Re: [opensuse] Evolution IMAP oddities

On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 10:51 -0800, Martin Mielke wrote: > Hi all, > > I mostly use Thunderbird to access our IMAP servers but sometimes I try with > Evolution just for fun... > Although it has been configured to copy the sent email under the same "Sent" > folder as Thunderbird it's quite strang

[opensuse] Evolution IMAP oddities

Hi all, I mostly use Thunderbird to access our IMAP servers but sometimes I try with Evolution just for fun... Although it has been configured to copy the sent email under the same "Sent" folder as Thunderbird it's quite strange not to find all the sent items inside... oddly enough under Proper

Re: [opensuse] Evolution 2.12 "reply" locks up on opensuse 10.3

On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 17:20 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > The Saturday 2007-12-01 at 10:50 -0500, Jim McKean wrote: > > (please, try not to top post with full original message) > > >>> I do have everything that was in my > >>> home direct

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Plugins

> > > Does anyone know of a good source to browse and download additional > > > plugins for Evolution beyond the standard plugins provided at install of > > > 10.3? > > I'm not aware of anything for this. May be something should be done for > > this with OBS. > I googled for plugins and seems to b

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Plugins

On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 10:42 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 17:34 -0600, Bryen wrote: > > Does anyone know of a good source to browse and download additional > > plugins for Evolution beyond the standard plugins provided at install of > > 10.3? > > > > -- > > ---Bryen---

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Plugins

Bryen, I'm not aware of anything for this. May be something should be done for this with OBS. -Srini. On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 17:34 -0600, Bryen wrote: > Does anyone know of a good source to browse and download additional > plugins for Evolution beyond the standard plugins provided at install of >

[opensuse] Evolution Plugins

Does anyone know of a good source to browse and download additional plugins for Evolution beyond the standard plugins provided at install of 10.3? -- ---Bryen--- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [opensuse] Evolution 2.12 "reply" locks up on opensuse 10.3

On Nov 29, 2007 6:58 AM, Jim McKean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I notice that a lot of people have had good luck with Evolution on > opensuse 10.3. I have not. > > > I have been using evolution since the Ximian days and it seems to be > increasingly unstable (for me). I'm still on 10.2, and Evolu

Re: [opensuse] Evolution 2.12 "reply" locks up on opensuse 10.3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Saturday 2007-12-01 at 10:50 -0500, Jim McKean wrote: (please, try not to top post with full original message) I do have everything that was in my home directory, so I suppose I could have something corrupted in the those, but I would be surp

Re: [opensuse] Evolution 2.12 "reply" locks up on opensuse 10.3

Do you mean a new linux user with a new home directory? Then reinstall Evolution and set everything up again? (That sounds a little like complaining, I am not, just trying to be clear.) J On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 16:17 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 >

Re: [opensuse] Evolution 2.12 "reply" locks up on opensuse 10.3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Thursday 2007-11-29 at 08:59 -0500, Jim McKean wrote: When I moved from 10.2 to 10.3, I backed up my /home directory, reformatted everything and installed from scratch, so I don't have any old libraries or corrupt binaries. I do have everything

[opensuse] Evolution 2.12 "reply" locks up on opensuse 10.3

I notice that a lot of people have had good luck with Evolution on opensuse 10.3. I have not. I have been using evolution since the Ximian days and it seems to be increasingly unstable (for me). My biggest problem at the moment is that I can reply only once in each session. When replying the seco

[opensuse] Evolution 2.12 "reply" locks up on opensuse 10.3

I notice that a lot of people have had good luck with Evolution on opensuse 10.3. I have not. I have been using evolution since the Ximian days and it seems to be increasingly unstable (for me). My biggest problem at the moment is that I can reply only once in each session. When replying the seco

Re: [opensuse] evolution and iprint on openSUSE 10.0

On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 14:20 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: > On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 16:16 +0100, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 09:54 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: > > > > > It kind of looks like your cups package is hosed. Did you upgraded it > > > or --force or --no-deps when installi

Re: [opensuse] evolution and iprint on openSUSE 10.0

On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 09:55 +0100, Johannes Meixner wrote: > Perhaps it might help to speed up the issue if at least Hundreds > of users demand a free iPrint client RPM ;-) I'm game. But I am also surprised that that our company's Novell site license does not result in better availability of this

Re: [opensuse] evolution and iprint on openSUSE 10.0

Hello, On Nov 15 21:33 Roger Oberholtzer wrote (shortened): > Why isn't iprint included in openSUSE? I assume you mean the iPrint client software (i.e. what is used on the client systems) and not the iPrint server software (i.e. what is used on an iPrint print server machine) because the latter

