[OpenStack-Infra] Resigning from infra-core

Hello all, I've been dreading writing this for a while now but all good things must come to an end. Due to changes at work and my inability to sustain any significant contributions to the project I think that regrettably it is time to resign from infra-core. It has been a wonderful experience

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [infra] OpenDev feedback forum session summary

Thank you for the update, it's much appreciated for those who couldn't make it :-) On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 4:34 AM Jeremy Stanley wrote: > Wednesday afternoon at the OpenStack Summit we met to discuss the > plan for the upcoming transition of the OpenStack Infrastructure > team to an

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Proposed changes to how we run our meeting

I admit that I rarely attend the meeting these days but I do generally keep an eye on the agenda and minutes. So for me I really appreciate that we have an agenda and generally follow it. Being more structured and prepared with it though would allow me to see which meetings I should make an effort

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Control Plane Server Upgrade Sprint Planning

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 9:09 AM Clark Boylan wrote: > Hello everyone, > > We still have a few Trusty servers hanging around. We should work to > upgrade them either to Xenial (using puppet deployment) or Bionic (using > ansible and containers?). We've made good progress in the past using a >

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Moving logs into swift (redux)

Hey all, I like this plan as a kind of next steps for OpenStack-Infra. I have some thoughts on how zuul might better improve it's logging story but will post those on the other thread. I do, however, share both of Clark's concerns. At the moment zuul_swift_uploads makes a POST request for each

Re: [openstack-dev] Winterscale: a proposal regarding the project infrastructure

On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 7:23 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > Joshua Hesketh writes: > > > So the "winterscale infrastructure council"'s purview is quite limited in > > scope to just govern the services provided? > > > > If so, would you foresee a need

Re: [openstack-dev] Winterscale: a proposal regarding the project infrastructure

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 2:25 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > Hi, > > With recent changes implemented by the OpenStack Foundation to include > projects other than "OpenStack" under its umbrella, it has become clear > that the "Project Infrastructure Team" needs to change. > > The infrastructure that

Re: [openstack-dev] Overriding project-templates in Zuul

> > I think in actuality, both operations would end up as intersections: > > === === > Matcher Template Project Result > === === > files ABBC B > irrelevant-files ABBC B >

Re: [openstack-dev] Overriding project-templates in Zuul

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:58 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > Hi, > > If you've had difficulty overriding jobs in project-templates, please > read and provide feedback on this proposed change. > > We tried to make the Zuul v3 configuration language as intuitive as > possible, and

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] PTG September 10-14 in Denver

If I get the opportunity I would love to come. Unsure what the likelihood is though. On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 4:02 AM, Melvin Hillsman wrote: > Planning on being in attendance (travel approval pending) > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Jeremy Stanley

Re: [Openstack] which SDK to use?

There is also nothing stopping you from using both. For example, you could use the OpenStack SDK for most things but if you hit an edge case where you need something specific you can then import the particular client lib. Cheers, Josh On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Chris Friesen

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][all] New Zuul Depends-On syntax

Perhaps we need to consider a backport of the syntax to the 2.5 series? It could help with the transition for those who need to upgrade. However, on the other hand it might make deployers more complacent to do so. On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:03 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul mailing lists

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:46 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > Hi, > > We recently completed the work needed to host mailing lists for projects > at their own domains. With our expanded focus in Zuul v3 on users > beyond those related to the OpenStack project, now seems like a

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Sydney Infra evening

+1 FYI I'll meet ya'll at the pub. On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Ricardo Carrillo Cruz < ricardo.carrillo.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for setting this up, I'm in. > > Cheers > > 2017-11-07 20:13 GMT+01:00 Ian Wienand : > >> Let's meet at the swirlly fountain pit

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Sydney Infra evening

Hey Ian, Thanks for starting that and putting in some great options to show infra a bit of Sydney and Australia :-). I'll definitely be coming and will fill in my availability once I know more. Looking forward to catching up with everybody! Cheers, Josh On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Ian

