[opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thursday 07 December 2006 08:44, you wrote: > its workin fine here. For god's sake, stop sending me direct replies. You have to be subscribed to post, hence its always completely redundant to send a direct copy in a reply. Desist! RRS -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additi

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

>Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 08:51:11 -0800 >From: Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: opensuse@opensuse.org >Subject: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!! > >On Thursday 07 December 2006 08:44, you wrote: >> its workin fine here. > >Fo

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On 07/12/06, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Fix the mailing list. Yep. When I click on "Reply" in GMail, my reply is addressed to the individual, not the list. -- Michael Leuty Nottingham, UK -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On 07/12/06 17:51, Randall R Schulz wrote: >> its workin fine here. > For god's sake, stop sending me direct replies. You're right, and I'm sorry to have done this stupid mistake, I hate too this bad habit. But why the hell the list manager doesn'

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thursday 07 December 2006 09:40, Michael Leuty wrote: > On 07/12/06, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fix the mailing list. > > Yep. When I click on "Reply" in GMail, my reply is addressed to the > individual, not the list. Fix gmail. X-Mailinglist: opensuse List-Post:

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On 12/7/06, John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 07 December 2006 09:40, Michael Leuty wrote: > On 07/12/06, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fix the mailing list. I think there was a discussion on this I do not remember all the arguments but should be in the archiv

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thursday 07 December 2006 10:44, Hoper Edei Deixai wrote: > ... > But why the hell the list manager doesn't set reply-to header to the > list? I've been member of many ML in ten years and recently I see > that this simple measure is no more taken. Is this to mitigate > spamming? -- Because then

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thursday 07 December 2006 10:59, you wrote: > Hi, Randall. > > Your subject speaks as if you were making the rules. Or maybe this > is a rule already on this list? Yes, it is. > ... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On 07/12/06 19:44, John Andersen wrote: >>> Fix the mailing list. >> Yep. When I click on "Reply" in GMail, my reply is addressed to the >> individual, not the list. > Fix gmail. > > X-Mailinglist: opensuse > List-Post: <<< > List-Help:

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

Torsdag den 7. december 2006 20:00 skrev Randall R Schulz: > On Thursday 07 December 2006 10:59, you wrote: > > Hi, Randall. > > > > Your subject speaks as if you were making the rules. Or maybe this > > is a rule already on this list? > > Yes, it is. > > > ... On a few occasions I accidently ans

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On 12/7/06, Verner Kjærsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Torsdag den 7. december 2006 20:00 skrev Randall R Schulz: > On Thursday 07 December 2006 10:59, you wrote: > > Hi, Randall. > > > > Your subject speaks as if you were making the rules. Or maybe this > > is a rule already on this list? > >

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thursday 07 December 2006 11:13, François Pinard wrote: > [Randall R Schulz] > > >On Thursday 07 December 2006 10:59, you wrote: > >> Your subject speaks as if you were making the rules. Or maybe > >> this is a rule already on this list? > > > >Yes, it is. > > Would you be kind enough to give m

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thursday 07 December 2006 09:09, Verner Kjærsgaard wrote: > Torsdag den 7. december 2006 20:00 skrev Randall R Schulz: > > On Thursday 07 December 2006 10:59, you wrote: > > > Hi, Randall. > > > > > > Your subject speaks as if you were making the rules. Or maybe this > > > is a rule already on

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

Hoper Edei Deixai wrote: > On 07/12/06 19:44, John Andersen wrote: > Fix the mailing list. >>> Yep. When I click on "Reply" in GMail, my reply is addressed to the >>> individual, not the list. >>> >> Fix gmail. >> >> X-Mailinglist: opensuse >> List-Post:

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

Hoper Edei Deixai wrote: > [...] > Not Thunderbird nor any webmail client. Please don't start this discussion again. Thunderbird has an extension which provides a list-reply functionality. See the November archive of this list for details (threads named "Seamonkey 1.0.6 rpm?" and "Thunderbird rep