Re: [opensuse] evolution and iprint on openSUSE 10.0

On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 14:20 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: > Maybe but the issue is that libgnomecups-1.0.so.1 is looking for a > symbol in an outside library that it can't find so its probably more > likley that library is the one that needs re-installing. So one would think that libgnomecups is link

Re: [opensuse] evolution and iprint on openSUSE 10.0

On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 16:16 +0100, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: > On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 09:54 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: > > > It kind of looks like your cups package is hosed. Did you upgraded it > > or --force or --no-deps when installing anything recently? > > In fact this has been this way a whi

Re: [opensuse] Evolution, IMAP and filtering

Bryen wrote: > Well, in my case, I'm trying to set colors to certain email messages. > Doesn't seem to be working. Another filter I set was to move a message > into another folder. That didn't work either. :-( > > Both of those work with Seamonkey & IMAP -- Use OpenOffice.org

Re: [opensuse] Evolution, IMAP and filtering

Bryen wrote: > Evolution 2.12.0 > > Is it safe to assume that Evolution filters do not apply to any imap > accounts? None of my filters work, and I can only assume it is because > I use imap. Or is this bugged? > > I use filters on Seamonkey & IMAP, so it's not an IMAP issue. -- Use OpenOf

Re: [opensuse] evolution and iprint on openSUSE 10.0

On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 09:54 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: > It kind of looks like your cups package is hosed. Did you upgraded it > or --force or --no-deps when installing anything recently? In fact this has been this way a while. I would not be surprised if there has been a gnome or cups update sin

Re: [opensuse] Evolution, IMAP and filtering

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Roger Oberholtzer wrote: > On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 10:22 +, G T Smith wrote: > >> (I do use procmail >> for spam filtering and for a couple of special bits of mail >> re-direction, but not for folder based sorting as it is more suited to >> more a s

Re: [opensuse] evolution and iprint on openSUSE 10.0

On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 09:51 +0100, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: > I am trying to use iprint (novell-iprint-xclient-sl-1.0.20051215-2) on > openSUSE 10.0. I have installed the iprint RPM, and it seems to look > around my network. I have not yet added a printer via iprint. CUPS lists > only my usual, fu

Re: [opensuse] Evolution, IMAP and filtering

On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 10:22 +, G T Smith wrote: > (I do use procmail > for spam filtering and for a couple of special bits of mail > re-direction, but not for folder based sorting as it is more suited to > more a static configurations and I find I have to modify folder rules a > couple of time

Re: [opensuse] Evolution, IMAP and filtering

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bryen wrote: > On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 16:43 -0500, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: >> On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 15:19 -0600, Bryen wrote: >>> Evolution 2.12.0 >>> >>> Is it safe to assume that Evolution filters do not apply to any imap >>> accounts? None of my fi

[opensuse] evolution and iprint on openSUSE 10.0

I am trying to use iprint (novell-iprint-xclient-sl-1.0.20051215-2) on openSUSE 10.0. I have installed the iprint RPM, and it seems to look around my network. I have not yet added a printer via iprint. CUPS lists only my usual, fully functioning network printer. When I run evolution (evolution-2.

Re: [opensuse] Evolution, IMAP and filtering

On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 00:38 +0100, Sandy Drobic wrote: > I don't think any of these rules can be created on the client. For procmail, at least, the rules are on the imap server, set up in each user's login account. -- Roger Oberholtzer OPQ Systems / Ramböll RST Ramböll Sverige AB Kapellgränd

Re: [opensuse] Evolution, IMAP and filtering

Bryen wrote: > Well, in my case, I'm trying to set colors to certain email messages. > Doesn't seem to be working. Another filter I set was to move a message > into another folder. That didn't work either. :-( It depends a bit on the imap server. Cyrus Imap for example uses SIEVE to filter mes

Re: [opensuse] Evolution, IMAP and filtering

On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 16:43 -0500, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: > On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 15:19 -0600, Bryen wrote: > > Evolution 2.12.0 > > > > Is it safe to assume that Evolution filters do not apply to any imap > > accounts? None of my filters work, and I can only assume it is because > > I use ima

Re: [opensuse] Evolution, IMAP and filtering

On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 15:19 -0600, Bryen wrote: > Evolution 2.12.0 > > Is it safe to assume that Evolution filters do not apply to any imap > accounts? None of my filters work, and I can only assume it is because > I use imap. Or is this bugged? Can't say. I would think imap filtering through

