Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [api] Paste Maintenance

On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 07:50 -0700, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > Also, doesn't bitbucket have a git interface now too (optionally)? > It does :) But I think it requires a new repo, so it means that could as well move to somewhere else like github or openstack infra :p

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Week R-25 Update

On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 16:40 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 10/23/2018 1:41 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > > Yeah, but part of the reason for placeholders was consistency > > > across all of > > > the services. I guess if there are never going to be upgrade > > > checks in > > > adjutant then I

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Week R-26 Update

hecker code, but I would love to see it re-using oslo-config- validator, as it would be the unique source of truth for upgrades before the upgrade happens (vs having to do multiple steps). If I am completely out of my league here, tell me. Just my 2 cents. Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp)

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] Discussing goals (upgrades) with community @ office hours

On Sat, 2018-10-13 at 15:04 +0200, Mohammed Naser wrote: > I wanted to propose one of the upcoming office hours to perhaps > invite > some of the community members (PTL, developers, anyone!) as well as > the TC with goal champions to perhaps discuss some of these goals to > help everyone get a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] assigning new liaisons to projects

On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 10:27 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > TC members, > > Since we are starting a new term, and have several new members, we > need > to decide how we want to rotate the liaisons attached to each our > project teams, SIGs, and working groups [1]. > > Last term we went through a

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] dropping xenial jobs

On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 06:50 +0200, Mohammed Naser wrote: > Hi everyone! > > So I’ve been thinking of dropping the Xenial jobs to reduce our > overall impact in terms of gate usage in master because we don’t > support it. > > However, I was a bit torn on this because i realize that it’s >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] bringing back formal TC meetings

On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 07:40 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Chris Dent writes: > > > On Thu, 4 Oct 2018, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > > TC members, please reply to this thread and indicate if you would > > > find > > > meeting at 1300 UTC on the first Thursday of every month > > > acceptable, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [election][tc]Question for candidates about global reachout

ing that box right now :D Best regards, Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe h

Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] PTL non-candidacy for Stein cycle

On July 27, 2018 4:09:04 PM UTC, James Page wrote: >Hi All > >I won't be standing for PTL of OpenStack Charms for this upcoming >cycle. > >Its been my pleasure to have been PTL since the project was accepted >into >OpenStack, but its time to let someone else take the helm. I'm not >going

Re: [openstack-dev] [sig][upgrades][ansible][charms][tripleo][kolla][airship] reboot or poweroff?

Sorry about the lack of participation too. Monthly sounds good. Regards, JP On July 24, 2018 9:34:56 AM UTC, Paul Bourke wrote: >Hi James, > >Sorry to hear about the lack of participation. I for one am guilty of >not taking part, there just seems to be never enough time in the day to > >cram

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][all] Front page template for project team documentation

Is there a lint tool that can catch incoherent markup at a global project level (vs at a page gen level)? Any tool to catch these issues would help. JP. On July 19, 2018 3:55:29 PM UTC, Petr Kovar wrote: >Hi all, > >A spin-off discussion in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/579177/ >resulted

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] dropping selinux support

This title seems very scary. It was to be read as "... for source installs" : ) To be honest, I feel very sad about the lack of involvement in CentOS in OSA over the years. We didn't get many contributors over time for it. This has always been a labour of love, and the honeymoon seems over for

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 18-26

My two cents: > I think if OpenStack wants to gain back some of the steam it had before, it > needs to adjust to the new world it is living in. This means: > * Consider abolishing the project walls. They are driving bad architecture > (not intentionally but as a side affect of structure) As

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [ptl] PTL E-mail addresses on rendered team pages

> Not sure it'd help but one option we do is to create aliases based on > the title. Though since the PTLs don't have addresses on the openstack > domain an alias may not make as much sense, it'd have to be a full > account forward. It's useful for centralized spam filtering. I foresee this: 1)

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [summary] Organizational diversity tag

