I know this isn't really OpenSolaris related, but I don't know of a
better list.
I've just done the pkg image-update to take me from express 151.0.1.12.
I tried a couple of weeks ago, and was left with an unusable boot
environment. I was left without a graphical screen at a login prompt.
On 12/ 8/11 04:45 AM, Rob McMahon wrote:
I know this isn't really OpenSolaris related, but I don't know of a
better list.
I've just done the pkg image-update to take me from express 151.0.1.12.
I tried a couple of weeks ago, and was left with an unusable boot
environment. I was left without a
I don't know if gmane archives it but comp.unix.solaris is still
somewhat active. However, most discussion exclusive to Solaris 11 may
be found on the sysadmin and dev fora here;
http://forums.oracle.com/forums/category.jspa?categoryID=303
-Gary
___
Gary gdri...@gmail.com writes:
I don't know if gmane archives it but comp.unix.solaris is still
somewhat active. However, most discussion exclusive to Solaris 11 may
be found on the sysadmin and dev fora here;
http://forums.oracle.com/forums/category.jspa?categoryID=303
Thanks for the link.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011, Harry Putnam wrote:
Do you know if that forum is available by NNTP?
I don't think any of the Oracle fora have NNTP gateways. If they're
using Jive Software's forum software there as well then I know it's
capable but I don't think Oracle has ever hosted a public NNTP
Can anyone tell me if there is a group on www.gmane.org's nntp service
that is intended to discuss (oracle) Solaris 11 express?
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi,
I see the documentation forum is all but dead; as we have no current Oracle
support contract to refer to I decided to post this here hoping that someone
will notice it...
The documentation bundle for Solaris 11 Express, available from
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cds/E19963-01.zip ,
We're not dead yet. :-)
We're looking into this problem and hope to republish this collection
soon to solve these issues.
Thanks for reporting this problem.
Cindy
On 02/11/11 02:50, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
Hi,
I see the documentation forum is all but dead; as we have no current Oracle
Chavdar, apologies for this inconvenience. We are aware of the problem
with the zip contents and are working to fix it. Thanks.
-alan
Subject: [osol-discuss] Solaris 11 Express Documentation Bundle
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 01:50:57 PST
From: Chavdar Ivanov ci4...@gmail.com
To: opensolaris
The Oracle distros are worthless to me if there's no security patches
available. I'm trying openIndiana now.. thanks for the advice Alex! so far
only one issue .. the system lost display when the machine was unattended for
some time.. seme to remember that happening with early version of
On 02/ 7/11 02:11 PM, Mike Suchodolski wrote:
The Oracle distros are worthless to me if there's no security patches
available. I'm trying openIndiana now.. thanks for the advice Alex!
Does OpenIndiana provides also security patches?
I will be amazed if it does :)
-Ghee
so far only one issue
Mike Suchodolski msuchodol...@msn.com wrote:
The Oracle distros are worthless to me if there's no security patches
available. I'm trying openIndiana now.. thanks for the advice Alex! so far
only one issue .. the system lost display when the machine was unattended for
some time.. seme to
On 02/ 7/11 06:11 AM, Mike Suchodolski wrote:
The Oracle distros are worthless to me if there's no security patches
available.
There are security patches available - just like for OpenSolaris 2008.05,
2008.11, and 2009.06, you can get security patches for 2010.11 by buying
a support contract.
* Ghee Teo ghee@oracle.com [2011-02-07 15:53]:
On 02/ 7/11 02:11 PM, Mike Suchodolski wrote:
The Oracle distros are worthless to me if there's no security patches
available. I'm trying openIndiana now.. thanks for the advice Alex!
Does OpenIndiana provides also security patches?
I will
-Mail: unixcons...@yahoo.com
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
- Original Message
From: Mike Suchodolski msuchodol...@msn.com
To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Sat, February 5, 2011 10:41:51 PM
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 11
, 6 Feb 2011 09:59:12 -0800
From: unixcons...@yahoo.com
To: msuchodol...@msn.com; opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 11 Express is out
Solaris 11 Express is free for personal use. You only need to pay for it when
you're using it in production
: [osol-discuss] Solaris 11 Express is out
I just found my way to this post.. I've been scratching my head as to why
update
manager has been failing to find any updates and I downloaded the latest
Oracle
Solaris to see if that would fix things.. only to find I can't even
register my
solaris
useful.
