That said, Fluendo plugins are based on the GStreamer
free media
streaming engine, and Sun employees are involved with
making GStreamer
work on Solaris.
Brian
I have a very negative experience with GStreamer in Linux (SuSE, Debian,
Fedora, Ubuntu). This experience was, unfortunately,
That community appears to have gone to sleep for a
while and it hasn't
considered small FLASH based boards.
I was looking for an alternative to CE on this class
of system.
If you want to start there a good start would be getting OpenSolaris to run on
the Soekris appliance. It's an AMD
I think gaim 2.0beta_whatever (maybe from blastwave) uses GStreamer,
but I never got it to work (although ISTR some email archives in which
that was a known problem not fully resolved). I ended up using NAS
(can't remember where I got that) and the associated auplay command, since
that had less
No, that's controlled by The Open Group, although the members
(of which Sun is only one) that contributed may have something
to say about it too.
See
http://www.opengroup.org/cde/
http://www.opengroup.org/desktop/ordering/
http://www.opengroup.org/desktop/ordering/motif.price.list.htm
Some times ago XiG was providing product called DeXtop (XiG variant of CDE)
If I am sure this link don't contains full DeXtop (XiG variant of CDE) source
code?
Am I sure?
ftp://ftp.xig.com/pub/src/
Thanks.
regards,
Girts
This message posted from opensolaris.org
W. Wayne:
That said, Fluendo plugins are based on the GStreamer
free media
streaming engine, and Sun employees are involved with
making GStreamer
work on Solaris.
I have a very negative experience with GStreamer in Linux
(SuSE, Debian, Fedora, Ubuntu). This experience was,
unfortunately,
Girts,
We discussed CDE support over in the desktop-discuss
community.
Jon Trulson and Bryan Chambers were the key contacts
of the DeXtop CDE 3.0 product under XiG.
There was still a license attached to that product as
well, yet I don't know if XiG still maintains the
product. Check it out.
~
MichaelLi writes:
Recently, I'm reading 'C Style and Coding Standards for SunOS'. But I
find it's writen in 1996 and it also refers to the future version of the this
document. I just find the 1996 version of this document on OpenSolaris Quick
Start site. Now I'm wondering where I can
The source there is just their X server and OpenMotif; no CDE.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
jason seok writes:
Hey.
planning to change IP addresses of some servers.
is there any way not to reboot after changing
/etc/hosts,/ets/netmasks,/etc/defaultrouter files?
Yes; see the ifconfig(1M) and route(1M) commands for details.
Note that some applications you're using may not be
Thank You all for answers.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
contribution too but with CDDL alone it is just not possible in
foreseeable future. People afraid to contribute to CDDL projects for
variety of reasons, look how cdrecord has been forked to be pure GPL
project just because of that.
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Ben Rockwood wrote:
Since your commenting on good things in B56 I'll add the following server
observations (on X4100):
On the down side, it still won't install on a Latitude D620 -- install
just hangs forever (problem appears same as in previous sxcr releases that
I've
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Stephen Harpster wrote:
We can't ditch CDDL for all the reasons we put it there in the first place --
and we don't want to alienate the community we have. There are still folks
who will want to embed OpenSolaris in appliances and create proprietary
solutions. CDDL allows
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Stephen Harpster wrote:
We can't ditch CDDL for all the reasons we put it there in the first place --
and we don't want to alienate the community we have. There are still folks
who will want to embed OpenSolaris in appliances and create proprietary
solutions. CDDL
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Stephen Harpster wrote:
An increase in developers developing applications for OpenSolaris and an
increase in people using an OpenSolaris distribution. It's reaching out to an
audience that has been ignoring OpenSolaris. Embracing more people, making
more friends, gets
Some people have asserted or implied that although support for this
proposal is not easily discernable, nevertheless it is there, and therefore
the proposal passes per current policy.
I agree and think we should move it along, which means that the next step
is a post (by me, as usual)
Thanks, John. You have seconds. I'll contact you offline to
get you set up.
Eric
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, John Sonnenschein wrote:
Currently, there is no possible way to build an opensolaris distribution without
including the closed-source libc_i18n.a. What this means is that a traditional
Eric Boutilier wrote:
Some people have asserted or implied that although support for this
proposal is not easily discernable, nevertheless it is there, and therefore
the proposal passes per current policy.