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Marking <= mitaka EOL

Hi All, I've processed the list that Tony sent through this morning, removing the branches and tagging their positions as described. The only exception being that openstack/zaqar doesn't have stable/liberty or stable/liberty2 branches to EOL. Let me know if I've missed anything. Cheers, Josh

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Tag stable/mitaka as eol for Monasca Ceilometer

Howdy, I have eol'd the mitaka branch for monasca-ceilometer. Please let me know if you find any mistakes. Cheers, Josh On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Hochmuth, Roland M wrote: > Hi Ashwin and Andreas, Yes, you can eol stable/mitaka for >

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Request to EOL Puppet OpenStack Mitaka

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:31 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Joshua Hesketh <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Request to EOL Puppet OpenStack Mitaka

Hello Emilien, My apologies for not getting to this sooner. I've processed the list that Tony put together which included the puppet repos. Please let me know if I've missed anything. Cheers, Josh On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:19 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

Hi all, Very sorry for the delay on processing this request. I have now EOL'd stable/mitaka branches for projects listed in [1]. If there are any mistakes it should be possible to restore the branch at the correct position. Similarly please let me know if there were any projects that should have

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] How to deal with confusion around "hosted projects"

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2017-06-29 18:58:09 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote: > > So I apologise if this has already been suggested/discussed (the > > long threads are difficult to keep up with), but has it been >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] How to deal with confusion around "hosted projects"

Howdy, So I apologise if this has already been suggested/discussed (the long threads are difficult to keep up with), but has it been considered to go back to using a stackforge namespace? It seems to me that the role of stackforge to provide a proving ground or place for aligned projects/repos

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:59 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2017-06-17 01:20:28 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote: > [...] > > I'm happy to help do this if you'd like. Otherwise the script I've > > used for the last few retirements is here: > >

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Request to EOL Puppet OpenStack Mitaka

When I've done branch removals in the past I've always created the EOL tag. The script I have used helps do this so in some ways it's easier to do it as part of the retirement rather than having teams go through and create tags themselves. On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Emilien Macchi

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-06-16 15:12:36 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote: > [...] > > It seeems a little odd to be following up so long after I first started > > this thread but can someone on infra please process the EOLs as > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Moving away from "big tent" terminology

An [official] OpenStack project is also a hosted project by OpenStack [infra]. I agree that "OpenStack-Hosted projects" is not very distinct from "OpenStack projects". Furthermore the "hosted" part is not unique to either category. I don't have an immediate suggestion for an alternative, but I

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul v3: proposed new Depends-On syntax

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:04:20PM -0700, James E. Blair wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As part of Zuul v3, we're adding support for GitHub (and later possibly > > other systems). We want these systems to have access to the

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul v3: proposed new Depends-On syntax

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 4:55 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2017-05-29 13:34:47 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote: > [...] > > We could extend the 'start message' of zuul to explain what it is > > about to do. eg: "Testing change XYZ against

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul v3: proposed new Depends-On syntax

On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 12:53 AM, James E. Blair <cor...@inaugust.com> wrote: > Joshua Hesketh <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:09 AM, James E. Blair <cor...@inaugust.com> > wrote: > >> So I think that we should

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul v3: proposed new Depends-On syntax

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:09 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > Sean Dague writes: > > > On 05/24/2017 07:04 PM, James E. Blair wrote: > > > >> The natural way to identify a GitHub pull request is with its URL. > >> > >> This can be used to identify Gerrit changes

[OpenStack-Infra] Fwd: Zuul v3: proposed new Depends-On syntax

I accidentally didn't reply to the list earlier, so forwarding this through for completeness. I agree with the proposal/discussion in general. -- Forwarded message -- From: Joshua Hesketh <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com> Date: Thu, May 25, 2017 at 3:53 PM Subject: Re: [OpenStack

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Boston 2017 Summit dinner

Howdy, Any of those evenings work for me thanks. Slight preference not to clash with the StackCity though. Cheers, Josh On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings! > > Its that time where we all try to figure out when and where to meet up for >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Questions for Candidates

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:19 AM, Kendall Nelson wrote: > Hello Candidates! > > You all have proven yourselves to be crucial parts of the community and I > just wanted to say good luck to each one of you in the upcoming election! > > Also though, I thought it might be good

