---BeginMessage---
Hello,
the Polipo in
https://www.torproject.org/dist/vidalia-bundles/vidalia-bundle-0.2.2.22-alpha-0.2.10-ppc.dmg
crashes on startup as follows:
dyld: /Applications/Vidalia.app.new/Contents/MacOS/polipo Undefined
symbols:
/Applications/Vidalia.app.new/Contents/MacOS/polipo
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:20:10 +
Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net wrote:
Thank you Juliusz, I appreciate your efforts.
Clearly Tor needs to ship with a working Polipo, so if this is a real
fault would the bundle developers please revert to the version which
was in the Vidalia 0.2.9 bundle
* Andrew Lewman and...@torproject.org [2011:01:31 08:56 -0500]:
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:20:10 +
Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net wrote:
Thank you Juliusz, I appreciate your efforts.
Clearly Tor needs to ship with a working Polipo, so if this is a real
fault would the bundle
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:56 -0500, Andrew Lewman and...@torproject.org
wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:20:10 +
Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net wrote:
Thank you Juliusz, I appreciate your efforts.
Clearly Tor needs to ship with a working Polipo, so if this is a real
fault would
On 1/31/2011 7:58 PM, Geoff Down wrote:
The difference is that the PPC bundle with vidalia 0.2.9 was built on a
10.3.9 ppc mac. However, the 10.3.9 machine died a smelly, melty
death during a build a few months ago.
Is nobody freecycling one? http://www.freecycle.org/group/US/
GD
I may be
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:59:49 +
Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net wrote:
how do I report a bug with the Polipo in
https://www.torproject.org/dist/vidalia-bundles/vidalia-bundle-0.2.2.22-alpha-0.2.10-ppc.dmg
?
And how do I tell which version is in there also please?
If that bundle contains
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:20 -0800, Robert Ransom
rransom.8...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:59:49 +
Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net wrote:
how do I report a bug with the Polipo in
https://www.torproject.org/dist/vidalia-bundles/vidalia-bundle-0.2.2.22-alpha-0.2.10-ppc.dmg
( I saw http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Jan-2011/msg00161.html but it
doesn't specify where the new bugtracker is).
We do not know of any new bug tracker for Polipo. If you have a bug
report for Polipo itself, report it to the polipo-users mailing list
(see https://lists.sourceforge.net
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:32 +0100, Erinn Clark er...@torproject.org
wrote:
* Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net [2011:01:20 12:56 +]:
The Polipo in
https://www.torproject.org/dist/vidalia-bundles/vidalia-bundle-0.2.2.21-alpha-0.2.10-ppc-1.dmg
is broken:
dyld: /Applications
-0427). Other fixes address a variety of assert
and crash bugs, most of which we think are hard to exploit remotely.
All Tor users should upgrade.
The Polipo in
https://www.torproject.org/dist/vidalia-bundles/vidalia-bundle-0.2.2.21-alpha-0.2.10-ppc-1.dmg
is broken:
dyld: /Applications
* Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net [2011:01:20 12:56 +]:
The Polipo in
https://www.torproject.org/dist/vidalia-bundles/vidalia-bundle-0.2.2.21-alpha-0.2.10-ppc-1.dmg
is broken:
dyld: /Applications/Vidalia.app.new/Contents/MacOS/polipo Undefined
symbols:
/Applications/Vidalia.app.new
Am 19.01.2011 03:27, schrieb andr...@fastmail.fm:
I'm using Ubuntu 10.04 and have the Tor browser bundle installed.
After Ubuntu boots up and I try to start Tor I find that Tor won't
start. I found that Polipo is running so I did a Pidof polipo and then
a sudo kill (for the polipo process
Hi Andre,
having polipo running should not prevent tor from running.
What messages did tor emit when it failed to start?
polipo is useful as a http proxy (which tor is not).
typically, you would set your system-wide http-proxy
environment variable to point to polipo, and configure
polipo to use
andr...@fastmail.fm wrote:
I'm using Ubuntu 10.04 and have the Tor browser bundle installed.
After Ubuntu boots up and I try to start Tor I find that Tor won't
start. I found that Polipo is running so I did a Pidof polipo and then
a sudo kill (for the polipo process number
I'm using Ubuntu 10.04 and have the Tor browser bundle installed.
After Ubuntu boots up and I try to start Tor I find that Tor won't
start. I found that Polipo is running so I did a Pidof polipo and then
a sudo kill (for the polipo process number).
