rrupt routing
(you'll lose some, but not all ACPI-based features).
Build 131 should correct this, though.
Thanks -
Dana
-Original Message-
From: Dana H. Myers
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris snv_130 panic.
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:58
Hello Juris,
You're running on an IBM xSeries machine: IBM xSeries 3650 64 bit,
which makes me certain this is reported as CR 6916573. Investigation
strongly suggests this is a duplicate of CR 6905550, regression induced
in build 129 and fixed in build 131. My apologies for the inconvenience.
andrew wrote:
I filed 6913815 since I didn't see it tracked elsewhere - the Tecra M10 won't shutdown or
restart through BIOS if VT extensions are enabled. I also see related bug 6870290 that
was marked - "defer - no resource" in bugster in August this year. Can anyone
tell me if there is resou
Adrian Carpenter wrote:
Just upgraded snv_129 to snv_130 but unfortunately it doesn't get past:
SunOS Release 5.11 Version snv_130 64-bit
Copyright 1983-2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved
Use is subject to license terms.
_ (blinking cursor)
Any hints? suggestions for working out
I'm investigating an old issue that may have been solved between
OpenSolaris 2008.11 and OpenSolaris 2009.06. It's hardware/BIOS
specific and I can't reproduce it on the machines I've looked at.
Could everyone running on x86/x64 running OpenSolaris 2009.06
or later (dev builds are interesting,
Florian Ermisch wrote:
Hi *,
after managing to (live-)upgrade to SXCE 112 I'm running 2
"bash-3.2$ lzma -c /export/incoming/sol-nv-b112-x86-dvd.iso > /dev/null"
and transmission with enough torrents to fill up my 12Mbit/s
downstream (and enough to cause 400 to 2000 interrupts in 5 seconds
acco
Jürgen Keil wrote:
and the following ACPI errors in the log:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=6964
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6820829
These look bad. Is this from a debug kernel?
Or from a standard release kernel?
Initial analysis indicates that t
Jürgen Keil wrote:
Both ac[] and al[] don't look this interesting to me...
Yep, there are no threshold temperatures defined,
so that tzp->current_level will never change and
always remains at -1 (so the code will never call
tzmon_set_power() to enable / disable any fans).
On Le
Amanda Waite wrote:
> I've just installed from scratch a Ferrari 3400 with OpenSolaris.
> Installed from the Live CD initially and then followed the process at
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/indiana-discuss/2008-July/007664.html
> to image-update to b94.
>
> It panics immediately after
Petteri Tammiaho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> And thanks, I'll crawl to the nearest corner and stay there a while after
> this feeling
> very much ashamed. Should have slept first and had another look. It was the
> typo. And
> I managed to screw up the exlude somehow a week ago. Now after renaming the
> f
Petteri Tammiaho wrote:
[...]
> Motherboard is an Abit AB9 Pro with Intel E6300 Core 2 Duo CPU
>
> The problem starts after the tzmon has been loaded:
> Apr 16 21:20:14 sauron genunix: [ID 936769 kern.notice] pcie_pci5 is /[EMAIL
> PROTECTED],0/pci8086,[EMAIL PROTECTED],5
> Apr 16 21:20:14 saur
Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Donald Brownlee wrote:
>> Am using CDE.
>>
>> I logout, then when the CDE login window appears,
>> I choose command line login, then login as root,
>> then run 'init 5'.
>>
>> Is there an easier way to do this?
>>
>> I realize that I could 'su', then run 'init 5', inside CD
Dennis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to ask how driver development is done at Solaris?
> - Do you ask hardware makers for the specs?
Ideally, yes. In some cases, it's even possible to develop drivers from
publicly available documentation; I wrote the original incarnation of the
'pcn' PCnet-PCI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>>> I would think that a Bluetooth implementation for Solaris just begs to
>>> be STREAMS based (and at some level, would have to be anyway).
>>> Are there any existing CDDL-compatible STREAMS-based implementations?
>> Not that I've seen (yet).
Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> I would think that a Bluetooth implementation for Solaris just begs to
> be STREAMS based (and at some level, would have to be anyway).
> Are there any existing CDDL-compatible STREAMS-based implementations?
Not that I've seen (yet).
The FreeBSD implementation uses th
wb wrote:
> this is a 2 proc machine, with 1G ram, standard i586.
