> On 8/20/07, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >> I beg to differ, as a Sun customer we are going commodity all the way.
>> We
>> >> haven't bought an Enterprise system since the 3800. Currently the
>> majority
>> >> of the Machines we are deploying are x4200s and T2000s. We are
On 8/20/07, Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you try the new installer in build 70? It just changed
> the default layout.
Yes, to the point it breaks on any big disk when you use an x86 platform.
I tried a 200GB ATA disk, and it told me the '/' slice extended beyond
the first 10
> I beg to differ, as a Sun
> customer we are going commodity all the way. We
> haven't bought an Enterprise system since the
> 3800. Currently the majority of the Machines we are
> deploying are x4200s and T2000s.
I find it funny that you use T2000 and commodity hardware in the same sentence.
T2
> I wonder what it would take to change that crazy "small root, the rest for
> /export/home/" layout?
>
> I mean, what good is a "default" when it has to be modified as a rule and not
> an exception?
I think we need to find that "how should the file system layout be designed?"
thread and stick
MC wrote:
>> I wonder what it would take to change that crazy "small root, the rest for
>> /export/home/" layout?
>>
>> I mean, what good is a "default" when it has to be modified as a rule and
>> not an exception?
>>
>
> I think we need to find that "how should the file system layout be de
Ian Collins wrote:
> MC wrote:
>
>>> I wonder what it would take to change that crazy "small root, the rest for
>>> /export/home/" layout?
>>>
>>> I mean, what good is a "default" when it has to be modified as a rule and
>>> not an exception?
>>>
>>>
>> I think we need to find tha
Hi, folks:
What does "subgraph" mean in the text:
milestone=milestone
Boot to the subgraph defined by the given
milestone. Legitimate milestones are none,
single-user, multi-user, multi-user-server,
and all.
We are going to translate the text. But I failed to find a official defination
of a sub
> >
> Sorry, I forgot to check my filters, that should have been
> caiman-discuss only.
I actually filed a bug yesterday :)
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hello,
This WE I tried to install Solaris 11 Nevada, beta 70 on a ASUS P5VD1-X based
PC with a 320GB IDE HD.
It did not went long, Solaris was unable to handle the HD... After some
thinking and some check on the net, I suppose it has to do with the 48bits
LBA issue (The 128 GB barrier). Back in
>Hello,
>
>This WE I tried to install Solaris 11 Nevada, beta 70 on a ASUS P5VD1-X based
>PC with a 320GB IDE HD.
>It did not went long, Solaris was unable to handle the HD... After some
>thinking and some check on the net, I suppose it has to do with the 48bits
>LBA issue (The 128 GB barrier).
Daniel Tourde wrote:
This would be better on opensolaris-help, CC'd.
> Hello,
>
> This WE I tried to install Solaris 11 Nevada, beta 70 on a ASUS P5VD1-X based
> PC with a 320GB IDE HD.
>
That shouldn't cause any problems.
> It did not went long, Solaris was unable to handle the HD.
In what w
"Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Strangly .. basic applications fail to launch.
>
> For example, I wanted to see what happens when I insert a Microsoft Windows
> Vista Business Edition DVD into my machine. I would expect that it would be
> automatically mounted but I was wrong .. snv
Hello,
First of all. I am sorry if I asked this question to the wrong forum. I will
send a mail to opensolaris-help as well. I am just a beginner on these
forums... ;)
> >This WE I tried to install Solaris 11 Nevada, beta 70 on a ASUS P5VD1-X
> > based PC with a 320GB IDE HD.
> >It did not w
Lars Tunkrans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dennis , I agree with you that SNV70 is not mounting a Vista UDFS
> dvd correctly
>
> I did a clean Install of Snv_70 on a new disc ( a 10.000 rpm disc which
> contributes
> nicely to the speed of the system btw )
>
> The automount by
Artem Kachitchkine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > # fstyp -v /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s2 | more
> > hsfs
>
> Some DVDs contain two filesystems [1], hence mountable as either hsfs
> and udfs. fstyp returns the first match, and that's what HAL will use.
> One fix would be to treat these in the same fas
"W. Wayne Liauh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It'd be great if we could run VMWare with Solaris as
> > the guest OS.
> >
>
> You mean with Solaris as a "host" OS?
For me, only Solaris as host OS would be of interest
> Does anyone have any experience on xen? thanks.