Uros
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 09:59:12 -0800
From: unixcons...@yahoo.com
To: msuchodol...@msn.com; opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 11 Express is out
Solaris 11 Express is free for personal use. You only need to pay for it when
you're using
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
From: Uros Nedic ur...@live.com
To: unixcons...@yahoo.com; msuchodol...@msn.com; OpenSolarisDiscuss
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Sun, February 6, 2011 12:52:49 PM
Subject: RE: [osol-discuss] Solaris 11 Express is out
Solaris 11 Express is free for personal and testing
I just found my way to this post.. I've been scratching my head as to why
update manager has been failing to find any updates and I downloaded the latest
Oracle Solaris to see if that would fix things.. only to find I can't even
register my solaris machine anymore.. :-(
I'm a manager now..
You may want to look into Illumos and OpenIndiana. They are
continuances of the OpenSolaris project and are actively maintained.
http://www.illumos.org/
http://www.openindiana.org/
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 23:41, Mike Suchodolski msuchodol...@msn.com wrote:
I just found my way to this post.. I've
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010, Claus Assmann wrote:
Oh well, maybe I put an nVidia graphics card into the box again and
see how that works (it caused some problems with X and the selection
It actually works ok. However, it would be nice to have the builtin
graphics working properly too -- AFAICT the
On 12/23/10 10:37 AM, Claus Assmann wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010, Claus Assmann wrote:
Oh well, maybe I put an nVidia graphics card into the box again and
see how that works (it caused some problems with X and the selection
It actually works ok. However, it would be nice to have the builtin
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010, Claus Assmann wrote:
0.0001 stat64(/usr/lib/X11/locale/common/ximlocal.so.2, 0x08045C70) Err#2
ENOENT
0.0001 fstat64(2, 0x08045E70) = 0
Failed to open input method
0. write(2, F a i l e d t o o p.., 28) = 28
On 12/15/10 09:38 AM, Claus Assmann wrote:
Oh well, maybe I put an nVidia graphics card into the box again and
see how that works (it caused some problems with X and the selection
of a graphics card before).
Details?
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
[Is it ok to ask questions about Solaris 11 Express here?]
I bought a new machine (with AMD 880G graphics chip) and while it
seems to run Solaris 11 Express (snv_151a) fine, it is very slow
under X. I ran some x11perf test which show good numbers, but the
thing that demonstrates the problem best
On 12/15/10 03:22 PM, Claus Assmann wrote:
[Is it ok to ask questions about Solaris 11 Express here?]
I bought a new machine (with AMD 880G graphics chip) and while it
seems to run Solaris 11 Express (snv_151a) fine, it is very slow
under X. I ran some x11perf test which show good numbers, but
On 12/14/2010 06:22 PM, Claus Assmann wrote:
I'd take a closer look at the following lines in your Xorg log. Is your
configuration correct? Do you have the right drivers installed?
Xorg log follows:
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/amd64/libglx.so
dlopen: ld.so.1: Xorg:
Loren Davis wrote:
On 12/14/2010 06:22 PM, Claus Assmann wrote:
I'd take a closer look at the following lines in your Xorg log. Is your
configuration correct? Do you have the right drivers installed?
Xorg log follows:
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/amd64/libglx.so
On 12/14/2010 07:19 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
xterm doesn't use glx - you shouldn't get messages like that, but GLX
acceleration isn't available for ATI graphics right now so it won't buy you
much.
Thanks for the information.
This message could be simply replaced by Hey! You're
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010, Loren Davis wrote:
I'd take a closer look at the following lines in your Xorg log. Is your
configuration correct? Do you have the right drivers installed?
It's a basic installation and I have not (yet) created an xorg.conf
file, i.e., X uses the builtin configuration:
Upgraded to solaris 11 express.
