On Thursday 05 April 2007 03:13, John Andersen wrote:
On the other side, I configured a Core 2 Duo Dell 9200 2 gig ram for
a friend.
You are the first one to actually say you are using *2 gig ram* and
that is
important... if you are using less than 2 gig you are going to look at
On Wednesday 04 April 2007, John Pierce wrote:
or grins we allowed my wifes to boot into vista,
20 minutes later we got to the first semi-useable desktop, we still
had alot of configuration to do.
On the other side, I configured a Core 2 Duo Dell 9200 2 gig ram for
a friend. It booted in
... this machine need *at least* one more GB Ram... what a joke...
Two months ago my wife and I decided that it was time for new laptops,
out IBM A21Ms had serverd us well. But 667Mhz P3s were a little out
dated. Since we get the maximum life out of machine we decided that
we would
M Harris wrote:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 03:27, John Andersen wrote:
After switching on the system, it took 15-20 minutes before it showd a
desktop. Huh, an Intel Core 2 Duo E6400, at 2.13 GHz, 2MB L2 Cache, 1066
MHz FSB 1GB Ram (DDR2 SDRam 533 MHz, 64 Bit), with NVidia GeForce 7650
GS
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 21:22 -0500, M Harris wrote:
On Monday 02 April 2007 21:05, Carl William Spitzer IV wrote:
Long ago about 2000 years we were warned we could not serve both GOD and
Bill Gates.
Preach it, bubba
... Amen
--
Kind regards,
M Harris
My boss
On Wednesday 04 April 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After switching on the system, it took 15-20 minutes before it showd a
desktop. Huh, an Intel Core 2 Duo E6400, at 2.13 GHz, 2MB L2 Cache, 1066
MHz FSB 1GB Ram (DDR2 SDRam 533 MHz, 64 Bit), with NVidia GeForce 7650
GS (256 MB DDR2 HDMI
I have seen the same thing, started up the a spanking new HP machine
with about 4GB of DDR2 ram, 2 core 2 chips and it was slo I
went out for a breather (cigarette) and cam back in again about 15
minuts later, but the machine was still busy starting, up nothing rong
with the machine
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 17:48 +, Russell Jones wrote:
Don't confuse certainty with ideology. Hedge your bets and you won't be
wrong. But you won't be right either. I know MS is appropriate in
certain situations. But one needs to take their strategy and the
distortions they create to
On Monday 02 April 2007 21:05, Carl William Spitzer IV wrote:
Long ago about 2000 years we were warned we could not serve both GOD and
Bill Gates.
Preach it, bubba
... Amen
--
Kind regards,
M Harris
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
Yep, specifically we are talking about Samba4, and it is quite a ways
from a release.
Right, so it does exist, it's just not useful yet. But it's not as if
it's not being developed and tested.
I was talking about something equivalent, not compatible.
Sure
John Andersen wrote:
On Monday 26 February 2007, Hans van der Merwe wrote:
This will probably spark some debates, but can someone point me to some
information that I can use to successfully challenge out IT department
concerning moving some Windows driven services to Linux (file, print and
This will probably spark some debates, but can someone point me to some
information that I can use to successfully challenge out IT department
concerning moving some Windows driven services to Linux (file, print and
email/collaboration).
An anti-FUD cheat-sheet if you like.
E-Mail
On 2/27/07, Hans van der Merwe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This will probably spark some debates, but can someone point me to some
information that I can use to successfully challenge out IT department
concerning moving some Windows driven services to Linux (file, print and
email/collaboration).
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 23:48 -0900, John Andersen wrote:
On Monday 26 February 2007, Hans van der Merwe wrote:
This will probably spark some debates, but can someone point me to some
information that I can use to successfully challenge out IT department
concerning moving some Windows driven
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 09:45 +0100, DElyMyth wrote:
On 2/27/07, Hans van der Merwe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This will probably spark some debates, but can someone point me to some
information that I can use to successfully challenge out IT department
concerning moving some Windows driven
Hans van der Merwe wrote:
Thx, but the practical problem is this... we have two competent Windows
centric IT people... one IT manager who overdosed on the MS-Coolaid
we have an AD, 70 XPs (full house, Office etc), MS-Portal, MS-Exchange,
MS-SQL, BackupExec, MS-IIS, FullSiteLicense(TM).
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 10:21 +, Dave Howorth wrote:
Hans van der Merwe wrote:
Thx, but the practical problem is this... we have two competent Windows
centric IT people... one IT manager who overdosed on the MS-Coolaid
we have an AD, 70 XPs (full house, Office etc), MS-Portal,
http://www.dongrays.com/btd/nt_to_unix/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 27 February 2007, Hans van der Merwe wrote:
Yes but something like - But, TCO is much lower with current Widows
arch than Linux, see these reports (classic FUD) is difficult to
counter -
Any manager that believe a single word from a Gartner report is
one you don't want to work for.
19 matches
Mail list logo
