RE: The PUG Guy yips a second time

2001-09-01 Thread Kevin Thornsberry
Was it your intention to omit Pentax PS from your list? I carry a Pentax 90WR in my briefcase as it was recommended on this list. -Original Message- From: William Robb [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 12:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:The

Re: PUG posts

2001-09-01 Thread Robert Harris
William Wooten wrote: Here's an idea. limit posts to PROFESSIONALS that only use Pentax bodies and Pentax lenses ... the photos must also be take while standing on one foot while rubbing their belly patting their head and sipping single malt scotch Can we make an exception and

Re: What is Pentax equipment?

2001-09-01 Thread Bob Blakely
From: Lasse Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bob B. wrote: Look. No one is being pissy here until you jumped in with this. No one is jumping on anyone else for previous submissions. No on is dumping on anyone who has followed the rules. Obviously you do not know what you have been saying.

Re: What is Pentax equipment?

2001-09-01 Thread Jim Moniz
My 2 cents worth, adjusted for inflation... Pentax bodies should be required, but for numerous reasons brought up previously, K-mount or M42 screwmount lenses of any brand should be accepted. - Original Message - From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday,

Re: The PUG Guy yips a second time

2001-09-01 Thread Artur Ledóchowski
- Original Message - From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: The PUG Guy yips a second time | Submissions must have been made using Pentax Digital, 6x7, 645, | K-Mount or M-42 screw mount camera equipment. Third party | equipment is welcome if it is Pentax compatible, and either

Re: Where in Illinois

2001-09-01 Thread Jody
Scary. It almost looks like he was posessed by demons sometime between February and August. His record up until now has been spotless. Or perhaps he is not who he seems. I guess somehow it would be possible to find/crack someone else's password. Although the same ID's turn up again and again in

RE: The PUG Guy yips a second time

2001-09-01 Thread Len Paris
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 12:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: The PUG Guy yips a second time Submissions must have been made using Pentax Digital, 6x7, 645, K-Mount or

Re: Sentence digital news, etc.

2001-09-01 Thread Jody
Well, I don't know about you, but I start drooling every time I hear that manual Pentax shutter click G --- John Mustarde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Poor Pentax. They're missing out on the power of instant gratification. Someone should introduce them to Pavlov and modern sales marketing. Get

RE: MZ-S Blah, blah, blah. Apology follows.

2001-09-01 Thread Ed
Lasse, as one who's been around a little longer than you, I can remember when you first came aboard and begged the question, Where are all the girls? I guess you've got your answer. G Thanks, Ed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of

More MZ-S battery consumprion

2001-09-01 Thread Pål Jensen
My MZ-S was accidentally left on in my camera bag from yesterday until today. That was enough to kill the batteries completely. It was turned accidentally on while squezing it into the camera bag. The on/off switch is great but maybe they should have provided a lock? Pel - This message is

Re: The PUG Guy yips a second time

2001-09-01 Thread Steve Larson
William Robb wrote: Submissions must have been made using Pentax Digital, 6x7, 645, K-Mount or M-42 screw mount camera equipment. Third party equipment is welcome if it is Pentax compatible, and either the body or lens is Asahi/Pentax Well done Bill. I think the guidelines are now in the

Re: The PUG Guy yips a second time

2001-09-01 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Steve Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 7:03 AM Subject: Re: The PUG Guy yips a second time William Robb wrote: Submissions must have been made using Pentax Digital, 6x7, 645, K-Mount or M-42 screw mount

Re: More MZ-S battery consumprion

2001-09-01 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Pel Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 7:11 AM Subject: More MZ-S battery consumprion My MZ-S was accidentally left on in my camera bag from yesterday until today. That was enough to kill the batteries

October PUG

2001-09-01 Thread Steve Larson
October: The Elements II (Earth, Air, Fire, and Water.) How many elements are necessary to qualify? Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax

Re: Pentax Vs. Non Pentax

2001-09-01 Thread Artur Ledóchowski
Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa3 / wrote: Is it really about the equipment, or is it really about the image? What matters most to you? Perhaps it is about both the equipment and the image. After all, if the image was the only concern then we should really send our pics to the Photoblink,

RE: What is Pentax equipment?