I think PTLs would naturally like to have those updated, and for me a TC +w would make sense. But we need to have guidelines, so that's it's more tangible, and the subtlety stays impartial. __ OpenStack Development Mailing

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Restarting our very own "SIG" teams

Please don't hesitate to edit this etherpad, adding your new special interest group, or simply joining an existing one if you have spare cycles! Thank you! Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp) [1]: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/osa-liaisons __

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [summary] Organizational diversity tag

> - Drop tags, write a regular report instead that can account for the > subtlety of each situation (ttx). One issue here is that it's obviously a > lot more work than the current situation. That's what I'd prefer personally. We have a website with a nice project navigator now [1]. This is

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [release] How to handle "stable" deliverables releases

Option 2 for me. And the option switch to independant is IMO just fine. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [openstack-ansible][releases][governance] Change in OSA roles tagging

> Right, you can set the stable-branch-type field to 'tagless' (see > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/releases/tree/README.rst#n462) and > then set the branch location field to the SHA you want to use. Exactly what I thought. > If you would be ready to branch all of the roles at one

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][releases][governance] Change in OSA roles tagging

lease file, similar to it. What I would like to have, from this email, is: 1. Raise awareness to all the involved parties; 2. Confirmation we can go ahead, from a governance standpoint; 3. Confirmation we can still benefit from this automatic branch tooling. Thank you in advance. Jean-Phili

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Organizational diversity tag

This would be, IMO, good enough to promote/declare diversity after the facts (and is an answer to the "what happened during the cycle"). Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][openstack-ansible]

Can't. use. words. Much sadness! But happiness for you and your future, at the same time :) It was a pleasure to work on your side. https://media.giphy.com/media/IcGkqdUmYLFGE/giphy.gif __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc][ptls] final stages of python 3 transition

stone" towards both python2 and python3. I am not sure this answers your question, as this is more gray than a black or white answer. But I am hoping we'll stabilize python3 this cycle, for ubuntu 18.04 at least, and other distros as a stretch goal. Best regards, Jean-Phili

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Implement rotations for meetings handling

, but one step at a time :) Best regards, Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Implement rotations for meetings handling

for your understanding. Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStackAnsible] Tag repos as newton-eol

Hello, > I'd like to phase out openstack/openstack-ansible-tests and > openstack/openstack-ansible later. Now that we had the time to bump the roles in openstack-ansible, and adapt the tests, we can now EOL the rest of newton, i.e.: openstack/openstack-ansible and

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Mohammed Naser as core reviewer

to safeguard the existing and future work about CentOS and help grow the maintenance community for it. [1] http://stackalytics.com/?module=openstackansible-group_id=mnaser=rocky=person-day Best regards, Jean-Philippe Evrard IRC: evrardjp

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] ubuntu-bionic and legacy nodesets

That's very cool. Any idea of the repartition of nodes xenial vs bionic? Is that a very restricted amount of nodes? On 20 April 2018 at 00:37, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > With ubuntu-bionic release around the corner we'll be starting discussions > about >

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Problems with Openstack services while migrating VMs

Maybe worth posting on operators, but it looks like the scheduling of the action fails, which let me think that nova is not running fine somewhere. Why is the restart in a random order? That can cause issues, and that's the whole reason why we are orchestrating the deploys/upgrade with ansible.

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] We need to change!

Dear community, Starting at the end of this month, I won't be able to work full time on OpenStack-Ansible anymore. I want to highlight the following: Our current way of working is not sustainable in the long run, as a lot of work (and therefore pressure) is concentrated on a few individuals. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Stepping down from OpenStack-Ansible core

Hello, Ahah, gate job breakages? You were the first to break them, but also willing to step in to fix them as soon as you knew. And that's the part I will remember the most. You will be missed, Major. Your next team is lucky to have you! It was a pleasure working with you. And the gifs, omagad!

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][release] Remove complex ACL changes around releases

LGTM __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Ansible] Vancouver forum etherpad

Dear OpenStack-Ansiblers, We've got an etherpad here [1], to track all the things we want to discuss at the forum. if you're an OpenStack-Ansible user, don't hesitate to add your session ideas, list what you liked or disliked in the last release, and share your experience! Thank you in advance.

Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] [tripleo] [puppet] [fuel] [kolla] [openstack-ansible] [cloudcafe] [magnum] [mogan] [sahara] [shovel] [watcher] [helm] [rally] Heads up: ironic classic drivers deprecation

Hello, Thanks for the notice! JP On 16 March 2018 at 12:09, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi all, > > If you see your project name in the subject that is because a global search > revived usage of "pxe_ipmitool", "agent_ipmitool" or "pxe_ssh" drivers in > the non-unit-test

Re: [openstack-dev] [ALL][PTLs] Community Goals for Rocky: Toggle the debug option at runtime

Thanks! On 16 March 2018 at 16:56, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2018-03-16 13:43:00 +: >> On 2018-03-16 08:34:28 -0500 (-0500), Sean McGinnis wrote: >> > On Mar 16, 2018, at 04:02, Jean-Philippe Evrard

Re: [openstack-dev] [ALL][PTLs] Community Goals for Rocky: Toggle the debug option at runtime

Hello, For OpenStack-Ansible, we don't need to do anything for that community goal. I am not sure how we can remove our name from the storyboard, so I just inform you here. Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp) On 28 February 2018 at 05:27, ChangBo Guo <glongw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi AL

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][all] Anyone using our ubuntu-mariadb mirror?

Hello, We were using it until a couple of weeks ago, when 10.1.31 got out. 10.1.31 got issues with clustering and we moved to use a mirror of 10.1. (here 10.1.30), instead of 10.1. We haven't decided if we'll move back to 10.1 when 10.1.32 will be out. You can remove it for now, I think we can

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Ansible Disk requirements [docs] [osa]

, ephemeral storage... Will commit a patch today. Best regards, Jean-Philippe Evrard On 15 March 2018 at 18:31, Gordon, Kent S <kent.gor...@verizonwireless.com> wrote: > Compute host disk requirements for Openstack Ansible seem high in the > documentation. > > I think I have us

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStackAnsible] Tag repos as newton-eol

Looks good to me. On 15 March 2018 at 01:11, Tony Breeds <t...@bakeyournoodle.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 09:40:33PM +0000, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote: >> Hello folks, >> >> The list is almost perfect: you can do all of those except >> openstack/ope

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStackAnsible] Tag repos as newton-eol

Hello folks, The list is almost perfect: you can do all of those except openstack/openstack-ansible-tests. I'd like to phase out openstack/openstack-ansible-tests and openstack/openstack-ansible later. JP On 14 March 2018 at 21:20, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi all, > JP

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Meetings change (PTG discussion follow-up)

> think that's a good alternative but the conversations still need to take > place and as many people involved as possible. What about having office > hours? > > Amy (spotz) > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:51 AM, Jean-Philippe Evrard > <jean-phili...@evrard.me> wrote: >&

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Meetings change (PTG discussion follow-up)

Hello, During the PTG, we've discussed about changing our meetings. I'd like to have a written evidence in our mailing lists, showing what we discussed, and what we proposed to change. I propose we validate those changes if they get no opposition in the next 7 days (deadline: 13 March). What we

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Roles not passing functional tests

to unmaintained, and will eventually be removed from release. Thank you for your understanding, Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp) [1]: https://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ansible/latest/contributor/additional-roles.html#maturity-downgrade-procedure [2]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][ptl] PTL candidacy for Rocky

g the time to read this and I hope to see you in Dublin, Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubs

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Limiting pip wheel builds for OpenStack clients

I added my comment/opinion on the bug. Thanks for reporting this, Major! __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching to longer development cycles

On 13 December 2017 at 16:52, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 12/13/2017 10:17 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> Over the past year, it has become pretty obvious to me that our >> self-imposed rhythm no longer matches our natural pace. It feels like we >> are

