Congratulations on the release! I appreciate all the work you guys
have put into WebWork/XWork, and I look forward to what's coming next.
Anoop
On Feb 8, 2004, at 10:52 PM, Patrick Lightbody wrote:
I'm pleased to announce the release of WebWork 2.0. You can download it
at:
https://webwork.dev.
I'm currently tossing around the idea of a XWork sanity checker. I'm
guessing something that runs as an ant task and checks a lot of the
things that have bit us in the ass during development.
Here are some examples of questions I want it to answer:
Do all the actions exist?
Do all the intercep
Yeah. It's not a big task, after all. (Maybe it is and I just don't
notice, since it's so trivial to do with ant.)
The latter is the case. It is a very big task, and you could easily
increase your development efficiency by 100% if you worked with an
exploded ear rather than earing and deploying
a
new one, even in the same session.
Anoop
On Dec 8, 2003, at 12:35 AM, Patrick Lightbody wrote:
Have your component implement Disposable.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Anoop Ranganath
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:27 PM
To: [EMAIL
How do I go about telling the IoC container to release a component?
For example, I have a List I am maintaining on the session. In a
particular action, I process the list and then I am done with it.
Right now, it seems the only option is to take the List and remove each
item. If I set the i
liche Nachricht-----
Von: Anoop Ranganath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Dezember 2003 21:08
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [OS-webwork] action chaining fun
I'm looking to somehow implement chain-like behaviour. I'd like to
perform one action completely, with all it
I'm looking to somehow implement chain-like behaviour. I'd like to
perform one action completely, with all it's interceptors, and then
perform another action completely with all it's interceptors. The
catch is that I want some parameters passed between them.
Any ideas?
Anoop
-
Problem solved. Classic case of PEBKAC. I was looking for a
particular behavior, and my code was the problem.
As far as the debugger goes, it was working properly. I was just
looking for a copout.
Anoop
On Dec 3, 2003, at 9:59 AM, Jason Carreira wrote:
Did you validate your XML against the
I have a default-interceptor-ref specified in my xwork.xml. here's the
snippet:
As you can see, it's sitting between the interceptors and
global-results. For some reason it's not getting picked up by the
application. I set a breakpoint in
XMLConfigurationProvider.loadDefaultInterceptorRe
Or just make the page at your domain one big frame, and have the frame
point to your home page.
On Dec 2, 2003, at 11:55 AM, John Patterson wrote:
Hi, I know this is off topic but I was wondering how others handle
this issue.
I want my domainwww.domain.co.ukto forward directly to my home pag
I finally realized that I needed to set "fieldvalue=true" to get my
checkbox to propertly set the boolean on my object (using ModelDriven).
Now I'm having an even more annoying problem. Once I set it to true
and it gets saved to the database, I can't uncheck it anymore! In
ParametersIntercep
version are you using, the
new beta2?
-Original Message-----
From: Anoop Ranganath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 3:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] escaping text in text fields
We're having an issue with our WW2 application and we're not sur
e escaping them... Which version are you using, the
new beta2?
-Original Message-----
From: Anoop Ranganath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 3:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] escaping text in text fields
We're having an issue with our WW2 applicatio
We're having an issue with our WW2 application and we're not sure
whether it's a bug or a feature.
In a text field, enter ® and click Save once. It returns us to the
form, but now instead of the text ® we see the Registered symbol.
Viewing the source of the web page, shows that it is still sh
I'm wondering if this fix is in also. I am still breaking like this in
CVS.
Thanks,
Anoop
On Nov 18, 2003, at 9:23 AM, Fred Lamuette wrote:
Is your fix committed ?
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de
Patrick Lightbody
Envoye : mardi 18 novem
At first I thought this would be a pain in the ass, but after reading
about OGNL, I think this may actually be a lot easier. Our domain
objects have some properties that are lists. Right now, we can easily
display them on screen by iterating through the lists in our velocity
template. Howeve
I'm having this same issue, so I'd like to know what I'm doing wrong also.
Anoop
On Wednesday, October 15, 2003, at 05:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi y'all! :)
Does it make sense that the type converters are not being called to convert fields back into their String (presentation) format? I'
where'd it go?
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lis
pt() method, and add them as action errors. The second caveat
is every call to an action results in a database hit. I'm sure there
are ways around this, but for our purposes
Any comments?
Anoop
On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 11:31 PM, Anoop Ranganath wrote:
I just started using
Is it possible for an interceptor to be Aware? I'd like an interceptor
to be handed a DAO. Ideally XWork would take care of it, because the
DAO has dependencies also. Is this possible?
Anoop
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
On Wednesday, October 1, 2003, at 11:35 AM, Jason Carreira wrote:
Is your Set Serializable? Is it marked as transient?
Hmm, the Set comes from Hibernate, and according to Hibernate,
net.sf.hibernate.collection.PersistentCollection implements
java.io.Serializable. There are a lot of transient fi
I scoped a component at the session level, and it is being preserved.
There is one problem, though. The component has a Set on it, and this
Set does _not_ gets saved between requests. Everything else will be
ok, but that one field will be null.
Do I need to make it a component with an enable
I'm trying to get the type conversion working, and adding a breakpoint
in XWorkConverter.convertValue I'm seeing that it's trying to load
com.opensymphony.xwork.util.CompountRoot-conversion.properties rather
than load the -conversion.properties for my object. Any idea why
that's the case?
Tha
I've tried type conversion two ways, and both ways, my type converter
is not being called.
The first way, I used the example from the wiki and created a
RetrieveProductAction-conversion.properties that contained
product.lastChecked=com.mypackage.MyConverter
and MyConverter was a subclass of De
can the key in the Action-conversion.properties file be any valid ognl
expression.
for example, I'd like to specifically format a date that is a property
on the product object which is on the action, can I put
product.lastChecked = com.ranganath.LongDateConverter
in the MyAction-conversion.pro
of course, two seconds after I post, i remembered xwork's type
conversion facility.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Opensymphony-we
I'm using Velocity with WW2, and I'm trying to figure out how to format
data presented with the TextField tags. Any ideas?
Anoop
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
I'm beginning work on my velocity templates for my ww2 app, and I'm
having a bit of an issue. Ideally, I'd have a template that contains
my header and footer, and then a token that inserts the appropriate
screen into it.
In my xwork.xml, I would have a result that points to screen1.vm, and
sc
If you're using domain objects or persisting the data, I would suggest
you use Object properties. Say, for instance, that you have an Invoice
domain object. You might have an CreateInvoiceAction Action class:
Ah. That's actually what I'm doing right now. So what makes this any
different than a F
So coming from other frameworks, I'm surprised to see that while
allowing FormBeans, WW2 doesn't encourage them anymore than just
putting the properties on the action. While I can't see a problem with
it, there's a voice in my head telling me to run away screaming.
As my last post mentioned, H
I just started using WebWork2 yesterday, and I'm sold. A new
techonology hasn't kept me smiling for so long thinking "this is right"
since I first started playing with Ruby.
I'm writing a vanilla database backed webapp for my client, and I'm
trying to decide where I should put the persistence
31 matches
Mail list logo
