On 11/09/2018 04:40 PM, Michael O'Brien wrote:
> Team,
>
> Noticed some of the clm reports are stale – not reflecting current
> state of dependency issues.
>
> This is usually fixed by the magic word “run-clm” – in a current merge.
>
> Issue is how do I kick of builds in all the repos
This looks like you may have something misconfigured for your origin
somehow.
You should be ending up with a URL that is:
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/tools/hooks/commit-msg
Note the inclusion of the /r/ before tools in the path?
You can manually do what git review is trying to do for the hook by
On 08/02/2018 02:09 PM, Michael O'Brien wrote:
> Weird question on my part – part of narrowing down jars are pushed to
> nexus.onap.org – which occurs on merges via the *-master-merge-java job
> that kicks in
>
>
>
> CLM job stands for ?
Greetings Michael,
Not so weird actually. CLM ==
On 06/21/2018 02:04 PM, rx1...@att.com via RT wrote:
> Dear Helpdesk,
>
> Can you tell me why Jira sometimes shows the Gerrit submission and
> sometimes not. I have not been able to identify a pattern to this.
> It seems to randomly work. This is a real productivity issue when we
> can't
On 05/03/2018 01:52 AM, Jaroslav Safka wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a question regarding nexus 2 and nexus 3. Is the nexus 2 still
> required, when we have the nexus 3?
>
> Are there any missing features in nexus 3?
>
> Thanks and have a nice day :)
Greetings Jaroslav,
Nexus 2 is still
On 02/23/2018 11:35 AM, HERNANDEZ-HERRERO, JORGE wrote:
> Hello,
>
> May be I missed communication, but if could you share some advice.
>
> I noticed that from 2/8, the staging repo, does not contain the daily
> release build artifacts
> (https://nexus.onap.org/content/repositories/staging/
>
On 01/09/2018 06:34 AM, Gary Wu via RT wrote:
>
> Tue Jan 09 09:34:10 2018: Request 50852 was acted upon.
> Transaction: Ticket created by gary.i...@huawei.com
>Queue: ONAP Helpdesk
> Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] maven artifacts
>Owner: Nobody
> Requestors:
On 11/28/2017 11:07 PM, Vitaliy Emporopulo wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> As a committer I’d say it should be enforced. Committers have tons of
> other work to do that cannot be automated.
>
>
>
> On the other hand, the problem with revert Alexis has pointed out must
> be solved. Probably by
elated to it bringing build instances online to clear.
>
> -Andy-
Greetings folks,
After poking the system some more and giving Jenkins a restart we've cleared up
the problem with the build instances not properly connecting. We have also
temporarily increased the maximum number of ins
ting if we need to actually give Jenkins a
restart to get an error we're seeing the logs which is related to it bringing
build instances online to clear.
-Andy-
--
Andrew Grimberg
The Linux Foundation
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
Greetings Morgan,
First, as ONAP is an open source project, please ask your questions out
in the public. Closed door discussions do not help the community. As
such, I've added the ONAP discuss list.
Second, global-jjb is an also open source and anyone can contribute to
it. The project generally
On 11/08/2017 11:23 AM, MAHER, RANDA wrote:
> Hello all…
>
> Since this is just a question and not an issue, I’m not going the help
> desk ticket route…Hope you can provide guidance on how we should proceed
> with below issue…Thanks, Randa
>
>
>
> APPC has many ccsdk artifacts as dependencies
There is no shell access available to any instances in the environment.
If you need to do any sort of troubleshooting but don't want to log out
to the archives, I suggest utilizing the sandbox and creating jobs that
output any extra diagnostics you want.
-Andy-
On 09/28/2017 08:18 AM, Gary Wu
On 09/28/2017 07:19 AM, Michael O'Brien wrote:
> DevOps team,
>
> Hi, noticed that we can’t view the settings on Jenkins jobs – is
> there a way to get read-only access – looks like a file-system-level
> access issue as the page content comes up empty – just curious
>
> Thank you
>
>
On 09/27/2017 09:09 AM, DeWayne Filppi wrote:
> Is there a way to "curl" archives from gerrit urls? Similar to github
> (which basically adds 'archive' to the path).
Greetings DeWayne,
Gerrit itself doesn't support archiving of the git repositories. That
being said, if you browse the project
m sure you're aware of with your
recent releases of oparent.
[0] https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Independent+Versioning+and+Release+Process
--
Andrew Grimberg
The Linux Foundation
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
ur
instance to be single use, otherwise work that you're testing in the sandbox
can impact other folks testing work.
