Ok ,I was able to set my path correctly with your
directions.However I have installed gcc under usr/bin
which was definitely in the original path,and in
opt/csw/bin via blastwave and when I do a which gcc
it says that it's not found under usr/bin or usr/sbin
so I don't know what else to look
Here's my personal wish list in priority order:
1. get SADA (existing Sun audio API) compatibility actually working - I don't
know how it is on x86, but on SPARC, last I tried (snv 60, latest-1 OSS),
it flat out didn't work - got an error trying to open the device.
2. support for builtin audio
I appreciate all of your help.By the way,I looked under /usr/sfw/bin and there
is a gcc binary in there but I can't run it(under root,doing a ./gcc in
/usr/sfw/bin gives me a no input file message) and even after adding the
directory to my path in /etc/default/login and /etc/default/su ,which
I don't honestly know. It sounds like it's not reading from the SUPATH entry in
/etc/default/su? Is the directory showing up when you type: echo $PATH in a
terminal?
You have to change two different things, the SUPATH for root (which is in
/usr/default/su), and the PATH for the user. The
Here's my personal wish list in priority order:
1. get SADA (existing Sun audio API) compatibility actually working - I don't
know how it is on x86, but on SPARC, last I tried (snv 60, latest-1 OSS),
it flat out didn't work - got an error trying to open the device.
The times I tried I too got
Thanks Darren/Casper for your replies.
your replies have led to demystify lot of things ...
can you suggest some ways to bind the rpc program with fixed port on the
portmapper which should involve minimal code changes as there are inherent
dependencies with other system..
Regards,
This
I appreciate all of your help.By the way,I looked
under /usr/sfw/bin and there is a gcc binary in there
but I can't run it(under root,doing a ./gcc in
/usr/sfw/bin gives me a no input file message) and
no input files is correct. Namely, you do need a C program to compile, as in:
gcc
Thanks Darren/Casper for your replies.
your replies have led to demystify lot of things ...
can you suggest some ways to bind the rpc program with fixed port on the
portmapper which should i
nvolve minimal code changes as there are inherent dependencies with other
system..
Regards,
The
Hmm, the Nvidia go 7400 works quite nicely - its
surprising that the go
6150 considering it is an older GPU than mine :S
Matthew
Actually Sun's xorg developers are well on top of this issue. I am
particularly interested in the nVidia GO 6150 because, as I mentioned quite a
few times,
[...]
My main issue with USB audio support is NOT how well
or not it works, but
that plugging in a USB microphone automatically makes
the USB device the
primary audio device; even though the USB device has
no audio output.
The system is free to pick a different default audio
device for
Thanks Darren/Casper for your replies.
your replies have led to demystify lot of things ...
can you suggest some ways to bind the rpc program
with fixed port on the portmapper which should i
nvolve minimal code changes as there are inherent
dependencies with other system..
Regards,
On a System V UNIX, such as Solaris, /opt is reserved
for 3rd party and for unbundled applications; that's
where stuff is supposed to go. /var/opt is where the
3rd party application data goes, and /etc/opt is
where the 3rd party application's configuration files
go.
And if you _must_ have
Alan DuBoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Michael Huff wrote:
Is it that simple?
Sun paid money to SCO to license IP (of some form) relating to Unix -why
would they do that if they already owned the rights to it?
Insurance? While I don't know exactly what they did
Richard L. Hamilton writes:
If there were a way to trigger some action when a port
was (de)registered with rpcbind, that might help; whether
that action was to add an ipf rule, or to communicate the
That doesn't work if the dependent device (firewall or whatever) is
outside of the box.
UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you guys hate CDE so much ?
Says who we hate it?
All of us old-skool oldtimers have been using CDE for years and years and
years.
I would say that old school people use Openwin ,-)
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353
Hello,
I have a nvidia gforce 6100 that have a Realtek HD
Audio. This chip works well without any driver other
than a nvidia driver shipped with OpenSolaris.
If you have a nvidia gforce like this, setting is
very easy:
- Run /usr/X11/bin/scanpci and find the device id
for HDaudio
-
Hello,
I have a nvidia gforce 6100 that have a Realtek HD
Audio. This chip works well without any driver other
than a nvidia driver shipped with OpenSolaris.
If you have a nvidia gforce like this, setting is
very easy:
- Run /usr/X11/bin/scanpci and find the device id
for HDaudio
-
I have done it all backwards and forwards.
driver_aliases is pci10de,26c.
