Am 22.04.2010 02:20, schrieb bsd:
I merely posted a link to an article and refrained from saying anything about
Oracle.
Oh yes, sure. How old are you?
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>Using an Osol b 133 nfs server. When working from a linux client I
>sometimes see files like: .nfs2def0002
> .nfs2f6b0001
>
>Appear on the filesystem as I'm working... any attempt to remove them
>(from the linux client) fails, with the me
I'm getting tired, in answering these things, but, please google, and then,
once found, read:
http://c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6514-About-this-ODF-for-MS-Office-plugin-discussion.html
In simple words:
MS Office (we might not like it, but, still) has implemented ODF saving
starting in Servic
bsd wrote:
> http://www.osnews.com/story/23181/Oracle_Starts_Charging_90_USD_Per_User_for_ODF_Plugin
>
> Solaris 10 90-day evaluation
> No security patch downloads for free
> ODF plugin $90 (100 min)
This is old news from Monday
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/ODF-Plug-in-Bei-Sun-war
Alan Hargreaves wrote:
You miss the point. This is a discussion list about OpenSolaris. Not
about a Microsoft Office Plugins. Not about Solaris. Not about Solaris
patches. The only reason to post this stuff (even without comment)
would be to sow FUD or dissention.
Quite honestly I'm getting
On 22.04.2010 02:27, Alan Hargreaves wrote:
> You miss the point. This is a discussion list about OpenSolaris. Not
> about a Microsoft Office Plugins. Not about Solaris. Not about Solaris
> patches. The only reason to post this stuff (even without comment) would
> be to sow FUD or dissention.
Or t
Svein,
You (Svein Skogen) wrote:
> On 22.04.2010 02:27, Alan Hargreaves wrote:
> > You miss the point. This is a discussion list about OpenSolaris. Not
> > about a Microsoft Office Plugins. Not about Solaris. Not about Solaris
> > patches. The only reason to post this stuff (even without comment)
*sigh*
On 22.04.2010 12:27, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
> Svein,
>
> You (Svein Skogen) wrote:
>> On 22.04.2010 02:27, Alan Hargreaves wrote:
>>> You miss the point. This is a discussion list about OpenSolaris. Not
>>> about a Microsoft Office Plugins. Not about Solaris. Not about Solaris
>>> patche
Svein,
On 22.04.2010 02:27, Alan Hargreaves wrote:
You miss the point. This is a discussion list about OpenSolaris. Not
about a Microsoft Office Plugins. Not about Solaris. Not about Solaris
patches. The only reason to post this stuff (even without comment) would
be to sow FUD or dissention
Svein,
You (Svein Skogen) wrote:
> *sigh*
>
> On 22.04.2010 12:27, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
> > Svein,
> >
> > You (Svein Skogen) wrote:
> >> On 22.04.2010 02:27, Alan Hargreaves wrote:
> >>> You miss the point. This is a discussion list about OpenSolaris. Not
> >>> about a Microsoft Office Plug
You (Sean Sprague) wrote:
> I do however agree that a statement from Oracle on the "future" of
> OpenSolaris is needed. but given the fact that it is likely to be couched
> in vagaries, obfuscation, legalese, and plain non-committal rhetoric, it
> will not provide us with any feelgood factor.
A
On 22.04.2010 12:51, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
> You (Sean Sprague) wrote:
>> I do however agree that a statement from Oracle on the "future" of
>> OpenSolaris is needed. but given the fact that it is likely to be couched
>> in vagaries, obfuscation, legalese, and plain non-committal rhetoric, it
Responses inline:
Svein Skogen wrote:
On 22.04.2010 02:27, Alan Hargreaves wrote:
You miss the point. This is a discussion list about OpenSolaris. Not
about a Microsoft Office Plugins. Not about Solaris. Not about Solaris
patches. The only reason to post this stuff (even without comment) would
snv_128 to snv_134, x86
Setting up iscsi against an Equallogic PS6500, I initially get between one and
three connections to a target, but then the initiator starts to loose
connections one by one, until there are no more connections left, and the zpool
fails.
I have tried to configure scsi_vhc
On 22/04/2010 11:11, Svein Skogen wrote:
On 22.04.2010 02:27, Alan Hargreaves wrote:
You miss the point. This is a discussion list about OpenSolaris. Not
about a Microsoft Office Plugins. Not about Solaris. Not about Solaris
patches. The only reason to post this stuff (even without comment) woul
Friends, i am on job trials.
I have learned solaris 10 and done certification part-1 and part-2.
I am not able to answer the below questions as i do not have work experience on
solaris. please help me with your answers.
Q.1) What is the project you are presently working on?
Q.2) What is your res
None of these are technical questions. They all refer to your work experience.
fpsm
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 9:52 AM, radhika wrote:
> Friends, i am on job trials.
> I have learned solaris 10 and done certification part-1 and part-2.
>
> I am not able to answer the below questions as i do not hav
Hugh> Back in May 2008, there was a question on desktop-discuss asking whether
Hugh> Solaris sendmail could be configured as an SASL auth client. The answer
Hugh> from John Beck was "no, because [of] some issues with Solaris' libsasl
Hugh> implementation that are preventing this work from moving f
Hello,
I am trying to install the package as mentioned in
https://pkg.sun.com/register/cred_construct?product=4
It seems like the link is not working.
pfexec pkg set-authority \
-k /var/pkg/ssl/Open_HA_Cluster_2009.06.key.pem \
-c /var/pkg/ssl/Open_HA_Cluster_2009.06.ce
Never mind the network setup on my node was screwed up. Fixed it and works fine
now. Thanks.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi folks,
Just wanted to let you know there's a review up of OpenSolaris over at my blog
Desktop Linux Reviews. Here's the link, hope you find it interesting:
OpenSolaris 2009.06 Review
http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/22/opensolaris-2009-06/
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
hedr...@rutgers.edu said:
> As for non-Sun hardware, we're being told it is still possible to get support
> for Soarlis 10u8 and older, but all problems will have to be duplicated on
> Sun hardware. It is not possible to get support for later releases.
