On Friday, March 28, 2014 07:05 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 01:06:00PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
Running oi -b 151_a8
I'm having a problem with smb/server in that it falls into
maintenance mode and logs say:
[...]
smbd: kernel bind error: Address already in use
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 11:22 AM, Geoff Nordli wrote:
On 14-02-12 06:55 PM, Carl Brewer wrote:
On 13/02/2014 12:27 PM, Geoff Nordli wrote:
Hi Carl.
I have a few OI+VBox boxes in production right now and I haven't
experienced any networking failure. The only part isn't supported is
Okay so it is standard on Linux but why do we need that piece of broken
crap from Lennart Poettering after he's had his fun? What next? systemd?
On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 03:13 PM, real-men-dont-cl...@gmx.net
wrote:
Hello everybody,
did anybody try to compile pulseaudio for OI, so
samba is 3.5.21?
There is a threading problem with the entire 3.5.x series that is gone
in 3.6.x. https://www.illumos.org/issues/2172
Ira Cooper hinted at that too when I got his attention.
I'll stay put with my a7 and my samba 3.6.x build.
On Monday, August 12, 2013 10:28 PM, Dmitry
On Wednesday, July 24, 2013 03:18 AM, CJ Keist wrote:
Yes, that would be the case. I'm looking at EMC iSCSI storage unit. So
it's pretty much the same case that I have with our current OI system
using Raid controller to present one single volume to create a ZFS
file system on correct? There is
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 06:12 AM, Alberto Picón Couselo wrote:
Hi, there.
I would like to know if MS Active Directory integration is supported
in OpenIndiana and which is the best way to provide ZFS filesystem to
Windows Servers.
user database integration possible with samba or user
On Friday, July 12, 2013 09:27 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
On 2013-07-12 06:28, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Friday, July 12, 2013 11:29 AM, Geoff Nordli wrote:
On 13-07-11 07:25 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
On a side note, you can always make ZFS snapshots via filesystem
interface mkdir $dataset/.zfs
On Friday, July 12, 2013 03:48 AM, James Carlson wrote:
The sole purpose to me is to support a couple of ugly legacy Windoze
systems, and the less time I spend thinking about it, the better.
So if you don't really care about serving CIFS, it wouldn't really
matter to you that they'd come
On Friday, July 12, 2013 11:29 AM, Geoff Nordli wrote:
On 13-07-11 07:25 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
On 2013-07-12 02:43, Geoff Nordli wrote:
The FSRVP could initiate a snapshot from the windows machine. Right
now
the windows machine consumes snapshots via the previous versions from
snapshots
On Thursday, July 04, 2013 02:59 AM, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Jul 3, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Roel_D wrote:
Did the Cisco manager do a reboot of the router after you switched servers?
If the router had rather long ARP and DHCP caching then it wouldn't give your
OI server new addresses
On Thursday, July 04, 2013 02:49 AM, Robbie Crash wrote:
Technically supported. I personally wouldn't trust ... and your complaint
adds validation to my superstition.
I personally configure samba to not join any windows domain. Just have
local user accounts inside the samba box. Manage all
Hi Peter,
On Thursday, July 04, 2013 10:40 AM, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
Off list.
Yeah, we do tend to get things done, but not in a very pretty manner! LOL
My spine is collapsing upon itself. Next month will be eleven years of
continuous nausea, and anywhere from moderate to
Whoops, yes, I thought it was addressed to Peter. Sorry.
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
On Tuesday, July 02, 2013 09:53 AM, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Jul 1, 2013, at 6:21 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Wait, what do you mean by the gateway ip is the same as your nic address?
What I meant is that the Gateway on line three says 192.168.0.4, and that is
also the IP
On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 07:45 AM, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have to call it a day. I appreciate all the help, everyone! I
appreciate it very much! Thank you. Peter,
You are almost there Peter. There are now two things you can choose
from. 1) Use a dns caching resolver (like
On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 08:56 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, July 02, 2013 09:53 AM, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Jul 1, 2013, at 6:21 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Wait, what do you mean by the gateway ip is the same as your nic
address?
What I meant is that the Gateway
Wait, what do you mean by the gateway ip is the same as your nic address?
If you cannot ping 8.8.8.8 then you have a routing problem. I don't know
what kind of setup you have got but I'd usually assign Internet
addresses directly to the server and not assign private addresses and
then use
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 12:15 AM, James Relph wrote:
All the rest is good but that crle line - ugh.