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching to longer development cycles

On 13 December 2017 at 16:49, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-12-13 16:45:14 + (+), Chris Jones wrote: > [...] >> For me the first thing that comes to mind with this proposal, is >> how would the milestones/FF/etc be arranged within that year? > [...] > > Excellent

Re: [openstack-dev] [E] [openstack-ansible] Cannot connect to proxy server from infra1-repo-container

your bridges on the host too? And your openstack_user_config.yml? When the repo-server gets installed, it installs a reverse proxy. All the nodes are then configured to use the repo server(s). So all the nodes need to r

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Dublin PTG format

On 29 November 2017 at 03:20, Masayuki Igawa wrote: > On 11/28, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: >> Mon-Tue/Wed-Fri works as most suitable format. There are always >> conflict for many of us but that can be adjusted by working with team >> planning. >> >> Another thing can help is

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Community managed tech/dev blog: Call for opinions and ideas

On 29 November 2017 at 11:30, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Jimmy McArthur wrote: >> Thierry Carrez wrote: >>> Historically blog.o.o used to be our only blog outlet, so almost >>> anything would go in: >>> >>> "OpenStack Events Sponsorship Webinar" >>> "New Foundation Gold

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Sydney summit -- We'll be there!

oject Update" session. I am looking forward meeting all of you! Best regards, Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp) PS: We have an etherpad listing all these activities and more details about the ops session here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/osa-sydney-summi

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [stable] [tripleo] [kolla] [ansible] [puppet] Proposing changes in stable policy for installers

>> -- >>>> Emilien Macchi >>>> >>>> >>>> __________ >>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>> Unsubscribe: >>>> openstack-dev-re

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Preping for the stable/newton EOL

hanks to the infra team for enabling this to happen today. > > Tony. > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [All][Elections] Vote Vote Vote in the TC election!

sage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > Hello, Thanks Kendall and the elections team. It looks the reminders have paid off :) Best regards, Jean-Philippe Evrar

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [elections] Technical Committee Election Results

peating this Pike trend. It looks like Queens is better in terms of turnout (see the amazing positive delta!). However, I can't help but noticing that the trend for turnouts is slowly reducing (excluding some outliers) since the beginning of these stats. Any idea on how to improve that? On top

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptls] Sydney Forum Project Onboarding Rooms

To be as cool as nova, we'll find nicknames until then. We can probably start with Kevin "Destroy of Clouds" Carter. On 17 October 2017 at 15:28, Jean-Philippe Evrard <jean-phili...@evrard.me> wrote: > Hello, > > I'd be happy to have a room for OpenStack-Ansible. > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptls] Sydney Forum Project Onboarding Rooms

Hello, I'd be happy to have a room for OpenStack-Ansible. I'll be there, and probably more ppl, like Kevin Carter(cloudnull) and Amy Marrich(spotz). Thanks! On 17 October 2017 at 03:39, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > I am the speaker. Michal couldn't be Sydney this summit. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [stable] [tripleo] [kolla] [ansible] [puppet] Proposing changes in stable policy for installers

On 16 October 2017 at 12:27, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Emilien Macchi wrote: >> [...] >> ## Proposal >> >> Proposal 1: create a new policy that fits for projects like installers. >> I kicked-off something here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/511968/ >> (open for feedback).

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Role maturity downgrades: Looking for contributions/maintainers

answer on this email or talk to us on our irc channel #openstack-ansible. If no contributor step forward for those roles, we'll have no choice than to downgrade their maturity status during the next community meeting. Thank you for your understanding. Best regards, Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Looking for help: bug triage meeting organiser

, it's greatly rewarding (be ahead of bugs). If you are interested, please contact me on IRC or answer this email. Thank you. Best regards, Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Changes in meetings now in application!

in mind that daylight saving might apply to you this month, for example in mainline Europe will be in "winter time" (that's how we call it in french, please translate to whatever word applies to you!), starting from the last weekend of October. See you next week, Best regards, Jean-Phili