-Andy-
--
Andrew Grimberg
The Linux Foundation
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
On 08/17/2017 04:52 PM, Lu, Lianhao wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I’m just want to if there is a way to retrigger a Jenkins job (e.g.
> xx-yy-zz-verity-python) without proposing a new patch set?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> -Lianhao
Greetings Lianhao,
To retrigger the verify job, just leave a comment on the
This work has now been completed.
-Andy-
On 08/17/2017 03:55 PM, Andrew Grimberg wrote:
> This work will be starting shortly.
>
> -Andy-
>
> On 08/15/2017 12:40 PM, Andrew Grimberg wrote:
>> What: The Linux Foundation will be performing a maintenance update on
>> the
This work will be starting shortly.
-Andy-
On 08/15/2017 12:40 PM, Andrew Grimberg wrote:
> What: The Linux Foundation will be performing a maintenance update on
> the ONAP Nexus3 server located at https://nexus3.onap.org
>
> When: Thursday August 17, 2017 @ 16:00 - 17:00 PDT (23:00
Note: Dropping the original message since it was all graphics. As an FYI
doing that instead of copy paste of terminal information makes it a lot
harder to do good replies.
Neeraj, the error that is in your issue is stating that you are getting
a connection time out to port 29418 which is the SSH
Greetings Gary,
On 08/16/2017 11:34 AM, Gary Wu via RT wrote:
> Resending since I didn't get a ticket number back for some reason last time.
Not certain why you didn't. The original ticket, which I've merged this
into is 44125
> From: Gary Wu
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2017 12:37 PM
> To:
What: The Linux Foundation will be performing a maintenance update on
the ONAP Nexus3 server located at https://nexus3.onap.org
When: Thursday August 17, 2017 @ 16:00 - 17:00 PDT (23:00 - 00:00 UTC,
07:00 - 08:00 CST)
Why: There are several outstanding updates that the Nexus3 system is
currently
Gary's changes have been merged in and the redis image has been built.
I've added a new minion template to allow the image to come online.
-Andy-
On 08/10/2017 09:55 AM, Gary Wu via RT wrote:
>
> Sorry about that. I’ve submitted a fix into ci-management:
> https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/7229/
On 08/10/2017 10:31 AM, DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM) wrote:
> My understanding was that when someone submits code for review, that
> committers automatically get email notification for it and also
> automatically get added to the list of reviewers. However, this has been
> inconsistent.
The ONAP
On 08/09/2017 07:10 AM, Guangrong Fu wrote:
> Hi integration team,
>
> Could you please have a look at the jenkins job below? They have been
> failing for a week.
>
> https://jenkins.onap.org/view/holmes/job/holmes-dsa-master-clm/1/console
> For this job, there's one fatal error:
>
> [FATAL]
On 08/08/2017 07:17 AM, Gary Wu via RT wrote:
> Hi helpdesk,
>
> Can you help? It seems that the redis minion is unavailable in Jenkins.
>
> Thanks,
> Gary
While the template has been merged, the ci-management job set that
creates the packer image still needs to be updated. After the job is
It's the same process we would follow for a single simultaneous release.
The difference is that each component would be (and presently ONAP does
this) producing their own staging repository.
So, the release is then a matter of identifying which repositories are
part of the release and doing the
g support was
> onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org
> Should this be retired in favor of helpd...@onap.org or do both work?
>
> Thanks, Randa
>
> -Original Message-
> From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org
> [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of
Greetings folks,
A survey was sent to the Gerrit mailing list yesterday soliciting
feedback from admins and users of Gerrit. If you want to possibly
influence changes to Gerrit here's your chance :)
It will take about 15 minutes to do.
https://google.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_0JKI9MBgY4eY4x7
Greetings folks,
I've been seeing a large uptick in unicast support requests directly to
myself or myself and other LF Release Engineers.
As an reminder, the LF Release Engineering team does not work on support
requests that are directed to our personal / corporate email. Support
requests _must_
On 07/16/2017 06:15 PM, Alexis de Talhouët wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was surprised to see one of my draft on SDC being publicly
> available. I thought those were private, or I haven't catch the notice
> that this project is making them visible.
> Is that true for all projects? Or just for SDC?
>
Greetings folks,
In an effort to improve inefficiencies across our managed projects The
Linux Foundation Release Engineering (LF RelEng) team has been working
on a couple of projects. These projects are global-jjb [0] and lftools
[1]. They are mirrored on GitHub at [2] and [3].
I'm making this
This work has now been completed.