Is there any reason I should have Polipo
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:03:58AM -0500, and...@torproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 03:21:22PM -0800,
travis+ml-tor-t...@subspacefield.org wrote 15K bytes in 259 lines about:
There has been much discussion over a combined tor and polipo package,
as well as a vidalia-tor-polipo
the default polipo configuration you are
shipping with the Tor Browser Bundle's and T(A)ILS' ones, just to
make sure no privacy/anonymity-related option was missed.
1. Make sure your package is in good enough shape so that it can be
included in Debian (= Debian users can use it as well, and Ubuntu
to Debian and Ubuntu is that hard
and I suggest the following process:
0. If not done yet, compare the default polipo configuration you are
shipping with the Tor Browser Bundle's and T(A)ILS' ones, just to
make sure no privacy/anonymity-related option was missed.
Good point, will do.
1
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:21:56 -0800
travis+ml-tor-t...@subspacefield.org wrote:
The real answer is to fix firefox so it doesn't need a proxy
between it and Tor. We patch firefox to do just this in the osx
and linux tor browser bundles. Polipo was a fine kludge until
either we started
Hi,
travis+ml-tor-t...@subspacefield.org wrote (17 Jan 2011 23:55:16 GMT) :
I am unsure of whether it should be in the debian repo, since the
dependencies aren't even in there yet.
What are the missing dependencies? (I have not had a single look at
your package yet, sorry.)
However, I could
---BeginMessage---
Dear all,
I've just moved the Polipo repository back to PPS. In order to get the
upstream Polipo sources, you now need to do
git clone git://git.wifi.pps.jussieu.fr/polipo
My branch is called ``master''; Chris's old branch is called
``polipo-chrisd'', and his last tree
git clone git://git.wifi.pps.jussieu.fr/polipo
Do you have a gitweb? That would be nice.
Chris's old branch is called polipo-chrisd
Oh, meaning 'chrisd/polipo' @ 20100113
193d95e3906967433081e0b10626a67c075ac131
and his last tree is tagged ``polipo-chrisd-20100330''.
Oh, meaning 'polipo
j...@subspacefield.org to get blacklisted.
polipo-tor_1.3_all.deb
Description: application/debian-package
pgpsdPPythEW5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I just upgraded my Tor setup with the Browser Bundle. It runs fine but
I noticed that I have privoxy and polipo still on my system from the old
setup.
Can I delete them?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 09:26:17AM -0500, pe...@aleksandrsolzhenitsyn.net wrote
1.4K bytes in 34 lines about:
: I just upgraded my Tor setup with the Browser Bundle. It runs fine but
: I noticed that I have privoxy and polipo still on my system from the old
: setup.
:
: Can I delete them
Hello,
According to the Tor manual
(https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#IkeepseeingthesewarningsaboutSOCKSandDNSandinformationleaks.ShouldIworry)
one should use SOCKS 4a.
AIUI, Polipo or Privoxy are used as HTTP proxies which then allow the
client (Firefox
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 6:18 PM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
Nothing in the open source field can do so yet afaik.
To do it, a shim needs to be coded and placed between the application and
Tor.
user - browser - [optional tool] - shim - tor:9050
The shim needs to listen on a proxy
I can see it could provide some
protection against ssl/ssh mitm attacks.
No. Why do you think it could?
It could better protect the
browser (or other app) by moving some of the ssl/tls/cert logic out to an
open source proxy of sorts.
Protect? Of what? How?
It could better protect users
For the most part, anything involving HTTPS, needs to be taken care of in
the browser itself.
My personal opinion (and I'm the author of Polipo) is that all content
munging should be done in the browser -- munging in the proxy is
a broken design. Unfortunately, the browser vendors care more
I can see it could provide some protection against...
No. Why do you think it could?
- because by default - lots of additional reasons...
The shim was just supposed to be a tool so you could hook into
an http[s] stream and do whatever with it, or nothing at all.
For instance, I've always
...@gmail.com wrote:
(snip)
As I understand it, Polipo can't scrub the headers of an HTTPS request,
even if you use it as an HTTPS proxy.
(snip)
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talk
https://anonymous-proxy-servers.net/en/anontest
As I understand it, Polipo can't scrub the headers of an HTTPS request,
Nothing in the open source field can do so yet afaik.
To do it, a shim needs to be coded and placed between the application and Tor.
user - browser - [optional tool] - shim
Trystero Lot lo...@callout.me writes:
it seems the censoredHeaders not working for me.