I agree and think we should move it along, which means that the next step
is a post (by
Chris Ricker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
contribution too but with CDDL alone it is just not possible in
foreseeable future. People afraid to contribute to CDDL projects for
variety of reasons, look how cdrecord has been forked to be pure GPL
I don't mean to spoil the party, certainly OpenSolaris has improved immensely,
but my laptop HP/Compaq NC6220 with Broadcom wireless, iwi, used to work with
earlier builds B52 I think. With B54, B55, B56, wireless disappears.
scanpci sees the hardware, pc8086,4220, but I can't get wireless
I don't mean to spoil the party, certainly OpenSolaris has improved
immensely, but my laptop HP/Co mpaq NC6220 with Broadcom wireless, iwi,
used to work with earlier builds B52 I think. With B54, B55, B56,
wireless disappears. scanpci sees the hardware, pc8086,4220, but I
can't get wireless w
Hi All-
this may be first and last post to this list...
Is there a portal site for this mailing list?
(I'm one of those types who baulks at 500+ emails since Friday.)
I've just got into the OpenSolaris thing, trying to get it installed on
a VirtualBox, so I do want to get tips advice, but
I believe the consensus was that it be a /project/ in the appliance or
storage communities. It didn't find traction to be a project under the
ON/Nevada community, and it didn't get consensus's to be a community on
its own at this time.
-John
Eric Boutilier wrote:
Some people have asserted
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Doug Scott wrote:
Xorg, keeps on going and going. You exit firefox, and Xorg does not
return
the memory.
Xorg uses standard UNIX malloc, so memory won't be returned to the OS
upon
free, just to the free space list in the Xorg heap, unless it was a
shared
memory
Max Russell wrote:
Hi All-
this may be first and last post to this list...
Is there a portal site for this mailing list?
Yes.
On the main opensolaris.org site click the discussions button.
That takes you to a list of all the @opensolaris.org mail aliases that
are bridged to a Jive forum
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Eric Boutilier wrote:
Some people have asserted or implied that although support for this
proposal is not easily discernable, nevertheless it is there, and
therefore
the proposal passes per current policy.
I agree and think we should move it along, which means that the
Stephen Lau wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Eric Boutilier wrote:
Some people have asserted or implied that although support for this
proposal is not easily discernable, nevertheless it is there, and
therefore
the proposal passes per current policy.
I agree and think we should move it along,
Doug Scott wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. This explains what is happening to
firefox. Is Xorg
looking into the problem, as it can be a real pain having to restart X
every so often.
I don't know of anyone at X.Org looking into the problem since it's pretty
universally believed to be a
Max Russell wrote:
Hi All-
this may be first and last post to this list...
Is there a portal site for this mailing list?
(I'm one of those types who baulks at 500+ emails since Friday.)
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=13
The return of Solaris.Read this:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/02/06/hp_solaris_support/
Giacomo
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
* Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-06 09:40]:
Stephen Lau wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Eric Boutilier wrote:
Some people have asserted or implied that although support for this
proposal is not easily discernable, nevertheless it is there, and
therefore the proposal passes per
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Stephen Lau wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Eric Boutilier wrote:
Some people have asserted or implied that although support for this
proposal is not easily discernable, nevertheless it is there, and
therefore
the proposal passes per current policy.
I agree and think
The Dec06/Jan07 OpenSolaris Community Newsletter:
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/content/newsletter/dec06-jan07/
Please send your contributions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Linda
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Stephen Hahn wrote:
* Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-06 09:40]:
Stephen Lau wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Eric Boutilier wrote:
Some people have asserted or implied that although support for this
proposal is not easily discernable, nevertheless it is there, and
therefore the
Hi All,
I have a few (3) Questions at the bottom, for you opensolaris developers, et
all.
But, first of all, thanks for OpenSolaris ! it works great (now, to get
Mplayer, and DVD:Rip goin' :) yup, its now workin'... betiful. mmm, The
4-channel sound is well -not so good? -no decent
Hi, I was wondering if the /etc/release file should be updated after all
patched have been applied to a system? I have solaris 10 06/06 and I did
an smpatch update and successfuly applied all patches. How do I know this
takes me up to 11/06 now?
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Stephen Lau wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Stephen Lau wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Eric Boutilier wrote:
Some people have asserted or implied that although support for this
proposal is not easily discernable, nevertheless it is there, and
therefore
the proposal passes
-ok there you are, i was lookin' for this post,
Hi All,
I have a few (3) Questions at the bottom, for you opensolaris developers, et
all.