Did someone use Xen and is
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> "W. Wayne Liauh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> It'd be great if we could run VMWare with Solaris as
>>> the guest OS.
>>>
>> You mean with Solaris as a "host" OS?
>
> For me, only Solaris as host OS would be of interest
>
>> Does anyone have any experience on xen? tha
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 23:57 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> UNIX admin wrote:
> > I wonder what it would take to change that crazy "small root, the rest for
> > /export/home/" layout?
>
> Did you try the new installer in build 70? It just changed
> the default layout.
>
Nope, same thing, a l
Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For me, only Solaris as host OS would be of interest
> >
> >> Does anyone have any experience on xen? thanks.
> >
> > Did someone use Xen and is it possible to run MS-WIN on case that
> > the host platform supports Pacifica or Vanderbilt?
>
> Techn
Hello,
I tried B70 (SXCE) this weekend and I noticed that with the new graphic
installer it was not possible anymore to decide over the partitioning (x Gb
in /, Y in /usr etc etc).
Will it come back in the future? (B71, B72?)
Daniel
--
**
I installed Neveda build 70 and it gives me the option to select
partitioning.
Thanks
P.S.M.Swamiji
Daniel Tourde wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I tried B70 (SXCE) this weekend and I noticed that with the new graphic
>installer it was not possible anymore to decide over the partitioning (x Gb
>in /, Y in /
Daniel Tourde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This WE I tried to install Solaris 11 Nevada, beta 70 on a ASUS P5VD1-X based
> PC with a 320GB IDE HD.
> It did not went long, Solaris was unable to handle the HD... After some
> thinking and some check on the net, I suppose it has to do wit
Stephen Lau writes:
> Gueven Bay wrote:
[...]
> > My question is - maybe someone just can clear it here - : It must be
> > possible to make a small installation of SXCE to compile on-src (I made
> > nightly compilations based on fully installed SXCE already, but I want to
> > minimize the instal
Daniel,
Thanks for trying the new installer.
If you choose the Solaris Developer Release install option you get the
new installer, it has restricted
ability over partitioning/slicing, and preservation. This feature will
be part of the new installer and is
planned for a future release, hopefully
Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 23:57 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>
>> UNIX admin wrote:
>>
>>> I wonder what it would take to change that crazy "small root, the rest for
>>> /export/home/" layout?
>>>
>> Did you try the new installer in build 70? It just changed
Hi,
Any updates on this?
I have tried to compile and nothing (I dont have that much experience :-/)..
maybe including it on the next build?
Thanks!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@ope
Hi,
Any updates on this?
I have tried to compile and nothing (I dont have that much experience :-/)..
maybe including it on the next build?
Thanks!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@ope
> Did you try the new installer in build 70? It just
> changed
> the default layout.
No. I'm explicitly waiting for snv_71 to come out so that I can have a
compressed ZFS root (snv_70 pukes on a ZFS compressed root, see bug # 6541114
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6
> I suggest people with issues take them to those lists
> rather than air
> them here.
Super. So:
- this is not a Solaris helpdesk
- Solaris 10 is not to be discussed here
- issues with OpenSolaris are not to be discussed here
What IS to be discussed on openSolaris-discuss then?
This messa
> All matters relating to the new installer and layout
> have been and are
> discussed on the caiman-discuss list, mostly copied
> to the
> install-discuss list.
>
> I suggest people with issues take them to those lists
> rather than air
> them here.
FYI, I've already (long before you wrote this
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, UNIX admin wrote:
>> I suggest people with issues take them to those lists
>> rather than air
>> them here.
>
> Super. So:
>
> - this is not a Solaris helpdesk
>
> - Solaris 10 is not to be discussed here
>
> - issues with OpenSolaris are not to be discussed here
>
> What IS t
> Hello,
>
> I tried B70 (SXCE) this weekend and I noticed that
> with the new graphic
> installer it was not possible anymore to decide over
> the partitioning (x Gb
> in /, Y in /usr etc etc).
> Will it come back in the future? (B71, B72?)
Yes. I don't know when. Dave Miner would.
Thi
> First, my situation. I have several disks of varying
> sizes I would like to run as redundant storage ina
> file server at home. Performance is not my number one
> priority, largest capacity possible while allowing
> for a single disk failure. Is there a soluton to my
> problem?
>
> My understan
> Either way you can create a
> RAID5/raidz with the drives and use excess space as
> non-redundant storage. So pick your poison!
