Re: [osol-discuss] Project Proposal: Enable/Enhance Solaris support for Intel Platforms

2007-02-09 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
Sherry Moore wrote: I'd like to propose a project to enable and enhance Solaris support for shipping and future Intel processors and platforms. +1 As we are all aware of, Sun and Intel have formed an alliance to make Solaris the Unix operating system of choice on Intel platforms. We

Re: [ksh93-integration-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] Formal Proposal : Port OpenSolaris to PowerPC

2006-07-27 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
p.s.: Is SUNW interested in GRUB2 on sparc? We finally could boot from USB mass storage then. The idea that GRUB or GRUB2 has anything to do with what devices a system can or can not boot from is mostly a miss-conception. A number of amd64/legacy-x86 systems have BIOSs that can talk to and

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Solaris on Intel Macs??

2006-04-13 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
Quick questions since I haven't had time to setup the environment to play with your patches yet. Did you see any disks, or can't you type anything yet ? Hmm, the Intel ICH7 chipset in the Intel iMac seems to suffer from the cntrl sharing DMA engine between channels problem, so that

[osol-discuss] Solaris iMac Hello World

2006-04-13 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
I've managed to install Solaris on an iMac with the bootcamp bits. The most significant hurdles were conquered when Juergen Keil enabled both multiboot and GRUB to work in a i8042 free system. That work is covered by: 6412224 GRUB hangs when no i8042 is present 6412226

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: Solaris on Intel Macs??

2006-04-13 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
Reading from the HDD is killing GUI performance on the iMac, it seems... There's an (supposedly dangerously) hacked ata driver floating around hat makes this work OK. Please contact me off-line if you'd like a copy of it. The bug that covers this is: 5031379

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris iMac Hello World

2006-04-13 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
To, as promised follow up on my own message: The next hurdle is that the Solaris fdisk doesn't interact all that well with the bootcamp prepared disk. I hacked around this by hand and am still gathering information to file the appropriate bug (with workaround). I'll follow up when the

Re: [osol-discuss] Creating new device node in device tree at system startup.

2006-03-27 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
You'll want to take a look at the driver.conf(4) man page and translate all the bits of information you previously decorated the node with via boot.rc into your .conf file. So, something like: name=ipmi_lpc parent=/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0 device-type=pci unit-address=1f ... You'll also need

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: grub miniroot optimisation (was Re: [dtrace-discuss] Comments on SystemTap?)

2005-09-29 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
Jan Setje-Eilers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: For what it's worth, I hacked away at the nevada build 22 miniroot and was able to install a 128Mb system. Here are the details: http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/setje?entry=post_new_boot_solaris_on In that blog, you mention

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: grub miniroot optimisation (was Re: [dtrace-discuss] Comments on SystemTap?)

2005-09-29 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
For what it's worth, I hacked away at the nevada build 22 miniroot and was able to install a 128Mb system. Here are the details: http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/setje?entry=post_new_boot_solaris_on You can probably gain a little more by not using a logging ufs filesystem for the

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: grub miniroot optimisation (was Re: [dtrace-discuss] Comments on SystemTap?)

2005-09-28 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
For what it's worth, I hacked away at the nevada build 22 miniroot and was able to install a 128Mb system. Here are the details: http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/setje?entry=post_new_boot_solaris_on -jan ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list