into the request tracker. There is however no guarantee for not
missing an issue, if I am in a hurry.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D
regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
__
OpenSSL Project
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Dec 31 13:21:06 2002]:
i'm having a few problems building OpenSSL 0.9.7 on a HP-UX 11.00
machine
using the HP Ansi C compiler. here's a list of the issues i've
noticed
so
far (i've listed configuration options and error messages below):
I am using
bc_enc_jmp_table-.L008PIC_point(%edx))
des-586.s:2645: Error: Unimplemented segment type 135296 in parse_operand(.L033c
bc_enc_jmp_table-.L032PIC_point(%edx))
This is answered in the FAQ.
Happy New Year,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Nov 14 10:08:34 2002]:
(Error report from requestor deleted)...
The same errors or different ones?
No more information could be obtained. I therefore consider this issue
to be resolved.
Best regards,
Lutz
[levitte - Tue Nov 19 09:41:32 2002]:
I'll admit I don't know anything about Mingw32. And I know just a
little bit about Windows. In Windows, there's the concept of import
libraries, and if I understand the Mingw32 building procedures
properly, libeay32.a and libssl32.a are import
The problem was not tackled in time for the 0.9.7 release.
I therefore move it forward to 0.9.7a!
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
[levitte - Tue Dec 10 09:03:57 2002]:
This has been resolved in 0.9.7, where there are easier mechanisms to
include platform information than has ever been available on 0.9.6.
I don't know how to solve this elegantly in 0.9.6, which is
apparently
the development branch you're
There was no time to solve this problem before the release of 0.9.7.
The ticket is therefore moved forward to 0.9.7a.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
[appro - Fri Dec 20 10:50:43 2002]:
The bugexptest.c problem is already addressed in 0.9.7-beta6. As for
HEAD/0.9.8 it will be addressed next year. Therefore the ticken
remains
open.
If I understand you correctly, the 0.9.7 related part of the problem is
resolved. Therefore the
[jaenicke - Fri Dec 13 10:43:35 2002]:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Dec 5 09:05:47 2002]:
Hi
I have a bug-report. when I compile the openssl-0.9.6g on AIX5L,I
found
some problem.
my compile envirement is
OS: AIX5L
specfile: (See attached file: opensslg.spec)
This
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Dec 18 08:58:59 2002]:
starting big number library test, could take a while...
test BN_add
test BN_sub
test BN_lshift1
test BN_lshift (fixed)
test BN_lshift
test BN_rshift1
test BN_rshift
test BN_sqr
Square test failed!
*** Error code 1
Stop
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Dec 4 09:59:14 2002]:
Hi,
While using openssl to test caching of session id's, I noticed that
the
session id of SSLv2 is not being extracted out of the message
correctly.
The spec (http://wp.netscape.com/eng/security/SSL_2.html) says that
the
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:48:57AM +0100, Marko Asplund via RT wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
...
What about 0.9.7-beta6? The shared library build system was reworked for
0.9.7 (with a special treatment to handle HP-UX).
ok, tried building 0.9.7-beta6 using
off the last line(s)
when using the WWW-Interface. The solution is to add some blank lines
(2 is completely sufficient) before sending.
If you check out the history you will find that the message was actually
recorded but only the mail sent has the problem.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Dec 5 09:05:47 2002]:
Hi
I have a bug-report. when I compile the openssl-0.9.6g on AIX5L,I found
some problem.
my compile envirement is
OS: AIX5L
specfile: (See attached file: opensslg.spec)
This report is similar to report #115.
for the moment and will see to add a corresponding
remark to verify.1 for resolving it over the weekend (in time for 0.9.7).
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
for the moment and will see to add a corresponding
remark to verify.1 for resolving it over the weekend (in time for 0.9.7).
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Dec 13 07:34:55 2002]:
Dear All,
I would like to configure OpenSSL on Apache server which installed on
Microsoft windows .Apache Server required compiled DLL's from OpenSSL
source
code to implement SSL. For compiling this source code on windows is
lengthy
[levitte - Thu Dec 12 19:23:44 2002]:
Any further work on this?