[opensuse] Evolution, IMAP and filtering

Evolution 2.12.0 Is it safe to assume that Evolution filters do not apply to any imap accounts? None of my filters work, and I can only assume it is because I use imap. Or is this bugged? -- ---Bryen--- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

[opensuse] Evolution 2.12 on 10.2

Hi, I have spent the morning trying to upgrade to Evol 2.12 from the GNOME: repo on the build service. The evolution packages installed fine - but I had to upgrade gtk2 "by hand" to get the rest of the dependencies in a row. (Im using Smart). Is this right? Is the Evolution packages dependent on t

Re: [opensuse] evolution contacts

On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 21:51 +0200, Aniruddha wrote: > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 15:14 -0500, Bryen wrote: > > Try Edit --> Plugins --> Then Uncheck the "Automatic Plugins" option. > > > > -- > > ---Bryen--- > > > > Thanks! That worked for me. However this is still a bug though, > disabling the plu

Re: [opensuse] evolution contacts

On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 15:14 -0500, Bryen wrote: > Try Edit --> Plugins --> Then Uncheck the "Automatic Plugins" option. > > -- > ---Bryen--- > Thanks! That worked for me. However this is still a bug though, disabling the plugin was never a requirement before. Turning the option off used to be

[opensuse] Evolution: stalling

Hey guys, I just installed 10.3 on my spare HD for may laptop, I decided to fore go the use of my previous home and build a new. After downloading some 1 e-mails I started to build all new filter rules, several times during this process Evolution would become unresponsive(grayed out) for upward

Re: [opensuse] evolution..

On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 08:21 +, Hans van der Merwe wrote: > On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 20:26 +0300, Janne Karhunen wrote: > > Jokes aside, 10.3 Evolution is the first ever to work for longer > > than a day for me. Great. This time the only thing that seems to > What version does 10.3 ship? 2.12.0

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Address Book Synchronization

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bryen wrote: > I'd like to be able to synchronize my address book in Evolution with > multiple machines. Any suggestions? > Are you talking machine with same O/S, machines with different O/Ss, phones + laptops + handhelds etc. Also how many? There a

Re: [opensuse] evolution..

On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 20:26 +0300, Janne Karhunen wrote: > Hi, > > Evolution: 10 years of development has finally paid off. Now you > can almost write emails with it ;) > > Jokes aside, 10.3 Evolution is the first ever to work for longer > than a day for me. Great. This time the only thing that s

[opensuse] Evolution Address Book Synchronization

I'd like to be able to synchronize my address book in Evolution with multiple machines. Any suggestions? -- ---Bryen--- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[opensuse] evolution..

Hi, Evolution: 10 years of development has finally paid off. Now you can almost write emails with it ;) Jokes aside, 10.3 Evolution is the first ever to work for longer than a day for me. Great. This time the only thing that seems to be completely broken is the 'character encoding' setting that i

Re: [opensuse] evolution contacts

On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 20:06 -0400, Mike McMullin wrote: > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 15:14 -0500, Bryen wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 15:51 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 12:52 -0500, Bryen wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 13:38 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > > >

Re: [opensuse] evolution contacts

On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 15:14 -0500, Bryen wrote: > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 15:51 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 12:52 -0500, Bryen wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 13:38 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > > > > Has anyone else that is using 10.3 and evolution noticed their

Re: [opensuse] evolution contacts

On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 17:15 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 15:14 -0500, Bryen wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 15:51 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 12:52 -0500, Bryen wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 13:38 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: >

Re: [opensuse] evolution contacts

On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 15:14 -0500, Bryen wrote: > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 15:51 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 12:52 -0500, Bryen wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 13:38 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > > > > Has anyone else that is using 10.3 and evolution noticed their

Re: [opensuse] evolution contacts

On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 15:51 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 12:52 -0500, Bryen wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 13:38 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > > > Has anyone else that is using 10.3 and evolution noticed their contacts > > > list auto adding addresses even though t

Re: [opensuse] evolution contacts

On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 12:52 -0500, Bryen wrote: > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 13:38 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > > Has anyone else that is using 10.3 and evolution noticed their contacts > > list auto adding addresses even though that setting is turned off? Every > > time I reply to any email the O

Re: [opensuse] evolution contacts

On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 13:38 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > Has anyone else that is using 10.3 and evolution noticed their contacts > list auto adding addresses even though that setting is turned off? Every > time I reply to any email the OP's address is being added to my contacts > list. > > -