Re: [openstack-dev] Thanks for all the fish

dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > Congratulations on the new job. You'll be missed, for sure! Thanks for the work done. Best regards, Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp)

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][all] Sample Config Files in setup.cfg

ropose a follow-up patch. In any case, I don't think it's a good idea to wait for things to happen, and expect that uniformity will happen naturally. This is a step in the right direction. On top of that we are still early in

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][tc] Accessible upgrade support

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > I'm hoping this will get a little more attention. > > We recently started discussing removing governance tags that did not have any > projects asserting them. I think this makes a lot of sense. Some tags were > defined

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul v3 Status - and Rollback Information

o it's maybe worth waiting after that for the next full rollout/roll-forward (whatever the term is!) to avoid the overlap of critical events in the same timeframe. Best regards, Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp) __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][all] Sample Config Files in setup.cfg

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Tuesday, 3 October 2017 14:31:05 CEST Thomas Goirand wrote: >> On 10/02/2017 02:04 PM, Luigi Toscano wrote: >> > Why not? Even if it does not fix the issue for proper installations, >> > - it does not provent people

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Meetings change

in which you can regularily attend OpenStack-Ansible meetings Please give your irc nick too, that would help. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp) [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/osa-meetings-planification

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack-Ansible testing with OpenVSwitch

Well, there are ppl already running OpenVSwitch on openstack-ansible, so I guess it's just a question of a few bug fixes and adding a scenario to make sure this is working forever :p On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Gyorgy Szombathelyi wrote: > >> >> Hello

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl] Improving the process for release marketing

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:16 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > On 14:33 Sep 26, Anne Bertucio wrote: >> Release marketing is a critical part of sharing what’s new in each release, >> and we want to rework how the marketing community and projects work together >> to make the release

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack-Ansible and Trove support

Hello Michael, On top of that, we intend to have a "role maturity" that will include when the role was proposed and it's current maturity phase, for more clarity, not unlike openstack project navigator. Our os_trove role has not received many commits recently, and the "maintenance mode" of Trove

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack-Ansible testing with OpenVSwitch

Hello, We currently don't have a full scenario for openvswitch for an easy "one line" install. It still deserves more love. You could come on our channel in #openstack-ansible to discuss about it if you want. But the general idea should be close to the same explained in the blog post. Best

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] PTG Team dinner

Hello guys, I propose we have a team dinner at casey's this Thursday, at the PTG. Could you please vote on the following poll, this way I can book? https://framadate.org/zQPEvPGPOH1u2EU8 Thank you in advance. Best regards, JP

[openstack-dev] [ptg] [openstack-ansible] [kolla-ansible] [tripleo] Ansible feedback sharing session

Hello, The OpenStack-Ansible team will have a session to share feedbacks about ansible 2.4 or ansible+python3. Anyone welcomed to share their experience and give insights. It will be on Wednesday 3:30 to 5pm. See you there! Best regards, Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] [tripleo] [openstack-ansible] [deployment] Collaboration at PTG

Hello Emilien, The Discussion room is a good idea. I like it. Most of the OpenStack-Ansible crew will be available the whole week, so we can even think of doing a conversation outside the Wed-Friday timeframe. If you/we all have enough time, maybe we could organise two sessions, probably with

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] group/host specific config file overrides: how-to?

Hello, The variables documented in each of the roles defaults/ are generally what you can consider a user level interface (i.e.: what you can modify), while the variables from vars/ are generally what's best to avoid overriding. We've been slowly phasing out variables insides templates, to

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] [tripleo] [openstack-ansible] [deployment] Collaboration at PTG

I'd be happy to join. I don't think we have constraints on the schedule yet, and we can indeed book slot(s). Best regards, JP. On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Hey folks, > > As usual, we'll meet in Denver and I hope we can spend some time >

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Queens PTL candidacy

experience in the larger community. * Upgrade to Ansible 2.4. I look forward to working with you all, and it would be my honor to serve as PTL for the next cycle. Best regards, Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp) __ OpenStack Developme