Ignore that, I should have deleted it out. I was using that while trying to
sort out the LDFLAGS bit, but it's not necessary.
One thing in terms of the LDFLAGS line actually that you might
On Monday, June 24, 2013 06:51 PM, James Relph wrote:
What do you get when you do wbinfo -a user or wbinfo -k user?
Plaintext and Kerberos authentication succeeds, but challenge-response doesn't
for some reason. Not sure if that's related?
Depends I guess. I have the same results but things
On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 08:21 AM, James Relph wrote:
Depends I guess. I have the same results but things work over
here...but then I did build a patched version of samba and I don't
just run vanilla samba like what csw built.
I tried the same approach myself but ran into a problem
Wow, just when I was looking for a new box to add too. I already have
the older 36 drive 4U box but they have managed to double the capacity
in 4U of space in less than five years and with 3.5 drives too?
Have you tried this Saso? Illumos runs on that board and with the
onboard SAS
On Monday, June 24, 2013 07:24 AM, James Relph wrote:
Yep, if I setup other PAM bits I can login via (for instance) SSH, and
netatalk worked pretty much straight away. I'll bring this up on the
samba lists and see if anyone has any ideas. Samba4 is working pretty
well, so that might be an
On Monday, June 24, 2013 10:24 AM, Jan Owoc wrote:
Hi,
I'm running a home NAS using OI 151a7 server (vs. desktop). I was
thinking of running Ubuntu Server in a virtual machine on OI, ideally
configured to startup/shutdown when OI starts/shuts down. I can
connect a monitor to the machine, but it
On Saturday, June 15, 2013 04:41 PM, axelle_apvri...@yahoo.fr wrote:
As for CUPS, I've had limited experience with it; I know that beside
standard (packaged with CUPS) drivers, there are also projects like
foomatic and Gutenprint which provide additional drivers, and CUPS
allows to use them. You
On Friday, June 14, 2013 08:20 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
As for CUPS, I've had limited experience with it; I know that beside
standard (packaged with CUPS) drivers, there are also projects like
foomatic and Gutenprint which provide additional drivers, and CUPS
allows to use them. You might try to
On Monday, June 10, 2013 03:20 PM, Stefan Müller-Wilken wrote:
Hi Gordon,
In case anyone wonders, updating components in userland
(or any of its derivatives like oi-build or whatever) requires
more than just getting the updated code to build. Someone
has to test it (assuming you want the
On Sunday, June 09, 2013 05:57 PM, ken mays wrote:
Stefan,
Samba 3.5.21 binary package is in the OI hipster repo. Samba 3.6.15 and patches
are already in the OI-userland git for review.
3.5.x smbd is broken on OI. The later releases sorted out winbind but
smbd processes still become 'stuck'
On Sunday, June 09, 2013 05:27 PM, Stefan Müller-Wilken wrote:
Hi all,
Kinda hard when I myself didn't exactly get a great experience on that score.
I've helped out with getting the samba package updated from that horrible
3.5.7/8 release to newer ones both with providing specs and running the
On Monday, June 10, 2013 05:03 AM, Jerry Kemp wrote:
What is the hipsters repo?
Can someone share the information for that.
And is there any chance it has a working copy of VLC?
Or ffmpeg or avidemux.
Is there any distro that is gcc compiled and not sun cc compiled? It'd
be probably
Hi Gordon,
On Monday, June 10, 2013 10:43 AM, Gordon Ross wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
Let me first build a 3.6.15 version then.
On Sunday, June 09, 2013 09:40 PM, Stefan Müller-Wilken wrote:
Chris,
the idea of my mail
what we/you can do to get this party
together again.
Kind regards,
The out-side
Op 8 jun. 2013 om 02:03 heeft Dave McGuire mcgu...@neurotica.com het
volgende geschreven:
On 06/07/2013 07:59 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
But it is of paramount importance to those running desktops
Let me also state for the record that I never said OpenSXCE did not run on AMD
platforms and that I am sorry if I don't have sparc and I run OI gave that
impression.
I am simply running production OI boxes on AMD boxes (and yes x64 is from AMD)
and not about to switch to any other distro. If I
Sent from my iPad
On 8 Jun, 2013, at 8:03 AM, Dave McGuire mcgu...@neurotica.com wrote:
On 06/07/2013 07:59 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
But it is of paramount importance to those running desktops!
