Re: Performance Monitoring Tools

2002-03-12 Thread Jorge Jimenez C
Hello. I have to do the same tests. Can you please tell me about the loading test tools that you've found. Thanks in advance. JJ - Original Message - From: Cugier (extern) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 10:25 AM Subject:

Re: Performance Monitoring Tools

2002-03-12 Thread Stephen Davidson
Optimizeit was quite useful to me. Cpu Usage, Object count, Memory usage, Garbage Collector activity. Also tracked the amount of time spent in each function call. -Steve Cugier (extern) wrote: Hello, we are planning to perform some load tests against our application (Servlet, JSP and

Re: Performance Monitoring Tools

2002-03-12 Thread Stephen Davidson
Hi Jorge. For generating the load, I have found both Siege and Grinder to be effective. Not fancy, but definately effective. -Steve Jorge Jimenez C wrote: Hello. I have to do the same tests. Can you please tell me about the loading test tools that you've found. Thanks in advance.

RE: Performance Monitoring Tools

2002-03-12 Thread Jens Schumann
Although it might sound strange I do not believe in low level tools such as OptimzeIt on EJB level - first stage. Usually you end up using a component based framework which might be distributed and EJB overhead just changes results significantly. We switched to a simple set of classes which

Re: Performance declines after moving to a faster Server

2002-03-07 Thread Curt Smith
NT offers a near infinate number of causes for slowness. Start by installing a good defrag'er and defrag all disks. Your new box may have dog slow disks? Eh? How about size of L2 Cache? Do the PIII's have same size L2 cach as the PII's which I think where all 256Kb... Or maybe there where a

RE: Performance problems (More Info).

2001-04-07 Thread Marco Pas (GMX)
and found that the HotSpot server behaves wierd with SMP. Switching to pure interpretted mode fixes the problem. It wasn't Orion... phew -Original Message- From: Aaron Tavistock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 12:11 PM To: Orion-Interest Subject: RE: Performance

Re: Performance problems (More Info).

2001-04-07 Thread Jeff Hubbach
--Original Message- From: Aaron Tavistock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 12:11 PM To: Orion-Interest Subject: RE: Performance problems (More Info). JVM Settings -- My normal settings are "-server -Xincgc -Xms128m -Xmx384m". I've tried playing around with d

RE: Performance problems (More Info).

2001-04-02 Thread Aaron Tavistock
. It wasn't Orion... phew -Original Message- From: Aaron Tavistock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 12:11 PM To: Orion-Interest Subject: RE: Performance problems (More Info). JVM Settings -- My normal settings are "-server -Xincgc -Xms128m -Xmx384m".

RE: Performance problems...

2001-03-25 Thread Mike Cannon-Brookes
Q: Are you running the JVM with -server? Q: Could it be a garbage collection related problem? If it's happening at odd times when heap usage is up, it might be gc collecting old jdbc objects? -mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of

RE: Performance problems...

2001-03-25 Thread Alex Paransky
What is the maximum number of connections that you have configured your database pool to? Could you be running out of connections? Are you properly releasing the connections back to the pool, and closing results set which might not be needed? During the time that the site is "frozen" (as you

RE: Performance problems...

2001-03-25 Thread Gary Shea
And from totally out in left field, how about conflicting database transaction/table locks. I doubt it, because those tend to be indefinite, but it's a thought anyway! I suspect that the running-out-of- connections idea is more likely to be correct, though... Gary -Original

Re: Performance problems...

2001-03-25 Thread Salvatore Sferrazza
I've had similar symptoms with ATG Dynamo. It usually occurs when the VM decides to garbage collect. The way we get around this is to have multiple Dynamo instances each with it's own dedicated VM and CPU. This makes the user experience more acceptable across all sessions on the system since

RE: Performance with ORION

2001-03-13 Thread Manne Fagerlind
There should be one for each active request. -Original Message- From: Ismael Blesa Part [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 March 2001 15:58 To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: Performance with ORION Yes it should create only one instance of each servlet. What I mean is how to specify how

RE: Performance with ORION

2001-03-12 Thread Mike Cannon-Brookes
It _should_ only create one instance of each servlet. Multiple threads are then used to serve different requests. -mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ismael Blesa Part Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 8:01 PM To: Orion-Interest

Re: Performance with ORION

2001-03-12 Thread Ismael Blesa Part
Yes it should create only one instance of each servlet. What I mean is how to specify how many threads the server should create. JRUN has several parameters to configure this, but I have not seen any one on Orion. Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote: It _should_ only create one instance of each servlet.

RE: re Performance test...

2000-10-26 Thread Duffey, Kevin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 5:21 PM To: Orion-Interest Subject: re Performance test... Kevin, quick question on your login test. Does your application use EntityBeans to represent your users (and therefore are you calling EntityBean.ejbFind() to load from

RE: Performance test...

2000-10-19 Thread Duffey, Kevin
. Anyways..this is sort of off topic..but if you have any questions, feel free to email me. -Original Message- From: Santosh Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 9:19 PM To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: Performance test... That was a simply great thing to

Re: Performance

2000-10-11 Thread KirkYarina
Usually a good answer, but take a look at http://www.volano.com/report.html The arguably most stable Linux JVM, Blackdown, is pretty far down the listsigh At 06:31 PM 10/9/00 -0200, you wrote: On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 02:00:06PM -0400, Sarathy Mattaparti wrote: Hi, Previously i used

Re: Performance

2000-10-11 Thread Daniel C. DiCesare
Message - From: "Rafael Alvarez" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Orion-Interest" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 2:07 PM Subject: Re: Performance Hi, This mail is useful only if you're using entity EJBs. Because EJB is RMI on steroids (is more than that, but l

Re: Performance

2000-10-11 Thread Storm Linux User
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 05:54:13PM -0400, Sarathy Mattaparti wrote: i bought windows 2000 Server (with 10 Clients ) for $1200.. is this the only option for me to change the OS ? It's just my opinion. I don't like Micro$oft products, epecialy because the lack of security. You can't

Re: Performance

2000-10-10 Thread Rafael Alvarez
Hi, This mail is useful only if you're using entity EJBs. Because EJB is RMI on steroids (is more than that, but let's keep it simple), if you need more that one entity to get the data you need for the presentation layer you end up opening a lot of rmi connections, with the overhead it implies.