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][infra][pbr] Nominating Stephen Finucane for pbr-core

+1, yay! :-) On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:46 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2017-04-12 08:14:31 -0500: > > Hey all, > > > > As I'm sure you all know, pbr is both our most pervasively used > > dependency and our least well understood.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

Howdy, To answer the original question, if elected, I should be able to commit at least a few hours per day to the TC (if not more). I can also be quite elastic in this being able to spend more time some weeks than others as the role dictates. My timezone is UTC+10 which makes the meetings at

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Skipping 2017-04-10 Zuul meeting

Hey, Just checking that you didn't mean the following week (17th) as it's Easter Monday. That's a public holiday in Australia (although the meeting falls on the Tuesday here), do we know if we'll have quorum next week? Cheers, Josh On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 6:10 AM, James E. Blair

[openstack-dev] [election][tc] Nominating for Technical Committee

Howdy, My name is Joshua Hesketh and I would like to self nominate for the Technical Committee. I work for Rackspace Australia and have been involved in the OpenStack community since the Havana release circa 2013. I have been primarily working on the Infrastructure (infra) project where I am

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Dell Ironic CI broken

Hey, I've disabled the account. Once it is fixed we can re-enable it. Thanks, Josh On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > Dell Ironic CI is reporting on unrelated changes like > https://review.openstack.org/449385 - project-config >

Re: [openstack-dev] Zuul v3 - What's Coming: What to expect with the Zuul v3 Rollout

Thanks for the great write-up Monty :-). Last week was great fun and zuulv3 is making excellent process. I'm excited for the switch-over. Cheers, Josh On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > Hi everybody! > > This content can also be found at >

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:55:41AM -0800, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > Has the liberty-eol cleanup happened? Because I still see > > stable/liberty branch in openstack/neutron repo, which gets in the way > > of some

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:55:41AM -0800, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > Has the liberty-eol cleanup happened? Because I still see > > stable/liberty branch in openstack/neutron repo, which gets in the way > > of some

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] PTG team dinner?

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017, at 03:01 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > > With the help of the small restaurant guide on the wiki I have > > discovered Poor Calvin's. This place looks neat, supposedly fusion of > > Thai and Southern

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] PTG team dinner?

> > I'd say reserve for 11 now. You can always adjust it as the etherpad > changes. > > I'd suggest maybe adding a few extra as we might find people during the day who want to tag along. ___ OpenStack-Infra mailing list

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Ask.o.o down

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org> wrote: > On 14/02/17 16:11, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > >> Hey Tom, >> >> Where is that script being fired from (a quick grep doesn't find it), or >> is it a tool people are using? >> >&g

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Ask.o.o down

wrote: > On 14/02/17 16:06, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> I've brought the service back up, but have no new clues as to why. >> > > Cheers. > > Going to try: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/433478/ > to see if this script is culprit. > > >

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Ask.o.o down

Hey, I've brought the service back up, but have no new clues as to why. - Josh On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Tom Fifield wrote: > On 10/02/17 22:39, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > >> On 2017-02-10 16:08:51 +0800 (+0800), Tom Fifield wrote: >> [...] >> >>> Down again, this time

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] PTG team dinner?

I am both interested and there (for the whole week, but any night works for me at this stage). Catching up with everybody is always a highlight for me :-). I also might own a Hawaiian shirt somewhere. On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > Hello, > > We

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] Please add a initial core member to meteos-ui-core.

All done :-) On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Hiroyuki Eguchi wrote: > Hello Infra Team. > > > > I've created new projects named meteos-ui > > which UI interface for Machine Learning as a Service. > > > > Could you please add me (Hiroyuki Eguchi )

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Samuel Cassiba wrote: > > > > On Dec 19, 2016, at 14:31, Tony Breeds wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 09:18:20AM -0800, Samuel Cassiba wrote: > > > >> The Chef OpenStack cookbooks team is way late to the party.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 05:41:31PM -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > Hey Tony, > > > > Could we also EOL tripleo-incubator and tripleo-image-elements > > stable/icehouse please? > > Yup, No problem. > I have retired

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Any way to disable zuul status page auto-refresh?