Remember that Linux became popular because it is reliable
alternative to both Windows
If your purpose is to provide a distribution with an up to date
illumos at its core and the
applications everybody expects on desk/lap-tops easily installable,
then I consider your
work as a really important and I would be ready helping you to live of
it.
But make it possible to easily
On Saturday, June 08, 2013 02:54 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
But it is of paramount importance to those running desktops!
Remember that Linux became popular because it is reliable
alternative to both Windows and MacOS as a desktop system.
Excuse me? Linux on the desktop has been and
On Saturday, June 08, 2013 05:23 AM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
For these large drives, raidz2 is recommended, as the likelihood of a
second drive failure during a rebuild starts to get pretty high.
What's wrong with striped mirrors? raidz2 does not like random i/o. I
happen to run raidz2 and
On Saturday, June 08, 2013 07:40 AM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 06/07/2013 07:36 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
But it is of paramount importance to those running desktops!
Remember that Linux became popular because it is reliable
alternative to both Windows and MacOS as a desktop system
On Thursday, June 06, 2013 06:52 AM, Heinrich van Riel wrote:
Any pointers around iSCSI performance focused on read speed? Did not find
much.
I have 2 x rz2 of 10x 3TB NL-SAS each in the pool. The OI server has 4
interfaces configured to the switch in LACP, mtu=9000. The switch (jumbo
enabled)
Yes, I think he has been banned or something. He twittered to that
effect if you check. The details for donating should be on the iso or
something.
On Wednesday, June 05, 2013 05:55 AM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
I get the impression, from another thread, that he might not be getting
messages from
On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 01:09 AM, Martin Walter wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:43:41PM +0100, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
Was filed as an illumos site issue, where it stayed for much of that
time. Generally speaking, just filing bugs and not asking for guidance
on what debug would be useful or
On Thursday, May 23, 2013 01:33 AM, alka wrote:
Why not using Solaris CIFS server?
It has a much better Windows integration than SAMBA
(Windows SID instead of Unix UID, Windows like ACL, previous version, AD
support,
shares are manageable via Windows computer management).
It is also mostly
On Sunday, May 19, 2013 06:19 PM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
There are devs working on it as per recent mails.
Hi Sriram,
How goes Belenix?
cheers,
Christopher
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Sounds like samba package on Ubuntu has now gone with setting minimum
auth level to ntlmv2 or kerberos.
IIRC, cifs/server supports ntlmv2 so maybe the latter.
On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 04:14 AM, Lucas Van Tol wrote:
One of my users had to change mount options after updating his Linux system
Spam detection software, running on the system portal.local, has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
On Tuesday, March 05, 2013 03:02 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, March 05, 2013 12:56 PM, Geoff Nordli wrote:
Yes, it has been running for about a year now without a problem. They
probably only have 3-4 active calls, but still if there were any
issues with the network, even one call
On Tuesday, March 05, 2013 01:22 AM, Geoff Nordli wrote:
On 13-03-03 04:43 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
If Vbox did try to install the crossbow driver, he should have
noticed it fail to load as there are three kernel calls that that
driver expects to find but will be unable to find.
In any
On Tuesday, March 05, 2013 09:21 AM, Geoff Nordli wrote:
On 13-03-04 03:01 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, March 05, 2013 01:22 AM, Geoff Nordli wrote:
On 13-03-03 04:43 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
If Vbox did try to install the crossbow driver, he should have
noticed it fail to load
On Tuesday, March 05, 2013 12:56 PM, Geoff Nordli wrote:
Yes, it has been running for about a year now without a problem. They
probably only have 3-4 active calls, but still if there were any
issues with the network, even one call would trigger complaints.
I would try the 82545EM driver on
If Vbox did try to install the crossbow driver, he should have noticed
it fail to load as there are three kernel calls that that driver expects
to find but will be unable to find.
In any case, the vbox streams driver is problematic and cuts off the
network from time to time. That's why I
On Thursday, February 21, 2013 10:32 PM, Armin Maier wrote:
Hello, i set up a openindiana 151a7 server with zfs and Active
Directory authentication. I can share zfs filesystems to windows
server and set permissions to Active Directory users, no problem. The
only issue is i can only access the
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 04:41 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
On 2013-01-23 06:41, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 10:39 AM, Robbie Crash wrote:
How full featured of a DC are we talking about in terms of Microsoft AD
compatibility?
