Tom Miller wrote: > I haven't seen this before. > > I just built another server to add to my Terminal Server 2008 farm. Logging > in as a domain admin, when attempting to change to "install" mode, I get a > message "only membe

Re: Terminal Server Install mode

yup, got it. Thanks. >>> Richard Stovall 4/6/2010 4:03 PM >>> Elevate the shell before you run the command. On Apr 6, 2010, at 3:54 PM, "Tom Miller" wrote: I haven't seen this before. I just built another server to add to my Terminal Server 2008 farm. Logging in as a domain admin,

Re: Terminal Server Install mode

Elevate the shell before you run the command. On Apr 6, 2010, at 3:54 PM, "Tom Miller" wrote: > I haven't seen this before. > > I just built another server to add to my Terminal Server 2008 farm. > Logging in as a domain admin, when attempting to change to "install" > mode, I get a messag

Re: Terminal server 2003 + malware

> > Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile > -- > *From: *Jon Harris > *Date: *Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:48:47 -0400 > *To: *NT System Admin Issues > *Subject: *Re: Terminal server 2003 + malware > > If in rescue mode go with VIPRE Rescue. Keep in mind

Re: Terminal server 2003 + malware

What about data drive (document and settings) And program and files drive And suggestions Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -Original Message- From: Jon Harris Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:48:47 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Terminal server 2003 + malware If in rescue mode go

Re: Terminal server 2003 + malware

Thanks will also try Can it be run in safemode Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -Original Message- From: "Jackson, Jeff" Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:55:48 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Terminal server 2003 + malware If you run VIPRE Rescue with the /deep option, I

RE: Terminal server 2003 + malware

ssues Subject: Re: Terminal server 2003 + malware If in rescue mode go with VIPRE Rescue. Keep in mind it only does the boot drive. Jon On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:38 PM, mailto:jgarciaitl...@gmail.com>> wrote: Current av avast Beside a avast preboot scan. Spybot Superanti Malwarebytes And a

Re: Terminal server 2003 + malware

If in rescue mode go with VIPRE Rescue. Keep in mind it only does the boot drive. Jon On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:38 PM, wrote: > Current av avast > Beside a avast preboot scan. > Spybot > Superanti > Malwarebytes > And a antirootkit tools > > How else could I clean a terminal server? > What sh

RE: Terminal Server CAL's

http://blogs.msdn.com/rds/archive/2010/03/12/managing-lower-version-licenses -from-a-license-server-running-windows-server-2008-r2.aspx Webster From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org] Subject: Terminal Server CAL's W2K3 Terminal Server in Application mode Can I run the licensing

RE: Terminal Server CAL's

Perfect – thanks again. CFee From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org] Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 3:44 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Terminal Server CAL's Just purchase 2008 CALS and your 2003 server will recognize them. You just cannot use 2003 CALS on a 2008 s

RE: Terminal Server CAL's

AL’s. CFee From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org] Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 3:12 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Terminal Server CAL's Yes. My TS 2008 farm has a few 2003 servers for our legacy app and uses the 2008 licensing server for licenses. >>> Caro

RE: Terminal Server CAL's

Thanks. Just to clarify – the 2003 servers are using 2008 CAL’s as well ? It doesn’t seem to be possible to purchase 2003 CAL’s. CFee From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org] Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 3:12 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Terminal Server CAL's Yes.

Re: Terminal Server CAL's

Yes. My TS 2008 farm has a few 2003 servers for our legacy app and uses the 2008 licensing server for licenses. >>> Carol Fee 3/8/2010 3:01 PM >>> W2K3 Terminal Server in Application mode Can I run the licensing server on a W2K8 server and purchase and install W2K8 CAL’s ? In other words, a

RE: Terminal Server Q

We have this set up for two 2003 TS servers (NLB). We've found though that if one "dies", clients do not get automagically redirected, they get kicked off. If it's truly unresponsive upon reconnection they will get pointed at the other one. It also will only load balance based on the load num

RE: Terminal Server 2008 Question

Create a batch file and make it the webapp. The batch file would consist of something like: R:\%USERNAME%\application.exe From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:cbusitl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 1:18 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Terminal Server 2008 Question I have a ques