You could try saving the status page and modifying the refresh time, or similarly you could checkout zuul and run the webapp locally[0]. You'd have to point it at [1] and modify the refresh times here [2]. (The status page in the zuul tree is different to the one on status.o.o). Cheers, Josh [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Joshua Hesketh <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com> > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

Hi Sumit, That's fine. That repo wasn't marked for removal. Cheers, Josh On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Sumit Naiksatam <sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Joshua Hesketh > <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The repos listed[0]

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Tony and all, > > I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get > to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root bea

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Tony and all, > > I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get > to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root bea

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

Hey Tony and all, I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to it I'll look at it then. Cheers, Josh On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Tue,

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [Infra] Ocata Summit Infra Sessions Recap

Thank you for the write up. Having missed being there in person it is much appreciated :-) On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > I'm Cc'ing this to the openstack-infra ML but setting MFT to direct > subsequent discussion to the openstack-dev ML so we can

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [infra]please help to add initial member to networking-zte-core andnetworking-zte-release group

I did this and replied to the os-dev list. On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:30 PM, flyflyzhen08 wrote: > Hi Infra team: > > Please add the following member to networking-zte-core > and networking-zte-release group. > > kyle liu: liu.hui58 at zte.com.cn > > Thanks! >

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Fw: [Openstack-Infra]please help to add initial member to networking-zte-core and networking-zte-release group

Hi Kyle, I've added you to those groups. Cheers, Josh On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 12:30 PM, flyflyzhen08 wrote: > Is anyone able to handle this? > > Thanks. > > ---Original--- > *From:* "flyflyzhen08 " > *Date:* 2016/11/21 16:30:03 > *To:*

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Group membership request

Hey Christopher, No problems, I've added you to that group. Cheers, Josh On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Christopher Aedo wrote: > Dear infra, could someone please add me to this group: > https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1651,members > > This was created as a result

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Help With CI/CD Setup

Hello Amit, 1. It /should/ be okay to have Jenkins+Gerrit on the one node, but I have not tried it so I can't be certain. You would have to configure apache or whatever you're using to point to jenkins/gerrit on separate vhosts, paths, or ports etc, but otherwise it should be okay. You could

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] About setting up CI

Hey, Yes, that blog post is likely outdated. The official documentation is published here: http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/ It includes a tutorial on running your own CI but admits it may also be out of date. I haven't checked in detail what parts are missing, but it's likely

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Scheduling a Zuul meeting

Hey, So selfishly speaking this is early for me (particularly when daylight savings ends). Would people consider 2200 or 2300? I suspect though this will make it hard for those in Europe so it's likely no viable. In this case 2000 is okay. Cheers, Josh On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Ian

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Future of turbo-hipster CI

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > > Having said that, I think Dan Smith came across a fairly large > > production DB dataset recently which he was using for testing some > > archive changes, maybe Dan will become our new Johannes, but grumpier of > > course.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Future of turbo-hipster CI

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Dean Troyer <dtro...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Joshua Hesketh <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> The question now is whether or not to continue running. Is there still >> value in running t

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Future of turbo-hipster CI

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:49 PM, Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On 10/3/2016 11:29 PM, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > >> Howdy, >> >> Quick bit of background. Turbo-hipster is a 3rd party CI system that >> runs nova's database migrations ag

[openstack-dev] [nova] Future of turbo-hipster CI

Howdy, Quick bit of background. Turbo-hipster is a 3rd party CI system that runs nova's database migrations against real datasets to try and catch real-world problems. When it was initially written the state of migrations in nova would cause a lot of pain for deployers (such as very long

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] [infra] Request for old branches removal

t rid of them? > > Thanks again, > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Joshua Hesketh > <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Emilien, > > > > I've removed all of the old branches on the specified repos and created > tags > > in their place. Let me

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] [infra] Request for old branches removal

Hi Emilien, I've removed all of the old branches on the specified repos and created tags in their place. Let me know if there are any problems. Cheers, Josh On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Greatings Infra, > > This is an official request to remove