[opensuse] evolution contacts

Has anyone else that is using 10.3 and evolution noticed their contacts list auto adding addresses even though that setting is turned off? Every time I reply to any email the OP's address is being added to my contacts list. -- Ken Schneider UNIX since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE since 1998 --

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Wednesday 2007-10-17 at 17:22 -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote: * Bryen <> [10-17-07 10:49]: Carlos... Great posting, and I appreciate it. Sure wish I was able to get this FAQ when I joined in last week. Wonder why it is no longer available. Hm

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Bryen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-17-07 10:49]: > Carlos... Great posting, and I appreciate it. Sure wish I was able to > get this FAQ when I joined in last week. Wonder why it is no longer > available. Hmm.. Anyway, if there's a link to the full-blo

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 16:13 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > - From the previous list FAQ: > > FAQ - Frequently asked questions of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. > > ... > > Q2. Why do my replies go to the original poster and not the list? > A2. We do not "munge" the mail headers by inserting >

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Wednesday 2007-10-17 at 08:10 +0200, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: If the list Netiquette for this list is to reply to the List, why is the Reply-To field set to the original author? No, you got it wrong somehow: the list server doesn't set the "R

Re: [spam?] Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 22:15 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 02:09 +0200, Igor Jagec wrote: > > The problem of Evolution is that it is not very much configurable. For > > instance, we can't edit Reply headers, toolbars, and so on. > This is because it is gnome based and gnom

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 21:36 -0400, steve reilly wrote: > > There's no need about that on Thunderbird: http://tinyurl.com/2geaxo > Thanks! You're very welcome. You can also install Display mailing list header extension. BTW why I get this output for your GPG signature: Signature exists, but need

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 22:08 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > Well, we all know there are still some lame client programs out there. > In my case, if you looked, the reply-to is set to the list because _I_ > got fed up receiving two emails when people replied to my posts. Where is the reply-to fi

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 00:26 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > The Tuesday 2007-10-16 at 21:46 +0200, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: > > > No big discussion wanted here. This is a can of worms. But I have to > > ask: > > > > If the list Netiquette for th

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Igor Jagec wrote: > Steve, > There's no need about that on Thunderbird: http://tinyurl.com/2geaxo > > Cheers! > Thanks! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 02:09 +0200, Igor Jagec wrote: > On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 18:49 -0500, Bryen wrote: > > > Seems to me that some people don't realize that a Reply-to-list function > > is not obvious to all. And those who aren't aware of the semi-"hidden" > > feature suffer the wrath of others.

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 00:55 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > The Tuesday 2007-10-16 at 18:36 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > > >> If the list Netiquette for this list is to reply to the List, why is the > >> Reply-To field set to the original

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Tuesday 2007-10-16 at 20:52 -0400, steve reilly wrote: does just "cc"ing break the thread? It shouldn't. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Randall R Schulz wrote: >> I just "cut" from the CC line and "paste" into the TO line > > Widespread observation suggests that this would be considered a > Sisyphean task by 99.95 percent of all users of email. > > > RRS lol, good one...I had to

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 20:12 -0400, steve reilly wrote: > I just "cut" from the CC line and "paste" into the TO line Steve, There's no need about that on Thunderbird: http://tinyurl.com/2geaxo Cheers! -- Igor Jagec signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * steve reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-16-07 20:14]: > Bryen wrote: > > I'm using Evolution/iMAP into this list. Is there anything I can do > > in Evolution to make it switch things around so that a reply doesn't > > get double-sent? > > > I just "cu

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

On Tuesday 16 October 2007 17:12, steve reilly wrote: > Bryen wrote: > > I'm using Evolution/iMAP into this list. Is there anything I can > > do in Evolution to make it switch things around so that a reply > > doesn't get double-sent? > > I just "cut" from the CC line and "paste" into the TO line

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bryen wrote: > I'm using Evolution/iMAP into this list. Is there anything I can do in > Evolution to make it switch things around so that a reply doesn't get > double-sent? > I just "cut" from the CC line and "paste" into the TO line -BEGIN PGP

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 18:49 -0500, Bryen wrote: > Seems to me that some people don't realize that a Reply-to-list function > is not obvious to all. And those who aren't aware of the semi-"hidden" > feature suffer the wrath of others. Yep. There's a nice FAQ about Evolution: http://www.go-evolu

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 00:55 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > The Tuesday 2007-10-16 at 18:36 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > > >> If the list Netiquette for this list is to reply to the List, why is the > >> Reply-To field set to the original

