Am 05/04/2012 02:31 AM, schrieb Albino Biasutti Neto:
Hi.
2012/5/3 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
I've added it as candidate to this Wikipage:
https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/**
On 02.05.2012 19:27, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 5/2/12 6:04 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 2 May 2012 16:51, Pedro Giffunip...@apache.org wrote:
...
I have no idea if it's common for Podlings to have a successful
vote in their first attempt but I have to say this result highlights
the
Here is the correct link
http://people.apache.org/~af/poodle1024.jpg
Hi,
On 03.05.2012 10:24, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 02.05.2012 19:27, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 5/2/12 6:04 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 2 May 2012 16:51, Pedro Giffunip...@apache.org wrote:
...
I have no idea if it's common for Podlings to have a successful
vote in their first attempt but I
On 05/03/2012 01:27 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
Here is the correct link
http://people.apache.org/~af/poodle1024.jpg
nice to see he gets out to have some fun every once in a while! :)
--
MzK
Well, life has a funny way
Am 03.05.2012 04:49, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
Congratulations to all and thanks to Juergen, too. But the words are
not enough; what is, is use.
+1
Unfortunately, we can not use AOO in our productive environment because
of this silly bug: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118977
Am 05/03/2012 09:57 PM, schrieb Andreas Säger:
Am 03.05.2012 04:49, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
Congratulations to all and thanks to Juergen, too. But the words are
not enough; what is, is use.
+1
Unfortunately, we can not use AOO in our productive environment because
of this silly bug:
Hi.
2012/5/3 Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de
I've added it as candidate to this Wikipage:
https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/**
AOO+3.4.1+Feature+Planninghttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4.1+Feature+Planning
Marcus
One question?!
The Risto
Juergen et al, (*and I mean everyone*!),
This is so amazing. My 'hats', my 'Apache Hat', 'my IBM Hat', are off to
you guys. If I may be so direct as to say, we have come together in a new
way, fashioning the future from the past. This may sound simple, but it is
not. I think we can agree on this.
Congratulations! and thanks for all people who worked very hard/helped on
this great delivery! It's a success for this community, and a beginning of
our excitement in Apache.
When will we have 3.4 release formally announced/shared with others? Are
there any more work left before we announce it?
Juergen,
Good news to all of us!
When the publish will be finished? I'd like to try the download testing
with official build published.
Best regards,
Lily
2012/5/2 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com
The vote period for releasing Apache OpenOffice (incubator) RC1 has
concluded.
Nice work team.
On May 2, 2012, at 5:03 PM, Xia Zhao lilyzh...@gmail.com wrote:
Juergen,
Good news to all of us!
When the publish will be finished? I'd like to try the download testing
with official build published.
Best regards,
Lily
2012/5/2 Jürgen Schmidt
Hi.
2012/5/2 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com
The vote period for releasing Apache OpenOffice (incubator) RC1 has
concluded.
The ballot passed.
VOTE TALLY
+1:
IPMC members:
+1 Marvin Humphrey
+1 Dave Fisher
+1 Jim Jagielski
For reference see also the vote thread on
On 5/2/12 11:03 AM, Xia Zhao wrote:
Juergen,
Good news to all of us!
When the publish will be finished? I'd like to try the download testing
with official build published.
I will keep you informed
Juergen
Best regards,
Lily
2012/5/2 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@googlemail.com
The vote
Dear Jürgen,
I believe I had voted a +1 at Apr 23th but not counted, thought the
result will still be the same. Maybe it only count on ooo-dev list?
On 2012/05/02 19:37, Jürgen Schmidt said:
On 5/2/12 11:03 AM, Xia Zhao wrote:
Juergen,
Good news to all of us!
When the publish will be
On 5/2/12 3:57 PM, imacat wrote:
Dear Jürgen,
I believe I had voted a +1 at Apr 23th but not counted, thought the
result will still be the same. Maybe it only count on ooo-dev list?
exactly only the votes on ooo-dev were counted. The next time I will
post it on ooo-dev only to avoid
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
jogischm...@googlemail.com wrote:
The vote period for releasing Apache OpenOffice (incubator) RC1 has
concluded.