Re: Performance

2000-10-09 Thread Sarathy Mattaparti
i'm using JSDK 1.3 i have lot of memory 512 MB so its not the problem with memory. i took care of DB connections. i'm unable to find the problem.. in cocumentation it says 5 times faster than iis i agree with that but my case is different.. I really wanna solve this problem, help me. Thanks

Re: Performance

2000-10-09 Thread Sarathy Mattaparti
i bought windows 2000 Server (with 10 Clients ) for $1200.. is this the only option for me to change the OS ? Sarathy On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 02:00:06PM -0400, Sarathy Mattaparti wrote: Hi, Previously i used Pentium III 550 MHz and 64 MB RAM and i bought a new computer its

RE: Performance

2000-10-09 Thread Duffey, Kevin
First of all, an 800Mhz cpu isn't terribly faster than a single 550. I have gone from 400 to 800 and don't see too much difference, about 12% or so. Second of all, dual cpus don't get utilized to their full potential unless an application is programed to use them properly. 3D rendering software,

Re: Performance for static files

2000-09-08 Thread Christof Baumgaertner
Looks to me like if Orionserver tries to do HTTP/1.1 Keep-Alive without setting the Content-length accordingly. Can anybody confirm? Dale Bronk wrote: Right now until I am proved otherwise, I disagree. I posted a message a day or so ago and have no reply yet. Now I do believe that it is

Re: Performance for static files

2000-09-08 Thread Dale Bronk
: Christof Baumgaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 3:00 AM Subject: Re: Performance for static files Looks to me like if Orionserver tries to do HTTP/1.1 Keep-Alive without setting the Content-length accordingly. Can anybody confirm? Dale

Re: Performance for static files

2000-09-08 Thread Robert Krueger
At 08:47 08.09.00 , you wrote: just did a test and it seemed to make a big difference. In IE advanced options I had Use HTTP1.1 turned off. I turned it back on and it made a big difference. As a matter of fact, I don't see the problem anymore as of yet. (after clearing cache). Dale then

Re: Performance for static files

2000-09-08 Thread Joel Shellman
Dale Bronk wrote: That may be true as I was including the time to server the file all the way to the point of the "little e" stopped spinning. Have you had the following problems with framesets... In Apache/IIS with JRun 2.3.3 the frameset and each individual jsp/html files popup

RE: Performance for static files

2000-09-07 Thread Juan Pablo Lorandi
in-process with Apache (instead of running as CGI with Orion). My 2c, JP -Original Message- From: Dale Bronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 9:15 AM To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: Performance for static files Right now until I am proved otherwise, I disagree

Re: Performance for static files

2000-09-07 Thread Dale Bronk
D] To: "Orion-Interest" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:57 PM Subject: RE: Performance for static files Hi, Two things. One..your correct about the browser keeps on going. I have the same "problem" on my site. Its strange, but the little E keeps spinni

Re: Performance for static files

2000-09-07 Thread Dale Bronk
, then the next. - Original Message - From: "Juan Pablo Lorandi" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Orion-Interest" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 12:36 PM Subject: RE: Performance for static files Perhaps a lil' off track, I'd like to point out that: you may

RE: Performance for static files

2000-09-07 Thread Rick Bos
To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: Performance for static files That may be true as I was including the time to server the file all the way to the point of the "little e" stopped spinning. Have you had the following problems with framesets... In Apache/IIS with JRun 2.3.3 the framese

RE: Performance

2000-08-21 Thread Kevin Duffey
Its impressive, but that depends on what your testing it with, and what the test is doing. Is it just a simple JSP page return with static html in it..or are you hitting the database such as a login process? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On

RE: Performance

2000-08-21 Thread Cory Adams
It is the HelloWorldServlet with the addition of a few lite mathematical operations and a counter. The testing tool is something I built to monitor http, smtp and gopher servers using a threaded Swing tool. Cory At 02:14 PM 8/21/00 -0700, Kevin Duffey wrote: Its impressive, but that depends on

[Fwd: Re: Performance Scalability Concern]

2000-07-05 Thread Eric Richardson
Oops, forgot to post to the list. Sorry Tom. Original Message Subject: Re: Performance Scalability Concern Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 07:24:32 -0700 From: Eric Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tom Wnuk wrote: I just migrated some

RE: Performance Scalability Concern

2000-07-05 Thread Tom Wnuk
y 05, 2000 7:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Performance Scalability Concern Tom Wnuk wrote: I just migrated some ejb's from a Weblogic 5.1 installation to Orion. The version I'm using is whatever was available from the web site about a week ago -- orion.jar

Re: Performance Scalability Concern

2000-07-02 Thread Karl Avedal
Hello Tom, Tom Wnuk wrote: I just migrated some ejb's from a Weblogic 5.1 installation to Orion. The version I'm using is whatever was available from the web site about a week ago -- orion.jar dated 6-5-2000, v1.xx. Try the latest one by doing a java -jar autoupdate.jar or get