integrate in opensc
and improve (the last version of 'minidrivers' is 7)...
Regards,
François
-Message d'origine-
De : Jan Suhr [mailto:j...@suhr.info]
Envoyé : mardi 12 janvier 2010 18:34
À : François Leblanc
Objet : Re: [opensc-devel] Opensc minidriver for base csp.
Hi Francois!
I read
On 10/12/2009 09:45 AM, François Leblanc wrote:
* we need to check copyright situation with the cardmod.h file and maybe
you used some template or similar for the ccm? then we need to give
proper reference etc. a few other files need a copyright header too.
Yes absolutely. The cardmod.h
I don't see any reason why we cannot use this...
+// THIS CODE AND INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS IS WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY
+// KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE
+// IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND/OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
+// PURPOSE.
On Mon, Oct
2009/10/12 Alon Bar-Lev alon.bar...@gmail.com:
I don't see any reason why we cannot use this...
+// THIS CODE AND INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS IS WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY
+// KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE
+// IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND/OR
Am Montag 12 Oktober 2009 08:45:42 schrieb François Leblanc:
Hi Andreas,
Thank you for your comments,
things come to my mind:
* add a few comments where the new pcsc_card and pcsc_ctx are looked at,
so people know ah, the basecsp with pcsc connection given to us.
also do you need the
we could define some new structure with reader parameters to be passed
as third argument and store the values there. still a hack, but I wonder
if that would be cleaner than using the config file code as transport.
not sure, what does everyone else think?
Ok, I see now what you mean.
I saw
+// THIS CODE AND INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS IS WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY
+// KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE
+// IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND/OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
+// PURPOSE.
I don't see any reason why we are allowed to use it
1. You don't need to check in versioninfo.rc
Ok.
2. I don't understand the empty winscard.h
Since I don't want to modify cardmod.h (it's not my file) and this file
include winscard.h but I don't have winscard.h with my cross compiler tool
mingw32...
3. If not absolutely required, put
OK.
When you finish functionality, ping me so we can work on building.
The winscard.h issue is strange... As there is a solution in sources
for the absent of winscard on win32.
But we will work this out.
2009/10/12 François Leblanc francois.lebl...@cev-sa.com:
1. You don't need to check in
Am Montag 12 Oktober 2009 08:45:42 schrieb François Leblanc:
Yes absolutely. The cardmod.h copyright need some attention. For opensccm
prototypes come from the cardmod.h.
can you have a look at Smart Card Minidriver Specification v7?
The documentation is public available at
Hi,
wow, nice work!
things come to my mind:
* add a few comments where the new pcsc_card and pcsc_ctx are looked at,
so people know ah, the basecsp with pcsc connection given to us.
also do you need the config file code for testing? if not, we could
drop it (or is there a useful way to do
Build issues:
1. You don't need to check in versioninfo.rc
2. I don't understand the empty winscard.h
3. If not absolutely required, put opensccm.reg in ANSI format so we
can edit it easily in other platforms. UCS-2 is difficult to maintain.
4. Why do you need to install cardmod.h winscard.h, but
Hi,
I've joined a patch to build a windows minidriver useable with basecsp.
This patch produce a dll named opensccm.dll (only for window of course) and a
binary testcsp.exe
You have to change atr value and put yours on opensccm.reg before to
register.
I've successfully have certificates
13 matches
Mail list logo
