Hi,
I just tried to install as many packages as possible and found something
very annoying: Conflicts are only shown one at a time. You can not solve
several conflicts at a time like before.
Should I file a bug or is this intended behaviour?
Regards,
Andreas
--
Andreas Vetter
Andreas Vetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to install as many packages as possible and found something
> very annoying: Conflicts are only shown one at a time. You can not solve
> several conflicts at a time like before.
>
> Should I file a bug or is this intended behavio
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Andreas Vetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just tried to install as many packages as possible and found something
> > very annoying: Conflicts are only shown one at a time. You can not solve
> > several conflicts at a time like be
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 09:48, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Andreas Vetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I just tried to install as many packages as possible and found something
> > very annoying: Conflicts are only shown one at a time. You can not solve
> > several conflicts at a time like before.
>
> I chose to install xmms with yast sw (beta8) - apparently xmms depends on
> xmms-lib which is also installed. This is all very nice - except in earlier
> versions of SL you would be informed of dependencies before they're
> installed - enabling you to change your mind - or at least know what's
>
Martin Schlander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 21 March 2006 09:48, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> Andreas Vetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I just tried to install as many packages as possible and found something
>> > very annoying: Conflicts are only shown one at a time. You can not s
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Martin Schlander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I chose to install xmms with yast sw (beta8) - apparently xmms depends on
> > xmms-lib which is also installed. This is all very nice - except in earlier
> > versions of SL you would be informed of d
Andreas Vetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree to delay the discussion. But we should also discuss for SLES 10.
Please discuss this on the SLES beta lists - or open a bugreport for
that...
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH,
On 22 Mar 2006 at 9:50, Andreas Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
[...]
> > I'd like to discuss this and similar issues once we have 10.1 out, so
> > that we can plan on what to do for 10.2...
>
> I agree to delay the discussion. But we should also discuss for SLES 10.
> > I chose to install xmms with yast sw (beta8) - apparently xmms depends on
> > xmms-lib which is also installed. This is all very nice - except in
> > earlier versions of SL you would be informed of dependencies before
> > they're installed - enabling you to change your mind - or at least know
>
> Hi!
>
> I'd suggest not to release 10.1 unless ready. The damage of a bad release
> will chase away a lot of people from SuSE, and from Linux in general.
>
> The current state seems "alpha" to me: It's not clear what the final
> features should be, and it's still full with bugs.
>
> It would be a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Martin Schlander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tuesday 21 March 2006 09:48, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >> Andreas Vetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > I just tried to install as many packages as possible and found something
> >> > very annoyin
Fedora Core 5 is out and the first review is out, nice reviewfor
Linux-experts. Every Windows-user will think twice or trice :D:
http://lunapark6.com/?p=481
I hope SUSE won't have the same.
"There was enough glitches in the second install, that I can say if you have a
Nvidia card or a moth
On Thursday 23 March 2006 00:36, Azerion wrote:
> I hope SUSE won't have the same.
>
> "Something tells me Fedora could have gone through a longer test cycle to
> iron out these quirks,"
Well, most of the problems with 10.1 seem to be related to the packagemanager.
The upside of the packagema
Azerion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Especially the last one I really don't want to see. I want 10.1 out, I really
So do I ;-)
> do. When I got beta3 I thought that it would be out in a month or so. I was
> on the edge everytime to see new things and see the improvements, so I am not
> lay b
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 09:46:25PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Azerion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Especially the last one I really don't want to see. I want 10.1 out, I
> > really
>
> So do I ;-)
>
> > do. When I got beta3 I thought that it would be out in a month or so. I was
> > o
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 10:19:20PM +0100, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 09:46:25PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > Azerion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Especially the last one I really don't want to see. I want 10.1 out, I
> > > really
> >
> > So do I ;-)
> >
> >
> I'm currently trying to get an overview of where we are with SUSE
> Linux 10.1. If you have issues that you consider real showstoppers,
> please tell them here publically - with bugzilla numbers if possible.
> I'll read everything but won't have time to comment on it in as much
> details as appr
On Thursday 23 March 2006 21:46, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> I'm currently trying to get an overview of where we are with SUSE
> Linux 10.1. If you have issues that you consider real showstoppers,
> please tell them here publically - with bugzilla numbers if possible.
- Networkmanager unable to conne
> I'd like to add to this that I just tried to add factory to rug:
>
> rug sa --type=yum
> http://mirrors.kernel.org/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/
>suse factory
>
> The progress bar stopped at 33% - but my harddisk, cpu and ram (512 megs)
> consumption ran amok - using at a time
Hello,
> I'd like to add to this that I just tried to add factory to rug:
>
> rug sa --type=yum
> http://mirrors.kernel.org/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/suse
>
> factory
>
> The progress bar stopped at 33% - but my harddisk, cpu and ram (512 megs)
> consumption ran amok - u
On Friday 24 March 2006 18:42, Azerion wrote:
> Lot of work to go but I see that the last 3 days some things are going a
> lot faster then before...
Ok, maybe I should've mentioned that I'm still on beta8.. only updated the
kernel - which was updated without warning as a dependency I assume - whe
> Maybe also the new release cycle should be reconsidered. If 10.1 is shipped
> in a rather buggy state - then 8 months is a long wait - maybe it should be
> considered going back to 6 months for 10.2 if 10.1 is not really up to par.
Try to get it next to Vista so they can be 'fair' compared. It g
23 matches
Mail list logo