No more information received. I therefore consider the problem to be gone.
Ticket resolved,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
TLS1_TXT_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_SHADHE-RSA-AES128-SHA
So the textual representation is AES128-SHA, which does not state the RSA
authentication.
Which brings up the next question: is there any reason for this inconsistency?
I will create a ticket...
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Dec 9 08:58:54 2002]:
The INSTALL file in openssl 0.9.7-beta5 mentions that RT is available
at http://www.openssl.org/rt2.html. Trying to browse that URL gives
me:
Not Found
The requested URL /rt2.html was not found on this server.
Apache/1.3.27 Server at
the openssl.org mail exchanger...
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
network infrastructure is down.
This notice _only_ applies to the OpenSSL Request Tracker. The rest of
the OpenSSL.org infrastructure are located at ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
Sincere regards,
Lutz Jänicke
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 08:35:43PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
On December 2, 2002 05:53 am, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:55:26AM +0100, Alain Guibert via RT wrote:
There is just an alert at some point:
| installing man3/engine.3
| ../../util
install should not install it.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
:-)
Geoff???
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
__
OpenSSL Project
regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
__
OpenSSL Project
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Nov 30 23:00:17 2002]:
Building OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta4 and snap 20021129 on RedHat 8.0 (gcc 3.2
glibc 2.3) configured with 'no-asm shared --with-krb5-flavor=MIT'
make
fail with undeclared MAXHOSTNAMELEN in ssltest.c (line 693).
After adding #include asm/param.h
[levitte - Tue Nov 5 08:40:04 2002]:
Is this still an issue? If it is, do you have the possibility and
knowledge to help us debug it? I just tried that command with your
openssl.txt as configuration file, and I had no problems, but that
was on Linux...
No more information on this
improved since the release of 0.9.6g. The version
of pod2man.pl shipping with OpenSSL should definitely work.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
in opensource.ee.ethz.ch's
mailq) we'll have to recheck why it was lost. I have seen mails lost
as some strange software called smtpfeed didn't understand the difference
between a permanent (5xx) and a temporary (4xx) error condition...
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
be there and the verification itself of course must be present.
Did you know, that TLS defines a maximum message size of 16k?
This means that you at least need 5% of your precious 300k as a buffer
for one connection for just the incoming data?
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke
No more conversation took place and the problem could not be reproduced
by us or other people. I therefore don't know what to could be done more
about this issue.
I therefore close this ticket.
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
[levitte - Thu Nov 14 19:13:05 2002]:
Bodo, if you haven't had more correspondence on this ticket, you
probably should resolve it...
No more information, so I'll resolve now.
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
No more information about this problem.
In the meantime, Ben performed a complete audit of the library and all
issues found were fixed.
I therefore resolve this ticket.
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
[jaenicke - Fri Nov 15 22:52:05 2002]:
The test_req script actually performs a
../apps/openssl req -config ../apps/openssl.cnf testreq.pem -inform
p
-outform d f.d
Can you run this manually?
Any updates?
Lutz
No more conversation took place and I don't see any more point to be
discussed.
I therefore resolve this ticket.
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
[levitte - Thu Nov 14 00:23:48 2002]:
Please try an 0.9.6 snapshot, and tell us if that helped.
No updates. I therefore assume that the problem is resolved with the
latest modifications.
Resolving,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL
[levitte - Thu Nov 14 09:51:01 2002]:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Aug 21 22:21:52 2002]:
When configuring OpenSSL 0.9.6g for solaris-sparcv8-gcc/solaris-x86-
gcc
shared, the way the shared libcrypto.so and libssl.so are built is
wrong:
* gcc is invoked with gcc -G, but
No more information.
I therefore assume, that the problem is no longer an issue.
