On 09/05/2006, at 3:49 AM, Larry Becke wrote:
Given the following:
2 Solaris 10/11 boxes, running Sun Cluster software with identical
package, hardware and patch loads.
Container defined on shared SAN disk, mounted to a shared filesystem.
Container information defined in both Global zones.
Qu
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 00:59, Robert Thurlow wrote:
> Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
> > Being that SUN has a comprehensive agreement with Microsoft, and CIFS
> > IIRC is an openstandard,
>
> CIFS? An open standard? No way. Microsoft has never managed to
> publish anything complete enough for independen
On Sunday 07 May 2006 08:14 pm, Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
> Good question, no body knows; wasn't it almost a year ago, we heard a big
> wig at SUN exclaim that IBM should work with SUN to port Solaris to POWER?
> then was much chest beating about porting OpenSolaris to PowerPC.
No, once again it seem
On Sunday 07 May 2006 08:05 pm, Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
> Well, I think people who are Solaris programmers (at SUN) need to realise,
> that the criticism of Solaris is not a criticism of them - they're part of
> the larger organisational engine, one cog in the machine, and very little
> that an unde
On Sunday 07 May 2006 08:01 pm, Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
> Being that SUN has a comprehensive agreement with Microsoft, and CIFS IIRC
> is an openstandard, there is nothing stopping SUN from implementing a
> kosher CDDL compatible version of SMB/CIFS.
First of all, I don't know how comprehensive of
On Saturday 06 May 2006 01:25 am, Ian Collins wrote:
> Your comments where out of place on the x86 list and they're out of
> place here. This list is for the discussion of OpenSolaris.
I don't get it myself.
"Doctor, my head hurts when I bang it against the x86 list, what should I do?"
--
Ala
Given the following:
2 Solaris 10/11 boxes, running Sun Cluster software with identical package,
hardware and patch loads.
Container defined on shared SAN disk, mounted to a shared filesystem.
Container information defined in both Global zones.
Question:
Would it be possible to boot the shared co
Please do NOT reply to this address. If you have any problems,
feel free to send email to the alias "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
Firefox 1.5.0.3 builds for Solaris10, Solaris 8/9 is now available on
mozilla.org
Download Page and Location
==
external:
http://www.mozilla.com/fire
> On 5/8/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [ warning : long and boring ]
>>
>>
>> # /usr/sbin/inetconv
>> inetconv: Notice: Service manifest for 100235/1 already generated as
>> /var/svc/manifest/network/rpc/100235_1-rpc_ticotsord.xml, skipped
>> inetconv: Error /etc/inet/inetd.conf
On 5/8/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ warning : long and boring ]
I have looked over the changelogs and don't see anything new related to
either tftp or inetconv. When I attempt to start up tftpd with a fresh
install of b38 I get a error message :
[1] as per manpage for tftpd I
Martin Schaffstall wrote:
I just had an idea: Would it be useful/feasible to sign all
executabley in Solaris with a cryptographic key and only allow
execution of signed binaries then? Would this help to improve system
security?
Way ahead of you by years!
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/darren
[ warning : long and boring ]
I have looked over the changelogs and don't see anything new related to
either tftp or inetconv. When I attempt to start up tftpd with a fresh
install of b38 I get a error message :
[1] as per manpage for tftpd I edit the /etc/inet/inetd.conf and ensure that
the lin
Ben Rockwood wrote:
The problem with supplying one number (a percentage in this case) is
thats all they want and all they need. No explanation will be read, by
and large. We'd just be setting ourselves up to look bad. When that
percentage hits 100% I'll feel diffrent, but even "Solaris is 98
Andrew Watkins wrote:
My manager asked me if I could a mirror copy of our /var/mail on another
system, just in case the system went down. He suggested that Windows has DFS
(Distributed File System) and I said I would look into it.
Microsoft's DFS is a method for creating another copy of your
Andrew Watkins wrote:
My manager asked me if I could a mirror copy of our /var/mail on another
system, just in case the system went down. He suggested that Windows has DFS
(Distributed File System) and I said I would look into it.
Over the weekend I thought of CacheFS which comes will solaris
Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
Being that SUN has a comprehensive agreement with Microsoft, and CIFS IIRC is
an openstandard,
CIFS? An open standard? No way. Microsoft has never managed to
publish anything complete enough for independent implementation,
and has always felt free to change the imple
Plain NFS should work fine. We (sun) have a (few) large /var/mail shared out
via nfs which works fine. We also live on NFS for just about everything,
(installs, home dirs, shared place for applications, you name it)
If you've a large number of connections to the nfs server up the nfs t
I see. Thank you very much for explaining it to me!
regards,
Anze
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
My manager asked me if I could a mirror copy of our /var/mail on another
system, just in case the system went down. He suggested that Windows has DFS
(Distributed File System) and I said I would look into it.
Over the weekend I thought of CacheFS which comes will solaris which allows you
to hav
Anze Vidmar wrote:
Thank you for the info. However, I'm still wondering why smb/cifs support was
never
included in the solaris kernel? Is it a legal issue?
We were talking about a CIFS client for Solaris in 1999 or so, but
we couldn't proceed because we couldn't make the business case.
At tha
Frank Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Is there **ANY** shell which actually supports this amyelencephalus?
> >
> > What is that word you keep using I can't find a definition for it.
>
> You didn't properly search then :)
>
> amyelencephalia (amy·el·en·ce·pha·lia)
> congenital absence
"Holger Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no way for a shell script to read, write, rename or delete an
You may do this either with 'cd -@ file' or using "runat".
> attribute file. Applications without special support for the openat()
> API have no way to access the files either. All
"Holger Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think runat(1) is a good debug/development tool. I don't believe that
> > it is useful for building applications on top of, if you need to build
> > apps then use openat(2) and friends not shell scripting.
>
> Please relocate the tool to /sbin/runa
"Holger Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Roland proposed to implement "cd -@ file" in addition to runat(1).
>
> In which list was this amyelencephalus proposed?
Could you lease try to use words that could be found in a dictionary?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAI
"Holger Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Sun implemention appeared 2 months after there was a XATTR related
> > discussion on the POSIX mailing list.
> >
> > The Sun XATTR implementation solves all problems shown by the Microsoft
> > members
> > of the OpenGroup board without suffering
"Holger Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/5/06, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Holger Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > What if the "application" is the shell itself? The shell cannot access
> >
> > This is not really true. the shell may access the files aft
Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > I see no reason to change the current API.
>
> Thanks thats good to know.
I like this implementation since it appeared a short time after
Microsoft proposed a non-POSIX compliant way for the same purpose in 2001.
It has the
Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to calculate (plus or minus about 5%) what percentage of the
> whole Solaris product is open source today and what percentage it is
> likely to be when Solaris 11 releases. It doesn't matter if the source
> is hosted on opensolaris.org or is
I'll try when mine arrives :)
I take it this means that the keyboards on the Macbooks are more
standard than those on the powerbooks (ADB)
On 08/05/2006, at 3:21 PM, Ché Kristo wrote:
there is no diff at all moving from an imac to macbook (mind you i
have only tried this on a 15"). So far
29 matches
Mail list logo