No errors but also no sound.
/dev/sound/0 and /dev/sound/0ctl are both there and
linked into /devices correctly but no sound.
What is reported by the command mixerctl ?
Maybe some usb sound device (webcam microphone)
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ian Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you guys hate CDE so much ?
A closed source desktop that no one appears interested in enhancing, let
alone opening, doesn't rub well with an opens source OS. Me. I'd prefer
Orvar Korvar wrote:
Ok, ive tried that, sub pixel smoothing and such stuff and it looks better.
Would installing trutype fonts make it looks better still? I can rip them
from my Windows XP installation?
GNOME mainly uses TrueType fonts already - high-quality TrueType
fonts may look better
There are lots of bundled stuff on the Solaris installation. Look everywhere
for them. gcc is in /usr/sfw/bin
This is my PATH. I had to manually look in every directory for executable
files, and I found them in:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 06:52:30PM +0100, Alan Burlison wrote:
It appears to me that opensolaris-discuss is becoming more and more
dominated with Solaris installation questions, and the OpenSolaris
content is becoming lost in the noise. Whilst it is very nice that
people are being so
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
I agree; this is why we set up opensolaris-help. But even there,
questions should be about getting up and running (or up and
developing) with an OpenSolaris-based distribution, not S10 or
anything else. And specific questions like How can I get my e1000g
NIC to
I think it's a bit too late, just go with the flow and leave -discuss
alone. Lobbies are always crowded and noisy, and those arriving in Hotel
Solaris need to feel welcome in order to want to say. Who cares what
version of Solaris they happened to try first, give them a chance to
figure stuff
Alan Burlison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
I think it's a bit too late, just go with the flow and leave -discuss
alone. Lobbies are always crowded and noisy, and those arriving in Hotel
Solaris need to feel welcome in order to want to say. Who cares what
version
If I remove SUNaudiohd package and install oss I get
the following when booting.
unknown HDA codec 11c13026.
Well, that's a problem.
Do you get a similar message with the audiohd driver?
The audiohd driver currently supports these HD codecs:
#define AUDIOHD_VID_ALC260 0x10ec0260
There is room for both support and general discuss forums. If the discuss
forum at the top is catching all the support requests, either A) the help forum
is too hard to find, and/or B) the help forum isn't as helpful as the general
forum.
In this case, the help forum is certainly hard to
Joerg Schilling wrote:
It is better to have clean decisions instead of moving away because of noise.
Agreed.
I can currrently live with the current level of newbe noise and I am in hope
that an official OpenSolaris helpdesk would reduce the amount of traffic in
this list.
There is one as
Sean Sprague wrote:
I agree completely. Without the employment of a moderator (very
short-straw job, and not very open), we are pretty much stuck with the
current situation; and the encumbent S/N ratio as you quite rightly say.
Its a shame, and even though people like Ian Collins do try
On 8/15/07, Alan Burlison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
I think it's a bit too late, just go with the flow and leave -discuss
alone. Lobbies are always crowded and noisy, and those arriving in Hotel
Solaris need to feel welcome in order to want to say. Who cares what
MC wrote:
There is room for both support and general discuss forums. If the
discuss forum at the top is catching all the support requests, either
A) the help forum is too hard to find, and/or B) the help forum isn't
as helpful as the general forum.
In this case, the help forum is
If I remove SUNaudiohd package and install oss I
get
the following when booting.
unknown HDA codec 11c13026.
Well, that's a problem.
Do you get a similar message with the audiohd
driver?
The audiohd driver currently supports these HD
codecs:
#define AUDIOHD_VID_ALC260
Alan,
So the solution is to list support forums above or otherwise adjacent
to the discussion forums. That's what makes sense, and that's what
works for others.
I agree, the opensolaris-help forum is *not* well signposted enough, and
the first one we point people at is
unknown HDA codec 11c13026.
Well, that's a problem.
Do you get a similar message with the audiohd
driver?
