I just uploaded a modified spec file for the R statistical package.
The fix is to patch *both* R scripts, and to patch not just R_HOME_DIR,
but also R_SHARE_DIR, R_INCLUDE_DIR, and R_DOC_DIR. This is necessary to
allow packages to be installed.
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Computational Science
created a patch that is compatible with both the new and the old
MakeMaker to fix this problem. I will submit it to the authors as well.
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Computational Science and Engineering Support (CSES)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
Bill,
Would you be willing to share your python version?
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Computational Science and Engineering Support (CSES)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Bill,
You recently posted a perl script called rpmgetopts.pl. Is this the one
you meant?
Thanks,
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Computational Science and Engineering Support (CSES)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
-Original Message
-package openpkg-*-*.src.sh ?
Thanks,
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Computational Science and Engineering Support (CSES)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
__
The OpenPKG Project
variable
before it adds the system directory to the path variable.
My question is whether you would entertain my submitting this change to
rc.func for inclusion as part of the OpenPKG base package.
Thanks,
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Computational Science and Engineering Support (CSES
?
Thanks,
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Computational Science and Engineering Support (CSES)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
__
The OpenPKG Project
Thanks Ralf!
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ralf S. Engelschall
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 10:47 AM
To: openpkg-dev@openpkg.org
Subject: Re: openssh with_ldap option fails in v 2.5
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006, Dennis McRitchie
OpenPKG as their solution. So it would
be good if we could understand the discrepancy, and then clarify, perhaps
through documentation, what the required Solaris 9 setup is for a successful
build.
Thanks,
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Computational Science and Engineering Support (CSES)
Academic
Dennis McRitchie
Computational Science and Engineering Support (CSES)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
-Original Message-
From: Ralf S. Engelschall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
be an unpopular choice
among our users.
Is there any thought to removing the static library restriction anytime
soon?
Thanks,
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Computational Science and Engineering Support (CSES)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
Hi,
I just uploaded perl-crypto-5.8.4-20050329.src.rpm to the contrib area.
The changes consist of adding Crypt::Rijndael v0.05 support to the package.
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton
.
This change has been tested on both RedHat Linux 9 and Solaris 9.
I know you're up to 2.2 now, but we're still on 2.1. Hopefully the change
can be easily ported to 2.2, assuming you haven't put in the option yourself
in the meantime.
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications
, so I thought I'd
mention it.
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
__
The OpenPKG Project
, 2004, Dennis McRitchie wrote:
The spec file in unixodbc-2.2.9-2.1.0.src.rpm lacks a Provides:
unixodbc directive. This is required by perl-dbi when
with_dbd_odbc=yes and by freetds.
I have uploaded a modified spec file with this directive added.
This cannot be. An RPM package foo
I submitted a bug report yesterday (twice) but it has not yet shown up in
the mailing list or the newsgroup.
Thanks,
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
to oracle-barebone? As it is, one has to
manually build and install oracle-barebone first before using openpkg-tools
for the rest of the packages.
Thanks,
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton
-lsasl2 -ldl
case %{l_platform -t} in
*-sunos5.* ) ldflags=$ldflags -lresolv ;;
esac
%endif
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
to satisfy some libsasl2 references. For some
reason, this was only necessary on RedHat Linux 9 and not on Sun Solaris 9,
though I was not able to track down the reason.
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
to demo_rdbms32.mk
because I built oracle-barebone using the 32-bit distribution, which
contains the former but not the latter. Perhaps a better solution would be
to have the rename be conditional on an option such as with_32-bit_oracle
being set to no, which could be the default?
Dennis
Dennis
The spec file in unixodbc-2.2.9-2.1.0.src.rpm lacks a Provides: unixodbc
directive. This is required by perl-dbi when with_dbd_odbc=yes and by
freetds.
I have uploaded a modified spec file with this directive added.
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic
will
not work as expected.
One solution is to add a with_xaw3d option to the emacs spec file to force
an RPM requirement for xaw3d, and thus guarantee that the latter will be
built first by openpkg-tools.
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services Department
is
used. Thus these packages cannot be built together using openpkg-tools.
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Schloh
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 2:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: perl-dbi spec changed to fix build error
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004, Dennis McRitchie wrote:
I have uploaded the spec file for perl-dbi-5.8.4-2.1.0.src.rpm
external packages that are fussy about this will not complain. These changes
are also present in this package.
Hope this helps.
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
still think you're giving yourself way more work than you need to by
moving these header files. But who am I to complain since you're doing most
of the work... :-)
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
, I am not on OpenPKG 2.0 yet, so the spec files also
reflect that.