Resolving,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Nov 27 14:49:04 2002]:
Sometime in the last couple of weeks the following change was made to
s3_clnt.c
698,699c699
if (s-hit (s-session-cipher != c))
---
if (s-hit (s-session-cipher_id != c-id))
...
This problem was already reported as #351 and
-dev
and try several algorithms (as was suggested, there's a private range,
and I see no harm in using them for tests, at least temporarly).
Bounced this thread into RT.
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU
on a system HP-UX hpiv113 B.11.11 U
9000/785 2016775763 unlimited-user license
I don't see any error message included.
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Nov 25 12:02:08 2002]:
I try what your technician suggested me. I use now gcc but my
compilation
failed because I don't have a file idea.h in my sources. See the
message :
making all in crypto...
( echo #ifndef MK1MF_BUILD; \
echo /*
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
__
OpenSSL Project
have already stated, idea.h is part of OpenSSL and has been part
of all version of OpenSSL since OpenSSL was born from SSLeay.
openssl-0.9.6g/crypto/idea/idea.h
After successfull call to Configure, you will find a softlink to it
from openssl-0.9.6g/include/openssl/idea.h.
--
Lutz Jaenicke
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Nov 24 19:52:37 2002]:
Hi!
I have a small problem with SSL_get_error. This function starts like
this:
int SSL_get_error(SSL *s,int i)
{
int reason;
unsigned long l;
BIO *bio;
if (i 0) return(SSL_ERROR_NONE);
/* Make things
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Nov 21 14:36:48 2002]:
We're making test on DUnix Tru 64 and we had problem with this
library:
We can send more informations if you want.
Please give details about the operating system, compiler and especially
the version of OpenSSL you are using. (Are you aware,
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Nov 20 09:21:07 2002]:
Hi,
When trying to use sessions under 0.9.7 beta 4 I get:
1424:error:140920C5:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_HELLO:old session cipher
not re
turned:.\ssl\s3_clnt.c:705:
This also seems to happen with s_server/s_client when specifying
[jaenicke - Wed Nov 20 10:01:23 2002]:
The change I made was that the cipher_id was compared instead of the
pointer to the CIPHER structure. This made the external caching
work fine (which I of course tested after the change) but made
the internal cache fail (which I did not test, because I
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Nov 20 16:04:03 2002]:
The test_rsa and test_sid targets fail in make test for beta 4 of
OpenSSL 0.9.7 on a 64-bit Linux system (HP Itanium) using gcc 2.96.
...
This bug has just been reported as #350. I will merge both reports
to be handled under ticket #350.
Best
, rcertfile, FORMAT_PEM,
NULL, e, responder other certificates);
if (!rother) goto end;
}
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:18:13AM +0100, Ernst G Giessmann via RT wrote:
Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:25:15PM +0100, Ernst G Giessmann via RT wrote:
I guess that in this case
=head1 B
is less opportunistic and therefore a bit better
workaround: as NAME OPTIONS are just
a subset of all OPTIONS, I have adjusted the structre, such now NAME OPTIONS
is only a =head2 section and does not longer create the problem.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Nov 18 18:19:17 2002]:
On Friday, November 15, 2002, at 01:33 PM, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 23 09:12:36 2002]:
Hey guys, a low priority bug exists in the openssl command line tool
modulo the documentation. If you run openssl
[levitte - Fri Nov 15 00:46:03 2002]:
This ticket looks resolved, so I'll mark it as such.
No, it is not resolved. There is a reliable workaround
(REUSE_CIPHER_CHANGE_BUG). As this is part of OP_ALL, the problem can
only arise for those few applications not enabling the default
workarounds.
[jaenicke - Fri Nov 15 09:38:15 2002]:
I will fix it over the weekend.
Ok, I have finally decided to go with the solution proposed by Steve
Haslam and perform the check based on the id instead of the pointer
to the cipher object (c-id != s-session-cipher_id).
Best regards,
Lutz
As no more information came in with respect to this issue, I consider
this problem to be resolved in the meantime.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 16 23:05:31 2002]:
Hey, I didn't actually RUN the thing, I just noticed that file and
like
tools didn't report it as a shell script, which got me thinking...