The ballot passed.
VOTE TALLY
+1:
IPMC members:
+1 Marvin Humphrey
+1 Dave Fisher
+1 Jim Jagielski
For reference see also
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
jogischm...@googlemail.com wrote:
The vote period for releasing Apache OpenOffice (incubator) RC1 has
concluded.
The ballot passed.
VOTE TALLY
+1:
IPMC
On 05/02/12 00:46, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
The vote period for releasing Apache OpenOffice (incubator) RC1 has
concluded.
The ballot passed.
VOTE TALLY
+1:
IPMC members:
+1 Marvin Humphrey
+1 Dave Fisher
+1 Jim Jagielski
For reference see also the vote thread on ooo-dev
On 2 May 2012 16:51, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
...
I have no idea if it's common for Podlings to have a successful
vote in their first attempt but I have to say this result highlights
the determination and impecable work done by the group.
+1 (it is not common)
Ross
--
Ross
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1
On 2 May 2012 16:51, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
...
I have no idea if it's common for Podlings to have a successful
vote in their first attempt but I have to say this result highlights
On 2012/05/03 00:04, Ross Gardler said:
On 2 May 2012 16:51, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
I have no idea if it's common for Podlings to have a successful
vote in their first attempt but I have to say this result highlights
the determination and impecable work done by the group.
+1.
On May 2, 2012, at 9:04 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 2 May 2012 16:51, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
...
I have no idea if it's common for Podlings to have a successful
vote in their first attempt but I have to say this result highlights
the determination and impecable work done by
While we're all thrilled about this, I have to ask us to keep this
information to ourselves until we formally announce next week. To
prematurely announce this publicy will be unhelpful to our overall goals of
managing the user experience for downloading and equally important the
extent to which we
On 5/2/12 6:04 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 2 May 2012 16:51, Pedro Giffunip...@apache.org wrote:
...
I have no idea if it's common for Podlings to have a successful
vote in their first attempt but I have to say this result highlights
the determination and impecable work done by the group.
2012/5/2 Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com:
YAY! Much thanks and applause to our release manager, Juergen and many
others who made this a reality!
Juergen did a incredible work studing all process and giving attention
for all (i don't know from where he found time!). ;-)
And congratulation for
Hi.
2012/5/2 Claudio Filho filh...@gmail.com
2012/5/2 Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com:
YAY! Much thanks and applause to our release manager, Juergen and many
others who made this a reality!
Juergen did a incredible work studing all process and giving attention
for all (i don't know from
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Albino Biasutti Neto biasut...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi.
2012/5/2 Claudio Filho filh...@gmail.com
2012/5/2 Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com:
YAY! Much thanks and applause to our release manager, Juergen and many
others who made this a reality!
Juergen did
Hi.
2012/5/2 Donald Harbison dpharbi...@gmail.com
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Albino Biasutti Neto biasut...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi.
2012/5/2 Claudio Filho filh...@gmail.com
2012/5/2 Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com:
YAY! Much thanks and applause to our release manager, Juergen
On 05/02/2012 01:27 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 5/2/12 6:04 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 2 May 2012 16:51, Pedro Giffunip...@apache.org wrote:
...
I have no idea if it's common for Podlings to have a successful
vote in their first attempt but I have to say this result highlights
the
Congratulations to all and thanks to Juergen, too. But the words are
not enough; what is, is use.
To that end, I've used the Mac version (and also Linux, though less
so) daily, and it has been great. I've also used it with Google Docs,
with Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac, with Calligra (KOffice)
The vote period for releasing Apache OpenOffice (incubator) RC1 has
concluded.
The ballot passed.
VOTE TALLY
+1:
IPMC members:
+1 Marvin Humphrey
+1 Dave Fisher
+1 Jim Jagielski
For reference see also the vote thread on ooo-dev
congratulations!
2012/5/2 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com
The vote period for releasing Apache OpenOffice (incubator) RC1 has
concluded.