No problem at all during upgrade (postgresql service destroyed though, but that
was expected ;-))
keyboard english after upgrad, had to modify keymap:default service def
compiz doesn't start automatically (?) but works if selected from gui
Xend doesn't start after
Pardon me for asking what might be obvious to others but is not to me;
why are folks upgrading production systems to Solaris Express
regardless of version? If you plan to use Xvm until Solaris 11 ships
with or without a replacement for it, why are you upgrading these
systems in the first place? I
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 06:18:13PM -0800, Muhammed Syyid wrote:
Is there any specifics somewhere about what the known issues are? I'm
currently on OSOL 126 (have been holding back primarily because of xvm)
On a tangential note, what does OpenIndiana use for VM (I read that it
doesn't
W. Wayne Liauh w...@hawaiilinux.org wrote:
# For LibreOffice I don't see any builds for Solaris. So, when we #wouldn't
care about our platform, what is then the foundation #doing? ;-)
I think your philosophy is fundamentally flawed. No one is expecting the TDF
to port LibreOffice to
W. Wayne Liauh w...@hawaiilinux.org wrote:
# For LibreOffice I don't see any builds for
Solaris. So, when we #wouldn't care about our
platform, what is then the foundation #doing? ;-)
I think your philosophy is fundamentally flawed.
No one is expecting the TDF to port LibreOffice to
On 11/23/10 05:08 PM, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
This thread started because I was unable to install OOo 3.3 RC5 in the just-released
S11e. The installation tarball came with a setup script (for installation)
which works in Ubuntu and S10u9 but not in S11e. I had so much expectation for S11e and
# For LibreOffice I don't see any builds for Solaris. So, when we #wouldn't
care about our platform, what is then the foundation #doing? ;-)
I think your philosophy is fundamentally flawed. No one is expecting the TDF
to port LibreOffice to Solaris.
If Oracle is not stubborn/stupid enough
Is there any specifics somewhere about what the known issues are? I'm currently
on OSOL 126 (have been holding back primarily because of xvm)
On a tangential note, what does OpenIndiana use for VM (I read that it doesn't
support xvm but does it support kvm instead or something else?)
--
This
Thank you for your response. I really don't want to get into any copyright
infringement stuff this is just a hobby/enthusiast type of thing for me.
First of all I would think Oracle has enough factory installed
hardware/software matched code to produce an extremely large product base. The
live
I can still log into wikis.sun.com dashboard actions:
https://identity.sun.com/amserver/UI/Login?org=self_registered_usersprogram=sdn
For some reason oracle creating a new account always fails wanting another
password. Tried different passwords and even my msn live email no luck.
Is there an
2:52:49 PM
Subject: [osol-discuss] solaris 11 express download
I can still log into wikis.sun.com dashboard actions:
https://identity.sun.com/amserver/UI/Login?org=self_registered_usersprogram=sdn
For some reason oracle creating a new account always fails wanting another
password. Tried different
Thanks for your reply. I did actually chat with two people during the process
the first was researching the problem but I ran short of time the second wanted
me to try with IE but I was booted into openindiana.Creating new account did
not work with windows/IE either. I think Sun Developer
john kroll wrote:
but no one : Genunix offers it mirrored or something ?
Unlike OpenSolaris, Solaris 11 Express is not offered under a
license that allows free redistribution mirroring.
--
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Platform
Hi Michael,
Just noticed that you have changed your email address from Sun.com/Oracle.com
to gmail.com, but we appreciate that you are still interested in
OpenSolaris--whatever that meant.
it means that as of Nov 12 I no longer *have* an Oracle email address
(that I can access) - but not
IMHO this is glorious news! I plan to immediately contact my account manager,
retract the scathing words I had said, and find out the future and if the
future is bright we will resume testing to augment (maybe someday replace) ESX.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Is there any information on how the Express train
will be going forward? like planned release cycle and
whether it will be continued after official S11
launches?
I still would like to stay with S11 express since I
am not use it in any business or production. I didn't
see release
interesting...so I guess this gives a clue there wont be any ON code update
until full solaris 11 release.
excerpt:
So, my opinion is that Solaris 11 Express is OpenSolaris 2010.11.
