Re: [osol-discuss] memory consumption in b131

2010-01-31 Thread Bruno Damour
Well, I did what you were suggested and it did nothing. Anyway I decided to try a bit harder and destroyed all my .gconf, .gnome, .mozilla, etc... folder that had been created long ago , I already had some issues with that. The result was positive because gconfd-2 is now using a very reasonable

[osol-discuss] update-manager freezes system for a long time

2010-01-31 Thread Bruno Damour
I've noticed that update manager runs periodically pm-update-manager. When it does, system becomes barely usable, likewise if one uses package manager ui I catched it in prstat and noticed that pm-update-manager runs with a priority of 60 whereas the normal desktop apps run with 59. The rss is

Re: [osol-discuss] memory consumption in b131

2010-01-31 Thread Jürgen Keil
However, I found that Xorg memory usage is still very high : 1446 root 448M 150M sleep 450 0:04:53 4.4% Xorg/3 especially compared to the one on my home server, with basically the same session apps running (including compiz, awn and conky) : 720 root 88M 58M sleep

Re: [osol-discuss] update-manager freezes system for a long time

2010-01-31 Thread Anon Y Mous
Hi Bruno, What is your output for these commands? cat /etc/release pfexec scanpci ? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] update-manager freezes system for a long time

2010-01-31 Thread Bruno Damour
Connection is over wifi (malo0), but its working quite well AFAIK. # cat /etc/release OpenSolaris Development snv_131 X86 Copyright 2010 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms.

Re: [osol-discuss] memory consumption in b131

2010-01-31 Thread Bruno Damour
Well, you are certainly right. The card in my home server is a fairly recent nvidia : (II) Jan 28 06:16:36 NVIDIA(0): NVIDIA GPU GeForce 9500 GT (G96) at PCI:6:0:0 (GPU-0) (--) Jan 28 06:16:36 NVIDIA(0): Memory: 1048576 kBytes while in my laptop I have an onoard intel : PCI:*(0:0:2:0)

Re: [osol-discuss] update-manager freezes system for a long time

2010-01-31 Thread Shawn Walker
On 01/31/10 03:07 AM, Bruno Damour wrote: I've noticed that update manager runs periodically pm-update-manager. When it does, system becomes barely usable, likewise if one uses package manager ui I catched it in prstat and noticed that pm-update-manager runs with a priority of 60 whereas the

Re: [osol-discuss] memory consumption in b131

2010-01-31 Thread Jürgen Keil
while in my laptop I have an onboard intel : PCI:*(0:0:2:0) 8086:27a2:1028:01c2 Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller rev 3, Mem @ 0xeff0/524288, 0xd000/268435456, 0xefec/262144, I/O @ 0xeff8/8, BIOS @ 0x/65536 ...

[osol-discuss] help with opensolaris pgrep

2010-01-31 Thread Thomas Burgess
I am currious...is there a reason why pgrep wouldn't work as i'd expect on opensolars? I come from FreeBSD and i usually use pgrep to check if a process is running for a script. For instance, i have a script which i use to check if rsync is running, if it isn't running, then it will rsync, if

Re: [osol-discuss] help with opensolaris pgrep

2010-01-31 Thread Jürgen Keil
For instance, i have a script which i use to check if rsync is running, if it isn't running, then it will rsync, if it is, then it should skip rsync. I put this in crontab for every 15 minutes. On FreeBSD this works fine, on OpenSolaris it doesn't seem to be working. any idea why this

Re: [osol-discuss] help with opensolaris pgrep

2010-01-31 Thread Oscar del Rio
On 1/31/2010 12:53 PM, Thomas Burgess wrote: I am currious...is there a reason why pgrep wouldn't work as i'd expect on opensolars? #!/bin/sh PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin SERVICE='rsync' REMOTE='wonsl...@xxx..xxx:/home/xx/x/' LOCAL='/tank/nas/dump/'

Re: [osol-discuss] Should OS2010.03 stick to the 2010.03 release date?

2010-01-31 Thread W. Wayne Liauh
However, the open source version of the QQ client is known to have limited features (though it should be good enough for inclusion in OpenSolaris). But as I am sure you are aware, Tencent actually provides QQ clients for various platforms, including Linux. Most Linux distros avoid the

[osol-discuss] mimic size=1024m setting in /etc/vfstab when using rpool/swap (zfs root)

2010-01-31 Thread Prakash Kochummen
Hi, While using ufs root, we had an option for limiting the /tmp size using mount -o size manual option or setting size=1024m in the vfstab. Do we have any comparable option available when we use zfs root. If we execute zfs set size=1024m rpool/swap it resizes the whole of the swap area which

Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] mimic size=1024m setting in /etc/vfstab whenusing rpool/swap (zfs root)

2010-01-31 Thread Prakash Kochummen
Thanks for the reply. Sorry i confused you too. when I mentioned ufs , i just meant ufs root scenario (pre u6). Suppose I have a 136G Hdd which as my boot disk,which has been sliced it like s0-80gb (root slice) s1-55Gb (swap slice) s7- (SVM metadb) My understanding was that if I had 16Gb of