The ballot passed.
VOTE TALLY
+1:
IPMC members:
+1 Marvin Humphrey
+1 Dave Fisher
+1 Jim Jagielski
For reference see also the vote
: Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:01:15 -0700
What does release-candidate voting at the Apache OpenOffice podling mean?
Is it is just an assessment of support/sentiment, or is there more
+1
Andre
On 21.04.2012 08:58, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release
for Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to continue the success of
OpenOffice.org.
This
On 25.04.2012 04:18, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Apr 24, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Dave Fisherdave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:21 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
[...]
(3) When building from source there was no warning about the inclusion of
Hi,
+1
Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating)
Le 21 avr. 12 à 02:58, Jürgen Schmidt a écrit :
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first
incubator release for Apache OpenOffice
+1 for the Release
Am 21.04.12 02:58, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release
for Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to continue the success of
: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 17:58
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; ooo-priv...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1
[ ... ]
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4
-1 (nobody)
For Finnish package only.
Reason:
http://www.saunalahti.fi/rjaaskel/Kuvat/Tulostaikkuna.jpg
Print dialog/window is working but it is so wide that it needs two screen (over
2000 pixel).
So if Finnish is dropped out now and published with next minor version if there
is possible
Hi,
Fetched r1327774, built and checked win pro version and mac version,
played around with both.
Looks fine, no bigger problems found
+1
On 21.04.2012 02:58, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
OpenOffice 3.4
HI.
2012/4/24 Risto Jääskeläinen rjaas...@saunalahti.fi
-1 (nobody)
For Finnish package only.
Reason:
http://www.saunalahti.fi/**rjaaskel/Kuvat/Tulostaikkuna.**jpghttp://www.saunalahti.fi/rjaaskel/Kuvat/Tulostaikkuna.jpg
Print dialog/window is working but it is so wide that it needs two
2012/4/24 Risto Jääskeläinen rjaas...@saunalahti.fi:
-1 (nobody)
For Finnish package only.
Reason:
http://www.saunalahti.fi/rjaaskel/Kuvat/Tulostaikkuna.jpg
Print dialog/window is working but it is so wide that it needs two screen
(over 2000 pixel).
So if Finnish is dropped out now and
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating)
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
+1
Rebuilt and tested r1327774 for Win/Mac/Linux for English and German.
This productivity suite is something we can be proud of.
Herbert
+1 (PPMC)
Tested Linux x86-64 on Fedora 16 and Windows version on Vista
Best regards,
Carl
On 04/20/2012 08:58 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release
for
Hi,
I'm a longtime user of StarOffice and OpenOffice and participated many
years in d...@de.openoffice.org and in testing OOo and will continue this
with AOO.
Am 23.04.2012 16:09, schrieb Juergen Schmidt:
...
The download page should at least mention that this installation set
will
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:21 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
snip
You snipped out the important part:
Sorry, thought you
Hi Günter,
Guenter Marxen schrieb:
Hi,
I'm a longtime user of StarOffice and OpenOffice and participated many
years in d...@de.openoffice.org and in testing OOo and will continue this
with AOO.
You are welcome.
[..]
When the feature to replace the old version in any case was introduced
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:21 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
Guenter Marxen wrote:
OOo installing with param -a or /a was a means to use a new version
(without system integration on Windows) parallel to the old.
I hope that this is also possible with OOo 3.4 and later with AOO 4. Can
anybody confirm this?
I've been reported so, but I didn't check
Hi Andrea,
Andrea Pescetti schrieb:
Guenter Marxen wrote:
OOo installing with param -a or /a was a means to use a new version
(without system integration on Windows) parallel to the old.
I hope that this is also possible with OOo 3.4 and later with AOO 4. Can
anybody confirm this?
I've been
+1
Marcus
Am 04/21/2012 02:58 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release
for Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to continue the success of
OpenOffice.org.
+1 (binding IPMC and PPMC)
Regards,
Dave
On Apr 20, 2012, at 5:58 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release for
Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to
+1
Kind regards
Regina
Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4
(incubating).
