Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice - 2.3. Issues

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Petr Mladek wrote: > Hello, > > I am sorry for the late repply. > > On Friday 12 October 2007, G T Smith wrote: >>> Do you know what macro caused this? >> It is a particular problem with a function call, the function failing is >> thiscomponent.store

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice - 2.3. Issues

Hello, I am sorry for the late repply. On Friday 12 October 2007, G T Smith wrote: > > Do you know what macro caused this? > > It is a particular problem with a function call, the function failing is > thiscomponent.storeAsURl with an unspecified exception, the values being > passed to seem to be

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice - 2.3. Issues

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Petr Mladek wrote: > Hello G T, > > On Wednesday 10 October 2007, G T Smith wrote: >> All, >> >> Because the OpenSuse and cifs issue resurfaced in my old copy of 2.0.x >> decided to give 2.3 a whirl Big mistake >> >> Installation managed to tr

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice - 2.3. Issues

Hello G T, On Wednesday 10 October 2007, G T Smith wrote: > All, > > Because the OpenSuse and cifs issue resurfaced in my old copy of 2.0.x > decided to give 2.3 a whirl Big mistake > > Installation managed to transpose home directory in front of my defined > Document path... (thought oh w

[opensuse] OpenOffice - 2.3. Issues

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All, Because the OpenSuse and cifs issue resurfaced in my old copy of 2.0.x decided to give 2.3 a whirl Big mistake Installation managed to transpose home directory in front of my defined Document path... (thought oh what the hell and changed

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3 upgrade broke Thunderbird default "Open with"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Wednesday 2007-10-03 at 09:09 -0400, Dennis E. Slice wrote: Then have a look at the mailcap files: ~/.mailcap and /etc/mailcap. No local .mailcap, and the /etc/mailcap doesn't appear to have anything relevant to msword and doc files. Mine h

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3 upgrade broke Thunderbird default "Openwith"

Dennis E. Slice schreef: > > But, that does not change the TB default app for such files - a new > window now opens briefly before the file is opened and the "Action" > preference page shows the separate, explicit, nondefault specification > of one of the above, soffice, etc. That might be fine,

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3 upgrade broke Thunderbird default "Open with"

Basil Chupin wrote: ...snip... > > Start Konqueror file manager and right-click on a *.doc file. What is > shown in the menu which comes up re which app is to be used to open/read > the *.doc file? > > Konqueror gives the option of "Open in a New Window" which eventually correctly invokes open

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3 upgrade broke Thunderbird default "Openwith"

Jos van Kan wrote: > Dennis E. Slice schreef: > >> Thanks for the speedy reply, but that's not quite it. Following the >> trail you suggest, I get to the action for .doc files is currently: >> >> "Open them with the default application:" >> >> This worked before 2.3, so what I think I need to do i

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3 upgrade broke Thunderbird default "Open with"

Dennis E. Slice wrote: Carlos E. R. wrote: The Wednesday 2007-10-03 at 04:30 -0400, Dennis E. Slice wrote: In TB: Edit>Preferences>Attachments>View&Edit actions ... Thanks for the speedy reply, but that's not quite it. Following the trail you suggest, I get to the acti

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3 upgrade broke Thunderbird default "Open with"

Carlos E. R. wrote: > > The Wednesday 2007-10-03 at 04:30 -0400, Dennis E. Slice wrote: > >>> In TB: Edit>Preferences>Attachments>View&Edit actions >>> > ... >> Thanks for the speedy reply, but that's not quite it. Following the >> trail you suggest, I get to the action for .doc files is currentl

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3 upgrade broke Thunderbird default "Openwith"

Dennis E. Slice schreef: > Thanks for the speedy reply, but that's not quite it. Following the > trail you suggest, I get to the action for .doc files is currently: > > "Open them with the default application:" > > This worked before 2.3, so what I think I need to do is change the > "default app

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3 upgrade broke Thunderbird default "Open with"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Wednesday 2007-10-03 at 04:30 -0400, Dennis E. Slice wrote: In TB: Edit>Preferences>Attachments>View&Edit actions ... Thanks for the speedy reply, but that's not quite it. Following the trail you suggest, I get to the action for .doc files i

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3 upgrade broke Thunderbird default "Open with"

Basil Chupin wrote: > ..snip... > OO is now separated into various modules which you install depending on > whether you need a particular application -- eg, if you want to use the > Writer then you install this module, or if you want to use the Database > then install the database module. Also, you

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3 upgrade broke Thunderbird default "Open with"