What *specific* kind of machine is this? We need to know
which make and model, is it PCI-Express?
Dana
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
wb wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I still have a problem I can't solve at starting my solaris 10 X86.
>
> usba: [ID 691482 kern.warning] WARNING: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci925,[EMAIL
> PROTECTED],3 (uhci1): No SOF interrupts have been received, this USB UHCI
> host controller is unusable
>
> How to correct
Eric Sproul wrote:
> Hi,
> I've got some new hardware in, and I'd really like to be running 6/06 on
> it, but I'm having terrible problems with lockups. They seem to happen
> anywhere from 30 minutes to 3 hours after bootup, regardless of
> workload, even sitting idle. The same behavior was obser
Robert Dickel wrote:
> Dual core T7400 Merom 64 bit cpu; w/ solaris 10 update 2 + patches (118855-19)
>
> 64 bit boot: only works with acpi-user-options=2 (which means I only get one
> of the cores)
> ... any other value causes a panic on boot:
Just to follow-up; Bob was kind enough to work with
The panic only happens in 64-bit mode; that's interesting.
This isn't a known problem. What happens if you boot
with acpi-user-options=0x4 ?
Dana
Robert Dickel wrote:
> Dual core T7400 Merom 64 bit cpu; w/ solaris 10 update 2 + patches (118855-19)
>
> 64 bit boot: only works with acpi-user-opt
Hello Ron,
> I have just installed nv47 on a new Asus P5WD2-E M/B with Pentium D Dual Core
> cpu
> and 975x chipset. The machine boots a 64 bit kernel, which is not as stable
> as the
> same OS version on a Intel 32-bit single core machine.
>
> Is there a way to 1) force the installation of the
Now that we've had a chance to do additional investigation, we've nailed-down
the root-cause of the DL385/585 run-time hang. The specific hardware
configuration
of the HP DL385/585 machines trips over Opteron Erratum #99 "Background
Scrubbing Must
Be Disabled With Non-Contiguous Memory Map", an
Bruce Riddle wrote:
> Dana H. Myers wrote:
>> Add the following line to /etc/system and reboot:
>>
>> set cpu\.AuthenticAMD\.15:ao_scrub_rate_dram = 0
>>
>> I expect you will no longer see the hang. If you still see
>> the hang, also add the followin
Dana H. Myers wrote:
> A number of us have been pretty busy putting a box around this
> hang; we seem to have made a bit of progress and have a possible
> work-around to test.
>
> Add the following line to /etc/system and reboot:
>
> set cpu\.AuthenticAMD\.15:ao_scrub
Gino Ruopolo wrote:
>>> This fix solves only boot hang?
>>> Our DL585 S10U2 hangs after about 3-4 hours of
>> uptime also ...
>>>
>>>
>> The fix for CR 6451513 addresses the boot-hang only;
>> the run-time hang
>> needs to be
>> investigated independently.
>
> We are unable to investigate more
Ian Collins wrote:
> I've recently upgraded my laptop from build 33 with a new drive and
> build 43 and everything works well, including the correct detection of
> the display resolution.
>
> Only problem is, the power button no longer works and I have to perform
> a manual shutdown.
>
> Is this
Gino Ruopolo wrote:
What exactly happens when you boot?
Did you try to boot the kernel with flags "-kv"?
>>> cannot mount root path
>> OK, so it's not hanging, it seems to have a problem
>> with missing drivers.
>
> Yes. The "hang problem" is still here with our DL585.
> We hope th
I've integrated the fix for CR 6451513, the HP DL585/DL380 etc. boot hang
into Solaris Nevada b46; I'll backport it into an S10 patch/update as soon
as possible. In the meantime, it should show up soon in Solaris Express.
Thanks all for the help,
Dana
___
Vlad wrote:
> I have DL385 after upgrade to Solaris 6/6 my server begun hang up after "init
> 6"or reboot.
This is a known problem, for which I am preparing to integrate a fix into
Solaris Nevada
(and into the next possible S10 update).
The hang is caused when, during PCI enumeration, a PCI-PCI
I've localized the boot hang on the DL585 to pci_boot.c:add_reg_props()
(see
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/on/usr/src/uts/i86pc/io/pci/pci_boot.c#1166)
The hang always occurs when probing the first PCI-PCI bridge in the system.
On a hunch, I changed this line:
1166 pci_putw
Dmitry wrote:
> I remind, what it hang not only boot, but and at work.