It works for me.
have anyone tried to use this and add useragent?
It's user-agent, not useragent.
censoredHeaders = user-agent
Juliusz
still the same. i uncommented and added user-agent
censoredHeaders = set-cookie, cookie, cookie2, from,accept-language, user-agent
censorReferer = true
my header is not clean and in fact shows my OS :(
tested using..
https://anonymous-proxy-servers.net/en/anontest
using..
https://anonymous-proxy-servers.net/en/anontest
As I understand it, Polipo can't scrub the headers of an HTTPS request,
even if you use it as an HTTPS proxy.
Robert Ransom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
,accept-language,
user-agent
censorReferer = true
my header is not clean and in fact shows my OS :(
tested using..
https://anonymous-proxy-servers.net/en/anontest
As I understand it, Polipo can't scrub the headers of an HTTPS request,
even if you use it as an HTTPS proxy.
Robert Ransom
it seems the censoredHeaders not working for me. have anyone tried to
use this and add useragent?
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body.
does anyone know if there is a config file option to turn off all
caching in Polipo?
If you look at the Polipo manual, there's an index. If you look at the
index, there's an entry for uncachable. If you follow the entry,
you'll find the config variable uncachableFile.
--jch
From: j...@pps.jussieu.fr
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Subject: Re: Polipo question
Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 18:08:22 +0200
does anyone know if there is a config file option to turn off all
caching in Polipo?
If you look at the Polipo manual, there's an index. If you look at the
index
I'm not sure whether either of these bugs are fixed at present (ugh). So
I'd recommend sticking with yes (or true, I guess it's called now).
If yes is the same as true then this is a setting the Polipo manual
strongly advises against. Finally, if dnsUseGethostbyname is true,
Polipo never
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 04:24:06PM +0100, pump...@cotse.net wrote 2.7K bytes in
64 lines about:
The standard Polipo configuration file for Ubuntu located at
https://svn.torproject.org/svn/torbrowser/trunk/build-scripts/config/polipo.conf
should replace the configuration file one downloads
and...@torproject.org wrote:
In practice, with that config file, dns queries are passed to tor
directly for resolution, not being done by polipo nor the actual system
resolver.
Thank you for the confirmation.
If you change the options, you should see polipo query your local dns
resolver
If you change the options, you should see polipo query your local dns
resolver either directly, or via gethostbyname.
But if you change it to false would that not be the safest option -
from what I can gather in this situation Polipo would never do its own DNS
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:14:31PM +0100, Matthew wrote:
If you change the options, you should see polipo query your local dns
resolver either directly, or via gethostbyname.
But if you change it to false would that not be the safest option -
from what I can gather in this situation Polipo
Hello,
The standard Polipo configuration file for Ubuntu located at
https://svn.torproject.org/svn/torbrowser/trunk/build-scripts/config/polipo.conf
should replace the configuration file one downloads when Polipo is
installed according to http://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-doc-unix.html.en
Subject: Re: Polipo question
From: incoming.li...@ax11.de
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 23:10:09 +0200
Am Donnerstag, den 18.03.2010, 23:35 -0400 schrieb downie -:
Hi,
does anyone know if there is a config file option to turn off all
caching in Polipo?
I am
off caching. It's core to
what polipo does. But perhaps Chris or Juliusz will contradict me.
Polipo is on port 8118 for Tor: anyhow, Firefox won't connect to
localhost - it's 'restricted'.
My guess is that's actually Torbutton preventing you from reaching port
8118 or port 8123, not Firefox
Am Donnerstag, den 18.03.2010, 23:35 -0400 schrieb downie -:
Hi,
does anyone know if there is a config file option to turn off all
caching in Polipo?
I am having a problem with variable PHP pages being cached, and would
prefer not to have to add Cache-Control headers everywhere. The manual
I'm running some automated widgets that connect to various onions.
The breakdown of 702 Polipo connects across about as many onions
is:
a 85 ok
b 1 ERROR 504: Connect to onion failed: General SOCKS server failure.
c 9 ERROR 504: Connect to onion failed: SOCKS connection not allowed.
d 99
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:35:49PM -0400, downgeo...@hotmail.com wrote 1.8K
bytes in 53 lines about:
: does anyone know if there is a config file option to turn off all caching in
Polipo?