Dennis E. Slice wrote: I was running OO 2.0 (the default version) on my SUSE 10.0 system. In tracking down a problem with Master Documents, I upgraded to 2.3. Works nicely, but now when I click on an attachment in the Thunderbird mail program (say, .doc or .xls) the default is to Save, and select

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3 upgrade broke Thunderbird default "Open with"

Jos van Kan wrote: > Dennis E. Slice schreef: > >> "filename.xls could not be opened, because the associated helper >> application does not exist. Change the association in your preferences." >> >> I can't find a place to change it, and besides .doc and .xls files (and >> I assume .ppt) automatica

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3 upgrade broke Thunderbird default "Open with"

Dennis E. Slice schreef: > > "filename.xls could not be opened, because the associated helper > application does not exist. Change the association in your preferences." > > I can't find a place to change it, and besides .doc and .xls files (and > I assume .ppt) automatically open just fine from

[opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3 upgrade broke Thunderbird default "Open with"

I was running OO 2.0 (the default version) on my SUSE 10.0 system. In tracking down a problem with Master Documents, I upgraded to 2.3. Works nicely, but now when I click on an attachment in the Thunderbird mail program (say, .doc or .xls) the default is to Save, and selecting "Open with" produces

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

On Tuesday 25 September 2007, L. Mark Stone wrote: > Petr, > > Thanks for taking care of all of this. Everything installed OK. > > One note: the NLD artwork still says version 2.1, even though this is > version 2.3. Good point. I have asked our artwork maestro to provide updated pictures. -- Be

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

Petr Mladek wrote: > On Thursday 20 September 2007, Ben Kevan wrote: >> On Thursday 20 September 2007 05:23:18 am JP Rosevear wrote: >>> On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 13:57 +0200, Hans van der Merwe wrote: On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 12:38 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: >>> 2.3 is the stable release now, Petr j

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Tuesday 2007-09-25 at 19:56 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > I would like to keep the OpenOffice_org:STABLE project really stable. I do > not > want to force people to download the big best every two weeks. So I really > would like to wait for the

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

Cc: "Carlos E. R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 2:04:19 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York Subject: Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3 On Thursday 20 September 2007, Carlos E. R. wrote: > The Thursday 2007-09-20 at 12:53 -0700, Ben Kevan wrote: > > I understand that

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

On Friday 21 September 2007, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: > I just tried installing OO 2.3 from smart om a SUSE 10.0, and I get > this: > > Can't install [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > no package provides OpenOffice_org-hyphen > > Indeed, an rpm -i --test reveals a need for these packages, wh

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

On Thursday 20 September 2007, Carlos E. R. wrote: > The Thursday 2007-09-20 at 12:53 -0700, Ben Kevan wrote: > > I understand that, but it is crazy that several days after the release > > openSUSE users don't have it in their "Stable" repository because one > > person doesn't have time to do so. >

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

On Thursday 20 September 2007, Ben Kevan wrote: > On Thursday 20 September 2007 05:23:18 am JP Rosevear wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 13:57 +0200, Hans van der Merwe wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 12:38 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > > > > 2.3 is the stable release now, Petr just hasn't had a

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

Hello, I am sorry for the late repply. I was busy with openSUSE-10.3. Then I was on the OOo conference, ... On Thursday 20 September 2007, James Knott wrote: > Are there any plans for a SUSE version of OpenOffice.2.3? The packages based on OOo-2.3-final are included in openSUSE-10.3.rc1. I hav

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 09:48 +0200, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: > I just tried installing OO 2.3 from smart om a SUSE 10.0, and I get > this: > > Can't install [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > no package provides OpenOffice_org-hyphen > > Indeed, an rpm -i --test reveals a need for these pac

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 11:42 -0700, Ben Kevan wrote: > On Thursday 20 September 2007 05:23:18 am JP Rosevear wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 13:57 +0200, Hans van der Merwe wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 12:38 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > > > > 2.3 is the stable release now, Petr just hasn't h

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

On 09/21/2007 08:36 PM, Michael Skiba wrote: > Am Freitag, 21. September 2007 02:21:10 schrieb James Knott: > >> I haven't noticed a 64 bit version there. >> > "The 64 bit versioen aren't released till now because we haven't tester with > these maschines" (IRC) > > I guess this is a invita

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

Am Freitag, 21. September 2007 14:36:53 schrieb Michael Skiba: > Am Freitag, 21. September 2007 02:21:10 schrieb James Knott: > > > However I just wanted to say, that openoffice.org also offers downloads > > > of the latest OOo versions ;) (also rpms) > > > > I haven't noticed a 64 bit version ther