:-D
Thanks for a prompt reply, in any case.
Thanks, fixed.
Best regards,
Lutz
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 23 09:12:36 2002]:
Hey guys, a low priority bug exists in the openssl command line tool
modulo the documentation. If you run openssl req with the -verbose
option mentioned in then you get an unknown option -verbose
error.
Just thought I'd let you
No more input came with respect to this report. I therefore suppose
that the problem has been solved by the requestor or the requestor gave
up.
I resolve the ticket,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
As no more information was sent with respect to this issue, I consider
this problem to be solved (or the requestor lost its interest in it).
I therefore close the ticket.
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Oct 12 11:42:13 2002]:
Hello Richard,
On Friday, October 11, 2002 at 10:15:30 AM +0200, Richard Levitte
via
RT wrote:
On my old Linux box (Intel Debian bo: kernel 2.0.39, gcc
2.7.2.1,
libc 5.4.33) during OpenSSL 0.9.6e build a test in make test
OpenSSL is correct in sending an empty fragment and the peer's software is
incorrect, is another topic.
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
[levitte - Thu Nov 14 15:31:34 2002]:
Lütz, did you get anywhere with this?
No. I didn't have the time to look into it. And I don't know, whether
I will find the time before next week. Maybe some hours are available
on Saturday and/or Sunday...
Best regards,
Lutz
,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
__
OpenSSL Project
Series 700 Model J210 running
HP-UX 10.20.)
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
giving it
a try, even though I doubt that you will finally be able to compile
OpenSSL with aCC.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Nov 11 09:03:32 2002]:
When I compile WIN32, following error occured.
...
s3_srvr.obj : error LNK2001:
unresolved external symbol _OpenSSLDie
out32dll\ssleay32.dll : fatal
error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
NMAKE : fatal error U1077:
'link' : return code
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 11:33:45PM -0500, assar wrote:
This patch fixes the POD syntax in the mentioned manpage.
Thanks, fixed.
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Nov 8 12:19:04 2002]:
Dear all,
I identified that the Documentation in doc/apps/x509.pod is wrong if
passed through pod2latex.
The line
=head1 NAME OPTIONS
causes a wrong representation in the tex-File (and maybe in others
too)
I'm not a perl guru, I fixed it
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Oct 29 13:54:05 2002]:
Hi,
I'm encountering problems installing openssl-0.9.6.tar.gz on Red Hat
7.2.
1.During untarring and installation I get error messages on issues
concerning symbolic links.
Does this mean I need to have an earlier version of openssl
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 23 23:41:35 2002]:
I have updated the bc, the bc tests run further. But the test_ssl
still
failed!
Did you get any further with your problem? I did not find a problem
report similar to your's. I don't know yet whether this is a platform
specific problem or
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 23 13:43:13 2002]:
Apologies if this is dumb, but I am not a Perl expert...
Having downloaded and unpacked 0.9.6g on my server, running the config
gives
the following perl error:
fgc052:root- ./config
Operating system: 9000/800-hp-hpux11
Can't locate strict.pm
with 0.9.7-beta3 but it
did work out without problems...
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
When using client certificates with very large RSA key lengths, the SSL
handshake fails with excessive message size errors.
Reason: the maximum permitted size for the key is hardcoded to 512 bytes
in ssl3_get_cert_verify() (call to ssl3_get_message()).
This fails for 4096bit RSA keys due to the
think that the change is small enough and making the behaviour consistent
seems like a bugfix to me.
Comments?
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D
using openssl
on HP-UX 10.20 and could not see any problem, yet.
I am afraid, that without a more specific problem report we will not
be able to help you in narrowing down the issue.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU
bounced it into RT for request #306.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Oct 8 09:08:37 2002]:
using the config --prefix=/usr --openssldir=/usr/local/ssl -threads
command.
I do a sucessfull make
I then run make test and get a segmentation fault.
