Re: [OPSAWG] [Mud] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-ol-05.txt

2024-04-22 Thread Eliot Lear
Michael: On 22.04.2024 19:29, Michael Richardson wrote: 0) Why is this document still kicking around the WG? (Too bad it doesn't have the word "mud" in the filename.) 1) I find the title confusing. 2) I don't think that AUGMENT does what you want, because YANG is not extensible in the way

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-ol-05.txt

2024-04-22 Thread Michael Richardson
0) Why is this document still kicking around the WG? (Too bad it doesn't have the word "mud" in the filename.) 1) I find the title confusing. 2) I don't think that AUGMENT does what you want, because YANG is not extensible in the way we are used to doing with IANA. 3) I think that you have

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

2024-04-22 Thread Victor Lopez
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts Victor From: OPSAWG on behalf of Joe Clarke (jclarke) Date: Friday, 19 April 2024 at 16:33 To: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work We’re up to WG LC on these four drafts. And while we did an IPR poll

Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: Attachment circuits work

2024-04-22 Thread Julian Lucek
I support the progression of these documents. They fill an important gap by modelling attachment circuits in more detail than had been done in the past, and therefore have high value. thanks Julian Juniper Business Use Only From: OPSAWG on behalf of "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" Date: Friday,

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

2024-04-22 Thread Victor Lopez
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts Victor From: OPSAWG on behalf of Joe Clarke (jclarke) Date: Monday, 25 September 2023 at 17:29 To: opsawg@ietf.org , mohamed.boucadair , Richard Roberts , Oscar González de Dios , samir.barg...@gmail.com , Wubo (lana) ,

Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13-06.txt.

2024-04-22 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Douglas, Please see inline. Cheers, Med De : Douglas Gash (dcmgash) Envoyé : lundi 22 avril 2024 11:22 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET Cc : John Heasley ; Andrej Ota ; Thorsten Dahm ; opsawg@ietf.org Objet : Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13-06.txt. Thanks

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

2024-04-22 Thread Oscar González de Dios
Dear Joe, all No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts. Best Regards, Oscar From: OPSAWG On Behalf Of Joe Clarke (jclarke) Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 4:32 PM To: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work AVISO/WARNING: Este correo

Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13-06.txt.

2024-04-22 Thread Douglas Gash (dcmgash)
Thanks Mohamed, please see inline… From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com Date: Friday, 19 April 2024 at 18:31 To: Douglas Gash (dcmgash) Cc: John Heasley , Andrej Ota , Thorsten Dahm , opsawg@ietf.org Subject: RE: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13-06.txt. Hi Douglas,

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG Adoption Call for draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03

2024-04-22 Thread Alex Huang Feng
Dear OPSAWG, I support the adoption of this draft. I think centralising the different used terms in one doc is useful. Regards, Alex > On 10 Apr 2024, at 20:05, Henk Birkholz wrote: > > Dear OPSAWG members, > > this email starts a call for Working Group Adoption of > >>