Without source code, and no production use without contract support.
Simple like that.
It’s not OpenSolaris
Hi,
does anyone know if it is already possible to get access to the Solaris 11
Express support repository at https://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/support ? Where
can I get the required certificate (given an Oracle Premier Support for Systems
contract) to register it as a pkg publisher?
For
Hi,
does anyone know if it is already possible to get
access to the Solaris 11 Express support repository
at https://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/support ? Where can
I get the required certificate (given an Oracle
Premier Support for Systems contract) to register it
as a pkg publisher?
For
The following comment was cc'd from the GullFoss Forum, in case my posting was
rejected:
I am unable to install OOo 3.3RC5 in the just-released Oracle Solaris 11
Express. I have no problem installing it in Ubuntu. And I was able to install
one of the previous RC's in Solaris 10u9 (with
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 18:33, W. Wayne Liauh w...@hawaiilinux.org wrote:
The following comment was cc'd from the GullFoss Forum, in case my posting
was rejected:
I am unable to install OOo 3.3RC5 in the just-released Oracle Solaris 11
Express.
it would really help to get some data
Greetings,
first sorry for my English.
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:33:36 +0100, W. Wayne Liauh
w...@hawaiilinux.org wrote:
I am unable to install OOo 3.3RC5 in the just-released Oracle Solaris 11
Express.
What is Your installation procedure?
My is follow:
1. I download(ed) from
The following comment was cc'd from the GullFoss
Forum, in case my posting was rejected:
I am unable to install OOo 3.3RC5 in the
just-released Oracle Solaris 11 Express. I have no
problem installing it in Ubuntu. And I was able to
install one of the previous RC's in Solaris 10u9
Hi,
this method may also work for you; First i switch
into root user, after I unpack the package, i went
into OOO330_m15_native_packed-1_en-US.9546/packages
ped: pkadd -d. (with a dot at the end)
said all to install
said 'yes' to all of the questions, then it
installed.
please disregard this method, openoffice did install
but also broke my solaris 11 install, this method
worked on previous opensolaris release but no
longer.
Regards
Edward
You are right, trying to install OpenOffice.org the hard way (i.e., directly
using pkgadd) will hose your
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 18:33, W. Wayne Liauh
w...@hawaiilinux.org wrote:
The following comment was cc'd from the GullFoss
Forum, in case my posting was rejected:
I am unable to install OOo 3.3RC5 in the
just-released Oracle Solaris 11 Express.
it would really help to get some
: david comay david.co...@oracle.com
À: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Envoyé: Mercredi 17 Novembre 2010 07h41:21 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin /
Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [osol-discuss] solaris 11 express and xvm
Does that mean that xvm is supported to use solaris 11 express
specific examples of that in the
VirtualBox documentation, but it's not too hard to figure out.
Lastest stuff available at www.virtualbox.org
Joe
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:50:58 +0100 (CET)
From: Bruno Damour ll...@ruomad.net
To: david comay david.co...@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] solaris
Ok, S11 Express finally got out.
Is there any information on how the Express train will be going forward? like
planned release cycle and whether it will be continued after official S11
launches?
I still would like to stay with S11 express since I am not use it in any
business or production. I
Thanks for the info. Unfortunately it seems I'm not able to use VirtualBox for
testing the upgrade way, since b134b seems to be crashing there. i.e. I just
see first boot message (Solaris Oracle copyright) then just something what
looks like a stackdump (backtrace) and then immediate reboot...
Hello,
In the repository (http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release)
I see :
system/x...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061852Z
system/virti...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061851Z
...
Does that mean that xvm is supported to use solaris 11 express as Dom0 ?
That would be a huge benefit for me,
Hi,
I did a clean install of Solaris 11 Express and I notice that while the
Oracle Solaris 11 Package Repository has more packages (3941) than
OpenSolaris (3794) it doesn't have GCC 4 or OpenOffice.
Is Oracle planning to add more packages to the repository in the future?
In the meantime I
Just to clarify, what is my path forward from OS 2009.06?
The release is for development, prototyping, etc. To quote the license: only
for the purpose of developing, testing, prototyping and demonstrating your
applications, and not for any other purpose.
