Hi Frank,
thank you for great amount of work you've done so far.
We'll monitor your updates.
Best regards,
alexander.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Ron Halstead wrote:
> > Where?
>
> Under the Quick Download Links:
>
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads/sol_ex_dvd/
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads/sol_ex_cd
> >
> >
> > This message posted from opensolaris.org
>
> --
> Derek Cicero
> Program Manager
> Solaris Kernel Grou
Martti Hamunen wrote:
What is the reason?
./configure is ok but make not.
It is here:
# make
make all-recursive
Making all in po
Making all in src
source='disc.c' object='disc.o' libtool=no \
DEPDIR=.deps depmode=none /bin/bash ../depcomp \
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include
What is the reason?
./configure is ok but make not.
It is here:
# make
make all-recursive
Making all in po
Making all in src
source='disc.c' object='disc.o' libtool=no \
DEPDIR=.deps depmode=none /bin/bash ../depcomp \
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include -g -c disc.c
"disc.c",
For example, if I bought a bunch of hardware pieces from
Frys or Circuit City or some yum-cha shop and got it up
and running with [Open]Solaris by sacrificing 3 virgins
whilst doing a tribal dance, I don't see this as being of
relevance to device-driver or other forums but at the
same time, pote
I'd like to propose that either a new discussion forum or a
new community and discussion forum be created for talk
about Solaris on various platforms. I'm not sure if there
should be a seperate one for sparc and x86. Maybe it becomes
hardware:sparc and hardware:x86, I don't know.
The goal is to
> You seem to not like GNOME very much or the most
> capable open source
> browser we have available for the platform. It might
> be better if you
> proposed alternatives.
I can't speak for him, but while I think GNOME _may_
have more potential, I think KDE is a lot slicker and faster
feeling rig
> I fully support this effort but I don't understand why a separate
> project repository, webpage and mailing list is required.
>
> This is really just about the build tools and we already have a project
> for this.
>
> So I VERY strongly suggest we do NOT create a project for this but
> inste
My Solaris 10 machine isn't booted at the moment but I believe my
recollection is accurate (I'm on an S9 machine). If I am incorrect in
any way I trust others will follow up.
Read the prtvtoc man page (man prtvtoc). Notice that the partition with
tag 5 is the entire disk. Use the correspond
>
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>>Here are unexpected outputs
>>>echo EFG|/usr/xpg6/bin/tr '[A-Z]' '[a-z]'
>>>FGH
>>>echo EFG|/usr/xpg4/bin/tr '[A-Z]' '[a-z]'
>>>FGH
>>>Th
>>>correct output
>>>echo EFG|/usr/bin/tr '[A-Z]' '[a-z]'
>>>efg
>>>I only see this issue on SPARC solaris. both 06/06
Jonathan Heard napisał(a):
I am seeing exactly the same issue on my Compaq evo N610c - I've even updated
to the latest BIOS just in case there was an issue, but still - When I try to
install b60 (Which is my first attempt to install OpenSolaris on my laptop) I
cannot type anything after leavin
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 07:48 am, Al Hopper wrote:
> > * James D. Carlson,
> > * Alan Coopersmith,
> > * Casper Dik,
> > * Glynn Foster,
> > * Stephen Lau,
> > * Rich Teer, and
> > * Keith M. Wesolowski.
>
> Let me be the first to congratulate our new OGB Board m
> Hi,
>
> In Linux, the procfs interface is used for more than
> just the process
> related information. For instance, on my linux box,
> /proc/fs/nfs/exports
> shows the nfs exports and /proc/vmstat has vm
> statistics etc...
>
> It looks like Solaris uses it only for exporting
> information
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 04:49 am, Shawn Walker wrote:
> "fat unstable GNOME" -- you realise that Sun chose GNOME as the
> desktop a long time ago for Solaris? I also think that your
> description of GNOME is rather unfair, and rather inaccurate.
It might be innacurate, but this has long been the
flarcreate(1M) aka Flash(TM)?
Read up on it on docs.sun.com.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
somebody knows how to create disk image contains 3 partition in
solaris 10?? I tried ufsdump but this tools only copy files and also I
tried g4u but not working because I have usb keyboard. you have any
ideas??
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
> Not sure why you would want to backup using dd. Have
> you looked at ufsdump / ufsrestore?
>
> Andrew.
yes but only copy files, I need create image file
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-disc
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 09:05 am, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> It may be that there is a bug in the voting software.