-Andy-
On 06/20/2017 03:45 PM, Andrew Grimberg wrote:
> This work will be starting shortly. It is estimated to take about 30
> minutes.
>
> -Andy-
>
> On 06/20/2017 08:41 AM, Andrew Grimberg wrote:
>> The Linux Foundation has been made
This work will be starting shortly. It is estimated to take about 30
minutes.
-Andy-
On 06/20/2017 08:41 AM, Andrew Grimberg wrote:
> The Linux Foundation has been made aware of some extremely high priority
> security updates that will be getting released within the next 24 - 48
&
The Linux Foundation has been made aware of some extremely high priority
security updates that will be getting released within the next 24 - 48
hours. These updates are so critical that we will be taking immediate
outage windows to apply them when they become available.
This update will cause
here are not, then updating the job template to take a new
variable is something that can be done, but then all projects that are
using the template must be updated to pass a proper default so as to not
break the jobs.
-Andy-
> files: '**'
> archive-artifacts: ''
> build
On 05/25/2017 02:36 PM, Gary Wu wrote:
> That makes sense given that staging artifacts were supposed to exist
> only long enough to decide whether they're good to release or not;
> they were not meant to be used as long-lived build dependencies.
>
> I think the right thing to do is to move away
On 05/24/2017 11:34 AM, SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER) wrote:
>
>> On May 24, 2017, at 10:54 AM EDT, Gary Wu
>> wrote:
>>
>> 3) I understand that all the staging process was meant to be
>> temporary, and to add on Gary’s last question, what is the plan
>> moving forward and
First: requests to add proxies need to go to the helpdesk
(helpd...@onap.org)
Second: ONAP _already_ proxies ODL's release repository and the
odl-third-party repository. We _will not_ proxy the 'public' repo from
ODL as that's a repo group. If there is a specific repo that needs to be
proxied
On 05/04/2017 05:43 AM, Alon Strikovsky wrote:
> Guys thank you for your tips,
>
> One important things the we are missing is the */setting.xml/* that is
> assigned to each job.
>
> I cannot find any trace of how they are built.
>
> Any tips ?
>
>
>
> Alon
Greetings folks,
I'm attaching a
On 04/20/2017 04:05 PM, Brian Hedstrom wrote:
> I like using Slack and creating different slack channels as one option
> instead of email lists for general discussion type content. I prefer
> using the Wiki for discussions centered around artifacts as it puts the
> discussion thread at the bottom
On 04/20/2017 03:28 PM, Aimee Ukasick wrote:
> On 04/20/2017 02:44 PM, Ed Warnicke wrote:
>> Thinking outloud... it almost feels like mailing lists as a tool are no
>> longer a good fit to the need.
>>
>> Is there another tool we could consider using?
>>
> I personally like the idea of a
On 04/20/2017 09:46 AM, Ed Warnicke wrote:
> Josef,
>
> I couldn't agree more. Typically 'discuss' in most communities is for
> 'cross project' discussion. Project specific converstions tend to happen on
> ${project}-dev mailers (think dcae-dev, sdnc-dev, etc). For this to
> work, one needs
On 04/20/2017 08:52 AM, Aimee Ukasick wrote:
> Andy Grimberg - do you where I create a ticket to have projects added to
> the onap-discuss top categories?
helpdesk at onap.org which is the address for any sort of infrastructure /
managed configuration changes.
-Andy-
--
Andrew J Grimberg
Lead,
On 04/20/2017 07:32 AM, Brijesh Khandelwal wrote:
> Basic question:
> Why no community discussion forum?
>
> --Brijesh
We have the Questions module [0] for Confluence installed on the wiki.
This does act as a discussion forum. Admittedly, it doesn't look like
anyone is really using it yet,
On 04/18/2017 08:36 AM, Andrew Grimberg wrote:
> This morning at 09:41 ET we received an alert that the primary Nexus
> system for ONAP. This system hosts the maven repositories and
> documentation sites for ONAP projects.
>
> We have finally determined the cause of the issue
This morning at 09:41 ET we received an alert that the primary Nexus
system for ONAP. This system hosts the maven repositories and
documentation sites for ONAP projects.
We have finally determined the cause of the issue and are working on a fix.
-Andy-
--
Andrew J Grimberg
Lead, IT Release
On 03/30/2017 01:08 AM, Lu, Lianhao wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I used to be able to login https://gerrit.openecomp.org with my
> linux foundation ID. But from yesterday, I found that with the change
> to https://gerrit.onap.org , I can't access it any more. It reports
> the following error on the
49 matches
Mail list logo