On 27/02/2012 Andre Fischer wrote:
Would it make sense to make localization a more continuous process? Like
adding a step to the build server to collect new strings daily or
weekly, upload them to the pootle server, and integrate any newly
translated strings?
It would be nice to have but not
Il 01/03/2012 11:49, Andre Fischer ha scritto:
On 29.02.2012 21:59, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 27/02/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 27/02/2012 Andre Fischer wrote:
It would help me, for example, if you could describe the localization
from you POV, like how you down- and later upload data
On 29.02.2012 21:59, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 27/02/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 27/02/2012 Andre Fischer wrote:
It would help me, for example, if you could describe the localization
from you POV, like how you down- and later upload data from/to the
pootle server. When do you start
On 27/02/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 27/02/2012 Andre Fischer wrote:
It would help me, for example, if you could describe the localization
from you POV, like how you down- and later upload data from/to the
pootle server. When do you start translation, how do you signal that you
have finished
2012/2/24 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com
Hi,
we move closer forward to our first release.
I would like to suggest that we focus on the following areas next week.
And I would like to propose the following schedule depending on the
progress we will make next week.
Monday: Feb.
On 2/26/12 12:40 PM, Michael Bauer wrote:
here we might run into a problem because of not having the translation
process in place 100%. We have to figure out which translation data is
the latest one, it's still not 100% clear if we really have it :-(
Well, for starters, why don't we get the
Hi Michael,
On 26.02.2012 12:40, Michael Bauer wrote:
here we might run into a problem because of not having the translation
process in place 100%. We have to figure out which translation data is
the latest one, it's still not 100% clear if we really have it :-(
Your mails arrive
Andre,
Your mails arrive out-of-thread and I have no idea who wrote the
sentence above. Could you check your mail client?That is a good idea.
Please go ahead.
The answer to your question is: I did not yet have time for it and
nobody else did it. Therefore you are welcome to do it.
-Andre
On 27.02.2012 14:03, Michael Bauer wrote:
Andre,
Your mails arrive out-of-thread and I have no idea who wrote the
sentence above. Could you check your mail client?That is a good idea.
Please go ahead.
The answer to your question is: I did not yet have time for it and
nobody else did it.
On 27/02/2012 Andre Fischer wrote:
It would help me, for example, if you could describe the localization
from you POV, like how you down- and later upload data from/to the
pootle server. When do you start translation, how do you signal that you
have finished translating and the uploaded data is
But this probably adds nothing to what you already know: in other
words, the code-Pootle conversions have always been black boxes
for translation teams.
Regards, Andrea.
Yes, that's (fortunately) been the case and should continue to be the case.
And I am a developer with limited knowledge
On 27.02.2012 15:55, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 27/02/2012 Andre Fischer wrote:
It would help me, for example, if you could describe the localization
from you POV, like how you down- and later upload data from/to the
pootle server. When do you start translation, how do you signal that you
have
Would it make sense to make localization a more continuous process?
Like adding a step to the build server to collect new strings daily
or weekly, upload them to the pootle server, and integrate any newly
translated strings?
Regards, Andre
Not on a daily basis. If you make things available for
Am Samstag, 25. Februar 2012 schrieb O.Felka :
Am 25.02.2012 01:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Feb 24, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Ross Gardlerrgard...@opendirective.com
wrote:
Without commenting on the dates, schedules and technical issues I
would urge you to make sure you allow significant time for
Am Samstag, 25. Februar 2012 schrieb Ross Gardler :
On 25 February 2012 05:36, Rob Weir rabas...@gmail.com javascript:;
wrote:
On Feb 24, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Without commenting on the dates, schedules and technical issues I
here we might run into a problem because of not having the translation
process in place 100%. We have to figure out which translation data is
the latest one, it's still not 100% clear if we really have it :-(
Well, for starters, why don't we get the Pootle server up and running,
enable all
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 05:36, Rob Weir rabas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 24, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com
wrote:
Without commenting on the dates, schedules and technical issues I
would
On 25 February 2012 05:36, Rob Weir rabas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 24, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Without commenting on the dates, schedules and technical issues I
would urge you to make sure you allow significant time for IP review
from mentors and
On 25 February 2012 07:54, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/24/12 11:04, Ross Gardler wrote:
Without commenting on the dates, schedules and technical issues I
would urge you to make sure you allow significant time for IP review
from mentors and the IPMC. I imagine this release will
Am 25.02.2012 01:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Feb 24, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Ross Gardlerrgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Without commenting on the dates, schedules and technical issues I
would urge you to make sure you allow significant time for IP review
from mentors and the IPMC. I imagine this
On 25 February 2012 16:56, O.Felka olaf-openoff...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 25.02.2012 01:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Feb 24, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Ross Gardlerrgard...@opendirective.com
wrote:
Without commenting on the dates, schedules and technical issues I
would urge you to make sure you allow
2012/2/24 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com
Hi,
we move closer forward to our first release.
I would like to suggest that we focus on the following areas next week.
And I would like to propose the following schedule depending on the
progress we will make next week.
Monday: Feb.
Hi,
we move closer forward to our first release.
I would like to suggest that we focus on the following areas next week.
And I would like to propose the following schedule depending on the
progress we will make next week.
Monday: Feb. 27th new dev snapshots
Monday: March 5th first RC
On 24/02/2012 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
And I would like to propose the following schedule depending on the
progress we will make next week.
Monday: Feb. 27th new dev snapshots
Monday: March 5th first RC candidate (based on the progress next week)
This is (of course) great and exciting news. I
Am 24.02.12 11:23, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
Hi,
we move closer forward to our first release.
I would like to suggest that we focus on the following areas next
week. And I would like to propose the following schedule depending on
the progress we will make next week.
Monday: Feb. 27th new
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
RC should be used indeed only if we think that it can be released, and
this depends on the progress ;-)
Perfect.
Note that https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118895 is still
not solved ...
here we might run into a problem because of not having the
On 2/24/12 12:40 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
RC should be used indeed only if we think that it can be released, and
this depends on the progress ;-)
Perfect.
Note that https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118895 is still
not solved ...
here we might run into a
On 24.02.2012 12:40, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
RC should be used indeed only if we think that it can be released, and
this depends on the progress ;-)
Perfect.
Note that https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118895 is still
not solved ...
here we might run into a
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:28:54 +0100
Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Raphael, you should keep in mind that we had a 3.4 beta already
last year. We have removed things or have replaced things. And
for both do we have tested it since weeks. If we figure further
critical issues
On 2/24/12 1:36 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:28:54 +0100
Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Raphael, you should keep in mind that we had a 3.4 beta already
last year. We have removed things or have replaced things. And
for both do we have tested it since weeks.
Without commenting on the dates, schedules and technical issues I
would urge you to make sure you allow significant time for IP review
from mentors and the IPMC. I imagine this release will get a great
deal of attention and, almost without a doubt, someone will come up
with something that needs to
On Feb 24, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Without commenting on the dates, schedules and technical issues I
would urge you to make sure you allow significant time for IP review
from mentors and the IPMC. I imagine this release will get a great
deal of
Hi Ross;
On 02/24/12 11:04, Ross Gardler wrote:
Without commenting on the dates, schedules and technical issues I
would urge you to make sure you allow significant time for IP review
from mentors and the IPMC. I imagine this release will get a great
deal of attention and, almost without a
33 matches
Mail list logo