I think you have to compile it without caching. Have you tried setting
chunkhighmark and objecthighmark
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:52:28 -0400
From: and...@torproject.org
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Subject: Re: Polipo question
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:35:49PM -0400, downgeo...@hotmail.com wrote 1.8K
bytes in 53 lines about:
: does anyone know if there is a config file option to turn off
Hi,
does anyone know if there is a config file option to turn off all caching in
Polipo?
I am having a problem with variable PHP pages being cached, and would prefer
not to have to add Cache-Control headers everywhere. The manual doesn't seem to
allow for that eventuality.
downie
Thank you very much.
-Original Message-
From: downie - downgeo...@hotmail.com
To: Or-talk or-talk@freehaven.net
Sent: Sat, Mar 13, 2010 10:22 am
Subject: RE: Polipo automatic?
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Subject: Polipo automatic?
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:50:23 -0500
From
Hi.
Just read a post made me think of this:
On Mac 10.5.2, with the Vidalia/Bundle, does Polipo automatically run after
starting Vidalia or do I have to start it separately? I think it's now Polipo
rather than Privoxy for v 0.2.1.24-0.2.7?
thanks
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Subject: Polipo automatic?
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:50:23 -0500
From: zzzjethro...@email2me.net
Hi.
Just read a post made me think of this:
On Mac 10.5.2, with the Vidalia/Bundle, does Polipo automatically run after
starting Vidalia or do I have to start
How does one, or rather I, do this switch on my Mac 10.5.2 ppc?
Thanks and should I?
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Lewman and...@torproject.org
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Sent: Sat, Feb 20, 2010 8:32 am
Subject: Re: why polipo?
On 02/15/2010 12:09 PM, Michael Gomboc wrote
Thank you Andrew for the nice explication!
2010/2/19 Andrew Lewman and...@torproject.org
On 02/15/2010 12:09 PM, Michael Gomboc wrote:
Why is polipo used and no longer privoxy?
The first question is, why a http proxy at all?
The answer is, because Firefox SOCKS layer has hard-coded
On 19 February 2010 20:32, Andrew Lewman and...@torproject.org wrote:
Once Firefox fixes bug 280661, we don't need a http proxy at all.
However, given the current pace of progress on 280661, we may switch to
Chrome before the fix occurs.
If the switch to Chrome was made, I assume that
On 02/20/2010 03:36 AM, zzzjethro...@email2me.net wrote:
How does one, or rather I, do this switch on my Mac 10.5.2 ppc?
Thanks and should I?
Should you switch? I cannot answer that.
How to switch? I can answer that at a high-level.
Install privoxy from http://www.privoxy.org/, reconfigure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Lewman wrote:
Chrisd even wrote Mozilla a patch and submitted it on the bug.
cool, do you apply the patch to windows tor bundles? if not, it could be
worth to be applied :)
on the other side, I've mixed feelings regarding the possible switch
On 02/20/2010 12:38 PM, Flamsmark wrote:
Once Firefox fixes bug 280661, we don't need a http proxy at all.
However, given the current pace of progress on 280661, we may switch to
Chrome before the fix occurs.
If the switch to Chrome was made, I assume that there'd be a port of the
TorButton
On 02/20/2010 03:58 PM, Marco Bonetti wrote:
Andrew Lewman wrote:
Chrisd even wrote Mozilla a patch and submitted it on the bug.
cool, do you apply the patch to windows tor bundles? if not, it could be
worth to be applied :)
No, we don't build our own Firefox yet. I've been resisting adding
Dealing with Chromium devs on incognito integratio is a great idea.
While we're discussing the bundle, I'd like to mention something
that's been on my mind lately. I recently ran a Privacy Tech Workshop
at the Students for Free Culture conference in DC - and the general
conclusion is that Tor/FF
On 02/20/2010 04:41 PM, Rich Jones wrote:
While we're discussing the bundle, I'd like to mention something
that's been on my mind lately. I recently ran a Privacy Tech Workshop
at the Students for Free Culture conference in DC - and the general
conclusion is that Tor/FF is too hard to use and
Egg -- My face
Well done, guys.
R
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Andrew Lewman and...@torproject.org wrote:
On 02/20/2010 04:41 PM, Rich Jones wrote:
While we're discussing the bundle, I'd like to mention something
that's been on my mind lately. I recently ran a Privacy Tech Workshop
at
On 02/15/2010 12:09 PM, Michael Gomboc wrote:
Why is polipo used and no longer privoxy?
The first question is, why a http proxy at all?
