[opensuse-factory] GNOME in 10.1

2006-02-28 Thread Jens Siebert
Hi there, what version of GNOME will be integrated into Suse 10.1? Currently there still is 2.12.x in the factory-tree but 2.14 is currently in the final stages of development. Greetings Jens Siebert Viel oder wenig? Schnell oder langsam? Unbegrenzt surfen + telefonieren ohne Zeit- und Volume

Re: [opensuse-factory] GNOME in 10.1

2006-02-28 Thread David Wright
Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 12:55 schrieb Jens Siebert: > Hi there, > > what version of GNOME will be integrated into Suse 10.1? Currently there > still is 2.12.x in the factory-tree but 2.14 is currently in the final > stages of development. > > Greetings > > Jens Siebert > I would guess that,

Re: [opensuse-factory] GNOME in 10.1

2006-02-28 Thread houghi
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 01:27:03PM +0100, David Wright wrote: > Don't forget the SUSE guys have to do a lot of integration work to make sure > it works reliably within the framework of SUSE Linux, it isn't just a case of > taking the 2.14 source and compiling it and bundling it. There needs to be

[opensuse-factory] People with a Tyan Tiger s2460 mainboard

2006-02-28 Thread Joop Boonen
All, I would like to know if there is anyone out there who has a Tyan Tiger S2460. I have a problem with it in combination with opensuse 10.1 b2 and up. It craches with EC((C) scrub) enabled in combination with ecad. I have 2 512MB ECC DIMMS onboard slot 0 en 1. Regards, Joop. I liked the FOSDE

[opensuse-factory] Hardware database (Would be very useful)

2006-02-28 Thread Joop Boonen
All, Especially SuSE people, I forgot to ask something at the FOSDEM. I notice when i have a bug. That you (understandably) don't have the same hardware in the house. So i was wondering if it might be interresting to have a database with all hardware of all beta testers in it. So you can ask an o

Re: [opensuse-factory] Hardware database (Would be very useful)

2006-02-28 Thread Pascal Bleser
Joop Boonen wrote: I forgot to ask something at the FOSDEM. I notice when i have a bug. That you (understandably) don't have the same hardware in the house. So i was wondering if it might be interresting to have a database with all hardware of all beta testers in it. So you can ask an other beta

Re: [opensuse-factory] Hardware database (Would be very useful)

2006-02-28 Thread houghi
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:22:23PM +0100, Pascal Bleser wrote: > Joop Boonen wrote: > >I forgot to ask something at the FOSDEM. I notice when i have a bug. That > >you (understandably) don't have the same hardware in the house. > > > >So i was wondering if it might be interresting to have a databas

Re: [opensuse-factory] Hardware database (Would be very useful)

2006-02-28 Thread David Wright
Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 14:22 schrieb Pascal Bleser: > Joop Boonen wrote: > > I forgot to ask something at the FOSDEM. I notice when i have a bug. That > > you (understandably) don't have the same hardware in the house. > > > > So i was wondering if it might be interresting to have a database

Re: [opensuse-factory] GNOME in 10.1

2006-02-28 Thread Martin Schlander
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 13:55, houghi wrote: > At a certain moment there is a version freeze. Perhaps this date should reevalutated for 10.1. I don't suspect that the current delays due to the packagemanager issues were anticipated at that point. Not only Gnome 2.14 but also KDE 3.5.2 will

Re: [opensuse-factory] GNOME in 10.1

2006-02-28 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:54:00PM +0100, Martin Schlander wrote: > On Tuesday 28 February 2006 13:55, houghi wrote: > > At a certain moment there is a version freeze. > > Perhaps this date should reevalutated for 10.1. > > I don't suspect that the current delays due to the packagemanager issue

Re: [opensuse-factory] GNOME in 10.1

2006-02-28 Thread David Wright
Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 14:54 schrieb Martin Schlander: > On Tuesday 28 February 2006 13:55, houghi wrote: > > At a certain moment there is a version freeze. > > Perhaps this date should reevalutated for 10.1. > > I don't suspect that the current delays due to the packagemanager issues > were

Re: [opensuse-factory] GNOME in 10.1

2006-02-28 Thread houghi
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:54:00PM +0100, Martin Schlander wrote: > On Tuesday 28 February 2006 13:55, houghi wrote: > > At a certain moment there is a version freeze. > > Perhaps this date should reevalutated for 10.1. > > I don't suspect that the current delays due to the packagemanager issue

Re: [opensuse-factory] Hardware database (Would be very useful)

