I have combobox with page numbers (1,2,3,etc). When user select the certain
page (by mouse or by keyboard(as combobox editable))
I want to show and total pages. That's why on combobox action I do:
@FXMLprivatevoid onPageComboBoxAction(ActionEvent event){
combobox.setValue(cu
Hard to say whether a public equivalent of NGExternalNode would be
feasible in the JDK 9 time frame. It depends on how much work would be
to expose what you would need in a way that would be robust. It isn't
something we plan for JDK 9, but I haven't given it enough thought to
know what would b
Hi Kevin,
Please review this proposed fix for a late-breaking regression found
during this week's sanity testing:
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130122
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8130122/webrev.01/
Thanks,
- Chien
Not by itself, although regressions are certainly taken very seriously.
In any case, the process is to get this into 9-dev (once it has been
reviewed), test it thoroughly, and then consider whether we can make a
case for taking it to the 8u60 release team.
-- Kevin
Hruda, Steve wrote:
Is a
Is a regression not release critical?
Diese E-Mail wurde versandt im Auftrag des Unternehmens Intergraph Ges.m.b.H.
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Maximilian Weber
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Margaretenstraße 70/I/1, 1050 Wien, Österreich, Tel. +43
(1) 9610567-0
Eingetragen beim Handelsger
Anton V. Tarasov wrote:
On 30.06.2015 21:13, Hruda, Steve wrote:
Hi Anton,
thanks for the detailed information and the good news.
You talk about JDK's jira? Am I right? . I don't have an access
for that JIRA system since the JavaFX's Jira has moved to the JDK Bug
System.
Ah, ok. Then
On 30.06.2015 21:50, Hruda, Steve wrote:
Yesterday I added my patch to the associated bug entry ->
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137003
It seems that someone landed my patch for automated commit but the WebKit
Commit Bot rejected my patch because of some stupid formatting mistakes (t
Yesterday I added my patch to the associated bug entry ->
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137003
It seems that someone landed my patch for automated commit but the WebKit
Commit Bot rejected my patch because of some stupid formatting mistakes (tabs
instead of spaces ...).
I corrected t
Hi Alexander,
Thanks for posting the samples. I'll check the printing stuff and will update
on results.
Regards,
Anton.
On 27.06.2015 9:30, Александр Свиридов wrote:
Hi Anton,
I send all files. If you open index.html in IE and printpreview->set scale 100% -> print , you
will get 16.8 cm of
On 30.06.2015 21:13, Hruda, Steve wrote:
Hi Anton,
thanks for the detailed information and the good news.
You talk about JDK's jira? Am I right? . I don't have an access for that
JIRA system since the JavaFX's Jira has moved to the JDK Bug System.
Ah, ok. Then I'll quote your e-mail.
A
Hi Anton,
thanks for the detailed information and the good news.
You talk about JDK's jira? Am I right? . I don't have an access for that
JIRA system since the JavaFX's Jira has moved to the JDK Bug System.
About the Apple stuff.
I know that Apple dropped Windows Safari support and in my opi
Steve,
I applied your suggestion and it worked on Windows.
The missed check you discovered could really be a mistake in WebKit, because Apple dropped releasing
(and shipping nightly builds for) Safari for Windows at 2012.
Safari 5.1.7 was the last version. I downloaded and checked it. The date
Hi all,
I agree that we need WebGL support in JavaFX. Recently, I made some
experiments with integrating the Qt based WebView/WebEngine into JavaFX via
synchronized shared memory buffers (see
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlIrY1SlNM4 and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQXG77O2MqQ).
what can i
> On Jun 30, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
>
> ...
> With respect to things like "support WebRTC" or "support WebGL" -
> seriously? WebRTC is useful for exactly one kind of app, video chat. It
> seems to have been driven primarily so Google could make a Skype competitor
> inside Gmail with
Mike, I believe it is essential that the JavaFX WebView supports WebGL as
this is where a lot of the OpenGL work is being done now. At the moment,
JavaFX WebView is limited to Lite Mode of Google Maps for example so it is
not really compatible with an external browser. Other than that, there has
I suppose i should stop shouting from the sidelines, roll up my sleeves and get
my hands dirty, what can i do as a lowly developer to help?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 30 Jun 2015, at 12:16, Felix Bembrick wrote:
>
> Well, we are all at the whim of Oracle executives decisions with the added
> he
Be fair, chaps. WebGL is not exactly accessible.
Desktop Linux is an extremely niche platform. JFX is open source. If
someone wants accessibility support on Linux, they can certainly contribute
patches to implement it.
The JDK9 plan looks OK to me. It doesn't sound exciting but "support
Jigsaw" a
That should of read 'set its aspirations higher'
Sent from my iPhone
> On 30 Jun 2015, at 12:13, Jack Moxley wrote:
>
> Maybe it should its aspirations a little higher, especially with the advent
> of unity, webgl or even scenegraph impls such as jmonkeyengine that do.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
Well, we are all at the whim of Oracle executives decisions with the added help
of third parties such as Gluon and RoboVM. The future of JavaFX really is in
*our* hands.
> On 30 Jun 2015, at 21:13, Jack Moxley wrote:
>
> Maybe it should its aspirations a little higher, especially with the ad
Maybe it should its aspirations a little higher, especially with the advent of
unity, webgl or even scenegraph impls such as jmonkeyengine that do.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 30 Jun 2015, at 09:42, Felix Bembrick wrote:
>
> JavaFX has *never* claimed to be write once, run anyway
>
>
>> On 30 J
JavaFX has *never* claimed to be write once, run anyway
> On 30 Jun 2015, at 18:13, Mike wrote:
>
> write once, run anywhere
>
> This about sums it up!
>
>
>
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Jack Moxley wrote:
>>
>> write once, run anywhere
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
On 29 Ju
write once, run anywhere
This about sums it up!
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Jack Moxley wrote:
> write once, run anywhere
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 29 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michał Zegan
> wrote:
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Does it mean platfor
To be fair Jack, WORA is/was used in reference to the Java language itself;
not JavaFX.
Felix
On 30 June 2015 at 17:12, Jack Moxley wrote:
> write once, run anywhere
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 29 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michał Zegan
> wrote:
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Has
write once, run anywhere
Sent from my iPhone
> On 29 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michał Zegan wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Does it mean platform support for linux won't be implemented now, or
> at all?
> I usually use windows, but still depend on that support because
24 matches
Mail list logo