The audiohd driver currently supports these HD
codecs:
#define AUDIOHD_VID_ALC260 0x10ec0260
#define AUDIOHD_VID_ALC262 0x10ec0262
#define
Sean Sprague wrote:
Snapped off www.opensolaris.org 30 seconds ago:
Join dozens of lively discussion forums for conversations on almost any
topic. You may wish to subscribe to opensolaris-announce, if you're a
new member. Or join the fray in opensolaris-discuss. You can also join
the
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Alan Burlison wrote:
Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
I think it's a bit too late, just go with the flow and leave -discuss
alone. Lobbies are always crowded and noisy, and those arriving in Hotel
Solaris need to feel welcome in order to want to say. Who cares what
version of
On 8/15/07, Alan Burlison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sean Sprague wrote:
Snapped off www.opensolaris.org 30 seconds ago:
Join dozens of lively discussion forums for conversations on almost any
topic. You may wish to subscribe to opensolaris-announce, if you're a
new member. Or join the
Brandorr wrote:
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/documentation/
http://www.genunix.org/wiki
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/documentation/newbie_faq/
http://solaris-x86.org/documents/
http://www.blastwave.org/docs/s10u3_howto.html
http://opensolaris.mynoteb00k.com/
Dennis Clarke wrote:
also ... I always wanted to do more with that and then I got busy and you
know how it is. :-\
Sure ;-) Ping me when you are ready.
--
Alan Burlison
--
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://www.blastwave.org/docs/s10u3_howto.html
as soon as Update 4 gets released ( Thursday ? ) I'll update that.
Dennis
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Dennis Clarke wrote:
http://www.blastwave.org/docs/s10u3_howto.html
as soon as Update 4 gets released ( Thursday ? ) I'll update that.
Any chance we could have a non-update-release dependent link, e.g.
http://www.blastwave.org/docs/s10_latest_howto.html, or somesuch?
... not until the
Alan Burlison wrote:
Alan Burlison wrote:
OK, here's a first stab, not currently linked to from anywhere else on
the site.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/newbies/
Updated with Brian's list of links.
Is it ok to mention this on blogs yet, or should
I/we/... wait until it's solidified a
On 8/16/07, Alan Burlison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Burlison wrote:
OK, here's a first stab, not currently linked to from anywhere else on
the site.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/newbies/
May I suggest a small note at the subscribe page for
opensolaris-discuss saying, if you need
James,
Alan Burlison wrote:
Alan Burlison wrote:
OK, here's a first stab, not currently linked to from anywhere else
on the site.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/newbies/
Updated with Brian's list of links.
Is it ok to mention this on blogs yet, or should
I/we/... wait until it's
1. Purpose - extending the lx brand to support 64-bit Linux applications.
2. Short name - lx64
3. Sponsoring community groups - BrandZ.
4. Participants - Wei Shen [EMAIL PROTECTED].
5. Brief description - Support for the creation of Linux Zones (lx
brand) on Solaris was introduced in build 49
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 19:31 +0100, Alan Burlison wrote:
Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
I think it's a bit too late, just go with the flow and leave -discuss
alone. Lobbies are always crowded and noisy, and those arriving in Hotel
Solaris need to feel welcome in order to want to say. Who
Sean Sprague wrote:
James,
Alan Burlison wrote:
Alan Burlison wrote:
OK, here's a first stab, not currently linked to from anywhere else
on the site.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/newbies/
Updated with Brian's list of links.
Is it ok to mention this on blogs yet, or should
I/we/...
Sean Sprague wrote:
James,
Alan Burlison wrote:
Alan Burlison wrote:
OK, here's a first stab, not currently linked to from anywhere else
on the site.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/newbies/
Updated with Brian's list of links.
Is it ok to mention this on blogs yet, or should
I/we/...
Alan,
Sean Sprague wrote:
James,
Alan Burlison wrote:
Alan Burlison wrote:
OK, here's a first stab, not currently linked to from anywhere else
on the site.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/newbies/
Updated with Brian's list of links.
Is it ok to mention this on blogs yet, or should
I forgot a few appropriate lists::
Usenet Solaris forum:
- http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.solaris/topics
Sun Managers for people who manage Sun Workstations and Servers:
- http://www.sunmanagers.org/
Solaris-Users mailing list is part of the Solaris Users Group in
Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
James C. McPherson wrote:
Is it ok to mention this on blogs yet, or should
I/we/... wait until it's solidified a bit more?
I'm gonna add links to it in some places that people have suggested, but
as it's pretty late here that won't be today. Once I'm done I'll send
mail to os-discuss,
people tend to subscribe to the mailing list that is the most visible
and close to what they need, the most visible list at osol.org is
osol-discuss. that is why people ask there instead of osol-help.
i think people asking things about solaris 10 here is a problem but i
actually expected that. i
Sean Sprague wrote:
OGB official signoff, and proper integration into the site I guess... Or
is the former bureaucracy-heavy?