2006-02-28 Thread David Wright
Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 14:48 schrieb houghi: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:22:23PM +0100, Pascal Bleser wrote: > > Joop Boonen wrote: > > >I forgot to ask something at the FOSDEM. I notice when i have a bug. > > > That you (understandably) don't have the same hardware in the house. > > > > >

Re: [opensuse-factory] Hardware database (Would be very useful)

2006-02-28 Thread houghi
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 03:09:19PM +0100, David Wright wrote: > Probably more helpful for the Dev's, say they've supposedly fixed a problem > which manefests itself on specific hardware or a combination of hardware, > they can look for a tester who has that configuration, and ask them to test >

Re: [opensuse-factory] GNOME in 10.1

2006-02-28 Thread Andreas Jaeger
Jens Siebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi there, > > what version of GNOME will be integrated into Suse 10.1? Currently there > still is 2.12.x in the factory-tree but 2.14 is currently in the final stages > of development. We will stay with the GNOME 2.12 version. When we started planning

Re: [opensuse-factory] GNOME in 10.1

2006-02-28 Thread Andreas Jaeger
houghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 01:27:03PM +0100, David Wright wrote: >> Don't forget the SUSE guys have to do a lot of integration work to make sure >> it works reliably within the framework of SUSE Linux, it isn't just a case >> of >> taking the 2.14 source and co

[opensuse-factory] Apt

2006-02-28 Thread Marcel Hilzinger
Hi, where do I find apt on beta5? Was it dropped?? Marcel Hilzinger - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [opensuse-factory] Apt

2006-02-28 Thread Robert Schiele
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:38:52PM +0100, Marcel Hilzinger wrote: > Hi, > > where do I find apt on beta5? > > Was it dropped?? Please learn to use a browser to look up package locations in http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/suse/ yourself. You first have to sel

Re: [opensuse-factory] Apt

2006-02-28 Thread Marcel Hilzinger
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:08:33PM +0100, Robert Schiele wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:38:52PM +0100, Marcel Hilzinger wrote: > > Hi, > > > > where do I find apt on beta5? > > > > Was it dropped?? > > Please learn to use a browser to look up package locations in > http://download.opensuse.

Re: [opensuse-factory] XML File for repositories

2006-02-28 Thread houghi
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 04:21:55PM +0100, houghi wrote: > So please let all know what your ideas are. What does SUSE already have? > How do you see the XML layout? OK. Nobody? Ik have thought up two structures. Please give me some feedback. First structure: Belgium Skynet (ftp.skynet.be)

Re: [opensuse-factory] Apt

2006-02-28 Thread Reinhard Gimbel
Marcel Hilzinger schrieb: > where do I find apt on beta5? > > Was it dropped?? More or less ... AFAIK "apt" was replaced by "smart" because "smart" can various / more formats. Correct me if I'm wrong ... -- Never give up ! Gruß, Reinhard. Thread in "c.o.l.m": "Do we need wine ?" The best an

Re: [opensuse-factory] Apt

2006-02-28 Thread Robert Schiele
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:18:31PM +0100, Marcel Hilzinger wrote: > I know, that's in the Factory tree. But I wonder, why ARCHIVES.gz So, why do you ask for the location if you know it. Do you think we are all quite bored and are just waiting to do some useless stuff? > doesn't list it and I can

Re: [opensuse-factory] Apt

2006-02-28 Thread Marcel Hilzinger
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:03:11PM +0100, Robert Schiele wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:18:31PM +0100, Marcel Hilzinger wrote: > > I know, that's in the Factory tree. But I wonder, why ARCHIVES.gz > > So, why do you ask for the location if you know it. Do you think we are all > quite bored a

Re: [opensuse-factory] XML File for repositories

2006-02-28 Thread Azerion
Hey, there is an method for designing databases the best way. Maybe you should take a look at that cause it causes the most efficient way of datahandling. Check this :D Product table: 1 | Cookies | 4$ 2 | Milk| 50ct 3 | Potatoes| 4$ 4 | Cola

Re: [opensuse-factory] Apt

2006-02-28 Thread Azerion
> So, why do you ask for the location if you know it. Do you think we are > all quite bored and are just waiting to do some useless stuff? > > > doesn't list it and I can't find it on CD1-CD5. > > $ zgrep apt-0.5.15cnc7 > /pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/ARCHIVES.gz | wc -l >

Re: [opensuse-factory] GNOME in 10.1

2006-02-28 Thread Frank-Michael Fischer
> > General Version Freeze is with Beta1, > > Andreas > I can't help it, but when will the Version Freeze of the package manager then happen? With 10.2 RC1? ;-) FMF - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional c