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra][all] Status update of the InfraCloud

This is awesome stuff. Thanks to all involved and to HPE for the hardware :-) On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Ricardo Carrillo Cruz < ricardo.carrillo.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there > > We would like to write an update about the status of the InfraCloud ( if > you never heard of it, it's

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Request to add group member into the Openstack projects

Hello Vadim, I've added the fuel-qa-core group into the new fuel-qa-mu-core. From there other cores/the PTL can add yourself to the group. Cheers, Josh On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Vadim Rovachev wrote: > Hi openstack-infra team, > > Kindly please add

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Development environments for infra's puppet modules

(sorry, mail client failure) On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Joshua Hesketh <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Simon McCartney <si...@mccartney.ie> > wrote: >> >> >> >> > However, I'm not sure Vagrant pro

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Development environments for infra's puppet modules

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Simon McCartney wrote: > > > > However, I'm not sure Vagrant provides a good solution for testing puppet > modules in isolation (I think it's great for the > system-config/project-config scenario, where you want to see how applying > the full

[OpenStack-Infra] Development environments for infra's puppet modules

Hey all, We should look for a way to make developing, debugging and testing our puppet modules locally easier and more consistent. Short of bootstrapping an entire clone of openstack-infra, how do developers currently set up an environment to investigate how a puppet module behaves? This brings

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Not able to login for https://review.openstack.org

Hi Prabhu, I've re-activated your account for you. Let me know if you have any troubles. Cheers, Josh On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Murthy, Prabhu wrote: > Hi , > > > > I am not able to login for https://review.openstack.org . Showing error > [1]. > > I came to know

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit group adds for user-committee

I went to do this but it looks like somebody beat me to it. So just FYI these people are now part of the appropriate groups. Cheers, Josh On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Tom Fifield wrote: > Thanks for the rapid reply, > > I submitted the patches, on behalf of the user

Re: [Openstack] [openstack-dev] Naming polls - and some issues

Hello Ian, My understanding of it is that you need to receive a new link. Monty is slowly sending those out in batches and he hasn't finished. I expect he'll email the list once he has finished to confirm so I'd suggest holding off until then to check. Cheers, Josh On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:58

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Naming polls - and some issues

Hello Ian, My understanding of it is that you need to receive a new link. Monty is slowly sending those out in batches and he hasn't finished. I expect he'll email the list once he has finished to confirm so I'd suggest holding off until then to check. Cheers, Josh On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:58

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

Hey Jesse, Sorry for the delay. I've gone ahead and removed icehouse, juno and kilo branches creating tags in their places. Cheers, Josh On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 3:27 AM, Jesse Pretorius < jesse.pretor...@rackspace.co.uk> wrote: > From: Joshua Hesketh <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com>

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Jesse Pretorius < jesse.pretor...@rackspace.co.uk> wrote: > Hi all, > > Now that OpenStack-Ansible has the final Swift kilo-eol tag implemented > we’ve requested a final tag [1]. Once that merges we are ready to have our > kilo-eol tag implemented and the ‘kilo’

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] [vitrage] branch marking policy

Hey Elisha, Have you looked at http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/drivers.html ? Cheers, Josh On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Rosensweig, Elisha (Nokia - IL) < elisha.rosensw...@nokia.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We've prepared a (local) branch with Vitrage that is *Liberty-compatible*, > and

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] request to delete obsolete branches in networking-nec

Hey Akihiro, No trouble. I've deleted the stable branches and added tags for them. I've also removed the split-backend-logic branch. Cheers, Josh On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > Hi infra-team, > > Could you drop the following branches of

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Robert Collins wrote: > Removing the pbr branch should be fine - it was an exceptional thing > to have that branch in the first place - pbr is consumed by releases > only, and due to its place in the dependency graph is very very very

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

deletion > please be reversed? > > Thanks, > ~Sumit. > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Andreas Jaeger <a...@suse.com> wrote: > > On 06/24/2016 02:09 PM, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I have completed removi