But, first of all, thanks for OpenSolaris ! it works great (now, to get
Mplayer, and DVD:Rip goin' :) yup, its now workin'... betiful. mmm, The
stevel == Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
stevel Approval must be obtained from the core contributors of the
stevel community. (i.e.: core contributors give the +1 or -1 votes).
stevel Votes are tallied and recorded by the project proposer, and the
stevel outcome recorded on the form.
RL == Richard Lowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RL It's important that projects are fairly easy to acquire, but it's
RL also important that they don't just appear, do nothing in public
RL related to the project, and sit dormant (I say, while looking firmly
RL at devname again).
One of the things
Richard Nekus writes:
1./ So, can you, as developers, ... of opensolaris simply not
make your own Open License ? instead of just GeePLvx, and/or CDDL,
... why not?
The instructions for developers are here:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/sun_contributor_agreement/
My understanding
Hi, I was wondering if the /etc/release file should
be updated after all
patched have been applied to a system? I have
solaris 10 06/06 and I did
an smpatch update and successfuly applied all
patches. How do I know this
takes me up to 11/06 now?
If you bought a Sun service
This involves the OGB too much in the day-to-day running of OpenSolaris.
I can imagine a project appealing to the OGB, but they shouldn't be
involved normally.
+1; the OGB should be a background task with few interrupts until there
is a serious conflict.
Casper
Upgrading to Solaris 10 11/06 isn't the same as loading patches. Often new
features are not in patches, but are in updates. So, your /etc/release will
stay at Solaris 10 06/06 unless/until you do a Solaris upgrade.
Brett Albertson
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Stephen Lau wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Stephen Lau wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Eric Boutilier wrote:
Some people have asserted or implied that although support for this
proposal is not easily discernable, nevertheless it is there, and
therefore
Mike Kupfer writes:
stevel == Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
stevel Approval must be obtained from the core contributors of the
stevel community. (i.e.: core contributors give the +1 or -1 votes).
stevel Votes are tallied and recorded by the project proposer, and the
stevel outcome
They get my +1 for sure. And I would say the storage/HC is the right
place.
/scott
On Feb 4, 2007, at 8:21 PM, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
Stephen Lau wrote On 02/03/07 04:19,:
Scott Tracy wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 11:25 PM, Stephen Hahn wrote:
* Scott Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL
Richard Nekus wrote:
Nevertheless, as one of many examples, how much has Apple, ..., or anyone,
including Sun Microsystems given to OpenBSD's OpenSSH, ..., for their contributions, just
to mention one. Well, apparently not a red cent! and we all know that. No? then just ask
Theo. ;) -good
On 2/6/07, Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry - I've never used Opera and don't know what it does.
One thing it *doesn't* do is to bloat Xorg to 684MB in 24 hours.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Thanks, Doug. You have seconds. I'll contact you offline to
get you set up.
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Doug Scott wrote:
For you who don't know, Xfce is a lightweight desktop built using the gtk+
libraries. Currently there is a very old verion of Xfce as part of the
companion CD with no owner. I am
Stephen Lau wrote:
Except that you have projects like devname[1] which
have done absolutely *nothing* with their project space.
...
[1] http://opensolaris.org/os/project/devname/
Yep. We need a project removal strategy too.
Maybe project requesters need to include what
the initial
So in my opinion, this project proposal, and getting
more like it, is
desirable.
Eric
I agree completely. I have experienced first-hand the proposal of a good and
useful, non-code project that, when it was socialized and proposed to the
associated community, was not blessed. And a year
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Doug Scott wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. This explains what is happening to
firefox. Is Xorg
looking into the problem, as it can be a real pain having to restart X
every so often.
I don't know of anyone at X.Org looking into the problem since it's pretty
Hey,
Richard Lowe wrote:
The initial project proposal process was written to generally allow
projects that had more than one interested individual, and was
appropriate when we didn't know what a project should be; I think Ben
and Steve's idea to refine it, now that we're further
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 15:58, James Carlson wrote:
At least at this point, I'd be disinclined to reject a project
unless it either looks like the output from /dev/urandom or like
this:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-terrell-math-quant-ternar
y-logic-of-binary-sys-04.txt
Hey,
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
Some have been considering a bug bounty program, so yes, I think we
ought to consider specific programs to engage more people in more ways
and then call attention to their contributions.
We really need to get our submission for the Summer of Code rocking this year -
I haven't heard back from anyone, and was curious if the folks at Sun could
comment (or forward the original message to someone who could) on the bugs
listed in the original message?