Please find attatched the output from a make report.
I am using openssl 9.6g
Redhat
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Sep 13 09:48:48 2002]:
Hi,
surprisngly I cannot find in FAQ at
http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.cgi what is the default randfile
compiled into openssl binary. I have Solaris 2.6 with kernel module from
http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~andi/ and I want to make sure it
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Oct 3 13:09:11 2002]:
Selon Ondrej Karpis via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have copied all header files from /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl to
/home/.../openssl-0.9.6g/include/openssl/ and it works.
I'll try to do this (Sorry if my english isn't good, but
[guest - Thu Sep 5 12:30:40 2002]:
This problem has been resolved.
int EVP_EncryptInit_ex(EVP_CIPHER_CTX *ctx, const EVP_CIPHER *type,
ENGINE *impl, unsigned char *key, unsigned char *iv);
EVP_EncryptInit_ex(ctx, EVP_bf_cbc(), NULL, key, iv);
In the example at
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Aug 26 10:31:09 2002]:
OpenSSL self-test report:
OpenSSL version: 0.9.6g
Last change: [In 0.9.6g-engine release:]...
Options: no-idea --prefix=/usr/local --openssldir=/usr/local/ssl
no-threads shared
OS (uname): Linux binky 2.4.19 #1 Fri Aug
[levitte - Mon Aug 19 11:33:34 2002]:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Aug 19 09:48:39 2002]:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 08:15:04PM +0200, OpenSSL Project wrote:
OpenSSL STATUS Last modified at
__ $Date: 2002/08/14
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Aug 18 12:30:48 2002]:
Here is some info on this subject
In crypto/rand/rand_win.c
RegQueryValueEx(HKEY_PERFORMANCE_DATA, Global, ...
is called. This call lock registry access
(_PredefinedHandleTableCriticalSection) and than load perfomance
dll using
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Aug 17 15:51:29 2002]:
...
You should take a closer look at 0.9.7 (currently in beta), where a
some of the stricter type handling has already been applied.
We will probably not apply your change to the 0.9.6 line of
development, because it's a rather big change,
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Aug 2 17:50:30 2002]:
While compiling openssl-engine-0.9.6e as 64bit on Solaris 8 using gcc3.1,
I get the following error when performing 'make test'.
...
Any news on this issue? Especially: does it still apply to 0.9.6g?
Best regards,
Lutz
.
The entries you found mean: I (jaenicke) put your request into the queue
of problems to be resolved before release of 0.9.6h and I added a keyword
to indicate that the problem is related to the build system.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED
,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
__
OpenSSL Project
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:43:09PM -0400, Chris Brook wrote:
In 0.9.7-stable ssltest.c, lines 408 416 need terminating brackets.
Chris Brook
Thanks, fixed,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Sep 24 10:23:50 2002]:
Hi,
I am trying to install openssl on AIX using gcc
GCC version - 2.95.3 20010315 (release)
AIX version - 4.3.2.0
OpenSSL version - 0.9.7-dev
The output of config -t is attached.
The make is not sucessful. The following is the error
), but it seems that RT2 eats
the last line that is not terminated by a newline. I just ate my
Lutz from my usual Best regards,\nLutz. Fortunately, it did not
eat up more important parts of the text...
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
about 0.9.7-stable, this will have the
fix tomorry).
RT2 seems to have problems with some MIME messages...
But sorry, no, I currently don't have time to look into it..
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Sep 19 12:11:15 2002]:
ljaenicke@lutz:~$ dpkg -l openssl
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
uppercase=bad)
||/ Name
SSL_CTX_set_options). As most applications enable
SSL_OP_ALL, the problem was not discovered until now, even though it
must be pretty old.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine
$ platforms).
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
just use SSL_use_certificate() and SSL_use_PrivateKey().
They will increment and decrement the reference counts as needed
(see ssl/ssl_rsa.c:ssl_set_cert(), just at the end of the function :-).
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
201 - 300 of 705 matches
Mail list logo