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][security] To firewalld, or not to firewalld

Hello, A few additions for/against firewalld, linked to ansible's firewalld module: http://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/firewalld_module.html +: The module is built-in, so no need to ship it. It provides idempotency, and is easy to use. -: The module is: "Not tested on any Debian based

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Bug smash

Hello team, We've talked about a few times in our channels about a bug smash. I think it's time to do it: - We have 9 bugs triaged as highly important - We have 21 bugs of medium importance - We have 30 bugs classified as low. That's 60 bugs we've agreed to fix, ranging from "when convenient"

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Ansible] Proposing Markos Chandras for osa-core

+1 Thanks for all the work! On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Nicolas Bock < nicolasbock.openst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:23:46AM +0100, Andy McCrae wrote: > >> Following on from last week's meeting I'd like to propose Markos >> (hwoarang) >> for OSA core. >> > > +1 !! >

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Next bug triages

-Philippe Evrard -- @evrardjp __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] mount ceph block from an instance

ther alternative. Regards, Fabrice > Le 25 mai 2017 à 14:01, Jean-Philippe Evrard <jean-philippe.evr...@rackspace.co.uk> a écrit : > > I doubt many people have tried this, because 1) cinder/nova/glance probably do the job well in a multi-tenant fashion 2) you’

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] mount ceph block from an instance

I doubt many people have tried this, because 1) cinder/nova/glance probably do the job well in a multi-tenant fashion 2) you’re poking holes into your ceph cluster security. Anyway, if you still want it, you would need (I guess) have to create a provider network that will be allowed to access

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Bug triage cancelled this week

Hello everyone, We’ll not have an openstack-ansible bug triage this week, as many of our contributors are on the summit! See you next week! Best regards, Jean-Philippe Evrard (@)evrardjp Rackspace Limited is a company registered in England & Wales (com

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Adding a scenario for shade's functional tests

Hey, My two cents. JP On 04/04/2017, 13:39, "Monty Taylor" wrote: Hey all! I woke up early this morning and found myself thinking "I clearly don't have enough work on my plate, why don't I add some more?" I'd love to make a gate job that: - Deploys

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Propose Marc Gariepy as core reviewer

Hello, Great! +1 Best regards, JP From: Jesse Pretorius Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Friday, 3 February 2017 at 13:33 To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Amy Marrich for core

Hello, Ofc it’s a +1! Thanks Amy for all the work :) Best regards, JP From: Alexandra Settle Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Friday, 27 January 2017 at 14:29 To: "OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptls][tc][goals] community goals for Pike

be happy to understand how we’ll adapt http://governance.openstack.org/goals/index.html into real life work usable for everyone. Thanks for your clarifications. Best regards, Jean-Philippe Evrard On 12/12/2016, 12:19, "Emilien Macchi" <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: On Tue, N

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack New Years Resolutions

s/COBOL/go/g and it makes your comment even funnier. Best regards, JP On 13/12/2016, 00:00, "Jay Pipes" wrote: On 12/12/2016 06:40 PM, Nick Chase wrote: > OK, so if you were putting together New Year's Resolutions for OpenStack > development for 2017, what would

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] pip issues

Hello, Is this a greenfield newton? Could you wget your http://172.16.1.2:8181/os-releases/14.0.1/requirements_constraints.txt file reliably? Are you using haproxy? Are all the backends OK there? Don’t hesitate to come by our irc channel, it’s probably easier to have a conversation there.

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] How do you haproxy?

to see in haproxy. I have an etherpad set up, and I’d be happy if you could fill your comments there: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-ansible-haproxy-improvements Thank you in advance. Best regards, Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp) Rackspace Limited

[openstack-dev] Ansible inventory - Would you need another inventory system for your openstack cloud and how would you like it to be?

spamming here. Thank for your help! Best regards, Jean-Philippe Evrard [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-ansible-inventory-ideas __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack