ting to improve this. From the pastebin
link Dave listed below, they have it up to ~80Mb now
David Lang
On Oct 2, 2014 9:55 AM, "Dave Taht" wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 12:10:46PM -0400, Weedy wrote:
On 30/03/14 06:29 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 02:24:44PM -0400, We
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 18:39 -0700, David Lang wrote
Well being used to something bad, doesn't mean things cannot get better.
Routers (to which I have some experience at), rarely have processes
running that wouldn't matter i
e a lot of swap" to cover this
up.
In spite of what some people say, it's far from a clear-cut win to disable
overcommit.
David Lang
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Sun, 10 Aug 2014, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hello,
Le 10 août 2014 09:44, "Etienne Champetier"
a écrit :
Le 10 août 2014 18:18, "Stefan Monnier" a
écrit :
It would be great to have all feeds in one place, on GitHub.
I think making oneself dependent upon a commercial company
withou
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, John Crispin wrote:
On 28/07/2014 10:41, David Lang wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, John Crispin wrote:
On 27/07/2014 23:07, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Note: this is *not* anyhow officially related to the OpenWrt!
This is my private request, I use OpenWrt ML just to reach ppl
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, John Crispin wrote:
On 27/07/2014 23:07, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Note: this is *not* anyhow officially related to the OpenWrt! This
is my private request, I use OpenWrt ML just to reach ppl
interested in this topic. Also I can't guarantee my development
will success and can't
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014, Gert Doering wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:18:46AM -0700, David Lang wrote:
While it is nice to say that IPv6 has a large address space and so nobody
will ever scan it, I don't believe it.
Don't believe. Try math. 2^64 is big enough that if you manage to
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 03:50:24PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
I'm well aware of all the bullshit that is knocking on my doors all
day. Point is, firewalls on the *routers* are not goint to help the
laptop that moves around, attaches to a
On Sat, 19 Jul 2014, Gert Doering wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 04:08:02PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
go do a tcpdump of your WAN interface some time, look at all the
attacks that are going on there (especially with an ISP that's not
blocking it for you)
I'm well aware of all th
erface some time, look at all the
attacks that are going on there (especially with an ISP that's not
blocking it for you)
If nothing ever got compromised from network attacks, the malware
wouldn't bother trying them.
David Lang
___
openw
ult should be idiot-friendly. Having the easy knob to
toggle to make it 'expert-friendly' should be enough. If the 'expert'
can't flip that knob, they can't secure their network either.
FWIW,
Bill
P.S. No, my printer is not v6-ready, either, but let's assum
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014, Benjamin Cama wrote:
Le jeudi 17 juillet 2014 à 17:03 -0700, David Lang a écrit :
But the reality is that hackers and worms have shown that leaving systems
exposed to the Internet is just a Bad Idea.
Do you mean, all the hackers and worms we see today despite all these
by the way, link local addresses are not going to be used for these devices,
because they will all have some 'cloud' feature that will require they have a
way to phone home.
David Lang
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014, David Lang wrote:
Every IPv4 home router I have seen defaults to 'blo
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Gui Iribarren wrote:
On 17/07/14 21:03, David Lang wrote:
I know that IPv6 designers pine for the "good old days" of the Internet
when no security was needed.
But the reality is that hackers and worms have shown that leaving
systems exposed to the Internet is
at it was safe for
them to be exposed.
But that's not the world we live in.
David Lang
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, Lyme Marionette wrote:
- Original Message -
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 2:10:53 PM "Gui Iribarren"
wrote:
Benjamin is giving some great examples of re
can actually knock you off the network
due to broken ISPs, cerowrt has spent a lot of time over the last couple of
months working on this. I would suggest at least reading through the issues
they've been having making things work in the real world before enabling this.
David Lang
Also
On Fri, 9 May 2014, John Crispin wrote:
(maybe i should start to only send the acks for this series, it will
save us a lot of time)
no, giving the reasons for each nack is valuable.
David Lang
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel
s are beginning.
David Lang
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Fri, 28 Mar 2014, Alan.Hoo wrote:
Hello Everyone
how can I remove the nf_conntrack kernel module from OpenWRT System ?
creating a build config without it is hard, there are a huge number of indirect
dependencies that trigger it, and most of them won't show up until you disable
some other
squashfs code to allow it to deal with badblocks.
has this been done? was I misinformed on what the problem is? or is this still a
problem and devices with nand flash can work, but only if they avoid squashfs?
David Lang
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
e rest of your system.
There are so many ways in that modifying the source code you download in a way
that will still compile on a project that changes as rapidly as openwrt is a
very daunting task, and you should expect that they have far better uses of
their time.
David Lang
At minimu
As I understand it, lawyers are looking over the situation with this driver
before it gets included in the upstream kernel.
David Lang
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013, Wojciech Kromer wrote:
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 14:34:44 +0100
From: Wojciech Kromer
Reply-To: OpenWrt Development List
To: OpenWrt
orts of it working for people?
do you need someone to sponsor reviews of it?
There are a lot of people out there who would like to run OpenWRT on their ADSL
router (myself included), so I would think that there's interest in adding
support for these sorts of devices.
David Lang
On Fri, 8 No
-tftp process. I just get timeouts on
the tftp.
Any suggestions?
David Lang
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
If nothing else, there is support for new hardware all the time.
A lot of people get really nervous about installing from a dev tree onto their
one and only router. They really should be able to install from a release before
the hardware is discontinued.
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2013-02-10 12:05 PM, David Lang wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013, Felix Fietkau wrote:
Newer OpenWrt versions put the device path in the wifi sections
instead of the MAC address.
This is a recent build from Trunk, could you give me an example of
ttle messy with lots of networks. I'll look into it though.
David Lang
- Felix
On 2013-02-10 11:25 AM, Mitch Kelly wrote:
Hi,
Removing option disabled 1 into 'wireless' and adding in the SSID etc before
you build should do the trick, You should not need to add the MAC address
i
ead is that two new radio sections get created, with the
MAC address in them, default SSID, and disabled.
How can I work around this without having to gather all the MAC addresses ahead
of time and putting them in the config files that I push out to the router
nwrt images for the 3700v2 and 3800 in the past, but
I am not as familiar as I would need to be with the boot process and firmware
signatures needed to get things loaded to move forward with this.
If someone can coach me through the process, I would
101 - 129 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
