Maybe a still too early notice: in the new 2.4 Linux kernel they will serve static
http request direct
from the kernel. This could give interesting results wrt performance :-)
On Thursday, September 07, 2000 11:46 AM, Christof Baumgaertner
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
This benchmarks do
If we were serving up static pages, then we wouldn't need Orion... :)
Frank Eggink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/07/00 03:43 PM
Please respond to Orion-Interest
To:Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: SV: Performance for static files
Maybe a still too
D]
To: "Orion-Interest" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:57 PM
Subject: RE: Performance for static files
Hi,
Two things. One..your correct about the browser keeps on going. I have the
same "problem" on my site. Its strange, but the little E keeps spinni
, then the next.
- Original Message -
From: "Juan Pablo Lorandi" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Orion-Interest" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 12:36 PM
Subject: RE: Performance for static files
Perhaps a lil' off track, I'd like to point out that:
you may
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: Performance for static files
That may be true as I was including the time to server the file all the way
to the point of the "little e" stopped spinning. Have you had the following
problems with framesets...
In Apache/IIS with JRun 2.3.3 the framese
Title: RE: IE performance with Orion
I found the problem causing the no performance issue using Internet Explorer when connecting to orion sites with orion 0.9. When I installed Internet Explorer 5.5 it changed my HTTP connection settings to not use HTTP/1.1. So, in other words, using HTTP
]]On Behalf Of Cory Adams
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2000 9:33 PM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Performance
I don't normally send gifs around but this is only 11 kb.
It shows the orionconsole (1.2.0). Check the Hits averages for the last
minute and hour.
The machine is a Pentium III 650 (notebook
20, 2000 9:33 PM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Performance
I don't normally send gifs around but this is only 11 kb.
It shows the orionconsole (1.2.0). Check the Hits averages for the last
minute and hour.
The machine is a Pentium III 650 (notebook), Orion 1.2.0, jdk 1.3 with
two
Even for simple benchmark test FioranoMQ beats
Orion JMS almost 10 times. WHATS'S UP DUDES ???
Is it possible to fix it, sound for me, may be you use
wrong collection classes or use synchronized methods ???
Orion ~ 200 ms
FioranoMS ~ 20 ms
I did test on
a. NT 4.0, Pentium III 600Mhz 256M, Sun
Has anyone done any benchmarking on how much faster jikes is compared to
using the standard javac compiler?
- Frank
our classes, not
it takes about 10 seconds. We were all wondering how it can compile
hundreds of classes in 10 seconds, but somehow it does.
It's not specific, but the performance increase is so huge--you might
not need specifics.
--
Joel Shellman
Ants.com: the world's fastest growing freelance
We are all proud
of Orion for WHOOPIN up on ASP. But have any numbers been done against
PHP/Zend? I know I will be using Orion in the future, but I am still
interested in the numbers.
Carl B.
Fyffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c:informix-sqli://beatnix.net-media.de:1536/BaseDB:INFORMIXSERVER=on
_beatnix"
connection-driver="com.informix.jdbc.IfxDriver"
username="informix"
password="topsecret"
/
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Kirk Kal
tion", you should set
ejb-location="jdbc/location". If by now the pet store used the "naked
location", you should observe significant performance gains. And - what's
more - only with the ejb-location transactions can be rolled back properly.
Jens
-Ursprüngliche Nachric
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: AW: Update: Performance Scalability
Hi Tom, I would like to know exactly the diference between
ejb-location and pooled-location.
...and other thing...but I thing that Orion team is the only one
who can answer me... How does
Oops, forgot to post to the list.
Sorry Tom.
Original Message
Subject: Re: Performance Scalability Concern
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 07:24:32 -0700
From: Eric Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Wnuk wrote:
I just migrated some
Orion has provided a
switch.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 7:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Performance Scalability Concern
Tom Wnuk wrote:
I just migrated some ejb's from a Weblogic 5.1 installatio
: Performance Scalability
ConcernI see that, but that sets the policy of which
libraries to use at the server level. When you have a large codebase then
pieces of it and the applications may use different non-binary compatible
versions and this breaks the component model of J2EE. Except
Hello,
I'm trying to understand the performance of my beans. I notice that on
every call to an Entity bean,
com.evermind.server.ejb.EvermindEntityContext.cloneObject is called.