2001-09-01 Thread Cory or Brenda Waters
Paul M. Provencher wrote: That's the point isn't it? Pentax Users Gallery (PUG) ppro So Paul, When I'm out passing film back and forth in my new MZ-5n while my Kalimar zoom is mounted (you don't think I'd have a Pentax lens if I had some money?), I'm not a Pentax user but If I mount my Pentax

Re: More MZ-S battery consumprion

2001-09-01 Thread Pål Jensen
William wrote: Whats going on with that camera at idle? I regularly forget to shut off my wifes MZ-5 (the peril of growing up with mechanical bodies, I guess), and it doesn't drain the batteries. This would possibly account for the high battery consumption you are seeing, as I would

Re: October PUG

2001-09-01 Thread Gary L. Murphy
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001 06:36:16 -0700, Steve Larson wrote: October: The Elements II (Earth, Air, Fire, and Water.) How many elements are necessary to qualify? Five.. :-) Later, Gary - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow

RE: The PUG Guy yips a second time

2001-09-01 Thread Kevin Thornsberry
Bravo! Sleep well. We'll find something new to debate while you sleep. -Original Message- From: William Robb [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 8:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: The PUG Guy yips a second time - Original Message

RE: More MZ-S battery consumprion

2001-09-01 Thread Kevin Thornsberry
What was it doing with all that juice? I often forget to turn off my ZX-5n and it doesn't seem to use much batter power when it is just sitting and waiting for someone to activate the shutter release button. -Original Message- From: Pal Jensen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: October PUG

2001-09-01 Thread Kevin Thornsberry
I think any number of elements would be acceptable as long as at least one carries the Pentax brand name. -Original Message- From: Steve Larson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 8:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:October PUG October: The

Re: Pentax Vs. Non Pentax

2001-09-01 Thread Bob Blakely
No photo list is a place to showcase any photo equipment. There are no photos of equipment. Is the purpose to showcase photos taken with Pentax equipment? Yes, but not entirely. I don't believe that the purpose is solely to share photos with others either. It's unlikely to be all that black and

Re: OT- Netscape WINxx FAQ's

2001-09-01 Thread Scooterman
http://www.ufaq.org/section_three.html is the URL for FAQ's on Netscape v4 above links to other versions misc headaches that still make MSIE look like the cobbled-together mess it is. Like, how to make Netscape the default browser == Jody... not all internet

Re: The PUG Guy yips a second time

2001-09-01 Thread Ann Sanfedele
William Robb wrote: Submissions must have been made using Pentax Digital, 6x7, 645, K-Mount or M-42 screw mount camera equipment. Third party equipment is welcome if it is Pentax compatible, and either the body or lens is Asahi/Pentax Does this provide sufficient compromise for the

OT: This has to be from soemeone here

2001-09-01 Thread William Robb
Anyone on the list deal with the GRAYSLAKE VETERINARY CLINIC in Mason, AL? William Robb - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Re: October PUG

2001-09-01 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Steve Larson Subject: October PUG October: The Elements II (Earth, Air, Fire, and Water.) How many elements are necessary to qualify? Mine has at least one WW - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to

Re: This has to be from soemeone here

2001-09-01 Thread Steve Larson
Sounds like a hic-up or hic-down. Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California - Original Message - From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pentax Discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 8:24 AM Subject: OT: This has to be from soemeone here Anyone on the list deal

Re: PUG submit's

2001-09-01 Thread Scooterman
I don't plan on planting any pics at the web site I fully acknowledge that the owner of the site can do any blamed thing they want with THEIR site. I does seem a bit unrealistic, given how folks scramble around just trying to get a BODY without missing a rent payment, that one would require

Re: My PUG entry

2001-09-01 Thread Wendy Beard
At 06:09 1-9-2001 -0400, you wrote: Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 10:01:04 +0100 From: Jim Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: My PUG Entry Peter Alling wrote: The only nit I would pick is with the dead white sky. Hey, what are you saying? That's not a ~dead~ white sky, that's a ~Welsh~ white sky! g

Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

2001-09-01 Thread Rodger Whitlock
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001 at 15:27:49 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] held forth, quoting Shel Belinkoff in his Creature's Comfort guise: Just so we're all clear about this: the PUG submission must be made with a Pentax brand camera and a Pentax brand lens - no third party zooms, no Ricoh

Re: This has to be from soemeone here

2001-09-01 Thread William Robb
Naw, they sent me a bunch of their billing information via email, along with that stupid virus that was bonking around a few weeks ago. I am just curious as to how I got into their address book William Robb - Original Message - From: Steve Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: Pål More MZ-S battery consumprion

2001-09-01 Thread karen_fraser
I've inadvertently turned on my MZ-S three times while putting my camera away, often overnight or longer, and I haven't drained my batteries. Now I know I don't shoot nearly as often as Pel does, but I haven't drained by batteries from leaving it on. Interesting. My apologies if I've misspelled

my favorite Sept. PUG entries

2001-09-01 Thread Amita Guha
Whitetail Doe In Grasses by Bill Sawyer I love the texture of the grasses and the composition Old Snag by Thomas Cakalic I like the three main colors and how they are placed in the picture Andy Jeff/Charlottesville/June 2001 by John Mason Cool, man. :) Curious Duck by David A.

