Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 06:57:08AM +0530, Anil Gulecha wrote:
On 9/29/07, Scott Rotondo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
hey ... anyone have an updated count of the number of lines of code in
the OpenSolaris source?
Jim
(Ada) 33 files,
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 06:57:08AM +0530, Anil Gulecha wrote:
On 9/29/07, Scott Rotondo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
hey ... anyone have an updated count of the number of lines of code in
the OpenSolaris source?
Jim
Patrick Finch wrote:
i.e. marketing not to blame.
Correct. We can't even agree among ourselves how to count the darn
thing. :) Not that it mattes much, but it's good trivia for doing talks
and tossing out t-shirts.
Jim
--
Jim Grisanzio http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris
On 10/1/07, Anil Gulecha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm guessing wc -l is pretty much a given..
With wc -l approach, a 15 lines of change in the license text that
gets included in each every ~40K files results in 0.6mn lines of
change without any change to the actual code :)
-Shiv
You really don't go about updating the system. There are no updates
made available for anything but the Production release of Solaris
(i.e. Solaris 10 at the moment).
You *can* upgrade to the next release whenever it comes out.
Also, if you installed the Developer Edition that
Bryan Miller writes:
This appears to be one of the key distinctions between Open Solaris and other
Open Source operating systems. Proving these kinds of updates or patch
bundles is a revenue stream for Sun and a matter or course for the others.
For those of us coming from the
On 01/10/2007, Bryan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You really don't go about updating the system. There are no updates
made available for anything but the Production release of Solaris
(i.e. Solaris 10 at the moment).
You *can* upgrade to the next release whenever it comes out.
adding the full prtconf -pv
what does SDDT say ?
see :
http://www.blastwave.org/dclarke/blog/?q=node/74
Dennis
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
SDDT says all green checks for networks
Solaris provides a companion CD which contains a lot of 3rd party/GNU software
that is installed in /opt/sfw.
I just installed Solaris CE, and was wondering if I should use the Solaris 10
companion CD or install the packages from the opensolaris companion effort. It
is a bit confusing what
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
given the total file count i'd guess that these numbers are
just for ON, which is only one component of opensolaris.
ed
Good point. I did my count on the ON usr/src tree because I had it
conveniently available (/ws/onnv-clone/usr/src at Sun).
Scott
Anil Gulecha wrote:
Total 40012 files, 8793366 lines
Thats funny, I remember seeing '11m' mentioned in some opensolaris
slides. Marketing to blame?
Remember my example about cat.c, where wc -l shows 630 lines, but my
tool reports 379 lines?
It's likely that the 11M number is
Solaris runs very well on this :-)
http://www.compactpc.com.tw/ebox-3800.htm
AMD Geode is an X86.
Dave
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 13:54 -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
With this sight, Solaris will never appear in
embedded systems.
Patience.
Solaris does not have the critical mass that took Linux
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, David Clack wrote:
Solaris runs very well on this :-)
http://www.compactpc.com.tw/ebox-3800.htm
AMD Geode is an X86.
Dave
Dave,
Yes, I think this type of hardware is good for OpenSolaris, the 256MB of
Systems Memory allow it to run, and as you note it runs quite
Roland Mainz wrote:
Does anyone here run Solaris 11/Nevada B72 on a M4000 ? I need some
feedback whether it runs (more or less) stable on that type of
machine...
... does anyone have a M4000 or M5000 around to test this, please ?
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Ceri Davies wrote:
What happens to a bug after it is submitted to bugs.opensolaris.org?
After hitting submit I'd expected to be given a bug id, but although I
was told that the bug report was created, I have no idea what the id is
and searching does not find it.
Brandorr wrote:
On 9/28/07, nospam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) project had released XO Laptops for the public
using G1G1 (Buy 2 Get 1).
One laptop will be sent to the buyer, another laptop will be sent to a
child in developing country.
Unfortunately the XO
On 10/1/07, Roland Mainz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandorr wrote:
On 9/28/07, nospam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) project had released XO Laptops for the
public using G1G1 (Buy 2 Get 1).
One laptop will be sent to the buyer, another laptop will be sent to a
256MB is passable for a server, but not so hot for a day to day desktop.
(GUI apps: Browsing/flash video/javascript heavy apps/mp3s, OpenOffice,
etc).
ok, you know there is a problem with your software when your desktop
box needs more memory than your server, that is just wrong
nacho
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
256MB is passable for a server, but not so hot for a day to day desktop.
(GUI apps: Browsing/flash video/javascript heavy apps/mp3s, OpenOffice,
etc).
ok, you know there is a problem with your software when your desktop
box needs more memory than your
On 01/10/2007, Ignacio Marambio Catán [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
256MB is passable for a server, but not so hot for a day to day desktop.
(GUI apps: Browsing/flash video/javascript heavy apps/mp3s, OpenOffice,
etc).
ok, you know there is a problem with your software when your desktop
box
20 matches
Mail list logo
