Re: [onap-tsc] OOM gating resources

Hi Lincoln, Does the new lab will mandate the use of a VPN to connect to it or may we hope to have an access via an SSH gateway? The reason I’m asking that is because all the gating system is running on Azure today and then we need to access to the ONAP gating environments via SSH and then

[onap-tsc] [OOM] Ready to move to gitlab

Hello, Today we have merged the different files allowing us to move to gitlab. We still have a few things not working: * Pushing tests charts into onap-helm-testing repository * Pushing released charts into onap-helm-release (well, it also doesn’t work on Jenkins today, a ticket is

Re: [onap-tsc] [OOM] Move to gitlab (from Gerrit)

Hello, I'm fine with that __ I'll make a MR soon then Le 01/12/2021 12:01, « Krzysztof Opasiak » a écrit : Hi, On 30.11.2021 16:46, sylvain.desbure...@orange.com wrote: > Hello, > > as said during TSC meeting on November, 4th, plan was to start "move > process" from

[onap-tsc] [OOM] Move to gitlab (from Gerrit)

Hello, as said during TSC meeting on November, 4th, plan was to start "move process" from gerrit to gitlab one week after Istanbul release sign off. I've worked on a fake (actually forked) repo of OOM to prepare that (https://gitlab.com/sylvainOL/oom) and I'm able to validate the following

[onap-tsc] [OOM] is AWX used by a use case?

Hello, AWS chart is failing consistently for several days now. Before trying to resolve the problem, I'd like to know if there are use cases using it. If not, I then propose to remove it from OOM. Regards, Sylvain

[onap-tsc] [OOM and Integration][Gating and Dailies] Various issues are hurting our systems

Hello, since July 15th, we have a "grey error" in our datacenter: 5 to 10% of incoming ssh connections are failing into timeout. As a daily installation is more than 40 ssh connections and a gating more than 20, it's super hard to have them passed. Fortunately, Gating systems on Azure are not

[onap-tsc] [OOM] Request to move to gitlab

Hello, A year ago, we shared our pain on administrative tasks needed to be done as PTL. Since, few progresses have been made but we still have big issues on the CI part, at least in OOM perspective: * I'm trying to have a proper release management on OOM since December and despite 3 tickets

[onap-tsc] [OOM] Removal of "AAF SSHSM"

Hello, AAF is in maintenance mode. In AAF, we actually have 3 separate components: * AAF "authz" (the one used for retrieving certificates) * AAF "SMS" (the one used by OOF for now in order to store some sensitive datas) * AAF SSHSM which is not used AFAIK (it seems to configure TPM part but I

Re: [onap-tsc] [HONOLULU Release] Quick status after the weekend

please also note that "lost" dockers from nexus prevents us for doing gating now so we won't be able to make progress as long as we have this issue De : onap-tsc@lists.onap.org [onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] de la part de Sylvain Desbureaux via list

[onap-tsc] [HONOLULU Release] Quick status after the weekend

Hello, on TSC call, it was decided to wait up to Tuesday in order to see what's and what's not included in Honolulu. Here's the status: - SDNC Macro mode regression fix (https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/120429, https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/120828), merged on master (although I shouldn't

[onap-tsc] [OOM] Post mortem of passing Honolulu RC0 and consequences

Hello, M3/RC0/RC1 path has been long and painful this time, a bit like we had for Guilin release. >From my point of view, I see a conjunction of several issues: * gating that was not used properly by OOM team * random issues on important components (and gate system) that blurs result

Re: [onap-tsc] [IMPORTANT] OOM status update for RC0

Also note that after the break of OOM master branch these last weeks and in order to not break it again, we (the OOM committers) have decided to merge a patch only if the code is OK and if the following rules on gate result is met: * changed component must have its pods running * if the patch

Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP Dockerhub Update

Hi Kenny, it works as expected without rate limits! thanks again and now it's time for you to enjoy thanksgiving day! regards, Sylvain De : kp...@linuxfoundation.org [kp...@linuxfoundation.org] Envoyé : jeudi 26 novembre 2020 16:25 À : DESBUREAUX Sylvain

Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP Dockerhub Update

I've created it this morning europe time so I believe it wasn't :) thanks again and good thanksgiving! De : kp...@linuxfoundation.org [kp...@linuxfoundation.org] Envoyé : jeudi 26 novembre 2020 15:34 À : onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; onap-rele...@lists.onap.org Cc :

Re: [onap-tsc] [OOM] registry.hub.docker.com seems to need authentication now

De : onap-disc...@lists.onap.org [onap-disc...@lists.onap.org] de la part de Sylvain Desbureaux via lists.onap.org [sylvain.desbureaux=orange@lists.onap.org] Envoyé : vendredi 20 novembre 2020 08:55 À : onap-rele...@lists.onap.org; onap-disc...@lists.onap.org Cc : onap-tsc