I'm doing none of those things. I'm
Mike Brancato wrote:
Really? That seems to disregard the license. Does buying support then
modify your license to include non-development or prototyping-related
activities?
Yes.
--
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering:
did you download the repository or connect through the web?
I have tried both and have problems both ways.
Part B of the repository will not mount up under any filesystem type. after
lofiadm the iso /dev/lofi/1 mount fails with not a hsfs filesystem. Part A
works fine.
When attempting to
did you download the repository or connect through
the web?
I have tried both and have problems both ways.
Part B of the repository will not mount up under any
filesystem type. after lofiadm the iso /dev/lofi/1
mount fails with not a hsfs filesystem. Part A works
fine.
You concatenate
did you download the repository or connect through
the web?
I have tried both and have problems both ways.
Part B of the repository will not mount up under
any
filesystem type. after lofiadm the iso /dev/lofi/1
mount fails with not a hsfs filesystem. Part A
works
fine.
You
I stand corrected. Concat the two parts together worked... Thanks
Build 150 repository was two parts that were not
concats. Instructions for that repository were to
rsync the different repos after mounting the
individual iso's
I would think that would not change.
--
This message posted from
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
All rights not expressly granted above are hereby reserved. If you want to
use the Programs for any purpose other than as permitted under this
agreement, [...] you must obtain a valid license permitting such use.
I think that S11Express include more then enough
On 11/16/10 01:04 AM, Bruno Damour wrote:
Hello,
In the repository (http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release)
I see :
system/x...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061852Z
system/virti...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061851Z
...
Does that mean that xvm is supported to use solaris 11 express as
On 11/16/10 08:06 AM, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
did you download the repository or connect through
the web?
I have tried both and have problems both ways.
Part B of the repository will not mount up under any
filesystem type. after lofiadm the iso /dev/lofi/1
mount fails with not a hsfs filesystem.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/16/2010 2:16 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
You concatenate the two parts and mount the resulting .iso file
- just fine.
They're actually separate ISO files -- not a physical file split.
That's not true. Not according to the page you download
On 11/17/10 08:11 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/16/10 01:04 AM, Bruno Damour wrote:
Hello,
In the repository (http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release)
I see :
system/x...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061852Z
system/virti...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061851Z
...
Does that mean that xvm
On 11/16/2010 3:24 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/17/10 08:11 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/16/10 01:04 AM, Bruno Damour wrote:
Hello,
In the repository (http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release)
I see :
system/x...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061852Z
On 11/17/10 03:17 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
On 11/16/2010 3:24 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/17/10 08:11 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
The 32-bit dom0 hypervisor has been removed, per the release notes:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/821-1479/fbdtw?l=ena=view
Other details regarding xvm usage can be
Kent Watsen wrote:
* if xvm Dom0 is in Solaris 11 Express, does that imply that it will
also be in Solaris 11?
No, we are still working through removal of EOF features. There are some
major removals yet to come. (I don't know about Dom0 specifically, just
the case in general.)
--
On 11/17/10 04:29 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Kent Watsen wrote:
* if xvm Dom0 is in Solaris 11 Express, does that imply that it will
also be in Solaris 11?
No, we are still working through removal of EOF features. There are some
major removals yet to come. (I don't
...@oracle.com
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Tue, November 16, 2010 9:39:37 PM
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] solaris 11 express and xvm
On 11/17/10 04:29 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Kent Watsen wrote:
* if xvm Dom0 is in Solaris 11 Express, does that imply
On 11/16/2010 7:39 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/17/10 04:29 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Kent Watsen wrote:
* if xvm Dom0 is in Solaris 11 Express, does that imply that it
will
also be in Solaris 11?
No, we are still working through removal of EOF features. There are
some
major
On 11/16/2010 8:16 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
On 11/16/2010 7:39 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/17/10 04:29 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Kent Watsen wrote:
* if xvm Dom0 is in Solaris 11 Express, does that imply that
it will
also be in Solaris 11?