I understand you're seeing a run-time hang as well. Based on the
investigation of the boot-time hang so far, I believe these are
separate problems.
Dana
___
opensolaris-discuss mail
I located a DL585 in the lab, installed S10U2 on it, and initially could not
reproduce the hang. On a hunch, I switched from using the serial console to
using the video console, and now I can reproduce the hang on roughly every
second or third reboot. My suspicion is that the hang is timing-sens
Jean-François Ndi wrote:
> Hello, Dana.
>
> This problem seems to be solved under Nevada (MASTER_ABORT followed by an NMI
> in short).
>
> pci _enumerate(), process_devfunc() have been modified in order to fix
> certain pci devices (in fact one) before the enumeration.
>
> http://cvs.opensolar
Rob McMahon wrote:
> For another datapoint, I'm seeing what looks like exactly the same problem on
> a DL385 (single AMD Opteron 280). Setting the appropriate flags in
> /etc/system, the hang ends with:
How much memory do you have, and how often does the machine hang on boot?
I've got a DL585
Dmitry wrote:
> today dl585 hang at work,
> but it only copied 1 big file from network,
So, the system hangs not only during boot, but sometimes
long after boot?
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Rob McMahon wrote:
> Dana H. Myers wrote:
>> According to the HCL, Solaris has been testing on the DL585 at least
>> once; this makes me curious what BIOS revision these two machines
>> (DL385 and DL585) are running. I believe you can get the BIOS version
>> by entering
Dmitry wrote:
> i don't now, i'm muzzy
> now i'll try to boot
> with difeerent options
> reboot -- -B acpi-user-options=
I would suggest not changing the default for acpi-user-options; the
evidence indicates that the issue is during PCI enumeration.
When the system *does* boot, would you be so ki
Rob McMahon wrote:
> For another datapoint, I'm seeing what looks like exactly the same problem on
> a DL385 (single AMD Opteron 280). Setting the appropriate flags in
> /etc/system, the hang ends with:
>
> Search PCI Hot-Plug Resource Table starting at 0xF
> Found PCI Hot-Plug Resource Tab
Jean-François Ndi wrote:
>>From what I see in the screenshot the hang occurs during the pci bus probing.
I haven't seen a screenshot - did Dmitri send one? Could you forward it
to me?
> I think it hangs in the following function:
>
> http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/on/usr/src/uts/i86pc/i
Jürgen Keil wrote:
[...]
> But... You also added "set pci_autoconfig:pci_boot_debug=1" ?
>
> The "PCI Hot-Plug" and the "NOTICE messages are not from the acpica code.
> So, now it is looking more and more as if acpica isn't responsible for the
> hang,
> but the pci bus enumeration code.
>
> Quo
Jürgen Keil wrote:
>> i havn't experience and compiler for remake autovec
>
> A compiler should be available as /usr/sfw/bin/gcc, if you've installed
> everything from the OS installation CD/DVD.
>
> You can also use the 32-bit autovec executable that is included
> in Dan Mick's source archive (s
Jürgen Keil wrote:
>> Solaris 10 06/06 x86 HP DL585 boot hang aftrer reboot
>>
>> when I shutdown server and power on,
>> solaris sometimes start, and working good,
>> sometime hang
>
> That is, if you power cycle the machine, it will boot without hanging,
> at least sometimes?
>
> One idea is t
Jürgen Keil wrote:
> There have been issues in the past where the bios acpi code
> was sending lots of (>1) interrupts/second.
>
> For example, see this thread:
> http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=46992
It is very unlikely that Dmitry is seeing this problem with an
HP DL5
Jean-François Ndi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> you can try this:
>
> - boot in the debugger (-kd)
> - ::bp acpica`_init (note the backtick character)
> - :c
>
> When you hit the break point:
> - ::step over
>
> this, until you either hang or see another module getting installed. (I know,
> not the most
Dmitry wrote:
> Thanks,
>>> set moddebug=0x8000 in /etc/system
> a few reboots
>
> and ...
> hang on
> [b]installing acpica, module id 11[/b]
>
> i am novice at Solaris.
>
> and brfore it, i do test Oracle, and system hang in work!!!
> it's correlated with boot hang?
>
> it's possible res
Dana H. Myers wrote:
> John Martinez wrote:
>> NOTICE: tzmon: can not set power
>>
>> Looks like it has to do with power management.