Re: [onap-tsc] [OOM] registry.hub.docker.com seems to need authentication now

isc...@lists.onap.org] de la part de Sylvain Desbureaux via lists.onap.org [sylvain.desbureaux=orange@lists.onap.org] Envoyé : vendredi 20 novembre 2020 08:55 À : onap-rele...@lists.onap.org; onap-disc...@lists.onap.org Cc : onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org; Kenny Paul; jw

[onap-tsc] [OOM] registry.hub.docker.com seems to need authentication now

Hello, it seems (although some people had this particular issue long time ago) that "registry.hub.docker.com" needs now authentication in contrary to "docker.io" :-(. It wasn't the case at least a couple of weeks ago. Unfortunately, it's used in several places in OOM, for a lot of releases.

Re: [Onap-release] [onap-tsc] [ONAP][Gating] gating results are not displayed anymore on gerrit

Fyi I add an email from Andrew 15Min ago and he has provided a solution. It works again now Regards, --- Sylvain Desbureaux De : au nom de "Sylvain Desbureaux via lists.onap.org" Répondre à : DESBUREAUX Sylvain TGI/OLN Date : mardi 22 septembre 2020 à 16:43 À : "onap-tsc

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP][Gating] gating results are not displayed anymore on gerrit

n gerrit Dear all, This issue has been escalated to LF IT. Investigations are ongoing. I saw the e-mail from Morgan about Nexus and IT support ticket. Does anybody create a LF Ticket about Gerrit? Many thanks and regards Catherine From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org On Behalf Of Sylvain Desbureaux vi

[onap-tsc] [ONAP][Gating] gating results are not displayed anymore on gerrit

Hi, Since last update of gerrit, the user pushing results to gerrit has 401 Unauthorized errors. That means that gating tests are executed but we have no simple clue to see if it’s finished and look at the results. As we don’t have real time support in Europe Time Zone, I’m afraid we won’t be

Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-release] [Maintenance Release]Status Update

I can understand, that not everyone is using APPC, but I think, quite anyone is using Portal… Rgds, Damian http://nok.it/onap From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org On Behalf Of Sylvain Desbureaux via lists.onap.org Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 11:40 AM To: Martial ; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; onap-rele...@lists.o

Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-release] [Maintenance Release]Status Update

nPkLMfJujUc26Htzo6F0F6M=> From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of Sylvain Desbureaux via lists.onap.org Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 11:40 AM To: Martial mailto:gervais-martial.ngu...@intl.att.com&

Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-release] [Maintenance Release]Status Update

Hi Martial, OK ! thanks for fast answer! Sylvain De : onap-rele...@lists.onap.org [onap-rele...@lists.onap.org] de la part de Martial [gervais-martial.ngu...@intl.att.com] Envoyé : mercredi 22 juillet 2020 11:27 À : onap-tsc@lists.onap.org;

[onap-tsc] [OOM] PTL election results

Dear TSC members, All committers of OOM project have voted (https://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_3584830cbf9b0f18). I've been elected as PTL. Thanks OOM committers for their confidence. Best regards, Sylvain Desbureaux

Re: [onap-tsc] [OOM] Ask for new repo

, On behalf of the TSC, I have reviewed your request and I have approved it. Best regards Catherine From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org On Behalf Of Sylvain Desbureaux via lists.onap.org Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 2:00 PM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; infrastructure-coordina...@onap.org Cc: Krzysztof

[onap-tsc] [OOM] Ask for new repo

Dear TSC members and infrastructure coordinator, I'd like to create new repositories for OOM : oom/platform/keycloak oom/platform/cert-manager oom/platform/cert-service The two first are meant to host onap specific pre configuration for keycloak (https://www.keycloak.org/) and cert-manager

[onap-tsc] [Maintenance Release]Status Update

Hello, here's Monday status update for El Alto and Frankfurt Maintenance release. Fyi, I've no right to send emails to onap-tsc and onap-ptl, so I'm trying 'onap-release' channel. [El Alto] https://gerrit.onap.org/r/q/project:oom+status:open+branch:elalto All Proposed merge requests have been

[onap-tsc] [OOM] PTL election for 2020

Dear committers of OOM project, the self nomination phase for 2020 OOM PTL election is starting now. Please nominate yourself for the PTL role if you're interested. According to

[onap-tsc] [ONAP][AAF]Maintenance mode and consequences

Hello Catherine, David and Kenny, If I've understood well last TSC meeting, AAF is now on "maintenance" mode. Regarding REQ-361 (Continue hardcoded passwords removal, TSC Must Have as it's a continuation), we mandate ONAP components to retrieve

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP][Maintenance Releases] What's onboarded from an OOM point of view