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Tuesday 2007-10-16 at 18:36 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: If the list Netiquette for this list is to reply to the List, why is the Reply-To field set to the original author? Perhaps he, like me, got tired of all the duplicate emails (and se

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 21:46 +0200, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: > On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 13:50 -0500, Bryen wrote: > > > This makes it a real pain to follow the rules of the road here. And > > apparently from a recent post I observed, others are having this problem > > too. I'm not criticizing the r

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Tuesday 2007-10-16 at 21:46 +0200, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: No big discussion wanted here. This is a can of worms. But I have to ask: If the list Netiquette for this list is to reply to the List, why is the Reply-To field set to the original a

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Bryen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-16-07 17:31]: > Neither the Welcome message nor the auto-email from HELP give any > explanations of any kind. failing memory. It was from the suse-linux-e list welcome message and further explained in the faq. from

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 16:41 -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > * Roger Oberholtzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-16-07 15:55]: > > If the list Netiquette for this list is to reply to the List, why is > > the Reply-To field set to the original author? >

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Roger Oberholtzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-16-07 15:55]: > If the list Netiquette for this list is to reply to the List, why is > the Reply-To field set to the original author? a search of the archives will give you a thousand explanations and much

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 13:50 -0500, Bryen wrote: > This makes it a real pain to follow the rules of the road here. And > apparently from a recent post I observed, others are having this problem > too. I'm not criticizing the rules here, just asking for assistance in > how to follow the rules here

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 21:02 +0200, jdd wrote: > Bryen wrote: > > > I wouldn't exactly call it trimming. More like cut and replace. I > > have to delete the contents of the To: field, then copy the contents of > > the CC: field into the To: field. > > the second step is not usefull (the copy)

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

Bryen wrote: I wouldn't exactly call it trimming. More like cut and replace. I have to delete the contents of the To: field, then copy the contents of the CC: field into the To: field. the second step is not usefull (the copy) - at least not in seamonkey jdd -- http://www.dodin.net -- To

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 13:39 -0500, Sunny wrote: > On 10/16/07, Bryen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In an effort to stay in line with the rules of the road here, I have a > > question about Evolution. If I do a reply to a posting, obviously, it > > will only reply to the sender. > > > > However,

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 20:41 +0200, jdd wrote: > Bryen wrote: > > In an effort to stay in line with the rules of the road here, I have a > > question about Evolution. If I do a reply to a posting, obviously, it > > will only reply to the sender. > > > > However, if I reply all, then it replies t

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

Bryen wrote: In an effort to stay in line with the rules of the road here, I have a question about Evolution. If I do a reply to a posting, obviously, it will only reply to the sender. However, if I reply all, then it replies to the original poster and CC's the list.I've noticed that when

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

On 10/16/07, Sunny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Reply to list - Ctrl-R or "Message->Reply to List" > > Cheers > I haven't used Evolution for awhile, but that's how it was. -- Svetoslav Milenov (Sunny) Even the most advanced equipment in the hands of the ignorant is just a pile of scrap. -- T

Re: [opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

On 10/16/07, Bryen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In an effort to stay in line with the rules of the road here, I have a > question about Evolution. If I do a reply to a posting, obviously, it > will only reply to the sender. > > However, if I reply all, then it replies to the original poster and C

[opensuse] Evolution Netiquette Question

In an effort to stay in line with the rules of the road here, I have a question about Evolution. If I do a reply to a posting, obviously, it will only reply to the sender. However, if I reply all, then it replies to the original poster and CC's the list.I've noticed that when others do that,

Re: [opensuse] Evolution shows HTML as text, rather than rendering it

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Chris Worley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-15-07 16:09]: > I transferred all my Outlook mailboxes to Linux, and am using Evolution now. > > Normally, evolution doesn't have a problem w/ HTML email, but on some > of my old email, rather than it rendering t

[opensuse] Evolution shows HTML as text, rather than rendering it

I transferred all my Outlook mailboxes to Linux, and am using Evolution now. Normally, evolution doesn't have a problem w/ HTML email, but on some of my old email, rather than it rendering the HTML, it just shows the HTML text... for example, from the top of Evolutions sub-window containg the mess

Re: [opensuse] Evolution email link problem

On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 20:56 -0700, toshi esumi wrote: > > > If you're using Gnome, I would check Control Center-> > Preferred Applications first. > I use it in both Gnome and KDE depending upon what else I am doing. Ill check it in gnome first. ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ || | | [__ | | | |__