RE: Terminal Server 2008 Question

rs it. From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:cbusitl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 4:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Terminal Server 2008 Question Bummer There's got to be an easier way... Thanks guys On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Webster wrote: Logon scr

Re: Terminal Server 2008 Question

Bummer There's got to be an easier way... Thanks guys On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Webster wrote: > Logon script copies application.exe, if it does not already exist, to > the proper location. > > > > > > Webster > > > > *From:* Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:cbusitl...@gmail.com] > *Subj

RE: Terminal Server 2008 Question

Logon script copies application.exe, if it does not already exist, to the proper location. Webster From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:cbusitl...@gmail.com] Subject: Terminal Server 2008 Question I have a question. I have an application that when run on a TS server needs to run its own i

RE: Terminal Server 2008 Question

You could always write a script for something like this and have the script be the published app. It seems awkward, however. From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:cbusitl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 1:18 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Terminal Server 2008 Question I

Re: Terminal Server Q

setting up the server 'farm' in NLB is pretty straightforward , but bear in mind that NLB uses TCP/IP connectivity to determine availability. (most recent I've set this up is Win2003 ) NLB really doesn't look into CPU or application availability. On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:59 AM, David Lum wrote

Re: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment

We didn't experience any issues when we P2V'ed our Win2k TS box. If anything, it works a bit better. Put it on an ESX 3.5 box, no issues. Kurt On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 04:17, Chris Hamby wrote: > Thanks James. Just need some ammo for when we go to virtualize one of our > customer's TS boxes. > >

RE: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment

. Webster From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 9:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment Yup, older version, chisel no, but definitely the slide rule ;) When we finally do upgrade to the latest

RE: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment

: - From: David Lum david@nwea.org Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:17:17 -0800 To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment What does this mean: "partitions are not aligned to the underlying disk structure" ? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER

RE: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment

NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment Common to all P2V's are the danger that the partitions are not aligned to the underlying disk structure. 2003 and earlier did not default to a partition alignment that was raid-friendly and neither VMware Con

Re: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment

; came with chisel and slide rule to add your own notes… > > > > *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 22, 2009 6:58 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment > > > > W

Re: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment

December 22, 2009 6:56 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment > > > > Well, yeah, I'm pretty sure it was done correctly since we've been running > this setup for a year now with no issues.. > > On Tu

RE: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment

Your version is older, right Sherry? I think the instructions on yours came with chisel and slide rule to add your own notes... From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 6:58 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Terminal Server in a Virtual

RE: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment

es Subject: Re: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment Well, yeah, I'm pretty sure it was done correctly since we've been running this setup for a year now with no issues.. On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 8:48 AM, mse...@ont.com<mailto:mse...@ont.com> mailto:mse...@ont.com>>

Re: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment

ity XenAppPrep. > > > > > > Webster > > > > *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] > *Subject:* Re: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment > > > > We P2V'd one of our Citrix servers, then cloned it to make the other Citrix > servers in VMW

RE: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment

Sure hope you followed all the other things you have to do to a XenApp 4.x or 5 server before you cloned it. Almost all of that has been automated now with the new Citrix utility XenAppPrep. Webster From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Terminal Server in a

Re: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment

26searchID=16978426 > > > Original Message: > - > From: Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com > Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:23:54 -0600 > To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com > Subject: Re: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment > > > We P2V'd one of ou

Re: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment

Are you sure it was done correctly? http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX107406%26searchID=16978426 Original Message: - From: Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:23:54 -0600 To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: Terminal Server in a

Re: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment

build from scratch. > > Original Message: > - > From: Chris Hamby tellys...@gmail.com > Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:52:20 -0500 > To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com > Subject: Re: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment > > > What are the dangers o

Re: Terminal Server in a Virtual Environment

Same problems you would have if you imaged a TS box. Not relaiable if not done properly. Best to build from scratch. Original Message: - From: Chris Hamby tellys...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:52:20 -0500 To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: Terminal

  1   2   >