RAIDZ is NOT RAID5. The two are almost radically different.
For example, RAID5 MUST have at least three disks, RAIDZ can work with only two.
All disks in a RAID5 con
> if I click on Display I get nothing but an hour glass
> and then ... nothing.
>
> I get a core file :
>
> $ file core
> core: ELF 32-bit LSB core file 80386 Version 1, from
> 'gnome_segv2'
mdb core
::status
$c
$q
This message posted from opensolaris.org
> Some DVDs contain two filesystems [1], hence
> mountable as either hsfs
> and udfs. fstyp returns the first match, and that's
> what HAL will use.
> One fix would be to treat these in the same fashion
> we treat hybrid
> data+audio media, i.e. pop a dialog asking for user's
> preference. A
>
The new SNV 70 GUI installer looks nice and moves right along. But. I can't
find the "advanced options" button that lets me decide how to slice my solaris
partition. And the minimum size of 8G is a pain. I'm installing multiple
(throw-away) images under VMWare on a ThinkPad T61 and don't hav
>> Some DVDs contain two filesystems [1], hence
>> mountable as either hsfs
>> and udfs. fstyp returns the first match, and that's
>> what HAL will use.
>> One fix would be to treat these in the same fashion
>> we treat hybrid
>> data+audio media, i.e. pop a dialog asking for user's
>> preferen
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, UNIX admin wrote:
>
>>> I suggest people with issues take them to those lists
>>> rather than air them here.
>>
>> Super. So:
>>
>> - this is not a Solaris helpdesk
right.
>>
>> - Solaris 10 is not to be discussed here
right.
>>
>> - issues with OpenSolaris are not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> Some DVDs contain two filesystems [1], hence
> >> mountable as either hsfs
> >> and udfs. fstyp returns the first match, and that's
> >> what HAL will use.
> >> One fix would be to treat these in the same fashion
> >> we treat hybrid
> >> data+audio media, i.e. p
UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Some DVDs contain two filesystems [1], hence
> > mountable as either hsfs
> > and udfs. fstyp returns the first match, and that's
> > what HAL will use.
> > One fix would be to treat these in the same fashion
> > we treat hybrid
> > data+audio media, i.
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>> Some DVDs contain two filesystems [1], hence
>>> mountable as either hsfs
>>> and udfs. fstyp returns the first match, and that's
>>> what HAL will use.
>>> One fix would be to treat these in the same fashion
>>> we treat hybrid
>>> data+audio me
Gurus;
Is there a way, through the procfs of Solaris to determine whether the a
process has opened listening network ports?
Either using Perl or otherwise?
I know of a very iterative approach but if we apply the approach to all
the ports and the processes in a running system, it well...does no
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Steven Sim wrote:
> Gurus;
>
> Is there a way, through the procfs of Solaris to determine whether the a
> process has opened listening network ports?
>
> Either using Perl or otherwise?
>
> I know of a very iterative approach but if we apply the approach to all
> the ports and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Why can't HAL simply cycle through the media, and mount ALL filesystems it
> >> finds on it?
> Generically, the 'cycle through' isn't that splendid an idea, especially
> with multi-faced filesystems; a CD may contain:
>
> - an ElTorito boot image which is a F
Lars Tunkrans wrote:
> The automount by HAL and rmmount did not mount the UDF filesystem
>
> All it did was mounting a HSFS where a little text file " readme.txt" with
> the following message appeared.
>
> "This disc contains a "UDF" file system and requires an operating system
>
> tha
What I meant is that the wildcard feature, which would save me 3.5 GB of HD
space, is very difficult to find.
BTW, not just Dennis, but even my neighbor, who runs a cement business, is
telling me to use cdrecord. :-)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
UNIX admin wrote:
>> All matters relating to the new installer and layout have been and
>> are discussed on the caiman-discuss list, mostly copied to the
>> install-discuss list.
>>
>> I suggest people with issues take them to those lists rather than
>> air them here.
>
> FYI, I've already (long
Peter Tribble wrote:
> Is there a registry of java package names, to avoid name clashes?
>
> For example, in jkstat, can I just use org.opensolaris.jkstat?
>
> (And what's the difference between org.opensolaris and org.opensolaris.os?)
>
> It strikes me that there ought to be a central list of p
Greg Potts wrote:
>> Allen Wittenauer wrote: ...