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

Am Freitag, 21. September 2007 02:21:10 schrieb James Knott: > > However I just wanted to say, that openoffice.org also offers downloads > > of the latest OOo versions ;) (also rpms) > > I haven't noticed a 64 bit version there. "The 64 bit versioen aren't released till now because we haven't teste

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

Ben Kevan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thursday 20 September 2007 12:34:16 pm Benji Weber wrote: >> On 20/09/2007, Ben Kevan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > I would totally understand if the reasoning was because it is not >> > considered fully tested / stable with Novell modifications, that w

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 20:21 -0400, James Knott wrote: > Michael Skiba wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 20. September 2007 13:11:57 schrieb James Knott: > > > >> Basil Chupin wrote: > >> > >>> James Knott wrote: > >>> > Are there any plans for a SUSE version of OpenOffice.2.3? > >

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

Michael Skiba wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 20. September 2007 13:11:57 schrieb James Knott: > >> Basil Chupin wrote: >> >>> James Knott wrote: >>> Are there any plans for a SUSE version of OpenOffice.2.3? tnx jk >>> Smart updated me (10.2) to 2.3.0.1) about 10

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Thursday 2007-09-20 at 17:46 -0400, Doug McGarrett wrote: > The original question seems not to have been answered, to wit: is Novell > going to include Open Office in its next release, and if not, what does one > do to get a Novell-compatible

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

Le September 20, 2007 05:57:51 pm Brad Bourn, vous avez écrit : > Someone already stated that it WILL be included in 10.3. > > B-) > > On Thursday 20 September 2007 3:46 pm, Doug McGarrett wrote: > > The original question seems not to have been answered, to wit: is Novell > > going to include Open

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

Someone already stated that it WILL be included in 10.3. B-) On Thursday 20 September 2007 3:46 pm, Doug McGarrett wrote: > The original question seems not to have been answered, to wit: is Novell > going to include Open Office in its next release, and if not, what does one > do to get a Novel

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

On Thursday 20 September 2007 13:20, Carlos E. R. wrote: > The Thursday 2007-09-20 at 17:31 +0200, Michael Skiba wrote: > > > > However I just wanted to say, that openoffice.org also offers > > > > downloads of the latest OOo versions ;) (also rpms) > > > > > > Which will not have all Novell modifi

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Thursday 2007-09-20 at 12:53 -0700, Ben Kevan wrote: > I understand that, but it is crazy that several days after the release > openSUSE users don't have it in their "Stable" repository because one person > doesn't have time to do so. And I d

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

On Thursday 20 September 2007 12:34:16 pm Benji Weber wrote: > On 20/09/2007, Ben Kevan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would totally understand if the reasoning was because it is not > > considered fully tested / stable with Novell modifications, that would > > make more sense ,but to just have t

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Thursday 2007-09-20 at 21:28 +0200, Michael Skiba wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 20. September 2007 19:20:53 schrieb Carlos E. R.: > > A important one should be the compatibility thing with that xml format of > > M$ - I don't write the exact name becaus

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

Le September 20, 2007 03:51:28 pm drek, vous avez écrit : > On 09/20/2007 08:42 PM, Ben Kevan wrote: > > On Thursday 20 September 2007 05:23:18 am JP Rosevear wrote: > >> On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 13:57 +0200, Hans van der Merwe wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 12:38 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > >> >

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

On 09/20/2007 08:42 PM, Ben Kevan wrote: > On Thursday 20 September 2007 05:23:18 am JP Rosevear wrote: > >> On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 13:57 +0200, Hans van der Merwe wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 12:38 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: >>> >> 2.3 is the stable release now, Petr just ha

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

On 20/09/2007, Ben Kevan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would totally understand if the reasoning was because it is not considered > fully tested / stable with Novell modifications, that would make more > sense ,but to just have the release of a long anticipated OOo put off because > someone "doesn

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

Am Donnerstag, 20. September 2007 19:20:53 schrieb Carlos E. R.: > A important one should be the compatibility thing with that xml format of > M$ - I don't write the exact name because I forgot; oxml? .xdoc?. But they > (Novell) do a lot of contributions, not only that one, I understand. You mean O

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

On Thursday 20 September 2007 05:23:18 am JP Rosevear wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 13:57 +0200, Hans van der Merwe wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 12:38 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > > 2.3 is the stable release now, Petr just hasn't had a chance to move it > over yet. Having a release put off be

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

On 20/09/2007, James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > So, I guess the next question is "where is it hiding?". ;-) http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/OpenOffice.org:/UNSTABLE/openSUSE_10.2/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Thursday 2007-09-20 at 17:31 +0200, Michael Skiba wrote: > > > However I just wanted to say, that openoffice.org also offers downloads > > > of the latest OOo versions ;) (also rpms) > > > > Which will not have all Novell modifications. Some of t

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

Am Donnerstag, 20. September 2007 17:13:47 schrieb Carlos E. R.: > The Thursday 2007-09-20 at 14:04 +0200, Michael Skiba wrote: > > However I just wanted to say, that openoffice.org also offers downloads > > of the latest OOo versions ;) (also rpms) > > Which will not have all Novell modifications.

