Re: [OAUTH-WG] Out-of-band code delivery and alternate redirect_uri schemes

2012-10-10 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
So you assume to use resource owner's address? Regards, Torsten. Pedro Felix schrieb: > > >> Hi Pedro, >> >> Am 10.10.2012 16:25, schrieb Pedro Felix: >>> 1) Out-of-band code transmission >>> >>> Currently Google OAuth2 implementation uses the special >"urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob" to signal

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Resource owner initiated OAuth delegation

2012-10-10 Thread Eve Maler
Ah, right. I think I got this more correct in my initial post than in this last one. Here's how I'd address this: RO Alice controls the access by client/requester Bob by virtue of consenting at access token issuance time in Prabath's proposal, vs. setting policies that direct an online service t

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Resource owner initiated OAuth delegation

2012-10-10 Thread zhou . sujing
Hi, Eve, The requester you described corresponds to Client in OAuth, so it is still client initiated delegation, not what Prabath wants. Eve Maler 2012-10-11 06:54 收件人 Prabath Siriwardena 抄送 zhou.suj...@zte.com.cn, "oauth@ietf.org WG" 主题 Re: [OAUTH-WG] Resource owner initiated OAuth de

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Resource owner initiated OAuth delegation

2012-10-10 Thread Eve Maler
Sure. We'll ultimately be publishing some case studies that will hopefully make this clearer, but the key place to start in the spec is here: http://docs.kantarainitiative.org/uma/draft-uma-core.html#r-h-attempt-access " The requester typically attempts to access the desired resource at the

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Out-of-band code delivery and alternate redirect_uri schemes

2012-10-10 Thread Pedro Felix
> Hi Pedro, > > Am 10.10.2012 16:25, schrieb Pedro Felix: >> 1) Out-of-band code transmission >> >> Currently Google OAuth2 implementation uses the special >> "urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob" to signal the Authorization Endpoint to return >> an HTML page with the code, instead of a redirect. At fi

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Resource owner initiated OAuth delegation

2012-10-10 Thread Prabath Siriwardena
Hi Eve, I have gone through UMA spec but failed to find any case which covers this scenario - in a resource owner initiated manner.. Can you please give some pointers..? Thanks & regards, -Prabath On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Eve Maler wrote: > There are a number of implicit actions happe

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Resource owner initiated OAuth delegation

2012-10-10 Thread Eve Maler
There are a number of implicit actions happening here that ideally should be accounted for. If Alice is the RO and Bob is operating the client, then when Bob accesses the protected resource it may not just be "on Alice's behalf" -- think of how people share calendar read/write access with other

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Out-of-band code delivery and alternate redirect_uri schemes

2012-10-10 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
Hi Pedro, Am 10.10.2012 16:25, schrieb Pedro Felix: 1) Out-of-band code transmission Currently Google OAuth2 implementation uses the special "urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob" to signal the Authorization Endpoint to return an HTML page with the code, instead of a redirect. At first sight, it seems

[OAUTH-WG] UMA Webinar on Oct 17th

2012-10-10 Thread Thomas Hardjono
FYI folks, There will be a free webinar on UMA in Higher Education on October 17th 2012. Info below. /thomas/ Webinar on UMA and Higher Education on Wednesday, October 17 Our next webinar is scheduled for Oct 17 at 8am PT! The topic is UMA and Higher Educ

Re: [OAUTH-WG] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-oauth-use-cases-02.txt

2012-10-10 Thread Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)
Thank you, Barry and Mike: I will make changes for the next version. Zachary -Original Message- From: barryleiba.mailing.li...@gmail.com [mailto:barryleiba.mailing.li...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 12:46 PM To: Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary) Cc: oau

Re: [OAUTH-WG] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-oauth-use-cases-02.txt

2012-10-10 Thread Barry Leiba
> Particularly, the authors are looking for advice with the use of the example > URLs. Following the guidance of RFC 2606, > > we have used “example” as the top level domain name (e.g., example.com). > This may mislead readers into thinking that all URLs belong to the same > organization. A general

Re: [OAUTH-WG] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-oauth-use-cases-02.txt

2012-10-10 Thread Mike Jones
You can use example.com, example.org, and example.net, if you think that would help. We do that in the OpenID Connect specifications. -- Mike From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Zeltsan, Zachary (

[OAUTH-WG] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-oauth-use-cases-02.txt

2012-10-10 Thread Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)
On behalf of the co-authors I have posted the draft. The main changes in the -02 version are the following: · Removal of the use case on re-delegation. (The case is too far from the present OAuth 2.0) · Clarification of the use case Device · Addition of a note for eac

[OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-use-cases-02.txt

2012-10-10 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : OAuth Use Cases Author(s) : George Fletcher Torsten Loddersted

[OAUTH-WG] Out-of-band code delivery and alternate redirect_uri schemes

2012-10-10 Thread Pedro Felix
1) Out-of-band code transmission Currently Google OAuth2 implementation uses the special "urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob" to signal the Authorization Endpoint to return an HTML page with the code, instead of a redirect. At first sight, it seems a good idea, however it isn't in the OAuth 2 RFC. a) Wha

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda for Atlanta Meeting

2012-10-10 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Hi Justin, Hi Torsten, We will take care of appropriate time management and agenda topics that have not seen enough presentation on the list will be postponed. In fact, I am concerned about the progress with the use cases document and the dynamic client registration work. I have notified the