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thu December 7 2006 2:18 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] skratched these words onto a coconut shell, hoping for an answer: > On Thursday 07 December 2006 09:09, Verner Kjærsgaard wrote: > > Torsdag den 7. december 2006 20:00 skrev Randall R Schulz: > > > On Thursday 07 December 2006 10:59, you wrote: > >

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On 07/12/06, John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Fix gmail. No problem. It might take me a few minutes though, so please be patient. :-) -- Michael Leuty Nottingham, UK -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thursday 07 December 2006 13:11, Sunny wrote: > > The solution is to click'n'hold and then select "reply to list". > > Just press the "l" key as in list. THANKYOU ! :-O ... that is what I've been searching for... I get bit by this every now and again... and it is as frustrati

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

Fix the mailing list. >>> Yep. When I click on "Reply" in GMail, my reply is addressed to the >>> individual, not the list. >> Fix gmail. >> >> X-Mailinglist: opensuse >> List-Post: <<< >> List-Help: >> List-Subs

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

>>> X-Mailinglist: opensuse >>> List-Post: <<< >>> List-Help: >>> List-Subscribe: >>> List-Unsubscribe: >>> List-Owner: >>> >>> KMail

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thursday 07 December 2006 09:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thursday 07 December 2006 09:09, Verner Kjærsgaard wrote: > > Torsdag den 7. december 2006 20:00 skrev Randall R Schulz: > > > On Thursday 07 December 2006 10:59, you wrote: > > > > Hi, Randall. > > > > > > -

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thursday 07 December 2006 19:40, Michael Leuty wrote: > On 07/12/06, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fix the mailing list. > > Yep. When I click on "Reply" in GMail, my reply is addressed to the > individual, not the list. > > -- > Michael Leuty > Nottingham, UK Well, pressing 'L'

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > And neither PINE: either reply-to-From, reply-to-Reply-To or > reply-to-all. Which is why the old one was better. But Bleh. If you are using procmail this receipe will add a Reply-To: header :0f * ^X-Mailinglist: suse-linux-e | /usr/bin/formail -bfi

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On 07/12/06, Stelian Iancu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In GMail, you can press Reply-All and manually remove the personal address. Thanks for the tip. -- Michael Leuty Nottingham, UK -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thursday 07 December 2006 18:31, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 08:51:11 -0800 > >From: Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: opensuse@opensuse.org > >Subject: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!! > > > >On

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > And neither PINE: either reply-to-From, reply-to-Reply-To or > reply-to-all. Which is why the old one was better. But Bleh. If you are using procmail this receipe will add a Reply-To: header :0f * ^X-Mailinglist: opensuse | /usr/bin/formail -bfi "Repl

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

Peter Nikolic wrote: On Thursday 07 December 2006 18:31, Jan Engelhardt wrote: Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 08:51:11 -0800 From: Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: opensuse@opensuse.org Subject: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!! On Thursday 07 December 2006 08:4

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thursday 07 December 2006 19:04, Hoper Edei Deixai wrote: > On 07/12/06 19:44, John Andersen wrote: > >>> Fix the mailing list. > >> > >> Yep. When I click on "Reply" in GMail, my reply is addressed to the > >> individual, not the list. > > > > Fix gmail. > > > > X-Mailinglist: opensuse > > List

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

>> Not Thunderbird nor any webmail client. > >well wada you expect the windBloZe infection again webmail total dire >crap .. > >Pete Kmail 1.9.3 and no proplems with list mail member of around 15 >lists . Just cut it already if you are not going to produce something useful (like the

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

Thomas Hertweck wrote: [Private Mail] John, [snip] setting the reply-to header to the list address and thus disabling any list-reply vs. private-reply functionality of good MUAs is a very bad idea. I had to change the address now manually to send you a private message. Thunderbird has an exten

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

Gee, thank you, all-caps, extra exclamation points, angry guy for bringing up this thread again and for so vituperatively insisting that 2000+ people here change their email clients and then configure those mail clients just for the way this one, lonely mailing list is set up and which is differen