No, we are still working through
On 11/17/10 05:23 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
On 11/16/2010 8:16 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
On 11/16/2010 7:39 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/17/10 04:29 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Kent Watsen wrote:
* if xvm Dom0 is in Solaris 11 Express, does that imply that it will
also be in Solaris 11?
No, we
Does that mean that xvm is supported to use solaris 11 express as Dom0 ?
Yes, the xVM packages are still present in 2010.11 although there are
known issues with them. And though the packages are there and I can't
speak to the dom0 roadmap, I should point out the following approved
ARC case
Solaris 11 Express:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/index.html
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/downloads/index.html
--
Paul Griffith |CSE Technical Team
Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering - York University
Tel: 416-736-2100
From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Paul Griffith
Solaris 11 Express:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/index.html
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-
On 16/11/2010, at 5:49 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:opensolaris-
discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Paul Griffith
Solaris 11 Express:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/index.html
From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Paul Griffith
Solaris 11 Express:
From the What's New: (Amongst many other things)
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/documentation/sol
interesting would be to know if the upgrade from OS 2009.06 is working well or
not.
Karel
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi Glynn
Those are good news.
Now OpenIndiana at home and Solaris 11 at work ;)
What I haven't seen (not much time anyway) is the migration path for those on
b134.
Will it be 134.0.2 on pkg.opensolaris.org,
and then to 151 on pkg.oracle.com/solaris/relese ?
regards
- Pablo
--
This message
On 11/15/10 11:03 AM, Karel Gardas wrote:
interesting would be to know if the upgrade from OS 2009.06 is working well or
not.
Yes, the process is described here and was noted in the release
announcement:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/821-1479/gklaa?l=ena=view
-Shawn
On 11/15/10 02:03 PM, Karel Gardas wrote:
interesting would be to know if the upgrade from OS 2009.06 is working well or
not.
Karel
Yes, I just finished upgrading from Opensolaris b134 (note, NOT b134b). It
booted up fine. You just have to follow the instructions in the release notes.
On 15 November 2010 17:13, Paul Griffith pa...@cse.yorku.ca wrote:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/index.html
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/downloads/index.html
Can someone post the MD1 and SHA256 hashes for the ISO files, please?
Well you know some of us home users aren't going to be happy.
*Supported on sun4v and sun4u based systems with OBP
(Open Boot PROM) level 4.17 or higher.
$ uname -a;prtdiag -v|tail -2
SunOS paradox 5.11 snv_97 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000
OBP 4.16.4 2004/12/18 05:18
POST 4.16.3 2004/11/05
On 16/11/2010, at 9:50 AM, Nicholas George wrote:
On 15 November 2010 17:13, Paul Griffith pa...@cse.yorku.ca wrote:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/index.html
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/downloads/index.html
Can someone post the MD1
On 11/15/10 04:20 PM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
Well you know some of us home users aren't going to be happy.
*Supported on sun4v and sun4u based systems with OBP
(Open Boot PROM) level 4.17 or higher.
$ uname -a;prtdiag -v|tail -2
SunOS paradox 5.11 snv_97 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Karel Gardas karel.gar...@centrum.cz wrote:
interesting would be to know if the upgrade from OS 2009.06 is working well
or not.
I haven't tried that exact path, but I have image-update'd from
OpenIndiana to something that looks quite similar to Solaris 11
It's likely that it will work for you if you install
from the text
installer media, but automated installation requires
that level of OBP.
I'd have to use a text-based installer anyway, since
anything that no longer includes Xsun won't support anything
other than an XVR-100 that would work
And realistically, having the source code is nice and all, but how many
people really compile ON anyways? Most folks just want something they can
download, install, and use.
Right.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Now from a licensing perspective, I was told by this same product manager that
the OTN license does enable us to use Solaris 11 Express, Solaris 11, and
Solaris 10 for personal use (development, education, evaluation, hobby, etc.)
for free. It's only when you use those products for production
Orvar Korvar knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote:
Actually, I also spoke to a marketing manager high up, about this. He spoke
with some managers high up, about Solaris 10/11 licensing and all the
managers said what you say: free for personal use.
For the future of Solaris this is
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