Re: my favorite Sept. PUG entries

2001-09-01 Thread Bruce Dayton
Amita, Thanks for the kind remarks. Certainly the fisheye is one of the funnest lenses to use. You just have to look for the right shots. I always take it along because you never know when the opportunity will present itself. I explored other lenses for this particular shot, but found the

Not able to pay attention, sorry

2001-09-01 Thread Mike Johnston
Sorry, I've been so busy I haven't been able to keep up with the digests. What was the question? --Mike pentax-discuss-digest at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whoopsie, my bad! Sorry about that folks, guess that wasn't it after all. Maybe Mike will let us know which one it is for sure

Re: October PUG

2001-09-01 Thread Robert Harris
Kevin Thornsberry wrote: I think any number of elements would be acceptable as long as at least one carries the Pentax brand name. OK if I just put a Pentax filter on my Canon lens, then? :) Bob Harris - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to

PUG submissions, Pentax gear definitions, and eBay sellers

2001-09-01 Thread John A. Hufnagel
Heh... I get to do a 3-for-1 here. :) My $0.02 on the PUG/Pentax gear thing... For almost 17 years I've been a Pentax user. My first camera is a K-1000 with the factory SMC-A 50mm/f2.0 lens. I used that for almost 3 years as my exclusive rig. I then obtained a Sigma 75-200/f2.8~3.5 lens. Why

Re: Not able to pay attention, sorry

2001-09-01 Thread Lasse Karlsson
- Original Message - From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 6:58 PM Subject: Not able to pay attention, sorry Sorry, I've been so busy I haven't been able to keep up with the digests. What was the question? Hi Mike. Regarding

RE: my favorite Sept. PUG entries

2001-09-01 Thread William D. Sawyer
Thank you, Amita, you made my day. Bill Sawyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Amita Guha Sent: September 01, 2001 12:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: my favorite Sept. PUG entries Whitetail Doe In Grasses by

Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

2001-09-01 Thread John Mustarde
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001 20:27:29 -0700, you wrote: The way I understand your definition is that I can use a Leica and Leica glass since the Leica takes Pentax lenses, and a Leica lens would be compatible with the Pentax-compatible camera body. Would a Ricoh with a K-mount Lentar lens and a Vivitar

Re: MZ-S Blah, blah, blah. Apology follows.

2001-09-01 Thread Doug Franklin
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001 04:32:14 -0700 (PDT), Jody wrote: That was 1/2 using Alt0189. Why did this happen? And that was supposed to be Pal with the accent on the a, using Alt0229. It's because Alt0189, and any other Altxxx code, only work with the Windows version of the ASCII character set. When

PUG Comments

2001-09-01 Thread Jim Brooks
Juan J. Buhler: Love the translucency of the marble faces, good composition, the grain does indeed look good. Adelheid, [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is an interesting perspective. Unfortunatly the grainy film or too much light erased the line of the cheek of the background face. Thanks for the

PUG Comment - Edward Kreis

2001-09-01 Thread Jim Brooks
Edward's shot Riga, After a Thunderstorm, is magnificent. I'm a sucker for twilight city shots anyway, but this is beautiful. More and more I am realising that photography is more about capturing the light, rather than looking for interesting subjects (not that this subject is not interesting).

Re: More MZ-S battery consumprion

2001-09-01 Thread Pål Jensen
- Original Message - From: Pel Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] No. I did write Pel according to my outbox. But I received it as Pel as well. Pel Bwha ha ha ho ho. I don't know how this happens but I am writing my name with an A with a dot on top. For some reasons its transformed to an E

Re: More MZ-S battery consumprion

2001-09-01 Thread Pål Jensen
Kevin wrote: What was it doing with all that juice? I often forget to turn off my ZX-5n and it doesn't seem to use much batter power when it is just sitting and waiting for someone to activate the shutter release button. I don't know. The batteries was somewhat used but should have quite