The vote starts now and will be open until:
UTC midnight Wednesday, 25 April: 2012-04-25 24:00 UTC.
After the vote of the PPMC the vote will start on
Thanks, Regina and Andrea,
Am 24.04.2012 21:30, schrieb Regina Henschel:
Hi Andrea,
Andrea Pescetti schrieb:
Guenter Marxen wrote:
OOo installing with param -a or /a was a means to use a new version
...
mind that if you are going to share your profile among different
versions (which will
+1
On 4/20/2012 5:58 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4
(incubating).
The vote starts now and will be open until:
UTC midnight Wednesday, 25 April: 2012-04-25 24:00 UTC.
After the vote of the PPMC the vote will start on
On 21/04/2012 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4
(incubating).
+1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating)
Regards,
Andrea.
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 08:58:24AM +0800, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator
release for Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to continue the
success of
Hi.
My vote:
[ X ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating)
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
The finished vote AOO in RC1 [1]. Officially Apache OpenOffice RC1? Thanks.
1 -
On 4/21/12 8:58 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release
for Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to continue the success of
OpenOffice.org.
This release
+1
2012/4/25 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com
On 4/21/12 8:58 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release
for Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone
Hi,
+1
I have successfully build on Windows 7. I am using the RC and former developer
snapshots in my daily work. Everything works fine for me.
Best regards, Oliver.
On 21.04.2012 02:58, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
+1
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
+1
I have successfully build on Windows 7. I am using the RC and former
developer snapshots in my daily work. Everything works fine for me.
Best regards, Oliver.
On 21.04.2012 02:58,
+1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating)
Thanks,
khirano
2012/4/21 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release for
Apache
Hi, +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) , build
use RC in my daily work.
Thanks
2012/4/21 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first
Hi, me too.
+1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating)
From: ZuoJun Chen zjchen...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:35:22 +0800
Hi, +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) , build
El día 21 de abril de 2012 02:58, Jürgen Schmidt
jogischm...@googlemail.com escribió:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release for
Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to continue the
2012.04.21. 2:58 keltezéssel, Jürgen Schmidt írta:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release
for Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to continue the success of
OpenOffice.org.
This
+1 PPMC non-binding.
On Friday, April 20, 2012, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release for
Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to continue the success of
Hi,
the MD5SUM of the German Windows installation set does not fit to the
MD5SUM stored at
http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo34-rc/rc1/windows/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_de.exe.md5
C:\downloadsmore
Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_de.exe.md5
Hi,
seems to be fine after the download has been initiated using wget.
Sorry for the confusion...
the MD5SUM of the German Windows installation set does not fit to the
MD5SUM stored at
Hi.
2012/4/22 Claudio Filho filh...@gmail.com
Hi
2012/4/22 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org:
Blog post:
http://www.escritoriolivre.org/artigo/extens%C3%B5es-no-apache-openoffice
This is Luiz, our old OOo/BrOo user group leader in Brazil.
snip
And how
we haven't a brazilian portuguese
On 23/04/2012 Joost Andrae wrote:
the installation wipes-out OOo 3.3 although I installed it into a
different directory.
We had the same report in Italian tests, but we considered it normal (a
stable version will remove the older version, and anyway removing 3.4 to
go back to 3.3 will leave
On Monday, 23. April 2012 at 21:54, Joost Andrae wrote:
Hi,
the installation wipes-out OOo 3.3 although I installed it into a
different directory. I had to deactivate Norton Sonar for the setup.exe
file because it quarantained setup.exe due to excecution of a second
thread within the
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Joost Andrae joost.and...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
the installation wipes-out OOo 3.3 although I installed it into a different
directory. I had to deactivate Norton Sonar for the setup.exe file because
it quarantained setup.exe due to excecution of a second thread
+1 (PPMC, binding)
and ditto Pedro's and Rob's comments on we should be proud.
I installed and ran some tests with the 32-bit Linux RPM binary.
I had been using a developer build since Apr 4 (can't note the svn release
number at the moment), and things were looking pretty good then to me.
