> How much of the work do you think could be used in an open
> MotoMAGX/OpenLimo kernel? At least here in the US, the only EZX phone
> that is still easy to get is the A1200e. (The MotoMAGX V8 and Z6 are
> readily available.)
>
I haven't had a hard time at all getting an A780 in the US recentl
>
> From: Antonio Ospite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 18:31:33 +0200
> Subject: Re: Which of the EZX phones should OpenEZX
> focus on in the future?
>
>> On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 08:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
>> Patrick Roberts <
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Paul Jimenez wrote:
Not to be to obvious, but Openezx should focus on whichever phone the
devs want to focus on. For instance, if I were to do work, it would all
be slanted toward making my A780 more functional, since that's what I
own. I suspect most devs are the same: they
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 08:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
Patrick Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From what I understand, MotoMAGX is very close if not
> identical to what LiMo's OS will be. Targeting this
> iteration of EZX casts the OpenEZX net wider than just
> Motorola.
>
> See:
> http://wiki.open
>From what I understand, MotoMAGX is very close if not
identical to what LiMo's OS will be. Targeting this
iteration of EZX casts the OpenEZX net wider than just
Motorola.
See:
http://wiki.openezx.org/Other_Linux_Phones#LiMo_Foundation
...Which is great, because Motorola is in turmoil.
Be
Not to be to obvious, but Openezx should focus on whichever phone the
devs want to focus on. For instance, if I were to do work, it would all
be slanted toward making my A780 more functional, since that's what I
own. I suspect most devs are the same: they're going to work to support
hardware they
> Better support for whatever type of phone only happends if somebody
> stands up and does the work. None of the devs have all phones so he
> can only work on the onces he has.
btw, I am willing to do anything that is non destructive (e.g. I dont want
the risk of flashing an untried bootloader an
Hello.
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 16:17, Konstantin Svist wrote:
>
> Switching focus to other phones/platforms would pretty much mean nothing
> practical will ever come of the project :(
While I like to see some traffic again on this ml this thread must be
more seen as a proposal instead of a decisi
Justin Treon wrote:
Dear OpenEZX,
I think that it is important to have more than just the FIC FreeRunner as a
development platform. Phones like the Rokr E2 seem very important to me since
it is
a candy bar phone with no touch screen. Which of the EZX phones should OpenEZX
focus on in the
> On the other hand...is moto going to be around in then next few years? They
> continue to make huge blunders in the phone market. Maybe the EZX platform
> should just die.
I do not think that Moto wireless will be going away, but the brand name may
change.
Their high end phones missed the mark
On the other hand...is moto going to be around in then next few years? They
continue to make huge blunders in the phone market. Maybe the EZX platform
should just die.
My E2 has the worst reception of any phone I've ever used.
Jae
Hi,
Jonathan Wilson schrieb:
> My vote also goes to the MOTOMAGX phones. They are the only linux phones
> still being made by moto. The kernel is a 2.6.x kernel and if a method
> can be found to overcome the signature checks, it should be fairly
> simple to migrate up to a newer kernel. The tricky
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:54:03 +0100
"Michael 'Mickey' Lauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are 6 million EZX devices out there lusting for a software
> update. If we manage to focus on A780 and A1200 to show that 'we can
> do it', I'm very sure that we can attract lots of new developers.
>
Hi
There are 6 million EZX devices out there lusting for a software update. If we
manage to focus on A780 and A1200 to show that 'we can do it', I'm very sure
that we can attract lots of new developers.
My view is that kernel-wise we're 80% there -- please correct me if that's
wrong. For userland
bar phone with no touch screen. Which of the EZX phones should
> OpenEZX
> focus on in the future? I would like to hear the option of anyone
> interested.
>
> Justin
I am not a developer, just an interested party/lurker, but I thought
I'd add my comments to give another POV.
My vote also goes to the MOTOMAGX phones. They are the only linux phones
still being made by moto. The kernel is a 2.6.x kernel and if a method can
be found to overcome the signature checks, it should be fairly simple to
migrate up to a newer kernel. The tricky part will again be the various
us
f you are not a totally smart guy that brings in a) a partly
re-written UI or b) an abstraction which choose some different widgets
on TS or keybpad in realtime.
But back to your main question.
> Which of the EZX phones should OpenEZX focus on in the future?
Let me say jehova. First we need som
Dear OpenEZX,
I think that it is important to have more than just the FIC FreeRunner as a
development platform. Phones like the Rokr E2 seem very important to me since
it is
a candy bar phone with no touch screen. Which of the EZX phones should OpenEZX
focus on in the future? I would like to
18 matches
Mail list logo