Re: eBay WARNING

2001-09-01 Thread Peter Alling
At 04:43 AM 9/1/2001 -0700, Jody wrote: Snip I think somewhere in the letter I will drop the fact that my half-cousin pays their wages (well the part I don't pay). He is the State Services Commisioner of NZ. They don't have to know that I know him only from the television. That might work. A

Thanks to someone and other things I learned today

2001-09-01 Thread Bill Owens
Recently someone posted that their local minilabs tended to print with too much magenta and too light. Today at work I tried setting our printer to -1 stop magenta and +1 stop dark. The results were fantastic! Caucasian skin tones much more natural and saturation increased noticeably. Thanks

Re: More MZ-S battery consumprion

2001-09-01 Thread Doug Franklin
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001 20:53:40 +0200, Pl Jensen wrote: Pel (did it come through this time?) Not in the message, but it's fine in the From: address. Go figure. This just started happening recently. The  (a with circle over it) had been coming through fine in messages and headers for a long

This moths PUG photos that work for me

2001-09-01 Thread Tim S Kemp
I don't feel qualified to comment but here goes! Curious Duck (David A Mann) Nce. Really like this frozen moment - would love to know what the duck was thinking! Frank St Mailboxes (Jan van Wijk) How did you get that sky? or was it really like that? I particularly like the balance of

RE: The PUG Guy yips a second time

2001-09-01 Thread Frits J. Wüthrich
I don't agree. This excludes 110 in the way I read it. And it also excludes any new formats coming out. Why so very difficult? Just say that the minimum is that either the lens or the camera must be Asahi or Pentax. Frits William Robb wrote: Submissions must have been made using Pentax

Re: PUG posts

2001-09-01 Thread Peter Alling
I would think you could participate if you were Drinking Asahi Beer. At 02:31 AM 9/1/2001 -0400, Robert Harris wrote: William Wooten wrote: Here's an idea. limit posts to PROFESSIONALS that only use Pentax bodies and Pentax lenses ... the photos must also be take while standing

Re: The PUG Guy yips a second time

2001-09-01 Thread Steve Larson
Bill said in an earlier message that the PS covered the 110. Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California - Original Message - From: Frits J. W|thrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 12:28 PM Subject: RE: The PUG Guy yips a second time I don't

Vivitar Series 1 lens?

2001-09-01 Thread Tim S Kemp
Need to add a wider lens to my current collection, as a first buy budget lens how does the Vivitar S1 19-35 fit with you guys? There's not many low-cost lenses under 35mm so any suggestions welcome! Currently have a pentax 35-80 and a sigma 100-300. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail

Re: The PUG Guy yips a second time

2001-09-01 Thread Bill Owens
Why not any camera body, lens or combination of which at least one element says Pentax? Bill, KG4LOV [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at

anyone want a Praktica LB?

2001-09-01 Thread Amita Guha
My boyfriend wants to get rid of his old Praktica. It won't advance with film in it and the light seals are gone. It has a 50mm 2.8 lens which appears to be scratched. The faux leather stuff on the back appears to be coming unglued on the back. If anyone wants it, let me know. I was thinking $5

Re: More MZ-S battery consumprion

2001-09-01 Thread Gianfranco Irlanda
Pel Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bwha ha ha ho ho. I don't know how this happens but I am writing my name with an A with a dot on top. For some reasons its transformed to an E somewhere in cyberspace. Pel (did it come through this time?) H...

RE: Please, stop all other topics, we must address the Pal issue.

2001-09-01 Thread Kevin Thornsberry
Shel Shared Now that *is* odd ... I typed it using an a with a small circle over it, and my copy came through that way, but the copy to the list appeared as above. As nearly as I can tell, sometime between 10:30 am (US Central (GMT - 6:00)) on 8/30/01 and 9:46 am on 8/31/01 P*l as we

Re: Please, stop all other topics, we must addres??us-ascii?Q?sthe Pal issue

2001-09-01 Thread Steve Larson
Pel Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California - Original Message - From: Cy Galley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 4:41 PM Subject: Re: Please, stop all other topics, we must addres??us-ascii?Q?sthe Pal issue Pel - Original Message -

Re: Please, stop all other topics, we must addres??us-ascii?Q?sthe Pal issue

2001-09-01 Thread Mike
Here is the link to the Official Name Change site. It cost just $69.95 to change your name. Sorry Pel, you'll just have to change your name. http://www.accessnamechange.com/cgi-bin/SoftCart.exe/nc/main.html?E+court - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to

Re: Please, stop all other topics, we must address the Pal issue.

