Hi,
i am having some trouble replacing a former failed disk. As you can see from
the following disk c11t15d0 is in condition "failed":
r...@openstorage:~# cfgadm -al c11
Ap_Id Type Receptacle Occupant Condition
c11scsi-sas co
Ty John wrote:
> Not sure if this is the correct ML but its the only one I'm subscribed
> to right now.
> I'm trying to compile the gtk engine, murrine from git but keep getting
> a syntax error in the configure script.
>
> checking whether the g77 linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared
> libraries.
Not sure if this is the correct ML but its the only one I'm subscribed
to right now.
I'm trying to compile the gtk engine, murrine from git but keep getting
a syntax error in the configure script.
checking whether the g77 linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared
libraries... yes
checking dynamic
Robin:
On 05/ 8/10 02:14 PM, Robin Axelsson wrote:
The delay is 3 minutes long (~180 seconds) and not 2 or 30 seconds. This
is delay easy to measure since there's a clock in the bottom right
corner of the login splash that is frozen which "jumps" 3 minutes
forward when the input text field for
Try openvpn or a web site that has a list. http://www.ilkda.com :-)
alan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
> I am interested in storage/back up products such as dropbox for personal
> computing
Crashplan has a backup solution for OpenSolaris (among other clients).
I've been using the home version across 4 different platforms for
quite some time an
I am interested in storage/back up products such as dropbox for personal
computing
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Before me can answer, please define "cloud app/product"... ;-)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Peter Jones
An: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Gesendet: 10.5.'10, 20:38
This may seem to be a naive question...but what cloud Apps/products are
available for Opensolaris users either t
This may seem to be a naive question...but what cloud Apps/products are
available for Opensolaris users either through Oracle or elsewhere?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.
> wrote: >
> And even they change their minds, so what they said last month may not be
> true this month, such as the recent changes re-expanding support for
> third-party hardware after previously announcing plans to cut it back.
>
cyril.pli...@mountall.com said:
> Alan,
> I probably misses that
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Albert Lee wrote:
> On Mon, 10 May 2010 08:08:45 -0700, Alan Coopersmith
> wrote:
>> Rob McMahon wrote:
>>> On 10/05/2010 14:15, Dave Johnson wrote:
>
Here is the evidence:
>>> Note the date on this one. Wasn't this before the Oracle takeover ?
>>>
On Mon, 10 May 2010 08:08:45 -0700, Alan Coopersmith
wrote:
> Rob McMahon wrote:
>> On 10/05/2010 14:15, Dave Johnson wrote:
>>> Here is the evidence:
>>>
>> Note the date on this one. Wasn't this before the Oracle takeover ?
>>> Date: Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 6:01 PM
>
> Yes - the plan to m
Erik Trimble wrote:
There are currently several 3rd-party solutions that work on both Sparc
& x64, for both OpenSolaris & Solaris. In addition, both support a
variety of VPN-style solutions via IPSEC and tunneling. Plus,
practically all of the VPN/Firewall vendors produce clients for Solaris
> Not to be rude, but can we take this discussion elsewhere?
It has become an action item in the OGB meeting which is in progress now.
--
Dennis Clarke2010 OpenSolaris Governance Member
dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org
Not to be rude, but can we take this discussion elsewhere? I'm not sure
why it was moved onto opensolaris-discuss, as it seems to be properly
handled over in ogb-discuss and indiana-discuss, which is where it was
originally.
Multi-list cross-posting gets to be a bit much.
-Erik
--
Erik Tr
> Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> The short story is:
> The Opera staff asked - as usual - for help to
> circumvent a Solaris
> bug. The (new) response, totally the opposite from
> Sun's helpful
> behavior of the past was:
> 1. Opera did not purchase support for Solaris
> 2. Without support Oracle wi
Rob McMahon wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 14:15, Dave Johnson wrote:
>>>
>> Here is the evidence:
>>
> Note the date on this one. Wasn't this before the Oracle takeover ?
>> Date: Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 6:01 PM
Yes - the plan to modernize /usr/bin and eventually get rid of the need
to have /usr/gnu/bin
Cyril Plisko wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Alan Coopersmith
> wrote:
>> And even they change their minds, so what they said last month may not be
>> true this month, such as the recent changes re-expanding support for
>> third-party hardware after previously announcing plans to cut it
> On 05-10-10, Chris Pickett wrote:
>Dennis, please add this to the OGB call agenda for today. IMO the OGB
>should intervene in favor of the ksh93/AST framework.