Nil unless someone builds a samba4
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 07:59 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (openindiana)
wrote:
From: Bentley, Dain [mailto:dbent...@nas.edu]
I have perused the lists and saw this might be support with OpenSolaris. It's
not listed on the HCL on the Openindiana wiki but like I said, some
OpenSolaris threads
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 10:39 AM, Robbie Crash wrote:
How full featured of a DC are we talking about in terms of Microsoft AD
compatibility?
Nil unless someone builds a samba4 package.
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
On Friday, November 16, 2012 07:05 PM, Florian wrote:
Hi,
I don't know where is your problem? You don't know our network
infrastructure.
It is not so easy to have two redundant switches, no it is even not
possible.
It would be nice, if we can have two redundant switches, but this was
not
On Thursday, November 15, 2012 08:23 PM, Florian wrote:
Am 15.11.2012 13:15, schrieb Jorge Palma:
raid1 at the OS level, but SPOF on network level.
This is no Problem, I change a switch in 5 minutes, but the Server
takes much longer.
This was not my question! Thanks for the not helping
On Friday, November 16, 2012 11:36 AM, Alex Smith (K4RNT) wrote:
If the targets are mirrored via ZFS and COMSTAR, why would the Linux host
require RAID? If it's using iSCSI anyway, wouldn't the Linux volume
management just needlessly redundantize the data, that ZFS is mirroring
already?
Or do I
webmin?
Ick. Swapping a desktop gui for a web gui...still get a gui.
So just offshore the gui problem eh?
On Thursday, November 01, 2012 06:55 AM, Roel_D wrote:
A GUI is only needed when you want to use the gui
I see more benefit in better webmin-support for zfs, mysql and other
On Thursday, November 01, 2012 03:01 AM, Ben Taylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:25 AM, openbabelopenba...@gmail.com wrote:
I am of a commercial view. I am interested in the most popular desktop and
most developed environment which is accepted by the current or potential
user base.It
On Saturday, October 13, 2012 09:10 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
2012-10-13 11:27, Roel_D wrote:
Yes! That is the card i own too.
I have tried to install it with solaris 10 but no driver existed.
Maybe today for OI
There is a driver tw provided by the vendor.
A couple of months ago Edward Ned
Er...SATA was designed to be hot swappable from the start? There is no
such thing as a non-hot swappable SATA hd. If you meant you can have 4
sata hard disks that are inconvenient to hot swap, then that is fine.
You can however get four disk bay cages that facilitate hot swapping by
allowing
On Monday, October 15, 2012 10:10 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, Jonathan Adams wrote:
We have Linux and Windows 2008 R2 servers running at different sites
in KVM machines and it works a treat (if you have all the passthrough
stuff on Intel chips turned on)
Is OpenIndiana's
type cage, but even on their
own, SATA and SAS is designed to be hot-swappable.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
Er...SATA was designed to be hot swappable from the start? There is no such
thing as a non-hot swappable SATA hd. If you meant
,
The out-side
Op 16 okt. 2012 om 16:50 heeft Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk het volgende geschreven:
Well, the existence of eSata should have been sufficient to point to
sata's builtin hot swap capabilities but ah well.
On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:44 PM, Alex Smith (K4RNT
Happy you got your stuff back.
On Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:30 AM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Ok, to stay correct:
First via rsync or /usr/sbin/tar cEf or cpio for the most important files.
Then I try, if piping zfs send still works.
IT ALL DOESN'T MATTER TO ME.
My DATA MAY BE RESCUED in a few
Is that possible? :-D
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
On 26/04/12 12:17 AM, Gary Gendel wrote:
That isn't what spamdyke is trying to accomplish here. This checks to
see if the sender is trying to spoof the MTA. What spamdyke is trying to
do is to blacklist emails based upon the ip address embedded in the
sending domain name. For example:
If I get
On Thursday, April 26, 2012 08:30 PM, Gary Gendel wrote:
On 4/26/12 5:01 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On 26/04/12 12:17 AM, Gary Gendel wrote:
That isn't what spamdyke is trying to accomplish here. This checks to
see if the sender is trying to spoof the MTA. What spamdyke is
trying to
do
On 24/04/12 09:30 PM, Gary Gendel wrote:
The pipeline architecture of qmail has been instrumental at making
third-party additions incredibly simple. You can easily plug in special
debugging modules, and even tee off things so you can test new modules
in parallel with real operations. Before
On 24/04/12 09:08 PM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
Dovecot's take on Qmail (and other MTA's http://wiki.dovecot.org/MTA )
which states qmail is an obsolete and unmaintained server. Its POP3
part can be taken over by Dovecot. Qmail started off boasting about
speed and security in the mid-1990s, but has
On 25/04/12 11:06 PM, Gary Gendel wrote:
Chris,
I've replaced my qmail chain for SASL delivery with postfix. It took me
a few rounds to get all the bits I needed working, but I'm good with the
results.