2001-09-01 Thread Lasse Karlsson
Kevin wrote: As nearly as I can tell, sometime between 10:30 am (US Central (GMT - 6:00)) on 8/30/01 and 9:46 am on 8/31/01 P*l as we know him ceased to exist and his alter ego, Pel, took over. Was some change to the server made during that time interval? What time is that? g (I'm not

Re: OT: 2 pics

2001-09-01 Thread Wendy Beard
At 11:33 1-9-2001 -0400, you wrote: From: Timo Hartikainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: 2 pics I scanned 2 pics yesterday: http://pp.hok.fi/hartikainen/tsign.htm http://pp.hok.fi/hartikainen/kolmio.htm Agfapan 400, scanned from 10*15 cm prints. Kx+100/4 macro. - - Timo One word, Timo,

RE: Please, stop all other topics, we must address the Palissue.

2001-09-01 Thread Kevin Thornsberry
Hopefully Doug Brewer is following this. I think some change has been made to the PDML. When I sent the last message, I deliberately sent it in rich-text format as a test (sorry all). In checking what came back to me it did not have the rich-text formatting I sent. Usually, when I forget to

Re: my favorite Sept. PUG entries

2001-09-01 Thread John Mason
Amita wrote: Andy Jeff/Charlottesville/June 2001 by John Mason Cool, man. :) The older I get the happier I am to see my name associated with the word cool. Hugs and kisses, John = John Edwin Mason Charlottesville, Virginia email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] alt email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get email

Re: my PUG Entry (Gary L. Murphy)

2001-09-01 Thread Gary L. Murphy
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001 22:16:00 -0400, Wendy Beard wrote: The composition would have been better without the fountain and pile of sand (or rock) at the right hand side. My eye is continually drawn to that part of the photograph, and in particular the light patch (more sand or a path?) above the

Re: October PUG

2001-09-01 Thread David A. Mann
William Robb writes: October: The Elements II (Earth, Air, Fire, and Water.) How many elements are necessary to qualify? Mine has at least one Mine all have several elements in several groups. All but two are Pentax. Cheers, - Dave David A. Mann, B.E. (Elec)

Re: Manual Pentaxes with mirror lock-up

2001-09-01 Thread David A. Mann
Bob Rapp writes: I know the So Island very well. It is the people south of Christchurch I admire. Plus the geography is much more noble once you leave the Canterbury Plains. You're right there; I find the plains quite boring in comparison to the rest of the South Island. I think my

Re: Pål More MZ-S battery consumprion

2001-09-01 Thread David A. Mann
Karen Fraser writes: My apologies if I've misspelled your name Pel. Is it Pel or Pel? OK that's funny :) Have you been watching too much of Monty Python's Flying Circus? Seriously though, its time for a test to see what's going on. I wonder if the list server is reformatting the body

Re: Pål

2001-09-01 Thread Rfsindg
Well, here is Pel copied from the subject line. Paal, Paul, Pel,... ...reminds me of the old 'You can call me Pal or you can call me Sal, but don't call me Johnson!' Regards, Bob S. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the

Re: Pentax 35-80 f4/5.6 any good?

2001-09-01 Thread Joseph Tainter
The F version of this lens was the default lens on my (M)Z(X) 50 kit. A lot of my PUG submittals were made with it. For an inexpensive, default lens, it is surprisingly good. An acquaintance borrowed a negative shot with it, and had a 20 x 30 print made. At any viewing distance except right next

RE: Pentax Vs. Non Pentax

2001-09-01 Thread Ed
Regardless of what many might fear, the PUG will always be filled with mostly Pentax made photos from mostly Pentax using people, because people by and large, subscribe to this list because they own and use Pentax and want to discuss some aspect of it. If I did not own it, I would not waste my

Re: This has to be from soemeone here

2001-09-01 Thread Bill D. Casselberry
Len wrote: Nope, I never owned a Pentax that needed that kind of service. Maybe the Bow wow Takumar? Now See Here!I just had it de-wormed last week! !8^D - Bill D. Casselberry ; Photography on

Re: Pål More MZ-S battery consumprion

2001-09-01 Thread Cy Galley
- Original Message - From: David A. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 8:14 PM Subject: Re: Pel More MZ-S battery consumprion Karen Fraser writes: My apologies if I've misspelled your name Pel. Is it Pel or Pel? OK that's funny :) Have

Re: Please, stop all other topics, we must address the Pal issue.