I'm just going to go ahead and do it, unless persuaded otherwise ;-)
--
Alan Burlison
--
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
Sean Sprague wrote:
Agreed, of course; but if this change becomes fundamental to how people
approach/adopt OpenSolaris, then it might at least be a bit friendly to
at least have a one-liner on the page to tell potential adopters that
they should read the Terms of Use carefully. Dunno.
It
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Btw, on the topic of this page, newbies might not be the best name for
this page. newbie or NOOB is often perceived as a derogatory
term... I don't want us to be perceived as elitest...
I don't personally feel it is derogatory, but please feel free to
suggest a PC
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
people tend to subscribe to the mailing list that is the most visible
and close to what they need, the most visible list at osol.org is
osol-discuss. that is why people ask there instead of osol-help.
opensolaris-discuss also has 3 times the membership of
Have you installed the latest BIOS update? I've had a
look at it appears
in that in 07/2007 there was an update F.38 which
might fix those
problems.
Matthew
___
Can you update the BIOS from Solaris? If yes, how? Thanks.
This message
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
people tend to subscribe to the mailing list that is the most visible
and close to what they need, the most visible list at osol.org is
osol-discuss. that is why people ask there instead of osol-help.
i think people asking things about solaris 10 here is a
Alan,
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Btw, on the topic of this page, newbies might not be the best name for
this page. newbie or NOOB is often perceived as a derogatory
term... I don't want us to be perceived as elitest...
I don't personally feel it is derogatory, but please feel free to
We're not sure when we'll be able to move to the
100-series nvidia
drivers, since they drop support for hardware Sun
still supports.
John Martin is working with nvidia to figure out what
to do here.
For now, if you need new nvidia versions, you can
download and
install, so it's not that
Boyd,
Isn't this what
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/advocacy/immigrants/ was
intended for?
Yes, but immigrants isn't exactly an obvious name to some...maybe
newbies could be aliased to redirect to that one? I would also note
that in many countries now, the word immigrant is
I'd like to see a new community added to the opensolaris that
supports developers of software that runs on top of opensolaris.
Why do we need that?
Because not every application that a developer wants to build
will fit into one of our buckets. We need a catch-all that can be
a home to people
I think New in the url as short for New Users is pretty descriptive, myself
:)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Orvar Korvar wrote:
Ok, ive tried that, sub pixel smoothing and such stuff and it looks
better. Would installing trutype fonts make it looks better still? I
can rip them from my Windows XP installation?
GNOME mainly uses TrueType fonts already -
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 09:31 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Orvar Korvar wrote:
Ok, ive tried that, sub pixel smoothing and such stuff and it looks
better. Would installing trutype fonts make it looks better still? I
can rip them from my Windows XP installation?
GNOME mainly uses TrueType
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 09:51 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
Congratulations!!!
Can you post a summary of problem and solution for
future reference to others ?
- Akhilesh
This problem should disappear when the nVidia v.100.14.13 driver is
incorporated
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 16:04 -0700, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
Have you installed the latest BIOS update? I've had a
look at it appears
in that in 07/2007 there was an update F.38 which
might fix those
problems.
Matthew
___
Can you
Boyd Adamson wrote:
Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Orvar Korvar wrote:
Ok, ive tried that, sub pixel smoothing and such stuff and it looks
better. Would installing trutype fonts make it looks better still? I
can rip them from my Windows XP installation?
GNOME mainly uses TrueType
Alan Burlison wrote:
It appears to me that opensolaris-discuss is becoming more and more
dominated with Solaris installation questions, and the OpenSolaris
content is becoming lost in the noise. Whilst it is very nice that
people are being so helpful, it would seem to me that we should
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 21:50 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Boyd Adamson wrote:
Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Orvar Korvar wrote:
Ok, ive tried that, sub pixel smoothing and such stuff and it looks
better. Would installing trutype fonts make it looks better still? I
can rip
Curt Mills wrote:
So we created an ISCSI target on our Solaris box and are now having trouble
connecting to it from Windows 2003, Windows Vista, or Windows XP when the
target is greater than 2GB.
comp.unix.solaris is a better place to ask Solaris 10 questions.
Ian
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 17:40 +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
Alan Burlison wrote:
It appears to me that opensolaris-discuss is becoming more and more
dominated with Solaris installation questions, and the OpenSolaris
content is becoming lost in the noise. Whilst it is very nice that
people
72 matches
Mail list logo