The non-SASL chain will be a big nut to crack. There are a lot of useful
spam features in
On 24/04/12 04:01 PM, Richard PALO wrote:
Evidently licensing is more the problem...
... hence the benefit of KVM
(and for those on AMD, that AMD SVM support continues to improve!)
This AMD Opteron user cannot wait for kvm to support AMD-V
___
On Monday, April 23, 2012 08:44 PM, låzaro wrote:
in Qmail, the security is patch-maked in postfix is by-design-maked
NO, that is not accurate. security where it means anti-spam, DJB did
not bother because as far as he is concerned, the way things are, things
are just broken. Too bad his
On 22/04/12 05:19 AM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
you could always use Sendmail ... It's reliable, and flexible, if you
can work out the configuration for it ... but Postfix is a damn sight
easier to get working.
people can still read sendmail rulesets? :p
My biggest bug bears with Postfix are
On 22/04/12 12:50 AM, Magnus Hedemark wrote:
If we're going out on limbs, Haraka might be worth a look.
http://haraka.github.com/
One still needs a proper mta on a later stage with haraka if used for
incoming...
Sounds more like a smtp proxy with filtering/authentication capabilities.
.
But where is the fun in that? Trying to debug, searching for that
missing tab, jumping here and there following the rules, isn't that what
it means to run sendmail? :D
Jerry
On 04/22/12 08:22, Christopher Chan wrote:
On 22/04/12 05:19 AM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
you could always use Sendmail
have looked beyond qmail and decided to stick with dot-qmail and
other goodies and found yourself a qmail-smtpd replacement.
Gary
On 4/22/12 8:26 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On 22/04/12 12:50 AM, Magnus Hedemark wrote:
If we're going out on limbs, Haraka might be worth a look.
http
On 21/04/12 09:29 PM, Magnus Hedemark wrote:
Postfix.
+1
Problem for both is still the same at the moment...build your
own...postfix integrates well with a lot of stuff...vpopmail, dovecot,
spamassassin via spamass-milter...at least, that is how i set things up.
qmail's modularity allows
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 08:24 PM, Dave Koelmeyer wrote:
On 12/21/11 12:43 AM, Gabriel de la Cruz wrote:
The most they can do is politely asking not to use it.
Am I wrong?
Yes. This is Larry we're talking about here. I can't quite believe
anyone is even seriously contemplating risking
There is an illumos issue on this I think: #1087. A fix is available but
I don't know if it has been applied to the illumos 151 tree and whether
OI has packaged that.
On Wednesday, December 14, 2011 08:18 AM, Patrick O'Sullivan wrote:
Question for the group at large:
Was true Kerberos
On Wednesday, December 14, 2011 09:17 AM, Patrick O'Sullivan wrote:
I found that issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/1087
However, that issue itself is that certain modes of access try to force
Kerberos auth, not that Kerberos auth itself is broken.
Do you know if the Kerberos auth issue
On Tuesday, December 06, 2011 07:01 AM, Joshua M. Clulow wrote:
We used to do this every 15 minutes on a pair of thumpers at the Uni I
worked at. Has anybody done this with a shorter period? You may get
more traction with the question on a ZFS mailing list.
I thought I was the only one
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 05:44 AM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
My comment was not directed at anyone in particular, but more broadly
scoped to include various posts that seem to keep holding up Linux like
it's the holy grail. I don't need another Linux option. I do have an
interest/need in
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 07:51 AM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
I think I've gotten frustrated enough at trying to make the same point N
times that I'm done here. One last time: the point was that someone brought
up OSX as an example of a widely deployed platform using a non-linux (as I
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 08:29 AM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
Richard, you continue to miss the point. This isn't about you (OS) vs me
(linux). I would wager that for every opensolaris user there are at least
10 linux users. Getting them to use OS (which is better in many ways,
granted),
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 08:32 AM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
Quite true. At this point, though, the admin space is the issue.