+1
--
Bye,
Yuri Dario
/*
* OS/2 open source software
* http://web.os2power.com/yuri
* http://www.netlabs.org
*/
I downloaded a Mac image from
http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo34-rc/rc1/macos/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg;
and ran it on Mac OS X 10.6.8. I tried to open my docuemnts(odt / odp /
ods), edit them and saved them. AOO3.4 works well.
So I vote +1. Thanks!
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
OK, I have a question on this one. MUST we download and build or can we vote
on an already built (binary) version? There was some discussion about this,
and, yes, there are notes about this on general information
+1 (PPMC)
On 22 April 2012 00:01, Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net wrote:
+1 (PPMC)
NB: installed the 64bit DEB on Ubuntu 11.10, no problem for the moment.
Thanks for this code release!
Hagar
Le Sat, 21 Apr 2012 08:58:24 +0800, Jürgen Schmidt
jogischm...@googlemail.com a écrit :
El día 22 de abril de 2012 16:51, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org escribió:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
OK, I have a question on this one. MUST we download and build or can we vote
on an already built (binary) version? There was some discussion
On 04/22/2012 08:05 AM, RGB ES wrote:
El d�a 22 de abril de 2012 16:51, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org escribi�:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
OK, I have a question on this one. MUST we download and build or can we vote
on an already built
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Jürgen Schmidt
jogischm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release for
Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to continue the
On Apr 22, 2012, at 7:51 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
OK, I have a question on this one. MUST we download and build or can we vote
on an already built (binary) version? There was some discussion about this,
and,
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 7:51 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
OK, I have a question on this one. MUST we download and build or can we vote
on an already
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
snip
You snipped out the important part:
The SDK and Binaries are missing the DISCLAIMER file. Is a missing Incubation
DISCLAIMER in a binary package enough to prevent release? I think probably not,
but this may be an edge case. The application
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
snip
You snipped out the important part:
Sorry, thought you answered your own question there. But since you
bring it up, there is no requirement for a DISCLAIMER file.
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
snip
You snipped out the important part:
Sorry, thought you answered your own question there. But since you
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
snip
You snipped out the important part:
On Monday, 23. April 2012 at 04:29, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47
Hi.
2012/4/22 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
Hi
2012/4/22 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org:
Blog post:
http://www.escritoriolivre.org/artigo/extens%C3%B5es-no-apache-openoffice
This is Luiz, our old OOo/BrOo user group leader in Brazil. And how
we haven't a brazilian portuguese list here, i started the work
(localization and some tests) in
Installed the windows EN build on my WinXP, tried to work on my
documents/presentations (created by Symphony) with no problem. And
installed IBM Connections extension successfully...
I'm quite satisfied with the RC build. So...
+1
- Simon
2012/4/21 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com
=0, abstain (PPMC)
-Original Message-
From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 17:58
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; ooo-priv...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1
[ ... ]
Please vote
@incubator.apache.org; ooo-priv...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1
[ ... ]
This release candidate provides the following important key changes
compared to former OpenOffice releases:
(1) Code clean up to remove all copyleft components and external
dependencies
OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release
for Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to continue the success of
OpenOffice.org.
[ ... ]
For a detailed feature
:01
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: 'xia zhao'; ooo...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1
[ ... ]
PARTICIPATE IN QUALITY-ASSURANCE COVERAGE OF THE CANDIDATE
It is valuable to download the source code and confirm that binaries can
+1 (PPMC)
I think in it's current state the code has the level
required to be considered the qualified successor of
OpenOffice.org.
Considering the size of the task I want to congratulate
our developers and the Apache infra team for working so
hard to make this wonderful release in such a short
+1 (PPMC)
NB: installed the 64bit DEB on Ubuntu 11.10, no problem for the moment.
Thanks for this code release!
Hagar
Le Sat, 21 Apr 2012 08:58:24 +0800, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com
a écrit :
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
[mailto:jogischm...@googlemail.com] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012
17:58 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org;
ooo-priv...@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache
OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