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

John, answering private emails on a mailing list is considered bad behaviour!! Please don't do it! There was a reason why I sent my previous email only to you and not to the list: this topic has been discussed here many times and it does the list no good to start it all over again. Would be fine

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

* ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-07-06 18:44]: > Gee, thank you, all-caps, extra exclamation points, angry guy for > bringing up this thread again and for so vituperatively insisting > that 2000+ people here change their email clients and then configure > those mail clients just for the way this one,

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Friday 2006-12-08 at 08:54 +1000, Rob Unsworth wrote: > If you are using procmail this receipe will add a Reply-To: header I have been using that one for years: some one told me that here. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -BEGIN PGP SIGNA

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

Jan Engelhardt wrote: >>> Not Thunderbird nor any webmail client. >> well wada you expect the windBloZe infection again webmail total dire >> crap .. >> >> Pete Kmail 1.9.3 and no proplems with list mail member of around 15 >> lists . > > Just cut it already if you are not going to p

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thursday 07 December 2006 18:14, Thomas Hertweck wrote: > answering private emails on a mailing list is considered bad behaviour!! So is top posting... quit it...ahahahahahahah ehem. > Please don't do it! There was a reason why I sent my previous email only > to you and not to the

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

O.K. ;-) M Harris wrote: ... and QUIT TOP POSTING CAUSE ITS RUDE AND SCREWS UP THE ARCHIVE ! -- Geir A. Myrestrand -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thursday 07 December 2006 21:39, Geir A. Myrestrand wrote: AHAHAHAHAHAHAH :--)) > O.K.                 ;-) > > M Harris wrote: > > ... and QUIT TOP POSTING CAUSE ITS RUDE AND SCREWS UP THE ARCHIVE ! > > -- > > Geir A. Myrestrand -- Kind regards, M Harris <>< -- To unsubscr

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thursday 07 December 2006 10:04, Hoper Edei Deixai wrote: > > KMail knows how to handle a list. > > Not Thunderbird nor any webmail client. > -- So pop gmail with kmail. Reply via smtp thru gmail. -- _ John Andersen pgpCBC6vxh8U9.pgp Description: PGP

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On 12/7/06, John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 07 December 2006 10:04, Hoper Edei Deixai wrote: > > KMail knows how to handle a list. > > Not Thunderbird nor any webmail client. > -- So pop gmail with kmail. Reply via smtp thru gmail. -- _

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

You know... I don't really care one way or the other how the reply-to works on this list... and we've thrashed it to death a dozen times per year... and the more vocal members of this list all yell and shout about how this list is configured correctly yadda yadda... we even had a vote, and the maj

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On 2006/12/08 07:57 (GMT+0100) Clayton apparently typed: > So.. can anyone point to any other mailing list that has Reply-to set > the same as the opensuse lists? I would really like to see it... I subscribe to about 40 lists. Among the 40 are a substantial number of Yahoogroups lists, which all

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

the remainder, at most one quarter do not set a reply-to header back to the list. Among those that do set a reply-to header back to the list: Debian, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora, Fontconfig, KDE, MC. Among those that do not: Samba. OK, interesting. I don't subscribe to Fedora, Mandriva etc, and wi

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thursday 07 December 2006 21:57, Clayton wrote: > You know... I don't really care one way or the other how the reply-to > works on this list... and we've thrashed it to death a dozen times per > year... and the more vocal members of this list all yell and shout > about how this list is configure

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thursday 07 December 2006 16:51, Randall R Schulz wrote: > On Thursday 07 December 2006 08:44, you wrote: > > its workin fine here. > > For god's sake, stop sending me direct replies. > > You have to be subscribed to post, hence its always completely redundant > to send a direct copy in a reply.