>
>Chris
I already added it before I got your message.
http://wiki.genunix.org:8080/wiki/index.php/2010_05_10_OGB_Agenda
Dennis
On 10/05/2010 14:15, Dave Johnson wrote:
Here is the evidence:
Note the date on this one. Wasn't this before the Oracle takeover ?
Evidence 1:
- Project cooperation with ksh project withdrawn
- GNU commands as replacements are the futur
-- Forwarded message --
From: John
2010/5/10 Matthias Pfützner :
> This "proof"-quotes from others came later!
>
> And, the fact, that side-by-side there's /usr/gnu/bin and /usr/bin shall
> indicate, that there's no FURTHER development of Solaris-tools, is
> ridiculous...
if
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discus
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>>On 05-10-10, John Plocher wrote:
>>On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Dave Johnson
>> wrote:
>>> This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?
>
>> While I have not been following this soap opera in excruciatin
This "proof"-quotes from others came later!
And, the fact, that side-by-side there's /usr/gnu/bin and /usr/bin shall
indicate, that there's no FURTHER development of Solaris-tools, is
ridiculous...
Matthias
Du (Martin Bochnig) schreibst:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Dennis Clarke
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>>On 05-10-10, John Plocher wrote:
>>On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Dave Johnson
>> wrote:
>>> This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?
>
>> While I have not been following this soap opera in excruciatin
>On 05-10-10, John Plocher wrote:
>On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Dave Johnson
> wrote:
>> This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?
> While I have not been following this soap opera in excruciating
> detail
John, I looked at it as "some guy" making a fair
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:33 PM, John Plocher wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Dave Johnson
> wrote:
>> This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?
>
> While I have not been following this soap opera in excruciating
> detail, my reading of the ARC discuss
2010/5/10 Matthias Pfützner :
> Worse, quoting himself as proof... ;-)
Matthias Pfützner:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2010-May/056462.html
--->>
A [ ] You are able to read
B [ ] ... ???
>
> You(Jennifer Pioch) wrote:
>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:50
Worse, quoting himself as proof... ;-)
You(Jennifer Pioch) wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Dave Johnson
> wrote:
> > This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?
> >
> > David
> >
> > -- Forwarded message --
> > From: Dave Johnson
> > Da
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Jennifer Pioch
wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Dave Johnson
> wrote:
>> This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?
>>
>> David
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Dave Johnson
>> Date: Mon, May 10, 2
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Dave Johnson
wrote:
>
> Oracle doesn't want the command modernisation and ksh93 projects. They
> had too much community influence in the past, are too independent and
> Oracle wants to replace the Solaris commands in usr/bin with GNU
> commands. Oracle has already
Do you have any proof of that?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB
> intervene?
Yeah sure .. I'll call up lawyers this morning first thing on nothing but
your word and file a statement of claim followed by a class action suit on
behalf of the active community members seeking remedy for both dama
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Dave Johnson
wrote:
> This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?
>
> David
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Dave Johnson
> Date: Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] 201
> Bob Palowoda wrote:
> > Just curious what is the basic plan for VPN
> solutions for Opensolaris or even Solaris in general?
> What would Oracle recommend as a common solution in
> this category that would include Solaris x86, and
> Solaris sparc? Open source or proprietary as long
> as it has a
Bob Palowoda wrote:
Just curious what is the basic plan for VPN solutions for Opensolaris or even
Solaris in general? What would Oracle recommend as a common solution in this
category that would include Solaris x86, and Solaris sparc? Open source or
proprietary as long as it has a roadmap th
Just curious what is the basic plan for VPN solutions for Opensolaris or even
Solaris in general? What would Oracle recommend as a common solution in this
category that would include Solaris x86, and Solaris sparc? Open source or
proprietary as long as it has a roadmap that can work and is ava
This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?
David
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dave Johnson
Date: Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] 2010.03, when will it be
available?
To: "Richard L. Hamilton"
Cc: opens
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>> Slide 22 is also very interesting and gives me a lot
>> of reassurance:
>>
>> OpenSolaris
>> • Oracle will continue to make OpenSolaris available
>> as open source and
>> Oracle will continue to actively support and
>> participate in th
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Alan Coopersmith
wrote:
>
> And even they change their minds, so what they said last month may not be
> true this month, such as the recent changes re-expanding support for
> third-party hardware after previously announcing plans to cut it back.
Alan,
I probably
39 matches
Mail list logo
