Randall R Schulz wrote:
In particular, you can get notification of an error (e.g., "disk full")
on the reply to a request much later than that of the request which
actually encountered the error. Software with complex ordering and
error sensitive behavior can be seriously undermined by asynchro
On Thursday 20 December 2007 21:23, Linda Walsh wrote:
> Randall R Schulz wrote:
> > In particular, you can get notification of an error (e.g., "disk
> > full") on the reply to a request much later than that of the
> > request which actually encountered the error. Software with complex
> > ordering
On Friday 21 December 2007 11:10, primm wrote:
> > NFS is kind of ugly itself, don't you think?
>
> Ugly? Naah! It's s neat. With nis and nfs anyone can login
> anywhere and get their own files and start work right after they've
> got a coffee. It just works. Just like NT server before someone
>
> NFS is kind of ugly itself, don't you think?
>
Ugly? Naah! It's s neat. With nis and nfs anyone can login anywhere and
get their own files and start work right after they've got a coffee. It just
works. Just like NT server before someone downloded a virus.
Sherry anyone?
Love Lynn x
-
Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Friday 21 December 2007 11:10, primm wrote:
NFS is kind of ugly itself, don't you think?
Ugly? Naah! It's s neat. With nis and nfs anyone can login
anywhere and get their own files and start work right after they've
got a coffee. It just works. Just like NT server
On Friday 21 December 2007 20:28:04 Randall R Schulz wrote:
> On Friday 21 December 2007 11:10, primm wrote:
> > > NFS is kind of ugly itself, don't you think?
> >
> > Ugly? Naah! It's s neat. With nis and nfs anyone can login
> > anywhere and get their own files and start work right after they
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Sunday 2007-12-23 at 08:10 +0100, primm wrote:
I setup an nfs server to export /home to 5 other clients. The same server
handles nis logins. No eggageration, it took me 1/2 hour most of which was
reading man exports until I discovered that Ya
You can get close with samba and cifs, but like Carlos says it's more
work.
There is also afs.
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 12:47:44PM +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> The Sunday 2007-12-23 at 08:10 +0100, primm wrote:
>
> >I setup an nfs server
On Sunday 23 December 2007 08:10:47 primm wrote:
> On Friday 21 December 2007 20:28:04 Randall R Schulz wrote:
> > On Friday 21 December 2007 11:10, primm wrote:
> > > > NFS is kind of ugly itself, don't you think?
> > >
> > > Ugly? Naah! It's s neat. With nis and nfs anyone can login
> > > any
primm wrote:
On Friday 21 December 2007 20:28:04 Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Friday 21 December 2007 11:10, primm wrote:
NFS is kind of ugly itself, don't you think?
Ugly? Naah! It's s neat. With nis and nfs anyone can login
anywhere and get their own files and start work right after they'v
On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 12:58 +0100, Anders Johansson wrote:
> On Sunday 23 December 2007 08:10:47 primm wrote:
> > On Friday 21 December 2007 20:28:04 Randall R Schulz wrote:
> > > On Friday 21 December 2007 11:10, primm wrote:
> > > > > NFS is kind of ugly itself, don't you think?
> > > >
> > > > U
On Sunday 23 December 2007 22:43:24 Hans Witvliet wrote:
> If you are not in control of your network, use openswan or strongswan
> for vpn, and put nfs-v3 over it. We have been using it in a test for
> connecting several locations. Works ok.
huh? You're connecting each client to the server using v
Anders Johansson wrote:
> On Sunday 23 December 2007 22:43:24 Hans Witvliet wrote:
>
>> If you are not in control of your network, use openswan or strongswan
>> for vpn, and put nfs-v3 over it. We have been using it in a test for
>> connecting several locations. Works ok.
>>
>
> huh? You're
On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 23:10 +0100, Anders Johansson wrote:
> On Sunday 23 December 2007 22:43:24 Hans Witvliet wrote:
> > If you are not in control of your network, use openswan or strongswan
> > for vpn, and put nfs-v3 over it. We have been using it in a test for
> > connecting several locations.
On Sunday 23 December 2007 23:22:58 James Knott wrote:
> Anders Johansson wrote:
> > On Sunday 23 December 2007 22:43:24 Hans Witvliet wrote:
> >> If you are not in control of your network, use openswan or strongswan
> >> for vpn, and put nfs-v3 over it. We have been using it in a test for
> >> con
> > nfs4 + kerberos gives authentication and encryption and requires very
> > little in the way of configuration. No offense, but VPN on a local LAN is
> > just silly
>
> Well, at my work they're rather paranoid.
> For some, we have to tunnel internet through the corporate network,
> For others, w
primm wrote:
nfs4 + kerberos gives authentication and encryption and requires very
little in the way of configuration. No offense, but VPN on a local LAN is
just silly
Well, at my work they're rather paranoid.
For some, we have to tunnel internet through the corporate network,
For others, we tun
On Monday 24 December 2007 02:40:58 Aaron Kulkis wrote:
> Hans Witvliet wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 23:10 +0100, Anders Johansson wrote:
> >> On Sunday 23 December 2007 22:43:24 Hans Witvliet wrote:
> >>> If you are not in control of your network, use openswan or strongswan
> >>> for vpn, and
Hans Witvliet wrote:
On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 23:10 +0100, Anders Johansson wrote:
On Sunday 23 December 2007 22:43:24 Hans Witvliet wrote:
If you are not in control of your network, use openswan or strongswan
for vpn, and put nfs-v3 over it. We have been using it in a test for
connecting several
Anders Johansson wrote:
On Monday 24 December 2007 02:40:58 Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Hans Witvliet wrote:
On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 23:10 +0100, Anders Johansson wrote:
On Sunday 23 December 2007 22:43:24 Hans Witvliet wrote:
If you are not in control of your network, use openswan or strongswan
for vp
20 matches
Mail list logo