Hello David, Here's my take on the two spreadsheet for OOM: El Alto: OOM-2361: @Mateusz, do you have some news on this one? OOM-2392: cause of OOM-2336 so "matched" All OOM "not

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP][Maintenance Releases] What's onboarded from an OOM point of view

Hello, If Ingress is also accepted as default deployment (it's for now in "PTL GO/NO GO" state), we (OOM team) can also create a template that would push the certificate on the ingress instead of pusing it on the component. Work to do that is not big although there's some. That's an approach

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] [ONAP][Maintenance Releases] What's onboarded from an OOM point of view

; /Morgan ________ De : onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> [onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] de la part de Sylvain Desbureaux via lists.onap.org [sylvain.desbureaux=orange@lists.onap.org] Envoyé : vendredi 10 juillet 2020 11:17 À : dmcbr

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] [ONAP][Maintenance Releases] What's onboarded from an OOM point of view

;https://jira.onap.org/browse/TEST-234> - Some corrections for vLB CDS: TEST-247<https://jira.onap.org/browse/TEST-247> /Morgan De : onap-tsc@lists.onap.org [onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] de la part de Sylvain Desbureaux via lists.onap.org [sylvain.de

[onap-tsc] [ONAP][Maintenance Releases] What's onboarded from an OOM point of view

Hi David and Catherine, Following yesterday's call, here's what I see from OOM code point of view on our maintenance releases. It's my view as of today, we may see new merge request coming, especially for the (not announced) Frankfurt Maintenance Release. # El Alto 24 commits have (will for

Re: [onap-tsc] New version 5.0.2 in parallel of 6.0.0?

e will also need to assess an update of the El Alto Release note for these > components. Yes sure! > Many thanks & regards > Catherine From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org On Behalf Of Sylvain Desbureaux via lists.onap.org Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 8:53 AM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Cc: onap-...@lists.o

[onap-tsc] New version 5.0.2 in parallel of 6.0.0?

Dear TSC members, We'll soon release 6.0.0 version of ONAP. During the last 6 monthes, "El alto" branch of OOM has received some commits: * 5 are certificates renewal * 4 are bug fixes * 2 are doc fixes * 1 is version upgrade (to follow official released version) I think it would be nice to

Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-usecasesub] REMINDER - Guilin Release - CALL FOR ACTION - Ends May 27th, 5 PM Pacific

Hi, As we discovered yesterday evening (europe time) that we filled our requirements at the wrong place, I decided to "just" set the title. I'll finish the work today and maybe tomorrow as it takes time and we also have an RC2 to pass ;) De :

Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-usecasesub] REMINDER - Guilin Release - CALL FOR ACTION - Ends May 27th, 5 PM Pacific

Please clarify. > > So by saying useless Sylvain was trying to ask "Why we need to put track > this in two different places instead of one?". > >> >> David >> >> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 9:21 AM Sylvain Desbureaux via lists.onap.org &

Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-usecasesub] REMINDER - Guilin Release - CALL FOR ACTION - Ends May 27th, 5 PM Pacific

Hi david, so https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Guilin+release+-+non-functional+requirements+proposed+list is useless? De : onap-tsc@lists.onap.org [onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] de la part de David McBride [dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org] Envoyé : mercredi 27 mai 2020

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] [OOM] Guilin Release Plan

to make sure we’re > tracking these requirements when we do our release planning for Guilin. > > Thanks! > > Dan > > *From: * on behalf of "Sylvain Desbureaux via > lists.onap.org" > *Reply-To: *"onap-...@lists.onap.org" , > "sylvain.desbure..

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] [OOM] Guilin Release Plan

ments when we do our release planning for Guilin. Thanks! Dan From: on behalf of "Sylvain Desbureaux via lists.onap.org" Reply-To: "onap-...@lists.onap.org" , "sylvain.desbure...@orange.com" Date: Monday, April 27, 2020 at 12:22 PM To: "onap-...@lists.onap.org

[onap-tsc] [OOM] Guilin Release Plan

Dear PTLs, dear TSC members, as RC0 is (almost) passed and Frankfurt branch will be soon created, I think it's important to share with you all the OOM release plan for Guilin. As you'll eventually push your changes in OOM, I think it's important that you know our plans. # TL;DR; * If you

Re: [onap-tsc] Gerrit usage too heavy with local HTTP calls

y have working well for us. If this is something the team wants to talk about, we can still bring it to a big audience and I can help gathering pros/cons of such migration. Thanks! Jess On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:27 AM Sylvain Desbureaux via lists.onap.org<http://lists.onap.org> m