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

, > ~Sumit. > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Andreas Jaeger <a...@suse.com> wrote: > > On 06/24/2016 02:09 PM, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I have completed removing stable/kilo branches from the projects listed > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

Hi all, I have completed removing stable/kilo branches from the projects listed [0]*. There are now 'kilo-eol' tags in place at the sha's where the branches were. *There are a couple of exceptions. oslo-incubator was listed but is an unmaintained project so no further action was required. Tony

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Infra priorities and spec cleanup

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Jeremy Stanley wrote: > >> On 2016-06-21 17:34:07 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> >>> On 2016-06-21 18:16:49 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: >>> It hurts a lot when it's down because of so many

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Infra priorities and spec cleanup

;fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2016-06-08 23:08:16 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> > wrote: > > [...] > > > Store Build Logs in Swift > > [...] > > > We should remove the or

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Upcoming changes now that Jenkins has retired

Hey Steve, Yes. The user "jenkins" in gerrit has actually been controlled by zuul for some years now. This rename is basically to reflect that and includes an 1st party CI comments (so check and gate). Cheers, Josh On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Upcoming changes now that Jenkins has retired

Hey Steve, Yes. The user "jenkins" in gerrit has actually been controlled by zuul for some years now. This rename is basically to reflect that and includes an 1st party CI comments (so check and gate). Cheers, Josh On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] Upcoming changes now that Jenkins has retired

We can update those without any trouble. We just need to also update the tests that check the usernames. You should be able to make all of the changes (as per your first patchset) and then find where the tests also need changing. Happy to help you on the review if you need more guidance. To

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Upcoming changes now that Jenkins has retired

We can update those without any trouble. We just need to also update the tests that check the usernames. You should be able to make all of the changes (as per your first patchset) and then find where the tests also need changing. Happy to help you on the review if you need more guidance. To

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Infra priorities and spec cleanup

Thanks for all the updates Jeremy :-) On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > Store Build Logs in Swift > - > > > http://specs.openstack.org/openstack-infra/infra-specs/specs/logs-in-swift.html > > This seems to have taken a break,

Re: [openstack-dev] StackViz is now enabled for all devstack-gate jobs

Awesome work to all involved. This is really neat! :-) On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Buckley, Tim Jason < timothy.jas.buck...@hpe.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > I'd like to announce that StackViz will now be running at the end all > tempest-dsvm jobs and saving visualization output to the log

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [infra] Jobs failing : "No matching distribution found for "

Thanks for your digging and help with this Ian and Andreas. I've added an apache rule to redirect -'s to .'s as a quick workaround to un-wedge the gate https://review.openstack.org/#/c/314898/ (and a few edge cases https://review.openstack.org/#/c/314956) If you have a build that has failed due

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra] Jobs failing : "No matching distribution found for "

Thanks for your digging and help with this Ian and Andreas. I've added an apache rule to redirect -'s to .'s as a quick workaround to un-wedge the gate https://review.openstack.org/#/c/314898/ (and a few edge cases https://review.openstack.org/#/c/314956) If you have a build that has failed due

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] An idea to help browse and troubleshoot Ansible Playbook runs

This is really neat, nice work David! I can see this being useful for zuulv3 or even just infra runs as more of our tooling moves to ansible :-) On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:24 AM, David Moreau Simard wrote: > Hi openstack-infra, > > I've been hacking on an idea since last

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] UNSTABLE jobs on the periodic-stable pipeline

Hey, Yolanda is helping repair this. Basically the log filesystem needs repairing and should be back shortly. Cheers, Josh On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > So the subject says it all really ;P > > The last batch of periodic-stable jobs all failed

[OpenStack-Infra] Infra and Friends dinner/social evening

Hi all, For those at the Austin OpenStack summit who would like to have an infra and friends dinner/social please join us this evening. We'll gather at The Loft Bar in the Hilton lobby after the last design summit session. Once we have quorum (around 6pm) we'll head out to find some good food.

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] On image building and CI environments

Great write up Ian. Thanks very much :-). On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: > Hi all, > > I spent a bit of time putting together a high-level view of the many > changes we've worked on to get our image building & platform support > to where it is today > >

  1   2   3   >