On Oct 26, 2017, at 9:52 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> It would also be good to see some discussion of those issues outside
> of campaign periods. Some of the questions, like the one about user
> perspectives held by the candidates, were clearly meant to elicit
> more info to help make a choice in
On Oct 25, 2017, at 10:36 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> The whole election takes close to 3 weeks of officials time so I'd like
> to ask we be mindful of that before we extend things too much
There isn’t really a need for the self-nomination period to be very long.
Announce it, say, a week before no
On 26/10/17 10:52 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2017-10-26 13:30:53 +:
On 2017-10-26 14:42:35 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
> I personally don't think the campaing period was too short. I saw
> enough interactions between candidates and th
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2017-10-26 13:30:53 +:
> On 2017-10-26 14:42:35 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
> [...]
> > I personally don't think the campaing period was too short. I saw
> > enough interactions between candidates and the rest of the
> > community, which was us
On 2017-10-26 14:42:35 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
> I personally don't think the campaing period was too short. I saw
> enough interactions between candidates and the rest of the
> community, which was useful for me to make up my mind and vote.
> This is, of course, my own view and
On 26/10/17 11:27 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Tony Breeds wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:06:46PM -0400, David Moreau Simard wrote:
Was it just me or did the "official" period for campaigning/questions was
awfully short ?
The schedule [1] went:
TC Campaigning: (Start) Oct 11, 2017 23:59 UT
Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:06:46PM -0400, David Moreau Simard wrote:
>> Was it just me or did the "official" period for campaigning/questions was
>> awfully short ?
>>
>> The schedule [1] went:
>> TC Campaigning: (Start) Oct 11, 2017 23:59 UTC (End) Oct 14, 2017 23:45
>> UTC
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:06:46PM -0400, David Moreau Simard wrote:
> Was it just me or did the "official" period for campaigning/questions was
> awfully short ?
>
> The schedule [1] went:
> TC Campaigning: (Start) Oct 11, 2017 23:59 UTC (End) Oct 14, 2017 23:45
> UTC
The original was:
- nam
Was it just me or did the "official" period for campaigning/questions was
awfully short ?
The schedule [1] went:
TC Campaigning: (Start) Oct 11, 2017 23:59 UTC (End) Oct 14, 2017 23:45
UTC
That's three days, one of which was a saturday.
Was it always this short ? It seems to me that this is no
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 09:48:06PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2017-10-25 12:18:59 -0400 (-0400), Zane Bitter wrote:
> [...]
> > Can we maybe calculate the electorate size using the old method as well so
> > that we can quantify how much of the dropoff (in theory it could be more
> > than 100
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 12:18:59PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 20/10/17 20:20, Tony Breeds wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> > With the election behind us it's somewhat traditional to look at
> > some simple stats from the elections:
> >
> > +--+---+---+
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:05:44AM +0100, Chris Dent wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, Tony Breeds wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 09:35:34AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote:
> >
> > > I agree, we should care about not repeating this Pike trend. It looks
> > > like Queens is better in terms of
On 2017-10-25 12:18:59 -0400 (-0400), Zane Bitter wrote:
[...]
> Can we maybe calculate the electorate size using the old method as well so
> that we can quantify how much of the dropoff (in theory it could be more
> than 100%) was due to the change in effective eligibility criteria vs.
> organic c
On 20/10/17 20:20, Tony Breeds wrote:
Hi All,
With the election behind us it's somewhat traditional to look at
some simple stats from the elections:
+--+---+---+---+
| Election | Electorate (delta %) | Voted (delta %) | Tur
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, Tony Breeds wrote:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 09:35:34AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote:
I agree, we should care about not repeating this Pike trend. It looks
like Queens is better in terms of turnout (see the amazing positive
delta!). However, I can't help but noticing th
Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 09:35:34AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote:
>
>> I agree, we should care about not repeating this Pike trend. It looks
>> like Queens is better in terms of turnout (see the amazing positive
>> delta!). However, I can't help but noticing that the trend
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Swapnil Kulkarni wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Kendall Nelson wrote:
>> Hello Everyone :)
>>
>> Please join me in congratulating the 6 newly elected members of the
>> Technical Committee (TC)!
>>
>> Colleen Murphy (cmurphy)
>> Doug Hellmann (dhellmann)
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Kendall Nelson wrote:
> Hello Everyone :)
>
> Please join me in congratulating the 6 newly elected members of the
> Technical Committee (TC)!
>
> Colleen Murphy (cmurphy)
> Doug Hellmann (dhellmann)
> Emilien Macchi (emilienm)
> Jeremy Stanley (fungi)
> Julia Krege
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 09:35:34AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote:
> I agree, we should care about not repeating this Pike trend. It looks
> like Queens is better in terms of turnout (see the amazing positive
> delta!). However, I can't help but noticing that the trend for
> turnouts is slowly
On 21 October 2017 at 01:20, Tony Breeds wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> With the election behind us it's somewhat traditional to look at
> some simple stats from the elections:
>
> +--+---+---+---+
> | Election | Electorate (delta %) | Vot
Congratulations to new TC members !
2017-10-21 7:59 GMT+08:00 Kendall Nelson :
> Hello Everyone :)
>
> Please join me in congratulating the 6 newly elected members of the
> Technical Committee (TC)!
>
> Colleen Murphy (cmurphy)
> Doug Hellmann (dhellmann)
> Emilien Macchi (emilienm)
> Jeremy Stan
Congrats to all
From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2017 12:00 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [elections] Technical Committee Election
Results
An awesome team! Thanks for
An awesome team! Thanks for willing to continue the hard work of on the TC.
Cheers,
Edgar Magana
On Oct 21, 2017, at 6:56 AM, Amy Marrich
mailto:a...@demarco.com>> wrote:
Congrats everyone!
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Kendall Nelson
mailto:kennelso...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello Everyone :
Congrats everyone!
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Kendall Nelson
wrote:
> Hello Everyone :)
>
> Please join me in congratulating the 6 newly elected members of the
> Technical Committee (TC)!
>
> Colleen Murphy (cmurphy)
> Doug Hellmann (dhellmann)
> Emilien Macchi (emilienm)
> Jeremy Stanley
Hi All,
With the election behind us it's somewhat traditional to look at
some simple stats from the elections:
+--+---+---+---+
| Election | Electorate (delta %) | Voted (delta %) | Turnout % (delta %) |
+--+
Congratulations to our new TC members! :)
Best Regards,
Ildikó
> On 2017. Oct 21., at 1:59, Kendall Nelson wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone :)
>
> Please join me in congratulating the 6 newly elected members of the Technical
> Committee (TC)!
>
> Colleen Murphy (cmurphy)
> Doug Hellmann (dhellman
Hello Everyone :)
Please join me in congratulating the 6 newly elected members of the
Technical Committee (TC)!
Colleen Murphy (cmurphy)
Doug Hellmann (dhellmann)
Emilien Macchi (emilienm)
Jeremy Stanley (fungi)
Julia Kreger (TheJulia)
Paul Belanger (pabelanger)
Full results:
http://civs.cs.corn
g; openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] Technical Committee Election
> Results
>
> Please join me in congratulating the 7 newly elected members of the Technical
> Committe (TC).
>
> Chris Dent (cdent)
> Davanum Srinivas (dims)
>
Please join me in congratulating the 7 newly elected members of the
Technical Committe (TC).
Chris Dent (cdent)
Davanum Srinivas (dims)
Dean Troyer (dtroyer)
Flavio Percoco (flaper87)
John Garbutt (johnthetubaguy)
Sean McGinnis (smcginnis)
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
Full results:
http://civs.cs.cornel
29 matches
Mail list logo