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

>> If you are using procmail this receipe will add a Reply-To: header > >I have been using that one for years: some one told me that here. Even comp.mail.pine suggested the/a procmail recipe. I wonder what's wrong in this world? :P -`J' -- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 08:40 +0100, Clayton wrote: > > the remainder, at most one quarter do not set a reply-to header back to > > the list. Among those that do set a reply-to header back to the list: > > Debian, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora, Fontconfig, KDE, MC. Among those that > > do not: Samba. > >

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

* John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-08-06 00:13]: > So pop gmail with kmail. Reply via smtp thru gmail. NO, smtp thru your own provider or someone _other_ than gmail so you can see your own posts. -- Patrick ShanahanRegistered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On 12/08/2006 01:57 AM somebody named Clayton wrote: > You know... I don't really care one way or the other how the reply-to > works on this list... and we've thrashed it to death a dozen times per > year... and the more vocal members of this list all yell and shout > about how this list is configu

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thursday 07 December 2006 16:43, J Sloan wrote: > Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > Just cut it already if you are not going to produce something useful > > (like the procmail recipe - thanks at this point to Rob Unsworth). It's > > interesting to see _you_ talking about "windbloze" though you are us

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

Hi, On Friday 08 December 2006 17:05, ken wrote: > Advocates of the > nonsensical suse method of list operations have told us and continue to > tell us (tossing in insults along the way) that they're smarter than the > rest of the world and so to change things to a sensible configuration > would

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Dec 8 2006 17:47, Hartmut Meyer wrote: > >... unless he invites people to vote on this. > >And guess what: he did. > >And guess again: the majority of voters wanted it the way it is now (the setup > >you disagree with). Go and search in the archives. It's just a few months >ago. A perfect e

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On 12/08/2006 11:47 AM somebody named Hartmut Meyer wrote: > Hi, > > On Friday 08 December 2006 17:05, ken wrote: > >> Advocates of the >> nonsensical suse method of list operations have told us and continue to >> tell us (tossing in insults along the way) that they're smarter than the >> rest o

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On 12/08/2006 12:00 PM somebody named Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Dec 8 2006 17:47, Hartmut Meyer wrote: >> ... unless he invites people to vote on this. >> >> And guess what: he did. >> >> And guess again: the majority of voters wanted it the way it is now (the >> setup >> you disagree with). Go

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Friday 08 December 2006 08:00, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > A perfect example of why democracy sucks. ... > (We could re-vote on a regular basis to workaround this.) So even the denouncer of democracy has nothing to suggest but more democracy!? -- _ John Ande

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Friday 08 December 2006 19:12, ken wrote: > On 12/08/2006 12:00 PM somebody named Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Dec 8 2006 17:47, Hartmut Meyer wrote: > >> ... unless he invites people to vote on this. > >> > >> And guess what: he did. > >> > >> And guess again: the majority of voters wanted it t

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Dec 8 2006 13:12, ken wrote: >And Einstein, when told that 2000 Nazi scientists had voted that the >theory of relativity was wrong, said 'You cannot vote on what is the truth.' Haha I knew it! -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_Law -`J' -- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Dec 8 2006 09:33, John Andersen wrote: >On Friday 08 December 2006 08:00, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >> A perfect example of why democracy sucks. >... >> (We could re-vote on a regular basis to workaround this.) > >So even the denouncer of democracy has nothing to suggest but more democracy!? I

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On 08/12/06, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Dec 8 2006 13:12, ken wrote: >And Einstein, when told that 2000 Nazi scientists had voted that the >theory of relativity was wrong, said 'You cannot vote on what is the truth.' Haha I knew it! -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Friday 08 December 2006 12:05, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Dec 8 2006 13:12, ken wrote: > >And Einstein, when told that 2000 Nazi scientists had voted that the > >theory of relativity was wrong, said 'You cannot vote on what is the > > truth.' > > Haha I knew it! -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On 2006/12/08 19:50 (GMT+0100) Anders Johansson apparently typed: > On Friday 08 December 2006 19:12, ken wrote: >> As Churchill said, democracy is the worst form of government, except for >> all the other forms of government. > The actual quote is "No one pretends that democracy is perfect or a

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On 12/08/2006 01:50 PM somebody named Anders Johansson wrote: > On Friday 08 December 2006 19:12, ken wrote: >> On 12/08/2006 12:00 PM somebody named Jan Engelhardt wrote: >>> On Dec 8 2006 17:47, Hartmut Meyer wrote: ... > > As I have said many many times before: I wish people who felt this