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Thursday 2007-09-20 at 14:04 +0200, Michael Skiba wrote: > However I just wanted to say, that openoffice.org also offers downloads of > the > latest OOo versions ;) (also rpms) Which will not have all Novell modifications. Some of them haven't

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Thursday 2007-09-20 at 13:57 +0200, Hans van der Merwe wrote: > > > Thats the UNSTABLE branch - anyone know if the official stable version > > > from Openoffice.org differs in any way? > > > > Of course it does: it is stable! :-P > > Well, at

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 13:57 +0200, Hans van der Merwe wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 12:38 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > The Thursday 2007-09-20 at 08:15 -, Hans van der Merwe wrote: > > > > > > You will find OpenOffice_org-2.3.

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

James Knott wrote: Basil Chupin wrote: James Knott wrote: Are there any plans for a SUSE version of OpenOffice.2.3? tnx jk Smart updated me (10.2) to 2.3.0.1) about 10 days ago or so and the update came from one of the SuSE sites. So, I guess the next question is "where

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

Am Donnerstag, 20. September 2007 13:11:57 schrieb James Knott: > Basil Chupin wrote: > > James Knott wrote: > >> Are there any plans for a SUSE version of OpenOffice.2.3? > >> > >> tnx jk > > > > Smart updated me (10.2) to 2.3.0.1) about 10 days ago or so and the > > update came from one of the Su

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

Hans van der Merwe wrote: On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 12:38 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Thursday 2007-09-20 at 08:15 -, Hans van der Merwe wrote: You will find OpenOffice_org-2.3.0.1-26.1.i586.rpm here ftp://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/rep

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 12:38 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > The Thursday 2007-09-20 at 08:15 -, Hans van der Merwe wrote: > > > > You will find OpenOffice_org-2.3.0.1-26.1.i586.rpm here > > > ftp://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/repositories/Op

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

Graham Smith wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Hans van der Merwe wrote: > >> On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 13:23 +1000, Basil Chupin wrote: >> >>> James Knott wrote: >>> Are there any plans for a SUSE version of OpenOffice.2.3? >>> Smart updated me (10.2) to 2.3.0.1) about 10

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

Basil Chupin wrote: > James Knott wrote: >> Are there any plans for a SUSE version of OpenOffice.2.3? >> >> tnx jk > > Smart updated me (10.2) to 2.3.0.1) about 10 days ago or so and the > update came from one of the SuSE sites. > > So, I guess the next question is "where is it hiding?". ;-) --

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Thursday 2007-09-20 at 08:15 -, Hans van der Merwe wrote: > > You will find OpenOffice_org-2.3.0.1-26.1.i586.rpm here > > ftp://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/repositories/OpenOffice.org:/UNSTABLE/openSUSE_10.2 > > Thats the UNSTABLE branch - any

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 18:08 +1000, Graham Smith wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Hans van der Merwe wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 13:23 +1000, Basil Chupin wrote: > > > James Knott wrote: > > > > Are there any plans for a SUSE version of OpenOffice.2.3? > > > > > > Smart updated me (10.2) to 2.3.0

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Hans van der Merwe wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 13:23 +1000, Basil Chupin wrote: > > James Knott wrote: > > > Are there any plans for a SUSE version of OpenOffice.2.3? > > > > Smart updated me (10.2) to 2.3.0.1) about 10 days ago or so and the > > update came from one of the

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 13:23 +1000, Basil Chupin wrote: > James Knott wrote: > > Are there any plans for a SUSE version of OpenOffice.2.3? > > > > tnx jk > > Smart updated me (10.2) to 2.3.0.1) about 10 days ago or so and the > update came from one of the SuSE sites. > > Cheers. > > > -- > Pa

Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

James Knott wrote: Are there any plans for a SUSE version of OpenOffice.2.3? tnx jk Smart updated me (10.2) to 2.3.0.1) about 10 days ago or so and the update came from one of the SuSE sites. Cheers. -- Past experience, if not forgotten, is a guide for the future. -- To unsubscribe, e-m

[opensuse] OpenOffice 2.3

Are there any plans for a SUSE version of OpenOffice.2.3? tnx jk -- Use OpenOffice.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]