>>> As a sidenote, while the Solaris DHCP server
>> back-end is supposed to
>>> be pluggable, example code was (and probably still
>> is) non-existent
>>> unless you grovel through the (Open)Solaris
>> codebase. When I last
>>> asked Dave Miner abou
> What I meant is that the wildcard feature, which would save me 3.5 GB of HD
> space, is very difficult to find.
>
> BTW, not just Dennis, but even my neighbor, who runs a cement business, is
> telling me to use cdrecord. :-)
>
those cement people are pretty savvy. They know that construction
Alan Burlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lars Tunkrans wrote:
>
> > The automount by HAL and rmmount did not mount the UDF filesystem
> >
> > All it did was mounting a HSFS where a little text file " readme.txt"
> > with
> > the following message appeared.
> >
> > "This disc contains
"W. Wayne Liauh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I meant is that the wildcard feature, which would save me 3.5 GB of HD
> space, is very difficult to find.
>
> BTW, not just Dennis, but even my neighbor, who runs a cement business, is
> telling me to use cdrecord. :-)
The ratio between what
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
> This is what mkisofs does and it may be that a lot of other software works
> in a similar way.
>
> It is good practice to add hsfs for compatibility and the current mkisofs
> version even supports to archive files up to 8 TB while it can only support
>
On 8/20/07, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On the other hand we can discuss how to make great coffee. That will
> probably be on topic here.
My company has a nice policy - tea/coffee/etc are free, provided you
offer to make the rest of your team a drink if you get one for yourself.
On 8/20/07, Dave Miner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can have the discussion here if that's what floats your boat, but
> you can also be certain that most of the people you'd like to have the
> discussion with will *not* be participating in it because they've got
> better things to do than wade
> > Either way you can create a
> > RAID5/raidz with the drives and use excess space
> as
> > non-redundant storage. So pick your poison!
>
> RAIDZ is NOT RAID5. The two are almost radically
> different.
>
> For example, RAID5 MUST have at least three disks,
> RAIDZ can work with only two.
>
>
No offense taken, I just feel generally bad pestering
the Solaris
developers. On topic: here is a closeup of Vista, Mac
and Ubuntu fonts. It
would be interesting to see Solaris fonts too? And
maybe mail the
blogger?
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=682
--
The ZDNet writer did
Steven Sim wrote:
> Gurus;
>
> Is there a way, through the procfs of Solaris to determine whether the a
> process has opened listening network ports?
>
> Either using Perl or otherwise?
>
> I know of a very iterative approach but if we apply the approach to all
> the ports and the processes in a
> Gurus;
>
> Is there a way, through the procfs of Solaris to
> determine whether the a
> process has opened listening network ports?
>
> Either using Perl or otherwise?
>
> I know of a very iterative approach but if we apply
> the approach to all
> the ports and the processes in a running sys
> those cement people are pretty savvy. They know that
> construction never
> goes out of style and it is the most stable
> investment if done right.
>
> dc
>
Actually, these days it is more profitable importing (construction grade) sand
from Canada. I was often told that you will do very wel
one user login into solaris, when using SecureCRT with ssh, the
$PATH=/opt/SUNWspro/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/sfw/bin:/usr/ccs/bin.
but when using xmanager , the
$PATH=/opt/SUNWspro/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/openwin/bin:/usr/ucb:/usr/sbin:/usr/sfw/bin:/usr/ccs/bin
could you tell me the reason?
thanks.
It's that time of month for the SVOSUG meeting again, and we have
something a little different than our normal type meetings, and as of
recent I've been getting requests to show compiz at the user group meeting
and/or show it running on Solaris/OpenSolaris.
This month we'll be doing an presenta
Hi Bill,
Queries about the new installer are best answered at caiman-discuss
mailing list which is the list for new installer related discussions.
Some of the points below have already been raised on that list and
responded to. You may want to look at the archives before posting the
query.
Coupl
> > For example, RAID5 MUST have at least three disks,
> > RAIDZ can work with only two.
> >
> > All disks in a RAID5 config MUST be the same size,
> > RAIDZ will take any size disks, although it will
> warn
> > about it, it will work.
...
> He was simply trying to decide how to allocate his
> d
> well only issues that are not covered under some
> other mailist and
> herefore the offending party needs to be advised they
> have committed an
> offense.
"An offense"?
What is this, a prison camp? Is there an offense code, pardon, spec, too?
So much for friendly community.
This whole "polici
66 matches
Mail list logo