Thanks for any insight,
- Ryan
--
UNIX Administrator
http://prefetch.net
This message posted from
Ryan,
You might try asking directly on security-discuss as that's where the SSH
minded folks hang out.
dsc
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Richard:
I think gaim 2.0beta_whatever (maybe from blastwave) uses GStreamer,
but I never got it to work (although ISTR some email archives in which
that was a known problem not fully resolved). I ended up using NAS
(can't remember where I got that) and the associated auplay command, since
On 6-Feb-07, at 6:03 PM, Glynn Foster wrote:
Hey,
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
Some have been considering a bug bounty program, so yes, I think we
ought to consider specific programs to engage more people in more
ways
and then call attention to their contributions.
We really need to get our
The first day that the CAB met, almost two years ago, we talked about
all of the things that OpenSolaris needed to do to become successful.
Central to that discussion were three principles:
1) everyone needs to work on a common version control system
2) everyone needs to use a common issue
The first day that the CAB met, almost two years ago, we talked about
all of the things that OpenSolaris needed to do to become successful.
Central to that discussion were three principles:
1) everyone needs to work on a common version control system
2) everyone needs to use a common
Peter Buckingham wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
Has anyone done any work on a minimal embeddable Open Solaris that can
boot from FLASH on a single board PC?
I was think initially of the windows CE space, rather than the embedded
Linux one.
For Honeycomb we use ramdisk images that we load
Ian Collins wrote:
I'm more interested in paring things down to a minimal kernel that can
be loaded from FLASH. 64-128MB would be my target.
That may well be possible with some more extreme measures. What I started
with is the reduced network core install which is ~200MB. This doesn't
include
Embracing more
people, making more friends, gets more people
talking about you,
participating, and developing with you. Growing the
population.
There's other ways to achieve this though - a simple
license change may not
necessarily be the best approach [1]. A very obvious
example
Otherwise, stick with the CDDL. GPLv3 cannot be
evaluated seriously
until it is actually approved by the FSF and
published in final form.
Even then, dual-licensing wouldn't make any sense,
but at least we'd
have an idea of the actual impact of a switch from
CDDL to GPLv3.
Roy
[
Peter Buckingham wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
I'm more interested in paring things down to a minimal kernel that can
be loaded from FLASH. 64-128MB would be my target.
That may well be possible with some more extreme measures. What I started
with is the reduced network core install which
Just a quick announcement that the closed binary emancipation project
is now open at http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/emancipation/ .
I've put some skeleton .c files up corresponding with the functions
of libc_i18n that need to be reimplemented on our hg repo:
Hey,
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Feb 3, 2007, at 14:46, Peter Tribble wrote:
I'm fairly sure that a flamefest on a mailing list isn't the right way.
Perhaps it's a necessary step, but I don't think it's conducive to
substantive discussions.
I would be pleased if it didn't happen like it has
Hey,
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
I think the lists on opensolaris.org (177 of them currently) represent
pretty well the community in the U.S. That's where the vast majority of
traffic and posts come from and it's not even close. However, there are
many people outside the U.S. who are just now
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Bob Palowoda wrote:
Hi, I was wondering if the /etc/release file should
be updated after all
patched have been applied to a system? I have
solaris 10 06/06 and I did
an smpatch update and successfuly applied all
patches. How do I know this
takes me up to 11/06 now?
If
Ian Collins wrote:
Interesting, do you have anything published?
Not yet. I'm working on putting something together as part of the Honeycomb
project. We've had interest both internally and externally about what we
are doing. Our system looks more like a server than a traditional embedded
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Bob Palowoda wrote:
Hi, I was wondering if the /etc/release file should
be updated after all
patched have been applied to a system? I have
solaris 10 06/06 and I did
an smpatch update and successfuly applied all
patches. How do I know this
takes me up to 11/06 now?
Hier ist die offizielle Dokumentation, echte Systemhelden jedoch kommen mit nur
zwei man-Pages aus: zpool und zfs.
- Constantin Gonzalez (loosely translated as 'Here is the
official documentation; real system heroes need only the
two manpages:
I'm more interested in paring things down to a minimal kernel that can
be loaded from FLASH. 64-128MB would be my target.
My minimized install miniroot is a 64MB; so it should be possible to make
that work (it's a full kernel running the installer)
Casper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm more interested in paring things down to a minimal kernel that can
be loaded from FLASH. 64-128MB would be my target.
My minimized install miniroot is a 64MB; so it should be possible to make
that work (it's a full kernel running the installer)
Is it
77 matches
Mail list logo