I'm not sure why you say that, and while I think it was confusing the way it
was setup (I had 2 different core contributors mention it was confusing to
setup their key), it seemed to
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I did set up everything and when I connected via ssh, I did see a menu that
> >allowed me to select between the "test vote (constitutuion" and the final OGB
> >election. I selected the first and answered the question. The last question
> >was
> >a
Gnome had an applet (gimlet?) which sounds exactly like the KDE KB switcher
you're describing, unfortunately it relied on a lobrary (xklavier) which
depended on private X.org internals. Since not everyone uses X.org and even
those who do don't all use the same version, the fact that it worked w
>Here are unexpected outputs
>echo EFG|/usr/xpg6/bin/tr '[A-Z]' '[a-z]'
>FGH
>echo EFG|/usr/xpg4/bin/tr '[A-Z]' '[a-z]'
>FGH
>Th
>correct output
>echo EFG|/usr/bin/tr '[A-Z]' '[a-z]'
>efg
>I only see this issue on SPARC solaris. both 06/06 11/06. The x86 one seems
>to be fine.
You need t
Here are unexpected outputs
echo EFG|/usr/xpg6/bin/tr '[A-Z]' '[a-z]'
FGH
echo EFG|/usr/xpg4/bin/tr '[A-Z]' '[a-z]'
FGH
Th
correct output
echo EFG|/usr/bin/tr '[A-Z]' '[a-z]'
efg
I only see this issue on SPARC solaris. both 06/06 11/06. The x86 one seems to
be fine.
This message posted
I'm looking for input and an example for what I'm about to accomplish with Soft
partitions on our Solaris 10 Sparc system.
We have 2 luns one is 153GB and the other is 156gb, and I've setup the disks
to have
everything on slice 0. These Luns are setup in an EMC Hardware Raid 5. Lun1
will cont
>I did set up everything and when I connected via ssh, I did see a menu that
>allowed me to select between the "test vote (constitutuion" and the final OGB
>election. I selected the first and answered the question. The last question
>was
>a question for the OGB candidates which looked to me lik
On Mar 27, 2007, at 08:13, Joerg Schilling wrote:
"Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now comes the really hard part .. the waiting !
Was somebody able to do a real OGB voting after he did
finish the prevoting on March 12th?
Yes, I was.
S.
___
What I, with the few but existing experiences I've had with it,
disfavor in GNOME is the fact that it does not look and feel good. It
looks old, gray and basic, and does not work intuitively. KDE has a
much fresher look, and has in my opinion a more intuitive interface.
For example, I never reall
Here are links to the latest batch of overview reports (rollups).
You can also receive them by subscribing to the RSS feed:
http://del.icio.us/rss/bootblog/oss:rollups
or bookmarking the URL:
http://del.icio.us/bootblog/oss:rollups
cab-discuss 03/01 - 03/15
http://mail.opens
Shawn Walker wrote:
On 26/03/07, Chung Hang Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please, no entrenched GNOME or gcc.
>
> What does that mean?
It means please do not take it down the Nexenta road
of using gcc built packages and fat unstable GNOME. It
"fat unstable GNOME" -- you rea
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Around March 12th, there was a mail that told us to to some kind of "testing"
of the voting system and to vote for the constitution.
I did set up everything and when I connected via ssh, I did see a menu that
allowed me to select between the "test vote (constitutuion" and
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, James Carlson wrote:
> An ioctl? How unlinucian. Why wouldn't that be more like this?
>
> # echo en_US > /proc/sys/kernel/locale
You see? That's why I'd never make it as a Linux programmer!
BTW, congrats on being elected to the OGB!
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSE
Rich Teer writes:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, James Carlson wrote:
>
> > On the plus side, by burying text formatting in the kernel where it
> > doesn't belong, it makes i18n support range from "hard" to
> > "impossible" to achieve. :-/
>
> You mean you've not heard of the new Linux kernel 2.18 ioctl
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, James Carlson wrote:
> On the plus side, by burying text formatting in the kernel where it
> doesn't belong, it makes i18n support range from "hard" to
> "impossible" to achieve. :-/
You mean you've not heard of the new Linux kernel 2.18 ioctl,
IOCSETLOCALE? :-)
--
Rich
Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > "Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Now comes the really hard part .. the waiting !
> >
> > Was somebody able to do a real OGB voting after he did
> > finish the prevoting on March 1
"Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 27/03/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Now comes the really hard part .. the waiting !
> >
> > Was somebody able to do a real OGB voting after he did
> > finish the prevo
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> "Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Now comes the really hard part .. the waiting !
>
> Was somebody able to do a real OGB voting after he did
> finish the prevoting on March 12th?
Hi Joerg,
I'm confused by this email - I have no
Joerg Schilling wrote:
"Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now comes the really hard part .. the waiting !
Was somebody able to do a real OGB voting after he did
finish the prevoting on March 12th?
I was.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun M
On 27/03/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now comes the really hard part .. the waiting !
Was somebody able to do a real OGB voting after he did
finish the prevoting on March 12th?
I was.
--
"Less is only more where more is no
"Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now comes the really hard part .. the waiting !