Re: [opensuse] Evolution email link problem

On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 09:56 -0700, Carl Spitzer wrote: > Seems clicking links no longer opens the browser. > I use Firefox and want that for the browser. > Evolution 2.4.0 and SuSE 10.0 fully updated. > > Which config file do I hack to fix this or is this one of those must fix > in YAST things? E

[opensuse] Evolution email link problem

Seems clicking links no longer opens the browser. I use Firefox and want that for the browser. Evolution 2.4.0 and SuSE 10.0 fully updated. Which config file do I hack to fix this or is this one of those must fix in YAST things? Expecially when it appears to be set in user.applications. in /.gno

[opensuse] Evolution will not start

Suse 10.2 all of a sudden developed a problem with Evolution. I tried installing Synce but ran into dependency problems. I installed evolution pilot where Yast upgraded some of the evolution packages. Of course synce still would not install. Then tried to start evolution. It comes up that configura

[opensuse] Evolution 2GB file size limit in OpenSuSE 10.2

I'm nearly fully converted from Exchange to Evolution, when consolidating folders... Evolution pops up a file size limit error. It's not an ext3 problem, as I have larger files... it seems Evolution specific. Any ideas? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail

[opensuse] Evolution + Exchange 2007

Morning, Wondering if there is an "easy" solution to connecting to an Exchange 2007 server from Evolution, on Suse10.2? The default packages don't support Exchange 2007, and I have been having issues trying to install the latest source for Evolution + Exchange connector.. Have got to this point: ch

Re: [opensuse] Evolution and dragging object to folder highlighting

How do, On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 09:19 +0200, Hans van der Merwe wrote: > I dont like to drag objects with the mouse, but sometimes its just the > easiest to move a mail item in Evolution to a different folder. When I > do this in 2.8 or 2.10 the destination folder does not highlight to > indicate t

[opensuse] Evolution and dragging object to folder highlighting

I dont like to drag objects with the mouse, but sometimes its just the easiest to move a mail item in Evolution to a different folder. When I do this in 2.8 or 2.10 the destination folder does not highlight to indicate that Im focusing the drop on that particular folder - is this just a Suse thin

Re: [opensuse] evolution-remove-duplicates

On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 12:56 -0400, taharka wrote: > How do list, > > Anyone here know of an evolution-remove-duplicates RPM for OpenSuse > 10.x? Searches only turn up RPMs for Fedora. > Sometimes though rarely a strange rpm will function. I have done this with older versions of SeaHorse when th

[opensuse] evolution-remove-duplicates

How do list, Anyone here know of an evolution-remove-duplicates RPM for OpenSuse 10.x? Searches only turn up RPMs for Fedora. TIA, taharka Lexington, Kentucky U.S.A. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [opensuse] Evolution vs. Thunderbird

I would agree with you Alexey. Another issue I have with Evolution is that when you move any email into a local folder is copies it, it will not just more it. The will be a copy of every moved email into a local folder in Evolutions deleted folder. I logged a bug, but from recognition I got a wontf

Re: [opensuse] Evolution vs. Thunderbird

It's all about features you need. For example I need my email client to save emails in HTML format. Evolution does not supports this, so I stick with Thunderbird. -- -Alexey Eremenko "Technologov" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [opensuse] Evolution vs. Thunderbird

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Mielke wrote: > Hi all, > > far from wanting another "religious war"... is it me or is Evolution more > feature-rich than Thunderbird? > > I even found references like this one: > http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/23/1648242 > >

Re: [opensuse] Evolution vs. Thunderbird

On Thursday 24 May 2007 14:04:42 Pueblo Native wrote: > Martin Mielke wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > far from wanting another "religious war"... is it me or is Evolution more > > feature-rich than Thunderbird? > > Maybe, but then again, there might be some situations where you don't > want all those fe

Re: [opensuse] Evolution vs. Thunderbird

How do, On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 07:09 -0600, Michael Folsom wrote: > Folks: > > Hate to break the chain of praise for Evolution but frankly I left it > and went back to Thunderbird because it is so incredibly slow. > > It take a long time to open up when tied to a Exchange server but who > knows w

Re: [opensuse] Evolution vs. Thunderbird

PROTECTED]> To: OpenSuSE Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 3:09:48 PM Subject: Re: [opensuse] Evolution vs. Thunderbird Folks: Hate to break the chain of praise for Evolution but frankly I left it and went back to Thunderbird because it is so incredibly slow. It take a long time to open up when tied to

  1   2   >