Why? Sounds like something people might want to be aware of the reasons
for, insofar as they affect either the user or developer experience.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris
> why would CDE users demand migration projects when they can
> just keep using CDE?
What sort of migration might we be talking about? Docs? Training?
Transfer of settings?
It isn't clear to me that you would want to simply migrate
from CDE to GNOME. They're sufficiently different that
starting o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speed in user interfaces is all about perception. We all want
gnome-terminal as fast as possible. Of course, if we made
it really fast you won't be able to see any information flying by
at all, anyway :-).
Well, except that in the GNOME case they made something fast w
>Speed in user interfaces is all about perception. We all want
>gnome-terminal as fast as possible. Of course, if we made
>it really fast you won't be able to see any information flying by
>at all, anyway :-).
Well, except that in the GNOME case they made something fast which
wasn't useful rath
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the same performance stunt we used for cmdtool in 1991 or so.
Dtterm does the same thing. What's wrong w/ this?
- the human brain can actually process much of the information
flying by so having it all fly by is preferred
This is difficult
>This is the same performance stunt we used for cmdtool in 1991 or so.
>Dtterm does the same thing. What's wrong w/ this?
- the human brain can actually process much of the information
flying by so having it all fly by is preferred
- by pretending to be fast, all reas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a little confused as to what behaviour people want with
PageUp/PageDown in gnome-terminal.
I'm running snv_42.
If I run vim inside a gnome-terminal then PageUp/PageDown moves me
through the document as I'd expect and want.
If I'm at the shell prompt then I need
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same here. But configurable, like it is in Xterm, is fine.
How come that something like gnome-terminals grows all eye-candy
and does away with all the useful features?
Welcome to GNOME where config is considered bad :-)
My pet peeve missing feature could actually be
>Scrolling around in gnome-terminal itself without having
>to press shift. I want the terminal to get PgUp, PgDn,
>Home, and End. I don't have any applications running inside
>a terminal window that I would ever want to send those
>events to, and it's twice the effort (at least) to have
>to press
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a little confused as to what behaviour people want with
PageUp/PageDown in gnome-terminal.
I'm running snv_42.
If I run vim inside a gnome-terminal then PageUp/PageDown moves me
through the document as I'd expect and want.
If I'm at the shell prompt then I need
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 09:29, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> I'm a little confused as to what behaviour people want with
> PageUp/PageDown in gnome-terminal.
>
> I'm running snv_42.
>
> If I run vim inside a gnome-terminal then PageUp/PageDown moves me
> through the document as I'd expect and want.
>
>I'm a little confused as to what behaviour people want with
>PageUp/PageDown in gnome-terminal.
>
>I'm running snv_42.
>
>If I run vim inside a gnome-terminal then PageUp/PageDown moves me
>through the document as I'd expect and want.
>
>If I'm at the shell prompt then I need to press Shift Pag
I'm a little confused as to what behaviour people want with
PageUp/PageDown in gnome-terminal.
I'm running snv_42.
If I run vim inside a gnome-terminal then PageUp/PageDown moves me
through the document as I'd expect and want.
If I'm at the shell prompt then I need to press Shift PageUp to m
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 11:32:52PM +0100, Peter
> Tribble wrote:
>
> > > Indeed, that's precisely why they were chosen
> (ditto all the other
> > > Shifted shortcuts in gnome-terminal). In fact,
> in JDS we changed it
> > > back for a while, but that patch seems to
> regressed (or removed, I do
14 matches
Mail list logo