Was somebody able to do a real OGB voting after he did
finish the prevoting on March 12th?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Alexander Zakharov wrote:
Hi Frank,
What's the current status of your proposal?
I'd like to take a part in this project if I can of course:)
Best regards,
alexander
Hi Alexander,
sorry for all the delay in this...
Yes, the project is going ahead. I'll fill the project pa
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Stephen Hahn wrote:
>
>Complete results posted at
>
>http://poll.opensolaris.org/2/
>
>Summary
>
>- With respect to Question 1, the Constitution is deemed ratified and
> in effect, with 145 Ayes, 4 Nays, and 4 Abstaining. With 268 Core
> Contributors,
I am seeing exactly the same issue on my Compaq evo N610c - I've even updated
to the latest BIOS just in case there was an issue, but still - When I try to
install b60 (Which is my first attempt to install OpenSolaris on my laptop) I
cannot type anything after leaving the GRUB boot screen.
This
Frank Hofmann writes:
> Linux procfs is doing the wrong thing in the wrong place ...
On the plus side, by burying text formatting in the kernel where it
doesn't belong, it makes i18n support range from "hard" to
"impossible" to achieve. :-/
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EM
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Manoj Joseph wrote:
[ ... ]
The problem I am trying to solve is that I want to export to userland some
information that is available in a kernel module - let's say my kernel
module.
The approaches that are being considered are 1) using the proc interface, 2)
using ioctls
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 02:14 -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
> Slightly off topic, but since you mentioned the disabilities act,
> doesn't the U.S. government use Linux as well? And I haven't noticed
> that the RedHat installer provides anything special for people with
> disabilities. So how's come RedHat
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Is my understanding correct? If it is, does Solaris have an
alternative for exporting more arbitrary information like Linux does?
Yes OpenSolaris does this in a much more structured way that the
arbitrary format text files that Linux does.
For mos
>Darren J Moffat wrote:
>
>>> Is my understanding correct? If it is, does Solaris have an
>>> alternative for exporting more arbitrary information like Linux does?
>>
>> Yes OpenSolaris does this in a much more structured way that the
>> arbitrary format text files that Linux does.
>>
>> For m
Manoj Joseph wrote:
The problem I am trying to solve is that I want to export to userland
some information that is available in a kernel module - let's say my
kernel module.
The approaches that are being considered are 1) using the proc
interface, 2) using ioctls.
Looks like 1 is not pos
Not sure why you would want to backup using dd. Have you looked at ufsdump /
ufsrestore?
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Is my understanding correct? If it is, does Solaris have an
alternative for exporting more arbitrary information like Linux does?
Yes OpenSolaris does this in a much more structured way that the
arbitrary format text files that Linux does.
For most of the things you d
How about changing the links on the download page to the "magic" ones which are
automatically updated? In other words:
http://opensolaris.org/sxce_dvd
and the CD equivalent.
Cheers
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-
On 26/03/07, Chung Hang Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please, no entrenched GNOME or gcc.
>
> What does that mean?
It means please do not take it down the Nexenta road
of using gcc built packages and fat unstable GNOME. It
"fat unstable GNOME" -- you realise that Sun chose G
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Hi,
In Linux, the procfs interface is used for more than just the process
related information. For instance, on my linux box, /proc/fs/nfs/exports
shows the nfs exports and /proc/vmstat has vm statistics etc...
A dumping ground of semi-structured information that is IMO
I have to backup many filesystems, which are changing and machines are heavy
loaded.
The idea is to backup online - this should avoid I/O read operations from
disks,
data should go from cache.
Now I'm using script that does snapshot and zfs send.
I want to automate this operation and add new op
I fully support this effort but I don't understand why a separate
project repository, webpage and mailing list is required.
This is really just about the build tools and we already have a project
for this.
So I VERY strongly suggest we do NOT create a project for this but
instead using the e
Quyen Nguyen wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know from which openSSH version that SUN_SSH_.1.1 was developed
from? I need this info to complete the IA (Information Assurance) certification
for Solaris 10 on x86 platform.
This was also asked and answered in detail on security-discuss.
--
Darren J
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Hi,
In Linux, the procfs interface is used for more than just the process
related information. For instance, on my linux box,
/proc/fs/nfs/exports shows the nfs exports and /proc/vmstat has vm
statistics etc...
It looks like Solaris uses it only for exporting informati
Hi,
In Linux, the procfs interface is used for more than just the process
related information. For instance, on my linux box, /proc/fs/nfs/exports
shows the nfs exports and /proc/vmstat has vm statistics etc...
It looks like Solaris uses it only for exporting information relating to
process
I have 3 partition on hard drive. If I backup these partition using dd how I
restore them?? Using another system (like Knoppix) or from this system??
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@op
58 matches
Mail list logo
