E-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Perl - Was Unix time conversion function
Because I'm picky. I ruled out OracleTool because it's web-based. While
it
may be an advantage at times (don't need to i
Because I'm picky. I ruled out OracleTool because it's web-based. While it
may be an advantage at times (don't need to install on every machine I use),
it's a whole number of layers I don't want to troubleshoot when in Crisis
Mode.
OraC is pretty cool. I looked at it when I got O'Reilly's Oracl
Ok Jared, I'm going to buy your book and give it ONE MORE TRY.
I shall report my progress here.
RF
-Original Message-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:51 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Robert,
Perl isn't really that hard.
As with any language, it can
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 17:49, Tim Bunce wrote:
> "If you can do it in Perl chances are" someone already has...
>
> Check it out:
> http://search.cpan.org
>
> Just search for something...
>
I think you'll find that the same is very rapidly becoming as true for
Python.
I'm not trying to get in
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:59:46AM -0800, Orr, Steve wrote:
> If you can do it in Perl chances are you can do it better in Python and
> someone can actually read and understand it without a PHD... AKA Perl Helper
> Dweeb. :-) In Perl it takes effort to write readable code but it comes
> naturally
Title: RE: Perl - Was unix time conversion function
Are you sure? It's written in C and is supposed to be relatively portable. I've not tried it on other platforms but, in addition to HP-UX and AIX, Python runs on: AS/400; Solaris; OS/2; Amiga; AROS; BeOS; PalmOS; QNX; VMS; VxW
You can always outsource your perl development to me. :)
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Hately, Mike (NESL-IT) wrote:
> Perl kind of makes sense but I haven't reached the point where it clicks and
> becomes natural. I still need to think about it very hard when I'm writing
> it. Hence, a lot of the time
hy? Look up OraC and OracleTool on google.
>
> Jared
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Jesse, Rich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 01/28/2003 07:58 AM
> Please respond to ORACLE-L
>
>
> To: Multiple rec
> -Original Message-
> I'll bet Stephen has a toolbox in his garage that contains
> a single flat blade screwdriver and no phillips screwdrivers nor any
> wrenches. ;)
>
-
Don't need tools. Got pshycokinesis (got milk too). Been taking les
I'll add a clarification. With its object interface, Perl actually lets
one define much more easily accessible data structures than one can in
C. The problem with that is that the extra code path consumed by the
accessor methods is too slow to actually *use* them in some of our code
(think tens of
Title: RE: Perl - Was unix time conversion function
I
haven't done anything with Python but my problem with Python or Ruby is
that
they
don't come with many OS variants. Perl comes with any OS and there is
a
huge
repository of ready made scripts. I have to confess stealing
Title: RE: Perl - Was unix time conversion function
If you can do it in Perl chances are you can do it better in Python and someone can actually read and understand it without a PHD... AKA Perl Helper Dweeb. :-) In Perl it takes effort to write readable code but it comes naturally in Python
Robert,
Perl isn't really that hard.
As with any language, it can be difficult to grasp at first, but once
you begin to understand it, it can be extremely powerful.
Regarding Cary's comments about the difficulty of complex Perl
data structures, I would have to say that they aren't any more diffi
03 07:58 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:RE: Perl - Was Unix time conversion function
For me, it was either Perl or an icky bass-ackward pipe-laden
awk/sed/regex
unmaintainable ba
What's the title of Jared's book?
-Scott
At 05:03 AM 1/28/03 -0800, you wrote:
I used to be, but I finally bit
the bullet ... I ordered my copy of Jared's book from Amazon.com
yesterday !!
Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN I
My impression of "Programming Perl" was that it was primarily intended as an
ego trip for the author. I found "Learning Perl" 2nd Ed. and "Perl Core
Language / Little Black Book" to be much more useful. Yes, I have the Perl
for Oracle DBA's too, but haven't had the time to get into it yet.
> --
I've started writing some perl and it is hard to learn, but once you learn,
it can do some great things. And if you learned it from the Larry Wall book
like I did, then it's even harder.
The thing I've discovered about perl it that it may be the only language
(computer or otherwise) that is easier
please don't take umbridge, but I feel enticed to quote
"what you don't know, dosn't (really) matter"
Larry Wall, programming with perl, O'Reilly.
just for a giggle.
sorry
apologies for any typos overlooked
kr mr
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/28/03 12:22 PM >>>
I've managed to successfully avoid
For me, it was either Perl or an icky bass-ackward pipe-laden awk/sed/regex
unmaintainable bastion. OK, I couldn't get rid of the regex. While I'll
not be entering the Obfuscated Perl contest anytime soon, I think Perl is
much easier to understand for a "traditional" programmer (Assembly, BASIC,
Original Message
In my mind there is nothing obvious about Perl,
Anyone else feel that way about Perl or am I a
lone wolf in a Perl world?
I think the correct progression is to start with ksh; then mix in sed, awk,
Title: unix time conversion function
Now
that's what I call a "Perl Breakdown!!" ...A nervous breakdown brought on
by pathological eclecticism. The cure for this is a healthy dose of Python. It
is truly refreshing!!
Steve
Orr
Oracle
DBA and part-time Python Evangelist.
-Origina
Perl kind of makes sense but I haven't reached the point where it clicks and
becomes natural. I still need to think about it very hard when I'm writing
it. Hence, a lot of the time I fall back on shell scripts supplemented by
pre-written (some would say shamelessly ripped off) perl code for the stu
The only problem I had was differentiating between the actual code and the
encrypted version of the same ;) But we will get there eventually.
Denny
Quoting Robert Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> unix time conversion functionCary I once thought I wanted to do
> some
> Perl coding... So I
Perl is great for getting the job done fast. It's harder to
write a large maintainable system in perl than other languages
but you use the right tool for the job. And, IMO, if you are ever
writing fancy or real creative code rewrite it. K.I.S.S.
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, April Wells wrote:
>
> Persona
Title: RE: Perl - Was Unix time conversion function
I used to be, but I finally bit the bullet ... I ordered my copy of Jared's book from Amazon.com yesterday !!
Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jama
Personally... I think that if I had the same teacher to help me through Perl
that REALLY taught me what C was doing in memory and got me to REALLY
understand the power and elegance of pointers, I would code more in Perl. I
can, and occasionally do, code in Perl, but nothing fancy or real creative
I've managed to successfully avoid learning Perl for a while now... my
reaction, while not quite so dramatic as yours, was that it made my
head hurt to try to understand it! :)
--- Robert Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> unix time conversion functionCary I once thought I wanted to do
> s
Title: unix time conversion function
I think it’s like almost any subjective
idea: it’s beautiful if you love it, heinous if you hate it.
I love Perl; it does what I mean. The only
thing I really don’t like about Perl 5 is its yucky way of supporting complex
data structures. I’m eager
28 matches
Mail list logo