2001-09-01 Thread Robert Harris
Lasse Karlsson wrote: My first observation of the misspelled Pel was in a message from Jody some 21 hours ago: You mean it must all be Judy's fault? Wonder who's name she will change next. Bob - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net

Re: F70-210/4-5.6 AF zoom

2001-09-01 Thread RobFilms
folks: not being a longtime pug-ster, i'm seeking opinions on this semilong pentax zoom. i'm looking to use this lens for the kid's sporting events. bodies would be the zx-m, pz-1p or mx. how decent are the optics? fast focusing w/the pz-1p? what about focusing w/the manual zx-m and mx?

Re: What is Pentax equipment?

2001-09-01 Thread Tom Rittenhouse
I have a photo that I think should be used as an example of minimum requirements for submission to the PUG. It is a shot of Doug Brewer (the list maintainer) taking a shot of me with his MZ-S and a 31 mm Limited lens. It was taken with my ME Super and his 77 mm Limited. I think that should be

OT: Re: Please, stop all other topics, we must address the Pal issue.

2001-09-01 Thread Doug Franklin
On Sat, 01 Sep 2001 22:31:40 -0400, Robert Harris wrote: You mean it must all be Judy's fault? Wonder who's name she will change next. Well, Jody, I'll put in an order for a slash through the o in my name. :-) TTYL, DougF - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,

Re: F70-210/4-5.6 AF zoom

2001-09-01 Thread Rfsindg
Rob, Here is a second hand opinion, as I would buy the lens, but have not found it yet. The reputation is that this lens is excellent, better than the FA70-210/4-5.6 AF zoom. It is reputed to have an asymmetric element which shows extra care in it's design and execution. This may also

Re: Please, stop all other topics, we must address thePalissue.

2001-09-01 Thread Dave Maki
This may be tied in to William Robb's GRAYSLAKE VETERINARY CLINIC virus - just look at the spelling change that took place when he later tried to spell Windoz and change browsers. Further evidence of this virus is that my inbasket shows this thread as occuring on a Saturday, when it really must

RE: Pål More MZ-S battery consumprion

2001-09-01 Thread Len Paris
If you convert the hex for those characters to binary, you may be able to determine what kind of a transformation has been performed on them. Len --- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cy Galley Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 9:31

Re: Manual Pentaxes with mirror lock-up

2001-09-01 Thread Bob Rapp
I'm with you on that Dave, Fiordland is a must. Must be patient and wait for a break in the weather. At that point there is no place like it. From Manapouri / Doubtful Sound to Milford Sound, you can not pack enough film! Annual rain fall is measured in meters - 6 to 7 per year! If I were

Portra 800 and weddings

2001-09-01 Thread Treena Harp
Just got proofs back from the nephew's wedding. Portra was definitely a good choice, although I credit a lot of it to a VERY good local professional processor and printer. I had figured the Portra 800 would be more grainy, but the grain was less than I expected. I also expected the color cast to

Re: Portra 800 and weddings

2001-09-01 Thread Mark D.
From: Treena Harp [EMAIL PROTECTED] To make this on-topic: shot the wedding with a PZ-1p w/ 500FTZ flash, and a 645 with a Sunpak 555 w/Lumiquest softbox (first time to use it; worked GREAT). Wow! You shot the whole wedding without any lenses?!?!? Damn, you're good ; ) Mark - This message is

MZ-S and 3rd party lenses

2001-09-01 Thread Mark D.
Hey Folks, Is there anyone one with the MZ-S who's had compatibility problems with Sigma or Tokina lenses? Mark - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at

Re: MZ-S and 3rd party lenses

2001-09-01 Thread Bruce Dayton
I have an MZ-S and have shot it quite a bit with a Tokina 28-70 ATX Pro II. I haven't noted any problems of any kind. What kind of problems are you seeing? Bruce Dayton Sacramento, CA - Original Message - From: Mark D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September

All lens data missing from the KMP

2001-09-01 Thread Bojidar Dimitrov
Hi, See if you can help with any of the following: Thanks, Boz === Missing optical diagrams: A 100/2,8 Macro; FA* 200/4 Macro; FA 24-90/3,5-4,5; FA 28-105/3,2-4,5; F 35-105/4-5,6; A 35-210/3,5-4,5; M 80-200/4,5 (version 2); F*

KMP, Lenses, the complete TODO list

2001-09-01 Thread Bojidar Dimitrov
Hi all, I have been off-line for a while (both in the real and in the stylistic meaning of the word), sorry... Anyhow, I am slowly progressing with my database idea, and I have the first fruits from it --- a complete list of ALL missing lens information. Please everyone scan the list below and