Re: [onap-tsc] Gerrit usage too heavy with local HTTP calls

Maybe it could be wise to think about using directly github / gitlab rather than hosted gerrit / Jenkins no? > Le 23 avr. 2020 à 19:28, Krzysztof Opasiak via lists.onap.org > a écrit : > > Hi Jess, > > is there any chance to provide us list of IP addresses and some traffic > stats so that

[onap-tsc] ONAP and CNCF joint work

Hello, My name is Sylvain Desbureaux and I’m appointed by ONAP [1] as “CNCF coordinator”. ONAP is a project hosted by Linux Foundation Network and its goal is to deliver an orchestrator to deploy and manage xNF (network functions, a.k.a routers, firewall, DPI, IMS), x being P (Physical),

[onap-tsc] [OOM] Removing unactive contributors of OOM

Hello, INFO.yaml of OOM repos have several contributors that are not active anymore: * Hong guan: not active since march 2019 (https://gerrit.onap.org/r/q/reviewedby:hong.guan%2540att.com+project:oom) * Name: Hong Guan * Email: hg4...@att.com * Id:

[onap-tsc] [ONAP][OOM] new repository for readiness container

I would like to ask for the creation of a new repository related to the readiness check container I updated the page https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Resources+and+Repositories. this container is widely used inside OOM deployment but current generation is done on docker hub with credentials I

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] ONAP codebase license scan, Mar. 2020

Hello all, and thank you for the answers! Sorry for the delay, but here's the answer: all these components are required by at least one ONAP component in order to be run. So ONAP installer (OOM) explicitly "install" them (as docker image being pulled / run by Helm) I'm not sure I'm clear so

[onap-tsc] [OOM][Coronavirus] Containment in France and consequences

Hello all, Due to Coronavirus, most of us inside Orange are working remotely. It shouldn’t change a lot of thing, except some delays in our mails (VPN access will be a scarce resource…) and child care from time to time. Our apologies if the time to answer will be a bit longer than usual, we’ll do

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] ONAP codebase license scan, Mar. 2020

Hello, I’m fearing to open the pandora box but I have a question around the way we install ONAP: in https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Operations+Manager, I’ve listed all components that we used around ONAP in order to deploy ONAP. I’ve also tried to find per components (and I may have

Re: [onap-tsc] Please join the ONAP PTL meeting NOW!

I agree with Morgan, the meeting is in 27min as it’s UTC --- Sylvain Desbureaux De : RICHOMME Morgan TGI/OLN Date : lundi 9 mars 2020 à 14:32 À : "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" Cc : DESBUREAUX Sylvain TGI/OLN Objet : Re: [onap-tsc] Please join the ONAP PTL meeting NOW! Hi, I already mentioned it

[onap-tsc] [CNCF] liaison to CNCF in order to start working with them

Hello, I would like to send an email to CNCF on behalf of ONAP in order to start to engage discussion together. It would be addressed to Dan Kohn (director of CNCF), Cheryl Hung (Director of ecosystem) and Taylor Carpenter (one of the main developpers of CNF-testbed). It would be CCed to

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Integration] Request for 3 new repositories to manage baseline docker images

Sorry, bad reply all instead of reply :-/ --- Sylvain Desbureaux Le 22/11/2019 09:41, « onap-tsc@lists.onap.org au nom de Sylvain Desbureaux via Lists.Onap.Org » a écrit : J'aurais mis onap-java et onap-python perso --- Sylvain Desbureaux Le 21/11/2019 19:05

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Integration] Request for 3 new repositories to manage baseline docker images

J'aurais mis onap-java et onap-python perso --- Sylvain Desbureaux Le 21/11/2019 19:05, « onap-tsc@lists.onap.org au nom de Morgan Richomme via Lists.Onap.Org » a écrit : Hi XinHui I open a new ticket for the creation of 3 new repositories aiming to host Dockerfiles to

Re: [onap-tsc] [Fwd: Re: [ONAP] Gating evolution]

Hello, It's been: * 3 months since we asked for KaaS resources during DDF in Stockholm (and the approval from TSC and PTLs) * 2 months since we (re)asked LFN for the KaaS resources * 3 weeks since first technical discussion with Andrew * a week and a half since last email from LFN on this

Re: [Onap-arc] [onap-tsc] New SDC repositories request

» a écrit : On 08.07.2019 10:20, Sylvain Desbureaux via Lists.Onap.Org wrote: > Hello Kenny, > > If I may I think that “micro” repos are a better way to handle code in a > CI/CD world. Let’s take two examples: > > * SO: SO has (roughl

Re: [Onap-arc] [onap-tsc] New SDC repositories request

Hello Kenny, If I may I think that “micro” repos are a better way to handle code in a CI/CD world. Let’s take two examples: * SO: SO has (roughly) one project into ONAP git but delivers 13 containers. That means that 1 code change that should affect only one of the containers will rebuild