The answer is, because Firefox SOCKS layer has hard-coded timeouts, and
other issues, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=280661.
Personally, I don't
Hi,
As polipo has now replaced privoxy in the default tor setup I am trying
to use it, but it doesn't work.
Could someone please help me do these 2 things:
1. Run polipo as a windows 2003 service.
Everytime I try to start polipo as a service it crashes. I tried to set
daemonise=true
hi all,
what is the difference in using privoxy and polipo?
im in ubuntu and have used both. and privoxy seems unable to render
all .gifs file. it shows part of the gif or in some cases won't show the
animation.
why is this?
thank you very much
arshad wrote:
hi all,
what is the difference in using privoxy and polipo?
im in ubuntu and have used both. and privoxy seems unable to render
all .gifs file. it shows part of the gif or in some cases won't show the
animation.
Privoxy has the ability to deanimate gifs. Check your Privoxy
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 04:50 -0700, Jim wrote:
arshad wrote:
hi all,
what is the difference in using privoxy and polipo?
im in ubuntu and have used both. and privoxy seems unable to render
all .gifs file. it shows part of the gif or in some cases won't show the
animation.
Privoxy
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 04:50 -0700, Jim wrote:
arshad wrote:
hi all,
what is the difference in using privoxy and polipo?
im in ubuntu and have used both. and privoxy seems unable to render
all .gifs file. it shows part of the gif or in some cases won't show the
animation.
Privoxy
arshad wrote:
but now i want to disable that deanaimate gif thing. but there isn't a
place in config file to do that :(
The place for personal configuration in privoxy is 'user.action'.
You can append these two lines:
{-deanimate-gifs}
/ # Match all URLs
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 14:06 +0100, Gitano wrote:
arshad wrote:
but now i want to disable that deanaimate gif thing. but there isn't a
place in config file to do that :(
The place for personal configuration in privoxy is 'user.action'.
You can append these two lines:
{-deanimate-gifs}
Darren Thurston wrote:
#!/usr/bin/perl
# estranged.pl
# AKA
# Polipo 1.0.4 Remote Memory Corruption 0day PoC
Cute.
$payload = GET / HTTP/1.1\r\nContent-Length: 2147483602\r\n\r\n;
The proof of concept works as advertised. Wheee.
Here's a simple patch (that probably breaks some
#!/usr/bin/perl
# estranged.pl
# AKA
# Polipo 1.0.4 Remote Memory Corruption 0day PoC
#
# Jeremy Brown [0xjbrow...@gmail.com//jbrownsec.blogspot.com//krakowlabs.com]
12.07.2009
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 08:37:28AM -0700, Wesley Kenzie wrote:
Hi, Christopher. If you could also solve the known instability issues with
polipo that Juliusz has not had time to resolve in the past year, then many
would be grateful. I cannot get polipo to run for more than about an hour
Hello,
I'll be working to increase Polipo's portability for GSoC 2009,
which starts a bit later this month. I'm happy to have Nick Mathewson
of the Tor project as my mentor, and I'll also be working with
Juliusz Chroboczek, author of Polipo, to hopefully get some of the
changes committed
Hi, Christopher. If you could also solve the known instability issues with
polipo that Juliusz has not had time to resolve in the past year, then many
would be grateful. I cannot get polipo to run for more than about an hour
without it crashing.
. . . . .
Wesley
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:10 AM
Chroboczek, author of Polipo, to hopefully get some of the
changes committed.
I thought Polipo was already portable. I've been using it with D.A.D. on a
USB drive for over a year, and haven't had any problems.
The main idea of the project centers on libevent integration. A number
of other
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 04:16:07PM -0700, Kyle Williams wrote:
I'll be working to increase Polipo's portability for GSoC 2009,
I thought Polipo was already portable. I've been using it with D.A.D. on a
USB drive for over a year, and haven't had any problems.
In software development lingo
Hi,
I'm using polipo. When I choose an exit node by sticking node.exit on
the end of a url, I think that is actually passed on with the Host
header. How do I get polipo to strip that off?
For example, http://www.showmyip.com.tortila.exit/; doesn't work as it
has no vhost set up
Hi,
I'm trying to switch from privoxy to polipo. But polipo seems to have an
annoying problem. Polipo gets started as a service while booting, the same as I
did with privoxy. But tor gets just started with activating Vidalia.
The problem is if tor is not running when polipo gets started
: a bobnjoe browser
: For the crass foreigners among us -- what does this idiom mean?