The program spends nearly 20% of the time in this method. Within the
method, the bulk o fthe time is spent
All,
In a previous message I expressed my concern about performance as compared
with Weblogic 5.1. With assistance from Karl Avedal, I made some changes to
my application and am very pleased to announce that Orion is approximately
2x faster than Weblogic 5.1.
I wasn't using the DB connection
password="topsecret"
/
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Kirk Kalvar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Dienstag, 4. Juli 2000 17:19
An: Orion-Interest
Betreff: RE: Update: Performance Scalability
Tom:
Could you be more specific? You weren't accessin
://www.orionserver.com/orion/orion.jar
(XML parser question already answered by Magnus, so I won't repeat)
2. Performance significantly slower
It's not rocket science, but I clocked the elapsed time it takes to complete
a round trip from a test client. Using the same code, Orion was at least 2x
consider necessary before using it a production environment:
1. Stress testing in your environment, regardless of what you've heard.
2. What are your performance requirements? Does Orion meet them? Does
anybody?
3. A more formal support structure from Orion. I'm not sure what the plans
. I have two main concerns that I
need answered before I can use Orion in a production environment. These two
are performance and stability.
Performance:
I have read in Orion's literature about how they intend for Orion to
outperform everything else on the market. On the benchmark page
I have been using Orion to develop for about two months now and love it.
Soon I will need to deploy my application. I have two main concerns that I
need answered before I can use Orion in a production environment. These two
are performance and stability.
Performance:
I have read in Orion's
smaller
applications). we are very satisfied with the overall performance but do
experience occasional crashes (the jvm eats up 100% cpu and has to be
restarted). the problem is that I'm not sure if this is orion's fault or
maybe a jvm bug (we're using sun jdk1.2.2 production release on linux
1. On this point I can guarantee you that Orion is at least 5x faster than
WebSphere - it is an absolute dog for performance from personal experience
(perhaps IBM is trying to convince you to buy some 'big iron' to run it on).
I know there were some benchmarks of Orion around 0.7 against WebLogic
Title: RE: (loading servlet at startup) No performance using internet explorer
I solved the problem. I downloaded the web-app.dtd from java.sun.com. :)
regards,
Patrik Andersson
-Original Message-
From: Kit Cragin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: den 7 juni 2000 22:02
To: Orion
Title: RE: No performance using internet explorer
The problem persists even though i have move the entire site to another machine running Orion 1.0rc2, JDK1.2.2, Hotspot Server VM 2.0. When I access the site using explorer 5.5beta. I haven't had time to switch to Orion 1.0 yet.
regards
Title: RE: No performance using internet explorer
How do
I have orion load a servlet on startup. I can't seem to get the
load-on-startup tag work. I've tried placing it inside
servlet/servlet tags and also in the servlet-mapping
tag. When I place it in either of the places the site goes
GenericServlet not HttpServlet. Also, you might try checking the various
logs.
- Kit
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrik Andersson
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 9:18 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: No performance using internet explorer
How do I
performance with Orion
Um, there were two things about this mentioned, I think. I already deleted
them from my Inbox, but I'll take a stab anyway.
"No performance using internet explorer"
That's hard to substantiate in the real world; admittedly, your setup may
be pathological i
Title: RE: IE performance with Orion
Where did you change localhost to your actual hostname? I've tried
patrik:8000/
patrik.webteknik.se:8000/
172.167.2.205:8000/
All with the same result.
-Original Message-
From: Magnus Ahlden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: den 31 maj 2000
Has
anyone experienced having almost no performance at all when using internet
explorer to navigate sites running on orion? I have orion setup on my local
machine, but navigating the site using internet explorer i impossible, but using
netscapes gives good performance. Also, when surfing
Um, there were two things about this mentioned, I think. I already deleted
them from my Inbox, but I'll take a stab anyway.
"No performance using internet explorer"
That's hard to substantiate in the real world; admittedly, your setup may
be pathological in behavior, but I use
Title: RE: No performance using internet explorer
I'm using Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5 Beta (I know, it's beta)
We have a site which I am currently running two instances of using Orion 1.0 rc1 (rc2 on my computer). When accessing that site on my local computer it doesn't have any
Title: RE: IE performance with Orion
The thing is that the problem only occurs when I access the site running locally on my machine, not when I'm accessing an almost identical site running on a different machine. That's what is so strange about it.