Re: [opensuse-factory] XML File for repositories

2006-02-28 Thread houghi
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:12:13PM +0100, Azerion wrote: > Hey, > > there is an method for designing databases the best way. Maybe you should > take > a look at that cause it causes the most efficient way of datahandling. Check > this :D > > Product table: > 1 | Cookies | 4$ > 2 | M

Re: [opensuse-factory] XML File for repositories

2006-02-28 Thread Azerion
> Again, I have no real experience with XML, so I have no idea how to get > to what you are talking about above. > > > houghi I dont have that neither: The key is to prevent double info. Things that don't change have to be in the top of the structure. It is stupid to have a line about the FTP-ad

Re: [opensuse-factory] XML File for repositories

2006-02-28 Thread houghi
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 12:56:09AM +0100, Azerion wrote: > > Again, I have no real experience with XML, so I have no idea how to get > > to what you are talking about above. > > > > > > houghi > > I dont have that neither: > > The key is to prevent double info. Things that don't change have to be

[opensuse-factory] Timezone installation

2006-02-28 Thread houghi
I was looking at the installation and during the installation, the default is Region: USA and the Time Zone is Mountain. In content it however says: TIMEZONE America/Los_Angeles I am not sure wether this is related or not. I did a grep on mountain an the CD1 and found nothing. Is there a way to c

Re: [opensuse-factory] XML File for repositories

2006-02-28 Thread Azerion
> That would be nice. Remember that with what you propose it will be: > > ftp.skynet.be > ftp > /pub/suse/distribution/ > 10.0 > i386 > i586 > 10.1 >

[opensuse-factory] Bugzilla responses

2006-02-28 Thread houghi
What is the correct procedure if a bug is posted into bugzilla? I put in a bug and after a while it will be assigned. What must be done if you see that nothing is happening? e.g. 144614, 144620, 144616 and 144615 are open for a while. I don't want to nag in bugzilla and don't want to flood the pe

Re: [opensuse-factory] XML File for repositories

2006-02-28 Thread houghi
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 02:59:10AM +0100, Azerion wrote: > That problem will stay that way, because we cannot make the URL-generator too > dynamic. We could make an superior xml-sheet with almost no duoble > information but that would be a mess to work with or to extend in the future. > In my pr

Re: [opensuse-factory] XML File for repositories

2006-02-28 Thread Azerion
> > > > > > ftp.gwdg.de > > ftp,http,rsync > > Well, this is someting I did not know was possible. That creates new > opportunities. :-) > > > > > > > > > pub/opensuse/distrib

Re: [opensuse-factory] GNOME in 10.1

2006-02-28 Thread Andreas Jaeger
Frank-Michael Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> General Version Freeze is with Beta1, >> >> Andreas >> > I can't help it, but when will the Version Freeze of the package manager > then happen? With 10.2 RC1? ;-) Should be 10.1 xxx. But with self developed software we have "feature fre

Re: [opensuse-factory] XML File for repositories

2006-02-28 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi, it's very fancy to talk about XML, but please: Whenever you talk about XML, also talk about DTDs. Without a DTD, XML is not more than "every element that starts also has to end, and you may nest elements". May that's why most peaply are so excited by XML: They just wrap something in XML. A

Re: [opensuse-factory] XML File for repositories

2006-02-28 Thread Azerion
Op woensdag 1 maart 2006 08:30, schreef Ulrich Windl: > Hi, > > it's very fancy to talk about XML, but please: Whenever you talk about XML, > also talk about DTDs. > > Without a DTD, XML is not more than "every element that starts also has to > end, and you may nest elements". May that's why most p

Re: [opensuse-factory] People with a Tyan Tiger s2460 mainboard

2006-02-28 Thread Ulrich Windl
On 28 Feb 2006 at 14:10, Joop Boonen wrote: > All, > > I would like to know if there is anyone out there who has a Tyan Tiger > S2460. I have a problem with it in combination with opensuse 10.1 b2 and > up. It craches with EC((C) scrub) enabled in combination with ecad. I have > 2 512MB ECC DIMMS

Re: [opensuse-factory] GNOME in 10.1

2006-02-28 Thread Ulrich Windl
On 28 Feb 2006 at 14:55, Marcus Meissner wrote: [...] > Allowing new features now would be a nightmare in itself, so it is very > unlikely. I agree, the new package manager is already enough ;-) Regards, Ulrich - To unsubscrib

Re: [opensuse-factory] XML File for repositories

2006-02-28 Thread Ulrich Windl
On 1 Mar 2006 at 0:25, houghi wrote: > Again, I have no real experience with XML, so I have no idea how to get > to what you are talking about above. > The PLEASE, visit http://www.w3c.org/ and learn XML before you design!!! Regards, Ulrich