Bob Joe's Bait, Tackle, and Web Browsers [...] Sorry for the confusion.
Quite the opposite -- thanks to you for the snippet of local colour.
Juliusz
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:54:30AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.1K bytes in
5 lines about:
: a bobnjoe browser
:
: For the crass foreigners among us -- what does this idiom mean?
It's a phobosism as a result of growing up in a rural area. I meant it
as a very small population of users.
On Tuesday 09 October 2007, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
It's fairly easy to convert the adblock plus 'easylist' into a polipo
forbidden file.
Do you have a script you'd be willing to share? I'd be glad to link
to it from the Polipo page.
Juliusz
On Sunday 14 October 2007 19:50:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:21:40AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.9K
bytes in 30 lines about:
: Do:
: Spoof user-agent (is this necessary even with javascript disabled?)
: (browser)
Arguably, unless you're using BobnJoe's
People will know that you are in the UAE if you are browsing websites
that are only for people and used by people in the UAE.
Kasimir Gabert
On 10/15/07, Robert Hogan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 14 October 2007 19:50:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:21:40AM +0100,
On 10/15/07, Robert Hogan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 14 October 2007 19:50:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:21:40AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.9K
bytes in 30 lines about:
: Do:
: Spoof user-agent (is this necessary even with javascript disabled?)
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:21:40AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.9K bytes in
30 lines about:
: Do:
: Spoof user-agent (is this necessary even with javascript disabled?) (browser)
Arguably, unless you're using BobnJoe's browser, any of the popular ones
should provide sufficient numbers
On Friday 12 October 2007 00:26:46 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 08:57:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 1.1K
bytes in 29 lines about:
: Keeping track of all the things you should turn off or get a proxy to
: tweak makes my feeble head hurt.
The latest torbutton-dev
Robert Hogan schrieb:
Do:
Spoof user-agent (is this necessary even with javascript disabled?) (browser)
I think, it is nessecary. Do this job in browser, because no proxy can
do it for SSL-encrypted stuff. And change the fake time by time.
You may try showmyip with and without javascript. In
TOR Admin (gpfTOR1) wrote:
Robert Hogan schrieb:
Do:
Spoof user-agent (is this necessary even with javascript disabled?) (browser)
I think, it is nessecary. Do this job in browser, because no proxy can
do it for SSL-encrypted stuff. And change the fake time by time.
I disagree. Don't do
Ben Wilhelm schrieb:
Pick the most common user-agent and use it. That's probably whatever the
latest version of Firefox returns.
Ok, I use (only a few examples):
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; sk-SK; rv:1.8.1.6)
Gecko/20070824 Firefox/2.0.0.6
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; de-DE;
On Thursday 11 October 2007, Robert Hogan wrote:
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 13:20:31 Pat Double wrote:
On Tuesday 09 October 2007, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
You should use RefControl
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/953 to spoof
referrers headers, not Polipo
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 08:57:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 1.1K bytes in
29 lines about:
: Keeping track of all the things you should turn off or get a proxy to tweak
: makes my feeble head hurt.
The latest torbutton-dev releases handle most of this for you.
--
Andrew
On Tuesday 09 October 2007, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
You should use RefControl
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/953 to spoof
referrers headers, not Polipo, as RefControl does HTTPS and HTTP.
Yep. In all cases, doing things in the browser is better than doing
them
On Tuesday 09 October 2007, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
It's fairly easy to convert the adblock plus 'easylist' into a polipo
forbidden file.
Do you have a script you'd be willing to share? I'd be glad to link
to it from the Polipo page.
If phobos doesn't have a script I'll most likely
If phobos doesn't have a script I'll most likely write one. The
problem would be that the 'easylist' also includes a whitelist at
the end, I assume that all patterns are scanned from start to end
and if something is blacklisted AND whitelisted, it is
allowed. AFAIK Polipo only provides
AND whitelisted, it is
allowed. AFAIK Polipo only provides a blacklist.
If you provide me with the precise semantics of the whitelist, I can
implement something compatible in Polipo.
Is this what you're looking for?
http://adblockplus.org/en/filters
--
Pat Double, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ye must
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 07:32:31AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 1.1K bytes in
39 lines about:
: Do you have a script you'd be willing to share? I'd be glad to link
: to it from the Polipo page.
:
: If phobos doesn't have a script I'll most likely write one. The problem would
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
