Hi Corey,
I was wondering if you were planning to roll the OpenIPMI library soon
or if you think the next version is still out on the horizon a bit?
Thank you very much,
Carol
--
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) fr
uldn't be
> time-critical, I would think.
>
> Andy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Carol Hebert
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 1:39 PM
> To: Cress, Andrew R
> Cc: openipmi-developer@lists
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 14:02 -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
> Someone reported a bug, and I'm waiting on a response from that before
> releasing the 2.6.25 patches. They are ready to go beyond that.
>
> -corey
>
Wow! That's fantastic news! Although we only recently started missing
the ipmi_imb m
ee that it would seem like clutter if this is patch gets
included
> in the base kernel.
>
> Andy
Hi Andy,
I was wondering if you were still working on the emu patch and, if so,
how long you think it will be before you're done? As it turns out, we
need to use it too, and are eager to g
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 21:33 -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:30:18 -0800 Carol Hebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This reverse enumeration scheme is actually differen
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 15:29 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:09:48 -0500
> Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Carol Hebert wrote:
> > > Hi Corey,
> > >
> > > This patch does not appear to be in the 2.6.25-rc8 ker
soon?
Thank you very much for all your help, :-)
Carol Hebert
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 10:22 -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
> From: Carol Hebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Currently, on systems with multiple BMC interfaces, the ipmi device
> names are being created in reverse order relati
rder in
which they are found on the system.
Signed-off-by: Carol Hebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.24.orig/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c 2008-01-30 11:21:55.0 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.24/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c 2008-01-30 11:18:05.0 -0800
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static voi
dmi_save_ipmi_device() list handling paradigm to a queue, thereby
allowing the ipmi driver to build the ipmi device names in the order in
which they are found on the system.
Signed-off-by: Carol Hebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.24.orig/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c 2008-01-30 11
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 22:47 -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
> If we take this patch, can you send this in standard patch format with a
> patch header and signed-off-by line? I'll need that to send it on.
Will do. I'll get it back to you in standard patch format within the
next few days.
Thank you
me
to try.
Thank you very much, :-)
Carol Hebert
--- dmi_scan.c.orig 2007-10-09 13:31:38.0 -0700
+++ dmi_scan.c 2008-01-18 10:24:17.0 -0800
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@
dev->name = "IPMI controller";
dev->device_data = data;
- list_ad
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 09:53 -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
> > oopses (appended below). Does this patch require one or more of the
> > other patches in the 39.1 set to be happy (for instance, the
> > allow-hot-smi-remove patch), or am I running into some other issue?
> >
> I looked at this yester
y issues such as
DeviceID mismatches with what's coded up in the SDR data, etc. So I
suspect it's something that might not happen anytime soon (if ever).
Anyway, hope this info is useful.
Thanks for all your help,
Carol Hebert
Unable to handle kernel paging request at
arger configs, we do support larger
systems and we support 2.4 distros so it's not inconceivable that
someone will eventually put the two together. :-}
Thanks much again,
Carol Hebert
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? N
t. BTW: I was wondering if it would be much trouble to get
the table->list patch put into the 2.4 tree as well? I'd be happy to
help and would be happy to test it out on a multi-node. :-)
Thank you very much, :-)
Carol Hebert
--
n getting an 8-node to test it on -- hopefully I'll get one
next week.
Thanks very much again, :-)
Carol Hebert
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 16:23 -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
> Ok, patch is attached.
>
> Carol Hebert wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 13:37 -0700, Carol Hebert wrote:
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 13:37 -0700, Carol Hebert wrote:
> Hi Corey,
>
> This latest patch worked great on my 2-node system! :-D I'll try to
> get some time on a 4-node and 8-node system asap to test it out on them
> as well.
Oops, I guess I'll probably need that pat
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 16:17 -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
> Carol Hebert wrote:
> > Hi Corey,
> >
> > This latest patch worked great on my 2-node system! :-D I'll try to
> > get some time on a 4-node and 8-node system asap to test it out on them
> > as well.
o get some unique
BMC device ID/GUID change made in the f/w as well (and in the process
find out what we have now ;-}? I'm also working on finding out whether
or not it's guaranteed that the BMCs are listed in node order in the
SMBIOS table.
Thanks very much for your help and for makin
p. In the meantime, I'll take a
look at the current code and try to figure out why it's still oopsing.
Thanks for your help,
Carol Hebert
> >
> The "easily digestible form" part is the problem here. You need some
> method to correlate a GUID to something a hu
t, it might be useful to increase it even more (12, 16?).
Finally, I don't believe dynamic node plugging will generally be an
issue for my system since the nodes are merged at boot time rather than
being dynamically added and/or removed.
Thanks very much,
Carol Hebert
On Wed, 2006-10-11 a
about operating system or SMBIOS order. So I believe you want to
> do this for reasons beyond the IPMI driver. There is an odd habit of
> using the IPMB address of the controller as the Device ID, but I have no
> idea where that comes from. It doesn't seem to be the intent of
f the two ipmi
device nodes (ipmi0) expected for the dual-node system although modprobe
of ipmi_si appears to hang Could you please take a look at the error
messages below and see if you can spot the problem?
Thanks much again,
Carol H
t I
missed seeing a patch and also because I'm not a sysfs expert and I
don't know what the original intent was for how to present multiple BMCs
(from multi-node systems) in the sysfs.
I'm pasting the stack backtrace below. Please let me know if you have
any suggestions or quest
#x27;m wondering about is whether there might be an issue with the watchdog
timer running (and being poked) while a firmware upgrade was being
attempted or was underway?
Anyway, thanks very much to you and Arkadiusz for the info and
help, :-)
Carol Hebert
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 20:45 -0500
rvice ipmi stop-watchdog".
What do you think would be the best approach to having the timer shut
off cleanly when the watchdog daemon is killed intentionally on an
otherwise healthy system?
Thanks much for your help,
Carol Hebert
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 19:17 -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
&
Hi Corey,
Roger and I believe your approach sounds great and very much appreciate
your help.
Thank you very much again,
Carol
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 18:23 -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
> Roger Mach wrote:
> > I took a look at these patchsets and they appear to be good, with just a
> > couple of mi
again Bela, for all your work, interest, and support.
And I most heartily second your thanks to Corey and Matt for all they've
done and continue to do for all of us.
Carol Hebert
> Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:37:37 -0500
> From: Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re:
times posted a
pointer to this website on the mailing list, customers probably don't
know to dig through the mail archives to find it.
Thank you very much again for your consideration and help with this
issue.
Carol Hebert
LTC System x Enablement
IBM Corp.
> Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:18
ast 2.4 patch set happen.
Thank you very much for your consideration of this critical matter,
Carol Hebert
LTC System x Enablement
IBM Corp.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techs
30 matches
Mail list logo