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralf S.
Engelschall
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 2:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: emacs, giflib, and tiff contributions
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004, Dennis McRitchie wrote:
3) tiff: emacs
where %{l_prefix} has been appropriately substituted.
And of course, each user needs to fill in their .odbc.ini file to identify
their database.
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
Resend since [EMAIL PROTECTED] is down.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis McRitchie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 4:54 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: New oracle-barebone submission
I have just uploaded oracle-barebone-9.2.0.1-20040128.nosrc.rpm
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralf S.
Engelschall
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 10:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New oracle-barebone submission
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004, Dennis McRitchie wrote:
I have just uploaded
oracle-barebone-9.2.0.1-20040128.nosrc.rpm
names to
be those of the 32-bit Oracle download. Created steps 5-7 to
be more explicit about what needs to be done at the end.
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
only report the spec file option defaults,
and not the set of options that the binary rpm was built with.
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
__
___
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004, Dennis McRitchie via RT wrote:
Using perl-dbi-20031129-20031129.src.rpm, I was able to build
DBD::Oracle on Solaris 9. However, using
perl-dbi-20040108-20040108.src.rpm, the build blew up
causing the files to be
unreadable by group and other.
3) oracle-barebone.txt: Changed the solaris gz file names to be those of the
32-bit Oracle download. Created steps 5-7 to be more explicit about what
needs to be done at the end.
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
__
The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
Developer
: Nobody
Status: open
Transaction: Correspondence added by mlelstv
Time: Fri Dec 19 22:49:56 2003
__
___
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:15:37PM +0100, Dennis McRitchie
via RT wrote:
My index file does seem
?
Thanks,
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
__
The OpenPKG Project
routinely, but don't currently have a lot of confidence in it. I
know it's not good practice to discuss more than one problem in an email,
but I sent in a reminder message about 284 the proper way on Dec 2 and never
heard back.
Thanks,
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications
of
confidence in it. I know it's not good practice to discuss
more than one problem in an email, but I sent in a reminder
message about 284 the proper way on Dec 2 and never heard back.
Thanks,
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services
: openpkg
Owner: Nobody
Status: open
Transaction: Correspondence added by mlelstv
Time: Fri Dec 19 18:24:59 2003
__
___
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 05:43:11PM +0100, Dennis McRitchie
via RT wrote
to please inform the author, I thought I would pass
it on in case you had not already noticed it.
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
What is the RBL patch, and what are the consequences of not having it? Where
can I get more information about it?
Thanks,
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralf S.
Engelschall
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 3:48 PM
To:
Why did I get the message below in connection with my reply to Michael's
comment? My original message, as returned by the OpenPKG server, is
attached.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis McRitchie
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: tcpwrappers
What is the RBL patch, and what are the consequences of not
having it? Where can I get more information about it?
Thanks,
Dennis
,
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Campbell
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 2:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: tcpwrappers
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003, Dennis McRitchie wrote:
What is the RBL patch, and what
-20031024.src.rpm), is to add:
ldflags=$ldflags -lsasl2 -ldl
conditionally if with_ldap == yes. It would be better, I suppose, to only
add the libraries if the LDAP in question was built with sasl, but I don't
know any way to detect that.
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic
by mlelstv
Time: Thu Oct 23 23:22:00 2003
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 11:06:37PM +0200, Dennis McRitchie via RT wrote:
Also, why does the build tool report:
# ATTENTION: openpkg has no upgrade path
# ATTENTION: OpenPKG
:
# ATTENTION: openpkg has no upgrade path
# ATTENTION: OpenPKG has no upgrade path
Thanks,
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
buildrh9.sh.didntcatcherror
Description: Binary
Also, if you want to see additional packages rolled or if you would
like to have additional build %options or whatever type of change
for the OpenPKG 2.0 release, please act _NOW_ and give this feedback
to us. Then there is certainly a chance for consideration and perhaps
inclusion into the
Although we've still a few important TODO points left
before we can make OpenPKG 2.0 (see FIXME entries in
http://cvs.openpkg.org/getfile?f=openpkg-re/news.txt), we now have to
start fixing all CORE, BASE and PLUS packages in preparation for the
OpenPKG 2.0 release engineering phase which
since the
original OpenLDAP scripts unconditionally use -lresolv on both RedHat and
Solaris. But I agree that it is preferred.
Dennis
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
^^
Dennis McRitchie
Research Academic Applications Support (RAAS)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
__
The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
53 matches
Mail list logo