I come from a Linux background with my experience being done on Redhat
Linux, Fedora, Centos and Ubuntu. I have also worked on FreeBSD and
OpenBSD. I do not see
On Monday, October 10, 2011 04:56 AM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 11:43 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 10/ 9/11 11:37 AM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
I haven't looked in recent years, but the last time I did look, port 25,
not port 80, was responsible for the lions share of Internet
On Monday, October 10, 2011 03:54 AM, LinuxBSDos.com wrote:
I fail to see why you consider my statements erroneous assumptions.
Whether we like it or not, forums rule. The most prolific communities on
the Internet are forums, or forum-like. answers.yahoo.com. facebook,
Google Groups, are all
On Monday, October 10, 2011 09:45 AM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 09:16 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2011 04:56 AM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 11:43 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 10/ 9/11 11:37 AM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
I haven't
On Wednesday, October 05, 2011 02:03 AM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
Hi Jeppe,
On 3 Oct 2011, at 14:19, Jeppe Toustrup wrote:
The only way I have found which I can find the order of the drives in
the JBOD along with the above names, without pulling out each drive
and see which one becomes
On Friday, August 26, 2011 01:55 AM, Oscar del Rio wrote:
On 08/25/11 01:19 PM, Kimmo Jaskari wrote:
I've been trying to get the Samba version that comes with OI to work,
but am unable to get it to authenticate. I'm running a Windows 7
client that I'd like to get going but have not had much
On Monday, August 22, 2011 01:46 PM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
And? You got a working rpm binary? Got an rpm based distro? ???
:-D
Yes, I've got a working environment in place for the past month which
And? You got a working rpm binary? Got an rpm based distro? ???
:-D
On Monday, August 22, 2011 12:46 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
All:
I wanted to give everyone a heads up on Belenix related activities.
Context:
We'd decided some time ago to use rpm5 + the smart package manager.
Please see:
On Friday, August 19, 2011 03:38 AM, Nikola M wrote:
Dave Koelmeyer wrote:
For those that haven't already seen:
http://dtrace.org/blogs/bmc/2011/08/15/kvm-on-illumos/
I would like to know, now that is KVM here in Illumos
(and presumably in OpenIndiana and when also AMD CPU support is
On Tuesday, August 16, 2011 02:33 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
On 08/16/2011 10:00, Dave Koelmeyer wrote:
For those that haven't already seen:
http://dtrace.org/blogs/bmc/2011/08/15/kvm-on-illumos/
Great news. However, without an ability to run it on AMD CPUs, it's not
so interesting for us
On Thursday, July 14, 2011 04:38 PM, Mark wrote:
On 14/07/2011 11:54 a.m., Gary wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Mark wrote:
The 500ppm ntp range limit is easy to exceed with virtual hardware,
since it
isn't real time orientated.
The original poster, Chris Chan, is running it on bare
On Thursday, July 14, 2011 04:11 AM, Mark wrote:
On 14/07/2011 2:44 a.m., Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 09:28 PM, Eric Pierce wrote:
Is the 9211-8i a different driver than mpt_sas?
No it is not. LSI 2008 chip - mpt_sas driver
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 09:28 PM, Eric Pierce wrote:
Is the 9211-8i a different driver than mpt_sas?
No it is not. LSI 2008 chip - mpt_sas driver
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 09:28 PM, Eric Pierce wrote:
Is the 9211-8i a different driver than mpt_sas?
No it is not. LSI 2008 chip - mpt_sas driver
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakkr...@karlsbakk.netwrote:
We're moving to 9211-8i - so far no such problems with
On Tuesday, July 12, 2011 02:00 PM, Gregory Youngblood wrote:
On Jul 11, 2011, at 9:07 PM, Joshua M. Clulow wrote:
On 2011-07-09 14:20, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Most of us use GUI-based email readers that handle80char subjects. Is
this really an issue?
Yes, it is really an issue. Trying
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 03:51 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Sigh...
ntpdate -u 192.168.9.1
10 Jul 09:01:15 ntpdate[29929]: step time server 192.168.9.1 offset
3317.946738 sec
IIRC ntpd won't adjust the time if the difference is too big, measured between
the system clock, inherited from
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