-Original Message-
From: Joseph B
Title: RE: No performance using internet explorer
Sorry, I'm using Windows NT 4.0 SP 6a, Java 2 SDK 1.3, Orion Server 1.0 rc2.
Regards,
Patrik Andersson
-Original Message-
From: Karl Avedal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: den 30 maj 2000 13:43
To: Orion-Interest
Cc: Orion
Patrik Andersson wrote:
Has anyone experienced having almost no performance at all when using
internet explorer to navigate sites running on orion? I have orion
setup on my local machine, but navigating the site using internet
explorer i impossible, but using netscapes gives good
Title: RE: No performance using internet explorer
But still, how would using a proxy slow down things almost to a halt when accessing a site running on my computer when it doesn't when the same site runs on a different computer?
I'm not using a proxy btw.
Regards,
Patrik Andersson
But still, how would using a proxy slow down things almost to a halt when
accessing a site running on my computer when it doesn't when the same site
runs on a different computer?
For instance by forwarding all your requests to a remote proxy
over a slow link (i.e. ppp), including local
Title: RE: IE performance with Orion
Are
you using IE5..perhaps under Win2000? I noticed an annoying situation with IE5
and Win2000. When I try to browse a local site, I keep getting pop-up windows
that ask me to connect or stay offline. If I stay offline, it keeps asking me
again. I don't
Title: RE: IE performance with Orion
Nope.
I'm Using Windows NT 4.0 sp6a, IE5.5Beta
-Original Message-From: Kevin Duffey
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: den 30 maj 2000
18:28To: Orion-InterestSubject: RE: IE performance with
Orion
Are
you using IE5..perhaps under
reading and writing.
Though absolute performance constantly increased with every orion version, i
wonder, why the server uses only 30-40 % of the CPU resources under heavy
load (meaning: subsequent calls to this session bean from ONE remote
client). I figured out, that the DB uses ~10% and orion 20-25
I have copied below code from the wrapper generated by Orion for the
NetwsItem.getText method in the news sample. Usually one doesn't get to see
the code generated for bean wrappers but one occasion Orion crashed while
deploying and it left behind the java files for the wrappers.
,
Jens Stutte
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Karl Avedal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Dienstag, 21. März 2000 18:49
An: Orion-Interest
Cc: Orion-Interest
Betreff: Re: EJB performance
Hello,
Note that when using BMP Entity beans a request is made to the db for every
bean
Ok,
after a day of testing and measuring, i have the following result (always
regarding the performance of the tests i described in the mail "EJB
performance"):
First of all: you are right, Karl (i have to apologize for the somewhat
"angry" other mail). A great deal of pe
Hi,
i made some tests regarding the EJB performance. Well... i know it's still
beta, and EJB is never lightning fast. But are you expecting some serious
improvements of performance with the release version ? Not to get me wrong,
i like the product and so on (and i know it's a general problem
Hi all!
I'm trying out orion for productional use and I've encountered something
odd. Mapping a servlet with wildcards gives, IMHO, a massive overhead.
The servlet I'm running has only got init() and service()
implementations, both of them are empty.
My performance measurements:
With servlet
" as the URL and see what kind
of results you get.
Hope it helps. :)
/Magnus Stenman, the Orion team
- Original Message -
From: "Jimmy Larsson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Orion-Interest" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 12:23 PM
Subject: Servlet mappings
PROTECTED]
To: "Orion-Interest" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 12:23 PM
Subject: Servlet mappings and performance
Hi all!
I'm trying out orion for productional use and I've encountered something
odd. Mapping a servlet with wildcards gives, IMHO, a massive
At 17:00 22.01.00 , you wrote:
Are you using jikes?
yes
I'm using JDK1.3beta, and Jikes, and the compile time is quite fast.
With JSP pages you hardly even notice the compile time for most pages.
it all depends on the size of the project. I'm talking about approx. 2
lines of EJB code that
Hi,
in case you're counting votes for possible improvements I would like to ask
for something being done about the deployment performance. is it possible
to restrict wrapper generation and everything to ejbs that have changed? if
I recompile one bean in an application all others get
101 - 153 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