I spoke with one of our contacts from Oracle
Again, as also mentioned, you can still buy Solaris + Support via the OEM
partners IBM, HP, DELL...
Matthias
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Marion Hakanson
An: hedr...@rutgers.edu
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Gesendet: 22.4.'10, 22:34
hedr...@rutgers.edu said:
As for non
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Edward Martinez wrote:
> I think since many business are moving away from HP-UX , Solaris ,etc over
> to redhat linux and windows, .Oracle, once they finish intergrating SUN,
> will offer solaris to the low-end business on sun units to compete
> against
Hi All,
If I use the priocntl command to change the class of a process from
'Interactive' to 'Real time', and set its priority to 59, how does this
process fare against other user and kernel processes in the system.
Thank you
Vish
___
opensolaris-discus
I'm confused. I tried to find this posting at opensolaris.org, but it doesn't
seem to be there.
I understand that Oracle needs to make money from Sun, but I think changing
Solaris from an OS that will run on many vendors' hardware to one that is the
equivalent of HP-UX changes the game. People
For a transition period:
Oracle has exercised its right to terminate HP’s Solaris Agreement. HP
clients that have purchased Solaris Subscriptions10 for HP ProLiant servers
from HP will continue to receive subscription support from Oracle and Technical
support from HP for the period of their c
On 04/23/10 08:46 AM, Charles Hedrick wrote:
Why do you persisting in discussing commercial Solaris issues on a
non-commercial, non-Solaris list?
Please whinge somewhere else, preferably where readers know the answers.
--
Ian.
___
opensolaris-dis
Too funny
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:52 AM, radhika wrote:
> Friends, i am on job trials.
> I have learned solaris 10 and done certification part-1 and part-2.
>
> I am not able to answer the below questions as i do not have work
> experience on solaris. please help me with your answers.
>
> Q.1
Quoted from your article: "OpenSolaris is derived from the Unix System V
Release 4 codebase, with significant modifications made by Sun since it bought
the rights to that code in 1994."
I wasn't aware that Sun bought the rights to SVR4, released in 1990, because it
was a joint project between U
Haaa lots of nice input there... thanks folks
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
hedr...@rutgers.edu said:
> I'm confused. I tried to find this posting at opensolaris.org, but it doesn't
> seem to be there.
I'm on the email list, sent this posting out via email. It probably
had not trickled through all the layers back to the forum.
> I understand that Oracle needs to make
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Vishal Ahuja wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> If I use the priocntl command to change the class of a process from
> 'Interactive' to 'Real time', and set its priority to 59, how does this
> process fare against other user and kernel processes in the system.
>
RT threads have
On 04/22/2010 06:32 PM, bsd wrote:
Quoted from your article: "OpenSolaris is derived from the Unix System V Release 4
codebase, with significant modifications made by Sun since it bought the rights to that
code in 1994."
I wasn't aware that Sun bought the rights to SVR4, released in 1990, beca
The way he states it in his article is that Sun made significant changes after
buying SVR4, which is incorrect, because changes to SVR4 were made after
Solaris was open sourced. Significant changes were made when SVR4 was
developed, not after. Solaris 2.0 was developed from SVR4.
--
This mess
I would say at the very least, the slab allocator, dtrace, zfs, smf,
are all things that would count as a 'significant' change, all of
which were I believe after SVR4, but prior to Opensolaris.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 9:20 PM, bsd wrote:
> The way he states it in his article is that Sun made sign
> On 22/04/2010 11:11, Svein Skogen wrote:
> > On 22.04.2010 02:27, Alan Hargreaves wrote:
> >> You miss the point. This is a discussion list
> about OpenSolaris. Not
> >> about a Microsoft Office Plugins. Not about
> Solaris. Not about Solaris
> >> patches. The only reason to post this stuff (even
Just an FYI: Comcast seems to have changed their authentication requirements
today,
which broke some stuff.
My sendmail is running on Solaris 9, but with my own build of
sendmail (don't even ask how I did that, I've long since forgotten),
since I needed features that the old version supplied with
bsd wrote:
> The way he states it in his article is that Sun made significant changes
> after buying SVR4, which is incorrect, because changes to SVR4 were made
> after Solaris was open sourced. Significant changes were made when SVR4 was
> developed, not after. Solaris 2.0 was developed from
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>> On 22/04/2010 11:11, Svein Skogen wrote:
>> > On 22.04.2010 02:27, Alan Hargreaves wrote:
>> >> You miss the point. This is a discussion list
>> about OpenSolaris. Not
>> >> about a Microsoft Office Plugins. Not about
>> Solaris. Not a
I didn't say there weren't significant changes since 2.0 and the release of
SVR4, but the article implies that "significant changes" occurred to Solaris
after 1994 when he says Sun bought the SVR4 codebase. That is not an accurate
statement, given the timeline of Solaris development and release
>Friends, i am on job trials.
>I have learned solaris 10 and done certification part-1 and part-2.
>I am not able to answer the below questions as i do not have work >experience
>on solaris. please help me with your answers.
>Q.1) What is the project you are presently working on?
>Q.2) What is y
42 matches
Mail list logo