>
> This message is innocuous; it means that the BIOS tables
> contain an incomplete 'thermal zone' and that the (newly-
John Martinez wrote:
>
> I just upgraded from b39. So far, so good. NVIDIA drivers seem to work.
> I had to trash all of my GNOME settings in order for JDS to look nice,
> though.
>
> Anybody seen this yet and knows what it means?
>
> NOTICE: tzmon: can not set power
>
> Looks like it has to do
Phi Tran wrote:
> WUSB has the higher bandwidth than bluetooth, but bluetooth
> supposedly uses less power and is less bulky.
WUSB and Bluetooth address two different problems, really.
No one would want to hook up an external disk drive or graphics
printer using Bluetooth - the performance would
Colin Zou wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> (Why is Wireless USB needed when you have bluetooth?
> My current idea is, WUSB is expected to be cheap and it's easy to
> compliant or co-exist with the current usb solution. Major hardware
> vendors are promoting this technology actively, it is expe
Alan Hargreaves wrote:
> Peter, could I possibly get you to log a support call on this so we can
> get the appropriate escalation path in place to get a fix done.
>
> Provide the bug-id, a pointer to this thread on the jive server and note
> that a PTS-Kernel Engineer (me), specifically asked for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Wireless USB finally coming out of the labs
>>
>> http://eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=189600587&pgno=1
>
> Interesting, but I thought one of the reasons to have cables was
> power?
>
> (Why is Wireless USB needed when you have bluetooth?
WUSB is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> BTW: thermal zone handling was introduced in Nevada build 40 as part of:
>
> 6363985 acpica: Metropolis SMB Alerts result in high background system load
>
> Metropolis, of course, is the W2100z
>
>
> (The "thermal" event can happen in overtemp conditions and some
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm more inclined to add an additional acpi-user-options bit
to permit users to relax the I/O permission checks. Legacy
acpi_intp had no permission check and I don't recall any
bugs filed, though any problem resulting from non-atomic access
to PCI config space is likely
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The system ACPI BIOS is attempting to access PCI configuration space
directly rather than using the correct PCI Config space operation regions.
This is unsafe - directly accessing config space like this is non-atomic.
The OSL implementation blocks these accesses.
Perh
Joerg Schilling wrote:
If I plug in a PS/2 mouse (even after the system is booted successfully)
the keyboard becomes non-functional until the system is rebooted.
That's odd. I'll have to forward this to the keyboard/mouse team;
it doesn't sound directly related to ACPI. Though...
OK, here
Joerg Schilling wrote:
"Dana H. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have a look here:
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/usr/src/uts/i86pc/io/acpica/osl.c#570
What I'm contemplating is adding yet another acpi-user-options bit to
disable access control for those willi
Joerg Schilling wrote:
"Dana H. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jul 4 21:41:45 s11 acpica: [ID 972481 kern.warning] WARNING: AcpiOsWritePort:
cf8 32 not permitted
Jul 4 21:41:45 s11 acpica: [ID 815887 kern.notice] ACPI-0519: *** Error:
Jul 4 21:41:45 s11 acpica: [ID 44
> On my machine anyway, a single power button press
> induces shutdown.
>
> A triple press induces panic+crashdump.
That's only if you've installed the experimental acpidrv (part of frkit)
Dana
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-d
Err - I meant to ask with acpi-user-options=0x8 . This will leave the system
BIOS in "legacy" mode but still use ACPI for enumeration, and this is the S10
mode.
Thanks -
Dana
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing lis
> The acpi code is full of nonportable bitfield
> definitions writen by Intel.
> It may be that so far nobody did ran into related
> problems.
> Everyone who has problems related to acpi should wait
> until the code
> has been fixed.
I'm not sure it's accurate to say that ACPI CA is full
of
> Hi,
>
> I have some really strange problems with booting
> Schillix on a PC with AMD Duron 650 and KT-133
> chipset (IIRC).
>
> The boot hangs after printing:
>
> boot scratch memory used: 0x26102c
>
> If I remove the Mouse(PS-2), it boots.
>
> There are many ACPI error messages. Is there a
Using acpi-user-opions=0x2 with b16 should have the same behavior as
default S10 - can you confirm this?
Thanks!
Dana
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
62 matches
Mail list logo