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On 12/08/2006 03:33 PM somebody named Felix Miata wrote: > On 2006/12/08 19:50 (GMT+0100) Anders Johansson apparently typed: > >> On Friday 08 December 2006 19:12, ken wrote: > >>> As Churchill said, democracy is the worst form of government, except for >>> all the other forms of government. > >

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Dec 8 2006 12:28, Randall R Schulz wrote: >On Friday 08 December 2006 12:05, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> On Dec 8 2006 13:12, ken wrote: >> >And Einstein, when told that 2000 Nazi scientists had voted that the >> >theory of relativity was wrong, said 'You cannot vote on what is the >> > truth.' >>

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thursday 07 December 2006 13:09, Verner Kjærsgaard wrote: > On a few occasions I accidently answered directly instead of the list. > > I happened, because I use Kmail. When you click on "reply" you mean to > reply to the list, but now and then this will cause the mail to go to the > origin

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Thursday 07 December 2006 17:19, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > ... "windows sucks linux rocks" Now you're catching on! -- Calling an illegal alien an 'undocumented worker', is like calling a home intruder an 'unwanted houseguest'. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional co

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Friday 08 December 2006 11:00, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Dec 8 2006 17:47, Hartmut Meyer wrote: > >... unless he invites people to vote on this. > > > >And guess what: he did. > > > >And guess again: the majority of voters wanted it the way it is now (the > > setup you disagree with). Go and

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

Randall R Schulz wrote: On Friday 08 December 2006 12:05, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Dec 8 2006 13:12, ken wrote: And Einstein, when told that 2000 Nazi scientists had voted that the theory of relativity was wrong, said 'You cannot vote on what is the truth.' Haha I knew it! -> http://en.wi

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Friday 08 December 2006 11:57, ken wrote: > On 12/08/2006 11:47 AM somebody named Hartmut Meyer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Friday 08 December 2006 17:05, ken wrote: > >> Advocates of the > >> nonsensical suse method of list operations have told us and continue to > >> tell us (tossing in insult

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 11:05 -0500, ken wrote: > On 12/08/2006 01:57 AM somebody named Clayton wrote: > Clayton, > > Very well put. I've been on mailing lists since before there was linux, > and I've set up and managed dozens of mailing lists, and I'm currently a > member of about 40 lists, and o

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

On Fri December 8 2006 5:09 pm, JB skratched these words onto a coconut shell, hoping for an answer: > On Friday 08 December 2006 11:00, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Dec 8 2006 17:47, Hartmut Meyer wrote: > > >... unless he invites people to vote on this. > > > > > >And guess what: he did. > > > >

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

>> ... "windows sucks linux rocks" > > Now you're catching on! Catching on what? -`J' -- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Friday 2006-12-08 at 11:54 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >> If you are using procmail this receipe will add a Reply-To: header > > > >I have been using that one for years: some one told me that here. > > Even comp.mail.pine suggested the/a proc

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Friday 2006-12-08 at 07:57 +0100, Clayton wrote: > So.. can anyone point to any other mailing list that has Reply-to set > the same as the opensuse lists? I would really like to see it... sourceforge lists do not set it; yahoogroups does. Is ya

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

* Carlos E. R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-09-06 15:30]: > By the way, I have another recipe to put direct replies out of sight ;-) Or just remove duplicate list/direct replies and be done with it: # --- # remove duplicate messages # --

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Saturday 2006-12-09 at 18:24 -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > Or just remove duplicate list/direct replies and be done with it: > ... > :0 Whc: msgid.lock > | $FORMAIL -D 16384 msgid.cache No, I don't like that method, and I tried it years ago

Re: [opensuse] NO PERSONAL REPLIES TO POSTINGS ON THIS LIST!!

* Carlos E. R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-09-06 20:11]: > > It is similar to what gmail does: it even considers duplicated the > sent email and the received copy from the list. > I work around that with gmail by using fetchmail from gmail and my provider for smtp rather than gmail. That way I see